Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Is there much difference between Clinton and Trump on the subject of illegal immigration? Why is Trump deemed hateful for his stance while Bill Clinton never was?

How about this Democrat?(Senator at the time)

 

There's big difference between deporting those caught at the border and those who've been living here productively for decades. The latter have proven their WORTH to America.

Posted
55 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There's big difference between deporting those caught at the border and those who've been living here productively for decades. The latter have proven their WORTH to America.

This the the stupid dishonest you push. They are only here for decades BECAUSE you don’t enforce the law. Then you turn around and say we shouldn’t enforce the law because you didn’t enforce the law….

Meanwhile, the reality is that you also ignore the criminals who end up raping and murdering Americans because you don’t give a shit how many get hurt. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

There's big difference between deporting those caught at the border and those who've been living here productively for decades. The latter have proven their WORTH to America.

Oh NOW you've regressed to, 'this is all about illegals who've been here for decades and produce instead of leach'.

You're pathetic.

You know you cannot win this argument because even you won't admit that protecting criminals is a worthy cause.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, Radiorum said:

 

This is just not true.

Why do you think I hate Trump because I present facts about him?

Why do you think it is your job to protect him?

Trumps bombastic arrogance is well known. Nor do I want to protect him.

However your obsession with constantly posting twisted facts needs to be shown for what it is. It's a hate driven nonsense which many of us can see. As I said pathological.

 

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

You shoulda popped for a nice hotel instead of the slums.

Why, people still need to walk around.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Oh NOW you've regressed to, 'this is all about illegals who've been here for decades and produce instead of leach'.

From his POV they do produce. There was a child-sodomizer, some rapists, murderers...

Those are his kinda peeps. Leftists to the core. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
16 minutes ago, Legato said:

However your obsession with constantly posting twisted facts needs to be shown for what it is.

You're right about one thing. They are facts.

If they are constant it is because Trump keeps doing twisted things.

 

17 minutes ago, Legato said:

Nor do I want to protect him.

But you do. 

 

17 minutes ago, Legato said:

As I said pathological.

I am driven by the truth, that is true.

Better than mistaking a demon for a savior.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

an Epstein survivor,

 

federal law required that all the Epstein files be released by December 19.

Less than 1% have been released. Wonder why

 

Wonder what Trump is going to come up with tomorrow to distract from them

Posted
1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

I am driven by the truth, that is true.

If by driven, you mean the truth drives you to run away from threads when your lies are confronted with it... sure. 

58 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

 

federal law required that all the Epstein files be released by December 19.

Less than 1% have been released. Wonder why

 

Wonder what Trump is going to come up with tomorrow to distract from them

You should do nothing else but post on this every day. Otherwise, you are clearly helping to cover for Trump, by distracting from this issue. 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

I guess you haven't heard about Sascha Riley, an Epstein survivor, who has named Trump as one of his abusers.

Why would we when all you can do is find Instagram sources? ROFL

 

 

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Hodad said:

Your detestation of facemasks is clearly subordinate to your tolerance for authoritarianism.

It’s actually subordinate to the hatred of those Democrats who stand willing to violently act on it.

19 hours ago, Hodad said:

Like the abusive father who says, "Look what you made me do!" 

You should reconsider the source of abuse… are you prepared to condemn violent obstruction, doxing, and personal attacks on agents?

19 hours ago, Hodad said:

the MAGA crowd is never upset at egregious actions of government officials and agencies, but rather upset at the people who call out that behavior.

There was no shortage of people (of all political stripes) upset about the massive amount of ill-advised and illegal border crossings. You were consistently warned that the level of madness you supported would result in a backlash… that’s exactly what happened and why it happened.

As Flybaby would say, “there was an election and you lost.” As it stands, ICE is carrying out duties as assigned, just like they did under the Biden Administration when they were tasked to wave at people streaming across the border.

The reason I keep asking what you thought was going to happen is that you seem shocked by a backlash that’s equal and opposite in scope and effect to the one you supported.

