CARNEY GIVES CABINET MINISTERS THE POWER TO EXEMPT ANYONE OR ANY CORPORATION FROM LAWS FOR 6 YEARS

[Moonbox]

13 minutes ago, Shady said:

No, 55 and under all went Conservative.  People over 55 but especially over 65 went hard for Carney, because they were irrationally scared by Trump.

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Everyone up to about 55 either preferred PP or was about even, only the older voters preferred the libs. 

This was from Nanos on April 13th.  The advantage in the younger demographic wasn't huge and wasn't sweeping, whereas for the older demo it was a blowout.   

Regardless, we still recent polling to show what the younger generations actually think of PP:

Imagine what the Conservatives could do if they didn't have an unlikeable, buffoonish shrill as their leader.

[Shady]

12 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

This was from Nanos on April 13th.  The advantage in the younger demographic wasn't huge and wasn't sweeping, whereas for the older demo it was a blowout.   

Regardless, we still recent polling to show what the younger generations actually think of PP:

Imagine what the Conservatives could do if they didn't have an unlikeable, buffoonish shrill as their leader.

I'm just telling you what the actual results of the election were.  Only people 55 and up, particularly 60 and up supported Carney.  

[TreeBeard]

Just now, Shady said:

Only people 55 and up, particularly 60 and up supported Carney. 

Con’s has a 4% edge over the Libs in the 18-34 year range.  So how does that equate to only old people voted for Carney?  Your sweeping statement makes no sense. 

[CdnFox]

13 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

This was from Nanos on April 13th. 

Soooo..... not the actual results. Just a poll.  Kay. 

Is there EVER a time in your life you don't choose to double down on the stupid?

But wait, it gets better  

The charts you posted show a clear advantage in voting intent under 34, AND ABOUT A TIE STATISTICALLY IN THE 35 TO 43, WHICH IS WHAT I SAID   

So not ONLY did you post "Evidence" that was irrelevant, what you did post shows i'm right and that the under 50's either preferred pp or were about the same for both. 

 

FFS,  honestly you can't see this shit when you're posting it? You honestly post that and think it's proving YOUR point?!?  What is the MATTER with you?

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

Con’s has a 4% edge over the Libs in the 18-34 year range.  So how does that equate to only old people voted for Carney?  Your sweeping statement makes no sense. 

Every poll pre and post election put the older people ahead for the libs.  Don't know why, it's kind of unusual. Older people are often more right leaning and younger people more left leaning, bit reversed right now. 

[Shady]

55 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Con’s has a 4% edge over the Libs in the 18-34 year range.  

More than that.

[Shady]

Just before the election.  Boomers elected Carney.  If you’re not old enough to be a boomer, but voted for Carney, you have a boomer brain! 😂

 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

Yup, this it what it will take alright.

 

If That's the case then you lied earlier, which shocks no one.

He said anyone can do it. However if it requires a constitutional change, you literally means that almost everyone has to do it or nobody can do it. Certainly no federal government could do it

But it's nice to finally hear you admit that you were completely full of shit when you said that harper should have done it   

[eyeball]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But it's nice to finally hear you admit that you were completely full of shit when you said that harper should have done it   

Of course Can'tservatives can't. They'd never be able to be corrupt themselves. They should at least have another chance at getting better at it don't you think?

Of course you do. It was nice to see you finally admit that whatever Trudeau did in power is fair game for your boy.

I'm pretty sure that's what Harper was thinking when he tabled his Catch-and-Release legislation for corruption.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Of course Can'tservatives can't.

You said they could.  So you were just being a LIEberal then?   LOL

Here's a hint, if you have to resort to cheesy lines that Herbie uses to make your point, you're admitting you lost right out of the gate    LOL you're such a child  

As to the rest,  I love that you're trying to excuse your own support of corruption and such by pretending somehow I would support the same corruption and therefore it's ok for you to do it ahead of time LOLOLOL

 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You said they could.  So you were just being a LIEberal then?   LOL

If I was, I was lying. Take it to the bank.  

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Here's a hint, if you have to resort to cheesy lines that Herbie uses to make your point, you're admitting you lost right out of the gate

Everyone remembers it was you who said if you need to say someone has lost it's because you have.

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

As to the rest,  I love that you're trying to excuse your own support of corruption and such by pretending somehow I would support the same corruption and therefore it's ok for you to do it ahead of time LOLOLOL

Ahead of time you say? You can't wait can you? LMAO!

On 12/7/2025 at 12:30 AM, CdnFox said:

whatever you guys do in power is fair game for the next guy.

Except you guys suck at being corrupt so hard you'll be out on your asses again 4 years later for some picayune faux pas for another 20 years. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Because you're losers.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

If I was, I was lying.

Yeah nobody actually needs you to tell us that  

 Take it to the bank.  

Quote

Everyone remembers it was you who said if you need to say someone has lost it's because you have.

And? I didn't say you lost, I said that your comment was basically an admission of it. It's pretty obvious you know you lost I was just pointing out that when you behave like that you're basically telling the world that you know it

LOL Swing and a miss kiddo  

 

Quote

Ahead of time you say? You can't wait can you? LMAO!

I love that you're doubling down on the future crime angle  

Translation: "I, eyeball, can't excuse my behavior today so I'll create a fake event that has never happened and may never happened as justification"

That's why you do the childish little fake quotes thing, why you do this little bizarre behavior, or why you try and play things off as a joke or the other usual telltale signs that clearly states as loud as possible that you know you've lost and your big mad about it

 

Quote

Except you guys suck at being corrupt so hard you'll be out on your asses again 4 years later for some picayune faux pas for another 20 years.

