Canadians Are Already Over Carney

[CdnFox]

20 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Or, you're at a dead end street now with no logical reason we should NOW stop trading with either.  It's obvious.... you're politically bias.  Interesting comments though....  over the years and whether federal or provincial elections I've voted for all 3 parties at one time or another so no, not because 'Carney told me what to think'.   I'm confidently assuming though that your Conservative Party loyalty won't allow you to think outside that box...does it.

Nobody believes that you voted for anybody but the liberals. Just reading you here it is so obvious you are blinded by your bigotry and hatred of everything non-liberal and you can't make an intelligent argument to save your life which suggests strongly you live your life based on ideology.

Your accusations our confessions. And he's dead right, when you ran out of steam and had nothing to say all you could do was attack your opponent and make an ad hominem argument. 

Why don't you learn to actually make an argument and say something intelligent? There's got to be someone on the left who's capable of this and maybe it's you. Give it a try

[LinkSoul60]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nobody believes that you voted for anybody but the liberals. Just reading you here it is so obvious you are blinded by your bigotry and hatred of everything non-liberal and you can't make an intelligent argument to save your life which suggests strongly you live your life based on ideology.

Your accusations our confessions. And he's dead right, when you ran out of steam and had nothing to say all you could do was attack your opponent and make an ad hominem argument. 

Why don't you learn to actually make an argument and say something intelligent? There's got to be someone on the left who's capable of this and maybe it's you. Give it a try

A really important fact to digest....  I don't care what you or anyone else thinks in regards to who I voted for or didn't vote for.  I've also explained countless times why we should continue the decades long trading relationship with both China and India. You're just a hopeless fool who defends any and all things right with an inability to think beyond that. That hasn't worked out too well has it....

[CdnFox]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

A really important fact to digest....  I don't care what you or anyone else thinks

It's quite obvious that you do. Especially as you constantly claim others are partisan when in reality it's you who are partisan. But you desperately need everyone else to think that you're not partisan to cover up your own accusations.

You are the political equivalent of somebody farting and then commenting on it to pretend it wasn't him

As to china opening the door to them means falling more and more under their control. If they're buying from us then we can buy from them but right now we buy 31 billion more of their stuff every year than they buy of ours, and that imbalance makes us very vunerable. 

The us at the end of the day is going to be the country we do the most business with and while i'm all for expanding trade elsewhere we can't let hostile foreign powers gain control of us as a result. It would be better to shut off the trade to china rather than fall under their influence. 

[LinkSoul60]

48 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's quite obvious that you do. Especially as you constantly claim others are partisan when in reality it's you who are partisan. But you desperately need everyone else to think that you're not partisan to cover up your own accusations.

You are the political equivalent of somebody farting and then commenting on it to pretend it wasn't him

As to china opening the door to them means falling more and more under their control. If they're buying from us then we can buy from them but right now we buy 31 billion more of their stuff every year than they buy of ours, and that imbalance makes us very vunerable. 

The us at the end of the day is going to be the country we do the most business with and while i'm all for expanding trade elsewhere we can't let hostile foreign powers gain control of us as a result. It would be better to shut off the trade to china rather than fall under their influence. 

If the world did turn upside down last year and by some strange occurance Poilievre was actually able to hold on to his supposedly insurmountable poll lead of ~27% and did the same deals....  you would have started a thread for petition to build him statue.  Get over it... 🤡

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Yes, it's expected that if you keep asking me to prove the same thing over and over again that eventually I'm going to stop

You did it, you've done it in the past, there's no doubt you'll do it again in the future, you're a liar and everybody knows it

This is why I absolutely nobody has any respect for you on this board. Your universally looked upon as being a childish little biatch Who attacks everyone around him and then cry babies if people come at back.

 

Tell your mom it's time to change your diapers again. You stink  

Still cannot prove your accusations and claims.... LOL

As suspected.....make claims and accusations but never able to prove them.  You cannot prove anything you say LOL

As always...fall back and say you already proved it when in fact...you have not!  LOL  People keep asking you and all you do is lie and say you did....and you never do.