I could unpack a bunch of stuff here but if you can’t understand why masking has become an SOP and refuse to condemn such things as doxing, delving into any of the more complex issues will be time wasted… I think you’re just looking for someone to roll with and I’m not going to spar with you.

Edited by Venandi
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Radiorum said:

The most recently released documents on Epstein, shared on the Justice Department’s website, prompted criticism for its heavy redactions and missing content. Ro Khanna, the Democratic representative who co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act with Thomas Massie, a Republican, alleged that “the most important documents are missing” from the trove of files that were released.

 

 

Why would Brandon have not released everything unredacted? Doesn't that bother you?

It is my opinion...formed by examining the facts as the have unfolded...that Epstien dealt with the most powerful people on Earth. He may even have been a Mosad agent. If that is true, those files are chalk full of names and other information that would all be very confidential...and very damaging to the most powerful people on Earth. People as or more powerful than Trump.

Those files will never be released.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
12 hours ago, Radiorum said:

OMG, that's the confirmation bias bonanza of the year 🤣

After all the things that you've completely ignored over the past 10 years, like the undisputed fact that the pseudovax was killing young people who never should have been forced to take it in the first place, you just heard about a random, unsubstantiated accusation from one girl and you've studied it so much that you're ready to write a set of encyclopedias about it...😂 

You stupid, worthless, little piece of crap.

Did you learn nothing at all from the Kavanaugh story?

Do you remember the creepy porn lawyer, Michael Avanatti, who became your hero and was literally on pace to become the Dems' presidential candidate just because he was snotty to Trump? Remember when he found another girl to testify against Kavanaugh? Her name was Lisa Swetnick, iirc.

Swetnick: "I went to a party that turned into a gang rape, and then I went to another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one. 10 of them." LMAO. 

Somehow your conformation bias was so jacked up that her "When I was a teen-ager I was addicted to gang-rape parties" story made sense to you. Effing twit.

This is the exact same shit. 

The Dems finally found someone to accuse Trump using the Epstein story and it was like an early Christmas present for you. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
12 hours ago, Radiorum said:

The most recently released documents on Epstein, shared on the Justice Department’s website, prompted criticism for its heavy redactions and missing content. Ro Khanna, the Democratic representative who co-authored the Epstein Files Transparency Act with Thomas Massie, a Republican, alleged that “the most important documents are missing” from the trove of files that were released.

Who was president from 2021-2025 and had full, fascist-level control of the FBI, and didn't release those documents? 

I'll give you a hint, terrorist-lover, it was the dumbest, most senile old fart on the planet.

OK, I'll give you another hint: his name rhymes with "Mo Glidin", and he was a US Senator who chummed around with ex-KKK grand cyclops Senator Byrd. He also cracked racist jokes about working in the 7/11. 

NVM, I just realized that I can't possibly make this easy enough for you. It was Joe Biden. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, Venandi said:

It’s actually subordinate to the hatred of those Democrats who stand willing to violently act on it.

You should reconsider the source of abuse… are you prepared to condemn violent obstruction, doxing, and personal attacks on agents?

There was no shortage of people (of all political stripes) upset about the massive amount of ill-advised and illegal border crossings. You were consistently warned that the level of madness you supported would result in a backlash… that’s exactly what happened and why it happened.

As Flybaby would say, “there was an election and you lost.” As it stands, ICE is carrying out duties as assigned, just like they did under the Biden Administration when they were tasked to wave at people streaming across the border.

The reason I keep asking what you thought was going to happen is that you seem shocked by a backlash that’s equal and opposite in scope and effect to the one you supported.

I could unpack a bunch of stuff here but if you can’t understand why masking has become an SOP and refuse to condemn such things as doxing, delving into any of the more complex issues will be time wasted… I think you’re just looking for someone to roll with and I’m not going to spar with you.

No, we just have VERY different perspectives. I think authoritarian abuses are the root problem. You think resistance to authoritarian abuses justifies the abuses. "Look what you made me do!"

