The Climate Crisis is a global scam

[John Stone]

15 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You just got busted, 100%, for being a cultist dolt.

I took your own insult and proved why it should actually be tattooed on your forehead as a warning to others, and you fired back with a childish insult 🤣

ha ha

.............. if u say so, kid! 

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, robosmith said:

In reality, the elimination of fossil fuel pollution will save MILLIONS of LIVES.

Buddy, that's Chinese propaganda.

While we are closing 100% RELIABLE coal-fired plants and replacing them with unreliable green tech and unsafe LNG, the Chinese are buying up all of our coal on the cheap and laughing as they burn it. 

Left4rd "logic":

1. We can't burn Alberta coal in Alberta because burning fossil fuels will kill us all by 2023
2. it has to be loaded on trains and shipped to the west coast of BC by burning fossil fuels 
3. then it has to be shipped across the Pacific Ocean by burning more fossil fuels 
4. then it has to be shipped by rail again, this time across China, burning even more fossil fuels 
5. only after we have burned fossil fuels to ship the coal all the way from from Alberta to China can it be burned, because the pollution-control standards are so much lower over there 

I know that this is over your head, don't worry about it. It's just here for other people.

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

 

1. When the CBC and CTV said that the Freedom Convoy was a sea of swstikas and confederate flags you parroted that claim here for months without seeing any evidence whatsoever.

2. Then you refused to find fault with the PM saying that "The unvaxxed are very often racists and misogynists, and the question that we need to ask ourselves as Canadians is 'should we tolerate these people'?"

3. Stop pretending to be a guy with his eyes open, Mike.

4. You're a dangerous little cultist sap; the kind who still refuses to believe anything's wrong even when human ashes are falling on him. 

1. I don't think so.  Provide a cite of me 'parroting' CBC claims... or maybe restate this without the hyperbole.
2. Far from it - and I have pointed this out to you several times.  I asked for a cite, because I couldn't find the quote.  Then someone posted it... it was in French.  So I retracted my claim, only to be rewarded with you bringing it up as me refusing to do so again and again.

(I don't know what your claim about Covid is/was)

3. You didn't respond to my points.  The fact that I retracted a mistake should be all the evidence you need that I strive for objectivity.  Do you have an example of yourself admitting you're wrong ?

4. Insults...

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, John Stone said:

.............. if u say so, kid! 

Gentle reminder:

Do you even understand the irony of mocking people who "believe that the earth is flat", while you still believe that the jabs are safe and that you can't give granny covid or get sick if you're jabbed? 

😉😘

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, that's Chinese propaganda.

While we are closing 100% RELIABLE coal-fired plants and replacing them with unreliable green tech and unsafe LNG, the Chinese are buying up all of our coal on the cheap and laughing as they burn it. 

Left4rd "logic":

1. We can't burn Alberta coal in Alberta because burning fossil fuels will kill us all by 2023
2. it has to be loaded on trains and shipped to the west coast of BC by burning fossil fuels 
3. then it has to be shipped across the Pacific Ocean by burning more fossil fuels 
4. then it has to be shipped by rail again, this time across China, burning even more fossil fuels 
5. only after we have burned fossil fuels to ship the coal all the way from from Alberta to China can it be burned, because the pollution-control standards are so much lower over there 

I know that this is over your head, don't worry about it. It's just here for other people.

NO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT as USUAL.

Apparently you don't know that China has recently reached the inflection point of fossil fuel vs renewables.

Quote

China has passed a major energy inflection point, with renewable capacity and generation now outpacing fossil fuel growth. By early 2025, solar and wind capacity surpassed coal for the first time, and in the first half of 2025, fossil fuel generation declined by 2% despite economic growth. This marks a shift from solely adding renewables to actively displacing coal-fired power. 