Just another epic FAIL from the pedophile LOSER LOL

There ya go again...posting to a child that you claim needs their diaper changed by their dead mother.. proof positive you are a degenerate pedophile LOL

[Goddess]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Why would I care what you question Carney about.

Oh, goodness.  You seem to care very much that I question Carney.

[herbie]

Perhaps it's about the quality of the questions being asked.

[Goddess]

43 minutes ago, herbie said:

Perhaps it's about the quality of the questions being asked.

Carney does seem to prefer the softballs.  Like when the CBC gal asked him if he would still buy strawberries from the US and he laughed and said he hasn't bought his own groceries in years. 

He gets really snarky & snippy when he's asked something he doesn't like.  Like how trade talks with the US are going.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

If the world did turn upside down last year and by some strange occurance Poilievre was actually able to hold on to his supposedly insurmountable poll lead of ~27% and did the same deals....  you would have started a thread for petition to build him statue.  Get over it... 🤡

Well lets unpack all the lies there  

What you mean is 'if he'd faced trudeau and won as he certainly would have if the ndp hadn't sold out or trudeau hadn't used his power to prorogue parliament for the sole benefit of the liberals" and pp had won...  He never had a lead against Carney 

Your next assumption is that PP would have done the same things that Carney did. He would not. what carney is doing is terrible and won't work and PP had very different ideas on execution.  So you're thinking is flawed from the get go. 

Your NEXT incorrect statement is that carney is doing deals.  He's not.  He's done almost no deals at all. We've gotten NOTHING in hard trade deals with any of the people he's visited except one small one.  Soooo there you go. 

IF PP did the same crap carney is doing his base would be furious.  Carney is deliberately preventing pipelines. He's created massive amounts of bureaucracy that costs a fortune and does nothing, he's bowing down to trump and he's giving away our trade to china without getting anything substantial in return. 

We would kill him for that. 

The Conservatives are the ones who got so furious at their party federally that they literally wiped it off the face of the earth and started again.  So it's not conservatives who are afraid to go after their party or leader for bad behavior 

Again you make up childish fantasies to justify your own bad behavior

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

Oh, goodness.  You seem to care very much that I question Carney.

You confuse, or better said ignore facts that don't align your abstract view of reality. The topic in this 'debate' is our half century plus trade relationships with China and India and supposed unwillingness to trade with the US any longer.  I'd question your logic and untruths whether it was Carney or any of other leader of any other party making these deals.

[LinkSoul60]

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well lets unpack all the lies there  

What you mean is 'if he'd faced trudeau and won as he certainly would have if the ndp hadn't sold out or trudeau hadn't used his power to prorogue parliament for the sole benefit of the liberals" and pp had won...  He never had a lead against Carney 

Your next assumption is that PP would have done the same things that Carney did. He would not. what carney is doing is terrible and won't work and PP had very different ideas on execution.  So you're thinking is flawed from the get go. 

Your NEXT incorrect statement is that carney is doing deals.  He's not.  He's done almost no deals at all. We've gotten NOTHING in hard trade deals with any of the people he's visited except one small one.  Soooo there you go. 

IF PP did the same crap carney is doing his base would be furious.  Carney is deliberately preventing pipelines. He's created massive amounts of bureaucracy that costs a fortune and does nothing, he's bowing down to trump and he's giving away our trade to china without getting anything substantial in return. 

We would kill him for that. 

The Conservatives are the ones who got so furious at their party federally that they literally wiped it off the face of the earth and started again.  So it's not conservatives who are afraid to go after their party or leader for bad behavior 

Again you make up childish fantasies to justify your own bad behavior

There is nothing to unpack...  Your infatuation lost a ~27% poll lead to a political unknown in what is certainly one the most historic and thoroughly embarrassing political losses of all-time.  Things haven't changed much for him or you either with a ~35% approval rating and a reserved seat at the back of the bus.  🤡

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

There is nothing to unpack... 