We can always hire a liberal to teach us   They'll do anything if you throw them enough money

[eyeball]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Yeah nobody actually needs you to tell us that

Yup, they all know it's just another lie. 

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Take it to the bank. 

Leave it for Santa.

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I love that you're doubling down on the future crime angle

Sorry, I was lying again.  

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I was just pointing out that when you behave like that you're basically telling the world that you know it

Talking to yourself is so you. LMAO!

[TreeBeard]

5 hours ago, Shady said:

More than that.

41 to 37 is 4 points. 

[CdnFox]

27 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yup, they all know it's just another lie. 

Leave it for Santa.

Sorry, I was lying again.  

 

LOL only a true Liberal would be as proud of being a liar as you are   But you do seem to enjoy it   

 

Quote

Talking to yourself is so you. LMAO!

Me telling you that you're giving away the fact you lost and are mad about it is talking to myself?

It's Tuesday bud, you're either 2 days too late or 3 days too early for drinking like that  

But i'm sure it's all harper's fault  

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

LOL only a true Liberal would be as proud of being a liar as you are

A true Liberal maybe, I'm liberal though. A completely different thing.

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Me telling you that you're giving away the fact you lost and are mad about it is talking to myself?

If you say so.

 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

A true Liberal maybe, I'm liberal though. A completely different thing

Oh I think we both know you're a true Liberal, you spend all day here defending them and blaming others for their failings. 

I'm sure you'd like to position yourself as being some sort of honest Progressive type of person but you're not. Most of your time here is spent being dishonest. You defend the liberals night and day. You blame Harper for Trudeau's bad actions. 

I could go on for some time. You're a big L all the way  

 

[eyeball]

25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

...you spend all day here defending them and blaming others for their failings. 

No I don't, I mock lame assed critics who fail to make much if any impact.

27 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You defend the liberals night and day.

Yup.

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You blame Harper for Trudeau's bad actions.

How was Harper able to do that again? I forget.

30 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

could go on for some time. You're a big L all the way  

A Liar yes, well, it goes without saying but since it's all you have to say...

...yawn....

Ah the NyQuil is finally taking effect. Sleep on it.

[Moonlight Graham]

Hardcore idealogues like PP and Trudeau need to retire from politics.  Glad Trudeau did.

So far Carney has done ok, probably because he seems like a pretty regular guy, unlike his predecessor.

[Barquentine]

16 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Imagine what the Conservatives could do if they didn't have an unlikeable, buffoonish shrill as their leader

Just thought that beared repeating. Could not have said it better myself.

[CdnFox]

10 hours ago, eyeball said:

No I don't, I mock lame assed critics who fail to make much if any impact.

LOL if that were true you wouldn't need the internet, a mirror would do  

You LEAP to the defense of the liberals constantly and it's frequently commented on.  Sorry kid, your own actions condemn you 

Quote

How was Harper able to do that again? I forget.

 

Oh i'm sure you'll remember if we wait 5 minutes.  Your brain works like that.

 

Quote

A Liar yes, well, it goes without saying but since it's all you have to say...

I say quite a bit more than that. But i'm sure considering how bad that usually makes you look you're happy to try to forget that .  

Quote

...yawn....

Awwww you tuckered out little guy?  Some of those words WERE pretty big for you.

 

Quote

Ah the NyQuil is finally taking effect. 

It should, it's about your third bottle  

[Goddess]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

I'm liberal though.

No.  Just no.

A liberal would not want a useless and ineffective experimental medical procedure forced on millions of people for a flu  with a slightly higher IFR than the seasonal flu, who have no need of it, especially children and pregnant women and advocate for them to lose their jobs, go to jail, have their children taken away and be locked down for 2 years.

You should just face the fact that you are a gullible useful id10t, highly susceptible to propaganda, who completely believes in submission to government, as long as it's the Liberal party. 

[Goddess]

11 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

So far Carney has done ok, probably because he seems like a pretty regular guy,

A regular guy, who when questioned about grocery prices, chuckled and said he hasn't bought groceries in decades and when questioned about dealing with the tariff situation said "Who cares?"

He has more in common with Trump than Polievre does.

[BeaverFever]

On 12/8/2025 at 1:13 PM, CdnFox said:

Sure, and we believe things like taxes should be reduced for everybody.

EVERY BODY.  Not select friends of the liberals in return for god knows what favors.  This is just more corruption. 

Everything in gov't is "temporary' till the next guy changes it, but yeah... the fact that it will now only apply to the 'elite' chosen by the liberals is very bad. 

I can explain why it's very bad if your moral compass is so far broken that you can't puzzle out why being able to grant massive favors like that with no oversight to your friends is a problem. 

The suggestion that it’s for friends and in exchange for private favours is just your made-up conspiracy.   It’s obviously to help juice major projects and investments and it’s all a matter of public record.  Could the law be abused? Sure any law can be abused but who gets what under this law is all a matter of public record. 
 

And if conservatives truly do the believe in private favours why do so many support Trump and his minions who have basically turned the White House into their own private racket machine?

[Legato]

1 hour ago, BeaverFever said:

  It’s obviously to help juice major projects and investments and it’s all a matter of public record.  Could the law be abused? Sure any law can be abused but who gets what under this law is all a matter of public record. 
 

Which are?

[BeaverFever]

5 minutes ago, Legato said:

Which are?

Nobody has been granted any exemptions under this law yet so you’ll find out if and when it’s ever actually used.