The fact is that various means of resistance to ICE--both wise and unwise--were never an issue before. Heavier deportations in previous administrations did not generate this response. What's happening now is a direct response to ICE's new tactics, which are deliberately and intentionally crafted to sow fear and chaos. Well, that's working, but people don't like living in an environment of fear and chaos, hence the resistance. 

^^You want to talk about cause and effect, there it is. If ICE were still functioning as a proper law enforcement agency people wouldn't hate and fear them. Instead, they are Trump's goon squad, rightly despised as a paramilitary invasion of the communities they go into. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, we just have VERY different perspectives. I think authoritarian abuses are the root problem. You think resistance to authoritarian abuses justifies the abuses. "Look what you made me do!"

No, you just don’t like that Trump is actually enforcing immigration law instead of ignoring illegal immigrants. 
 

You can hate that all you want, but as soon as you start using your vehicle to drive into Officers, expect some serious consequences. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

No, you just don’t like that Trump is actually enforcing immigration law instead of ignoring illegal immigrants.

I think it was The Ho who was arguing that the state of Texas had no right to enforce its border, only the Feds do.  He is against individual states enforcing immigration.

But it's the Feds in Minnesota enforcing immigration and he's against that too.

So he doesn't want the Feds enforcing it and he doesn't want individual states doing it either.  

Basically, he is against all immigration enforcement, no matter who does it.  That's the bottom line.

On a related note, Prof. Gad Saad's new book is now available for pre-order:

8122nMEdQTL._SL1500_.jpg

  • Like 1

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
1 hour ago, Goddess said:

I think it was The Ho who was arguing that the state of Texas had no right to enforce its border, only the Feds do.  He is against individual states enforcing immigration.

But it's the Feds in Minnesota enforcing immigration and he's against that too.

So he doesn't want the Feds enforcing it and he doesn't want individual states doing it either.  

Basically, he is against all immigration enforcement, no matter who does it.  That's the bottom line.

On a related note, Prof. Gad Saad's new book is now available for pre-order:

 

If you have to make up false positions for me, you may as well leave me out of it and create a fake persona as well.

I have said quite consistently that the problem with what ICE is doing now is that they have intentionally and deliberately adopted new methods intended to sow fear. The leadership thought that terrorizing immigrant communities would lead to self deportation--and it probably has, but it turns out that terrorizing communities has secondary effects as well. The leadership is neither wise, nor thoughtful. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hodad said:

If you have to make up false positions for me, you may as well leave me out of it and create a fake persona as well.

I have said quite consistently that the problem with what ICE is doing now is that they have intentionally and deliberately adopted new methods intended to sow fear. The leadership thought that terrorizing immigrant communities would lead to self deportation--and it probably has, but it turns out that terrorizing communities has secondary effects as well. The leadership is neither wise, nor thoughtful. 

No one is making up anything about you. Look at you now, calling it “immigrant communities”

ICE is enforcing the law against ILLEGAL immigrants.

So tell us, do you support that or not? 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Why would Brandon have not released everything unredacted? Doesn't that bother you?

It is my opinion...formed by examining the facts as the have unfolded...that Epstien dealt with the most powerful people on Earth. He may even have been a Mosad agent. If that is true, those files are chalk full of names and other information that would all be very confidential...and very damaging to the most powerful people on Earth. People as or more powerful than Trump.

Those files will never be released.

No reason not to release them those agents' names if they have been diddling minors.

They need to be FIRED at the very least.

Posted
5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No reason not to release them those agents' names if they have been diddling minors.

They need to be FIRED at the very least.

Who's gonna fire them?

You?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

Communist Broadcast News

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding to the torso following the incident, according to two U.S. officials briefed on his medical condition. 

It was unclear how extensive the bleeding was. The Department of Homeland Security confirmed Ross' injury, but has not yet responded to CBS News' requests for more information. This story will be updated as we learn more.

**********

Anyone want to talk about how he wasn't hit? 

 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...