And yet there was and I did! I imagine it was hard to notice, what with your head stuck in the sand and all...

 

Quote

Your infatuation lost a ~27% poll lead to a political unknown

Can you point to a pole that suggested that poilievre had a 27% pole lead over Carney at any point?

No? As I thought. A liar. Also carney wasn't a political unknown, while he hadn't been a politician he had been in the political spotlight many times and had publicly spoken on behalf of trudeau's libs and advised them and publicly appeared on the liberals behalf many times. 

 

Quote

in what is certainly one the most historic and thoroughly embarrassing political losses of all-time.

I'll give you that, it was up there   It wouldn't have been except that he lost his riding. 

Quote

 Things haven't changed much for him or you either with a ~35% approval rating and a reserved seat at the back of the bus.  🤡

The poles have been showing the conservatives at or head of the liberals for many many months now. Carney's enjoying a short blip at the moment but that'll vanish quickly

Voter intent matters, not personal popularity and we've seen that many many times. Which is why you've been avoiding talking about the motor intent numbers.

 

But it seems that all of this is just you crying in your panties about the fact that what I said was completely correct and the conservatives would not have tolerated what carney is doing despite your previous claims. You want to pretend that other people are bad people to excuse the fact that you're a bad person. That's not how the universe works

Edited March 6 by CdnFox

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

And yet there was and I did! I imagine it was hard to notice, what with your head stuck in the sand and all...

 

Can you point to a pole that suggested that poilievre had a 27% pole lead over Carney at any point?

No? As I thought. A liar. Also carney wasn't a political unknown, while he hadn't been a politician he had been in the political spotlight many times and had publicly spoken on behalf of trudeau's libs and advised them and publicly appeared on the liberals behalf many times. 

 

I'll give you that, it was up there   It wouldn't have been except that he lost his riding. 

The poles have been showing the conservatives at or head of the liberals for many many months now. Carney's enjoying a short blip at the moment but that'll vanish quickly

Voter intent matters, not personal popularity and we've seen that many many times. Which is why you've been avoiding talking about the motor intent numbers.

 

Not hard to find the facts 🤡

You are correct though in voter intent....and the Canadian voter intention says your infatuation will never get near the PM seat while continuing to be an anchor and liability to the party.

Move on clown....  it's done so get over it.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Not hard to find the facts 🤡

So in other words I'm right and you don't want to admit it  

As noted he never did have that lead that you claimed and you're a liar. And yes it was stunningly easy to look that up maybe you should have before you opened your mouth?

 

Quote

You are correct though in voter intent....and the Canadian voter intention says your infatuation will never get near the PM

Says the opposite. He's out or better than carney and frankly 1% or 2% more of the voter intent and he would have had the same result carney did. Which is why you've got your panties in a knot and you're crying about it

Quote

Move on clown....  it's done so get over it.

Oh look, are you crying again because the big mean evil bullies telling you facts and making you confront reality? Awwww poor thing  LOLOL

If you really believed what you said the last thing you would be trying to do is convince conservatives that Poilievre is a poor choice. You would be demanding that we keep him and saying next time for sure! Instead you spend all your time desperately lying about his polling numbers and crying like a baby to try and demand that we switch leaders. You know, for our own good because you like us so much     

[LinkSoul60]

Just now, CdnFox said:

So in other words I'm right and you don't want to admit it  

As noted he never did have that lead that you claimed and you're a liar. And yes it was stunningly easy to look that up maybe you should have before you opened your mouth?

 

Says the opposite. He's out or better than carney and frankly 1% or 2% more of the voter intent and he would have had the same result carney did. Which is why you've got your panties in a knot and you're crying about it

Oh look, are you crying again because the big mean evil bullies telling you facts and making you confront reality? Awwww poor thing  LOLOL

If you really believed what you said the last thing you would be trying to do is convince conservatives that Poilievre is a poor choice. You would be demanding that we keep him and saying next time for sure! Instead you spend all your time desperately lying about his polling numbers and crying like a baby to try and demand that we switch leaders. You know, for our own good because you like us so much     

You've lost so often that you actually think you're winning now.  