Key details regarding China's energy transition:

• Unprecedented Growth: China installed more solar capacity in 2025 than the rest of the world combined. By early 2026, wind and solar capacity reached an estimated 1.5 terawatts.
• Production Shift: In early 2025, renewables overtook coal in installed capacity. Furthermore, in H1 2025, fossil fuel generation fell for the first time in 10 years, even as demand grew.
• Infrastructure & Cost: Solar power is now cheaper than coal across three-quarters of China. By 2035, renewables are projected to supply over 50% of the country's electricity.
• Drivers: The transition is driven by a desire for energy security, reduced import dependence, and the goal of establishing an "ecological civilization". 
  ember-energy.org +8

Despite this, China continues to build new coal plants to balance the intermittency of renewables.

 

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Gentle reminder:

Do you even understand the irony of mocking people who "believe that the earth is flat", while you still believe that the jabs are safe and that you can't give granny covid or get sick if you're jabbed? 

😉😘

Do you understand the irony of a non-MD pretending to have EXPERTISE about medical science on top of your FAILURE to cite EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIMS? LMAO

[Legato]

[Reg Volk]

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, that's Chinese propaganda.

While we are closing 100% RELIABLE coal-fired plants and replacing them with unreliable green tech and unsafe LNG, the Chinese are buying up all of our coal on the cheap and laughing as they burn it. 

Left4rd "logic":

1. We can't burn Alberta coal in Alberta because burning fossil fuels will kill us all by 2023
2. it has to be loaded on trains and shipped to the west coast of BC by burning fossil fuels 
3. then it has to be shipped across the Pacific Ocean by burning more fossil fuels 
4. then it has to be shipped by rail again, this time across China, burning even more fossil fuels 
5. only after we have burned fossil fuels to ship the coal all the way from from Alberta to China can it be burned, because the pollution-control standards are so much lower over there 

I know that this is over your head, don't worry about it. It's just here for other people.

well said - that's about it.

[WestCanMan]

30 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. I don't think so.  Provide a cite of me 'parroting' CBC claims... or maybe restate this without the hyperbole.

Lol.

1) the search feature is gone here now, so you know it would take me a very long time to find that

2) you're the one who has to live with knowing that you're lying now and you supported & propagated vile propaganda, I don't really care if you're willing to acknowledge that here

Quote

2. Far from it - and I have pointed this out to you several times.  I asked for a cite, because I couldn't find the quote.  Then someone posted it... it was in French.  So I retracted my claim, only to be rewarded with you bringing it up as me refusing to do so again and again.

And you still never bothered to acknowledge 1) how evil it was for a Canadian Prime Minister to say such and evil thing and 2) how blatantly biased it was for the MSM to ignore it. 

If Poilievre asked Canadians if we should "tolerate another group of Canadians" who just held reasonable beliefs, the MSM would have been apoplectic for YEARS, and demanded his head on a platter.

Should we tolerate blacks, MH?

Should we tolerate Jews, MH? 

Should we tolerate Indo-Canadians, MH?

Should we tolerate Mennonites, MH?

Should we tolerate people who vote NDP?

Should we tolerate people who drive motorcycles?

Should we tolerate people who wear turbans?

Should we tolerate people who don't wear black to funerals?

What should we do with these people once we have decided that we will no longer tolerate them, MH?

We should have "voluntary self-isolation camps" in the Yukon for them, right? Nothin' to see here, move along. 

Quote

The fact that I retracted a mistake should be all the evidence you need that I strive for objectivity.

That's not true, MH. You didn't merely retract a mistake.

You:

1. dismissed it out of hand, even though there was a link and a photo of the article
2. never bothered to check on it for weeks 
3. then after you finally checked it out you pretended it wasn't a big deal

Again, if a conservative politician asked Canadians "if we should tolerate other Canadians", while building "voluntary self-isolation camps" for them, that politician would be railroaded out of politics forever on that very same day by an angry mob of journalists, the likes of which you have never seen before - The hyperbole and histrionics from them would blow the roof right the F off of the HoC... 

And then you couldn't even comment on the media bias aspect of it either, MH. They ignored the story altogether - complete radio silence - and they even called an MPP (R Hiller from Ontario) crazy for suggesting that there were voluntary self-isolation camps built.

OUR MSM IS A DISGUSTING BUNCH OF TRAITORS, the likes of which haven't been seen in NA or Europe since the Nuremberg trials. 