BTW, your little moral victories are amusing....  Keep up the good fight clown.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

You've lost so often that you actually think you're winning now.  

 

So you've decided that you're losing, and to help yourself mentally cope with that you've decided to accuse me of thinking I'm winning     You're a broken little man aren't you?

Quote

BTW, your little moral victories are amusing....  Keep up the good fight clown.

And your little emotional breakdowns in hissy-fits are hilarious   keep up the leftist tears kiddo  

[LinkSoul60]

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you've decided that you're losing, and to help yourself mentally cope with that you've decided to accuse me of thinking I'm winning     You're a broken little man aren't you?

And your little emotional breakdowns in hissy-fits are hilarious   keep up the leftist tears kiddo  

Whenever your little mind gets flustered you automatically defer to others having 'emotional breakdowns' or 'hissy fits'.  I'm fine here thanks, but why in your typical little tantrums do you keep sending people emojis of your tongue hanging out....why?  

[Goddess]

These MOUs and vague promises are worth less than the paper they're on.  This is barely even a letter of intention, let alone an actual commitment.

With "the right policy settings" COULD lead to $10 billion in investment.

Over 10 years.

That's ALMOST enough to pay the CBC's annual $1.4 billion subsidy.  We'll only be $4 billion short at the end of the decade.

 

 

Meanwhile, Canada has had a capital flight outflow of $1 TRILLION in the last 10 years.

A trillion-dollar gap: 12 charts highlighting Canada’s capital flight crisis - The Hub

 

BONUS!!

If you hold the above chart upside down, it's a visual of Carney's Brookfield stock portfolio investments.

[Goddess]

Poilievre isn't saying anything new here.  This is the plan he ran on.  He talked about how Germany got an LNG plant running in 6 months.  We can do this!

We could have been a whole YEAR into this by now.

Can we please stop pooping our pants every time Trump tweets and get on with building an economy in Canada?  What if we promise a free lifetime supply of Depends for all the Liberal voters?  Wubbie blankets, maybe?  

Is there anything that will get them to stop focusing on orangemanbad & MOUs that sound more like "Do you like me? Check Yes or No." notes passed in Grade 5 math class and start actually doing something?

 

 

Edited March 6 by Goddess

[Goddess]

New party, same as the old party.

 

[eyeball]

47 minutes ago, Goddess said:

New party, same as the old party.

You figure Poilievre will do a better job than his old boss at putting an Accountability Act in place to curbs Liberal excesses the next time Conservatives lose?

I can't wait.

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Whenever your little mind gets flustered you automatically defer to others having 'emotional breakdowns' or 'hissy fits'. 

No I point when they have breakdowns and hissy fits. Many don't by the way, they cope pretty well with being faced with information or arguments they can't refute. But many on the left have exactly the kind of little emotional breakdown that you have.

Robo smith does it although I don't interact with him much because he's largely scared of me and he's west can man and nationals punching bag more than anything   X flyer goes into an immediate hardcore mental crash on a regular basis when presented with any facts that contradict his little viewpoint, etc etc

And you don't really see that from the posters on the right. You don't catch any of them repetitively posting the same thing over and over like x-fire does.

And you do too. And I'm not the first person to notice it. You get beaten up and then you just fall back on cheesy little grade school insults to try and make yourself feel better I mean hey, i'll definitely call someone stupid when they're being stupid but I will explain in detail why they're stupid and what the correct answer was. You just freak out

So the real question is why is the left like this? The other thing that has been commented on here forever with consistency is that when you guys get pinned on an argument a stunning amount of the time you fall back onto weird homosexual fantasies and commentary which is another thing you just generally don't see from the right.

In short you guys are emotionally disturbed and weird but at least you're consistent  

[Army Guy]

8 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Can't talk sense into someone incapable of understanding....  Yes, we've been dealing with forever, they've been investing in our country forever, and both will continue to.  Trade with a population of over 3B people brings the opportunity for economic stability in agriculture, energy, tech, etc.... and you have a moral epiphany now because it's a liberal gov.  As you sit on your high moral pedestal it's convenient you don't question your American idol Trump's morals...why not?   

Perhaps your not talking sense, your a liberal and therefore incapable of listening....we also did trade with Russia and other unlikeable countries and yet somehow we don't today....not because of some conservative values, it was because time after time they proven to be a hostile nation...I've asked you a million times what does China produce that we absolutely can not get from other nations....And it is not now we are all having moral values epiphanies, Carney knows it is going to be tough to distance ourselves from the US, and now he is forced to deal with nations that do not respect us as a nation, nor do they care what we do or think...it has not stopped them from killing Canadians...but that we can see past because it is all about trade right......As for trump has he killed Canadians yet ? all he had done is scared the crap out of liberals...

[Army Guy]

8 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Or, you're at a dead end street now with no logical reason we should NOW stop trading with either.  It's obvious.... you're politically bias.  Interesting comments though....  over the years and whether federal or provincial elections I've voted for all 3 parties at one time or another so no, not because 'Carney told me what to think'.   I'm confidently assuming though that your Conservative Party loyalty won't allow you to think outside that box...does it.

blame me, it is what liberals do point fingers...., you have not even answered one of my questions, , you continue to, scream into the mike like some mad man....because that is part of the liberal hand book...Personally i really don't care whom you claimed to vote for, your responses , your posts all reflect liberal values or the lack off....

I want to point out once again it is these very liberal values that have brought Canada to the space we are in now....So you'll have to excuse me for not jumping on board with liberal thought processes as they don't really work, in fact if you wanted to write a book on how to destroy a nation in a decade it would have a picture of the present day liberal government and throw in Justin picture in there as well...

[LinkSoul60]

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

No I point when they have breakdowns and hissy fits. Many don't by the way, they cope pretty well with being faced with information or arguments they can't refute. But many on the left have exactly the kind of little emotional breakdown that you have.

There is a lot of shït that goes on in that little mind of yours... you really would be a good study subject for a clinical psychiatrist.  For whatever the reason you everyone is having a hissy fit when your little heads decides it's ready to explode from the BS that runs through it which then leads to your natural reaction of saying you won a debate with undeniable facts.  What a 🤡

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And you don't really see that from the posters on the right. You don't catch any of them repetitively posting the same thing over and over like x-fire does.

You're kidding right...?   Seriously.... all you fools do is literally say the same thing over and over each and every day.  in some form or fashion... 'Look what the liberals did', 'Canada's broken', 'Carney's in it for Brookfield',  'Liberals are lying', etc, etc....  Good humour with that comment though 👍

34 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And I'm not the first person to notice it. You get beaten up and then you just fall back on cheesy little grade school insults to try and make yourself feel better I mean hey, i'll definitely call someone stupid when they're being stupid but I will explain in detail why they're stupid and what the correct answer was. You just freak out

Say again...kiddo?  Maybe when your little mind gets to a grade school intellect you'll be qualified to talk about grade school. 

37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So the real question is why is the left like this? The other thing that has been commented on here forever with consistency is that when you guys get pinned on an argument a stunning amount of the time you fall back onto weird homosexual fantasies and commentary which is another thing you just generally don't see from the right.

In short you guys are emotionally disturbed and weird but at least you're consistent  

You in particular talk about homosexuality a lot and obviously like including emojis of your tongue hanging out in comments. Your fellow minions always seem to revert to trannies at some point in a retort to the left.  Can't say I see many or for that matter any of similar comments coming from anyone I'd perceive to be on the left?  

Seek help, or better meds 🤡