Your commentary on the whole situation was a mixture of denial, minimization, and then silence, MH. And if you're being honest, that was an extremely kind description. It really lacks the proper emphasis and outrage. 

Edited March 10 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

28 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NO EVIDENCE for ^this BULLSHIT as USUAL.

Apparently you don't know that China has recently reached the inflection point of fossil fuel vs renewables.

Apparently your head is so far up your ass that you don't even know I have the internet:

Google won't even say the number of plants China has built in the last 6 years because it is in the hundreds. FYI a large CF plant is 1GW, many are less, so when you see "38.4 GW in 2020", that's more than 38 plants.

Quote

Do you understand the irony of a non-MD pretending to have EXPERTISE about medical science on top of your FAILURE to cite EVIDENCE for YOUR CLAIMS? LMAO

Buddy, it doesn't take a lot of "medical expertise" to know that "thousands of 3x-vaxed people dying of covid in one month" doesn't mean "you won't get sick from it, and you won't spread it to grandma". 

Are you just coming here to prove that you're the dumbest cultist of all? 

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You're the ones who thought that those were issues, dummy 🤣

FYI conservatives weren't walking around thinking that men could have babies, and we certainly weren't trying to convince little children that they could change their sex and then procreate as a member of the opposite sex you evil donkey. 

No, most think taking away a persons rights because of their choice of sexuality was/is an issue. The only reason you fools are on this is because your orange idol decided to make it part of his narrative.  ~10 trans out of ~550K NCAA athletes and it's one of society's most pressing concerns.... 😂

[Michael Hardner]

21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

1) the search feature is gone here now, so you know it would take me a very long time to find that

2) you're the one who has to live with knowing that you're lying now and you supported & propagated vile propaganda, I don't really care if you're willing to acknowledge that here

3) That's not true, MH. You didn't merely retract a mistake.

4) OUR MSM IS A DISGUSTING BUNCH OF TRAITORS, the likes of which haven't been seen in NA or Europe since the Nuremberg trials. 

 

1) Google.
2) You really really have to frame this as a conspiracy don't you ?  You stated something, I asked for the cite.  You told me to go find it.  i couldn't.  Eventually it came up as something Justin said in French.  I retracted.  

You can't simply have a discussion with someone you disagree with without making them into a villain of sorts, can you ?

Again, I admitted the error.  Do you do that on here, ever ?

3) I deny this.

4) Culture wars again.  Sigh... Ok you're having a bad day so let's put you back on ignore until you're polite again, ok ?
 

[WestCanMan]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

No, most think taking away a persons rights because of their choice of sexuality was/is an issue.

Liar. No conservatives were talking about taking away people's rights. 

If anyone was taking away people's rights, LEFTISTS WERE TAKING AWAY THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND LITTLE GIRLS TO USE BATHROOMS WITHOUT MEN IN THEM. 

Quote

 The only reason you fools are on this is because your orange idol decided to make it part of his narrative.

So you think that men should be going into the bathroom with girls, right?

Thank you Linkfrey Epstein.

Quote

~10 trans out of ~550K NCAA athletes and it's one of society's most pressing concerns.... 😂

Here ya go dummy:

1. 10 trans out of 550K NCAA athletes, winning 9 golds and 1 silver, meaning that thousands of girls spent their childhood and early adulthood training for a sport where they no longer had a shot at winning
2.  and it's one of the NCAA's  most pressing concerns.... 

And yes. It is 100% normal for people to voice their concerns.

It's normal for me, a guy, and one who has never competed in NCAA sports, or in any sports at that level TBH, to empathize with PEOPLE WHO HAD EVERYTHING THEY WORKED FOR TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM. 

If you wanna tuck in your junk and sit on Trudeau's lap, you go fir it. Wear a mini-skirt for him, let him have his way with you, etc. Fill yer boots, Linkie. Just don't go into a bathroom with little girls if you have a penis, cultist loser. 

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

My question was why not answer his question?  That's a pretty normal question    You seem to be tying my question in with other questions. LOL  Now i'm thinking more about the stupidity of someone who complains about someone's question and gets the wrong question   

The subject was/is about climate change so of course you would think asking about transvestites and unborn children are normal questions.  That's what you clowns do....

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

All questions that have been heavily discussed in recent years. 

They have been.  Just not usually in a conversation about climate change.

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

When I feed us or egg transitions from simply living tissue to an actual human with rights attached is one of the foremost questions of our time. There's nothing silly about it

It's beyond silly, but better said asinine when the topic and conversation is about climate change.... 🤡

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1) Google.
2) You really really have to frame this as a conspiracy don't you ?  You stated something, I asked for the cite.  You told me to go find it.  i couldn't.  Eventually it came up as something Justin said in French.  I retracted.  

You can't simply have a discussion with someone you disagree with without making them into a villain of sorts, can you ?

Again, I admitted the error.  Do you do that on here, ever ?

3) I deny this.

4) Culture wars again.  Sigh... Ok you're having a bad day so let's put you back on ignore until you're polite again, ok ?
 

You're still doing exactly what I accused you of, MH.

I accused you of dodging the story and minimizing every aspect of it and you are still doing that exact f'ing thing right now 🤣. 

Ask any conservative here if they have EVER seen you react with disgust or anger about anything that Trudeau ever said or did and they will all say "Not a f'ing chance. MH has always supported the LPoC 100%. He is a diehard liberal who only says that he is a conservative."

@CdnFox @Nationalist @Reg Volk @I am Groot @Legato @Goddess @paxamericana @... 

1. Have any of you guys EVER seen MH critical of Trudeau or the LPoC?
2. Have you ever seen him take a policy position that's conservative in nature? 
3. Have you ever seen him find fault with anything the LPoC or Dems have ever done?
4. Do you find him taking the side of libs over conservatives more than 99% of the same?
5. In your own estimation, what % do you think MH is a conservative? 

Edited March 10 by WestCanMan

[LinkSoul60]

59 minutes ago, User said:

Same people:

OMG The Science! TM

also

Men can be women, no literally, they have no biological advantages, are exactly the same, and get to share the bathrooms and participate in sports, like totally same. How dare you “assign” sex at birth, it’s something the child will determine later on its own and we must affirm them! 

also

Unborn children are just a clump of cells and can be destroyed, but we also need to save the Sea Turtle eggs, because those are totally Sea Turtles. 
 

You people have no hold on claiming to believe in science

 

You and your crowd are freaking stunned.  For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children.  Really.... 

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Oh...avoid avoid...

I usually do avoid talking about trans when the subject is about climate change.  You...not so much?

[robosmith]

25 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Apparently your head is so far up your ass that you don't even know I have the internet:

Google won't even say the number of plants China has built in the last 6 years because it is in the hundreds. FYI a large CF plant is 1GW, many are less, so when you see "38.4 GW in 2020", that's more than 38 plants.

Buddy, it doesn't take a lot of "medical expertise" to know that "thousands of 3x-vaxed people dying of covid in one month" doesn't mean "you won't get sick from it, and you won't spread it to grandma". 

Are you just coming here to prove that you're the dumbest cultist of all? 

You ARE DISINGENUOUSLY IGNORING the record amount of renewables built by China which is more than the rest of the world combined

Quote

China is constructing more wind and solar capacity than the rest of the world combined, with 339 GW currently under construction—nearly twice the capacity of all other nations. In 2024, China accounted for nearly 64% of the world's new renewable energy capacity, adding 374 GW, mostly in solar. 

Global Energy Monitor +3

Key Takeaways on China's Renewable Surge

• Dominance in Construction: China is building 159 GW of wind and 180 GW of solar, making up 74% of all large-scale projects globally.
• Unprecedented Solar Growth: In the first half of 2025, China installed more than twice as much solar capacity as the rest of the world combined, accounting for 67% of the global total.
• Total Capacity: By 2024, China’s total renewable capacity reached 1,878 GW, with solar capacity surpassing 1,000 GW, which is about half of the world's total.
• Impact on Global Goals: China's rapid deployment ensures the global goal to triple renewable capacity by 2030 is within reach. 
  ember-energy.org +4

Key Drivers

• Manufacturing Monopoly: China produces 80% of the world's solar panels and 50-70% of wind turbines.
• Energy Strategy: The buildup is driven by national goals for energy independence, decarbonization, and technological leadership.
• Daily Installation Rate: At its peak, China was installing approximately 100 solar panels per second, or 93 GW of solar capacity in a single month.

 

[LinkSoul60]

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Liar. No conservatives were talking about taking away people's rights. 

If anyone was taking away people's rights, LEFTISTS WERE TAKING AWAY THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND LITTLE GIRLS TO USE BATHROOMS WITHOUT MEN IN THEM. 

So you think that men should be going into the bathroom with girls, right?

Thank you Linkfrey Epstein.

Here ya go dummy:

1. 10 trans out of 550K NCAA athletes, winning 9 golds and 1 silver, meaning that thousands of girls spent their childhood and early adulthood training for a sport where they no longer had a shot at winning
2.  and it's one of the NCAA's  most pressing concerns.... 

And yes. It is 100% normal for people to voice their concerns.

It's normal for me, a guy, and one who has never competed in NCAA sports, or in any sports at that level TBH, to empathize with PEOPLE WHO HAD EVERYTHING THEY WORKED FOR TAKEN AWAY FROM THEM. 

If you wanna tuck in your junk and sit on Trudeau's lap, you go fir it. Wear a mini-skirt for him, let him have his way with you, etc. Fill yer boots, Linkie. Just don't go into a bathroom with little girls if you have a penis, cultist loser. 

WTF....  stay hidden in the closet.  It's safer in there for you...  

[Legato]

44 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You and your crowd are freaking stunned.  For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children.  Really.... 

I usually do avoid talking about trans when the subject is about climate change.  You...not so much?

"No, most think taking away a persons rights because of their choice of sexuality was/is an issue. The only reason you fools are on this is because your orange idol decided to make it part of his narrative.  ~10 trans out of ~550K NCAA athletes and it's one of society's most pressing concerns.... 😂"

"The subject was/is about climate change so of course you would think asking about transvestites and unborn children are normal questions.  That's what you clowns do.."

"They have been.  Just not usually in a conversation about climate change."

"You and your crowd are freaking stunned.  For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children.  Really.... "

Yes really, who's on first.

[User]

48 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You and your crowd are freaking stunned.  For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children.  Really.... 

No, I was responding to the mocking of others for not accepting “The Science! TM”

 

 

 

[LinkSoul60]

6 minutes ago, Legato said:

yes really, who's on first.

You don't even get up to bat.  At the end of the bench son.... and fill the water bucket when you can.

[LinkSoul60]

7 minutes ago, User said:

No, I was responding to the mocking of others for not accepting “The Science! TM”

 

 

 

Okay.... good one!  See, you should have said that right from the beginning.  I still would have laughed at you but at least we would have saved a page of typing....

[Legato]

12 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You don't even get up to bat.  At the end of the bench son.... and fill the water bucket when you can.

Who's on first?

[LinkSoul60]

4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Who's on first?

Don't worry, it's not going to be you.  Consider badminton as an alternative...

[Legato]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

Don't worry, it's not going to be you.  Consider badminton as an alternative...

So who just hit a home run, sorry about your loss.

[robosmith]

35 minutes ago, Legato said:

"No, most think taking away a persons rights because of their choice of sexuality was/is an issue. The only reason you fools are on this is because your orange idol decided to make it part of his narrative.  ~10 trans out of ~550K NCAA athletes and it's one of society's most pressing concerns.... 😂"

"The subject was/is about climate change so of course you would think asking about transvestites and unborn children are normal questions.  That's what you clowns do.."

"They have been.  Just not usually in a conversation about climate change."

"You and your crowd are freaking stunned.  For christ sakes....the topic is about climate change and you id*ots feel the need to talk about transvestites and unborn children.  Really.... "

Yes really, who's on first.

Since you're TOO LAZY to use the QUOTE feature, your POST MAKES NO SENSE.