FDA Admits Myocarditis Was A Side Effect

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

And this one had to fight like hell to keep his:

Victory for Dr. Charles Hoffe as Case Withdrawn After Lengthy Battle: – HART

Dr. Hoffe was the first in Canada to report the clotting issue in his patients and they tried very hard to shut him up.

A couple months after he talked about that the town that he was practicing in, Lytton BC, burned to the ground, and as a result his patients were scattered far and wide.

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

A couple months after he talked about that the town that he was practicing in, Lytton BC, burned to the ground, and as a result his patients were scattered far and wide.

It was such a little town and he had those patients for decades, so he knew them well.  He knew their health.  When he started seeing things, he reported it. 

You would think people would WANT a doctor who stands up for and fights for his patients, but most here have mocked Dr. Hoffe every time I've talked about him over the years.

So bizarre.

[Legato]

30 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It was such a little town and he had those patients for decades, so he knew them well.  He knew their health.  When he started seeing things, he reported it. 

You would think people would WANT a doctor who stands up for and fights for his patients, but most here have mocked Dr. Hoffe every time I've talked about him over the years.

So bizarre.

Just heard the FDA to investigate adult covid vax deaths.

[WestCanMan]

15 minutes ago, Legato said:

Just heard the FDA to investigate adult covid vax deaths.

In a timely manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

😂🤣😂🤣😭

[WestCanMan]

48 minutes ago, Goddess said:

You would think people would WANT a doctor who stands up for and fights for his patients,

I can names some who wouldn't: eyeball, exflyer, hodad, and everyone else with an IQ lower than their blood alcohol level. 

[Goddess]

28 minutes ago, Legato said:

Just heard the FDA to investigate adult covid vax deaths.

Heard that too.

So far, autopsies have been done mostly by private pathologists on request from families. The proper staining has to be done to find the spike and where it went in the bodies.

The private pathologists have confirmed many deaths due to the vax, but.....can't sue Pfizer.  They have immunity for all vaccine deaths, unless it can be proven that they committed fraud, which we know they did.

This will open up the floodgates and there's going to be a lot of angry people, angry parents.

[Goddess]

Not Mandatory ≠ Unavailable, you fearmongering cow.

No one has interfered with anyone's ability to get a HepB shot, if they want one.

 

 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Goddess said:

Not Mandatory ≠ Unavailable, you fearmongering cow.

No one has interfered with anyone's ability to get a HepB shot, if they want one.

 

 

CDC recommendations (used to) play a major role in whether vaccines are covered by insurance.

You're probably unaware of that importance since you have universal healthcare.

Edited December 11, 2025 by robosmith

[Goddess]

11 hours ago, robosmith said:

CDC recommendations (used to) play a major role in whether vaccines are covered by insurance.

You're probably unaware of that importance since you have universal healthcare.

Why should taxpayers pay for vaccines that are not mandatory?

Why should taxpayers pay billions for making unnecessary vaccines mandatory?

If you want a vaccine, go get it.

On your own dime.

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Why should taxpayers pay for vaccines that are not mandatory?

Why should taxpayers pay billions for making unnecessary vaccines mandatory?

If you want a vaccine, go get it.

On your own dime.

Because pandemics only care about SCIENCE, NOT RFKjr pandering to conspiracy theorists.

[User]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because pandemics only care about SCIENCE, NOT RFKjr pandering to conspiracy theorists.

“Pandemics” do not care about anything. They are not sentient beings. 
 

The people in charge of government and in control responding to a pandemic do care about pandering, do have motives, and do not act perfectly according to science. 

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because pandemics only care about SCIENCE

Science, like......

• The corona virus knows if you're sitting or standing in a restaurant.
• You can get the virus buying nails at your local Mom & Pop hardware store, but not if you buy them from Home Depot.
• "You will NOT get covid if you get these shots!" (It was never tested for transmission.)
• Children face the same risk of dying as 90 year olds.
• 2 year long lockdowns and school closures do not affect children in any way.
• If some children have to die to save octogenarians, then it's all worth it.

[Goddess]

NOW they tell us.

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots - The Atlantic

 

But don't overreact.

They're awfully sorry and all that, you just need to look on the bright side - your dead baby* is a NET BENEFIT.

The jabs did not stop infection or transmission, but your dead baby's sacrifice helped Dr. Fauci reach his jab goals and Big Pharma made billions.

* DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

This article felt like it was written by a robo-AI, unfeeling, uncompassionate, psychopathic.

Child deaths are framed as acceptable collateral damage of a program that "prevented death on a vast scale".  It completely avoids acknowledging that the baseline risk for babies and children was NEVER high enough to justify any kind of "net benefit" claim.

They HAD to lie to everyone about the dead babies to prevent anti-vaxxers' agenda from taking root.

In reality, the admission moves the jabs from the "safe as air" box into the "can kill healthy children" box.  It makes the whole propaganda scheme feel positively evil - the unscientific and non-data-based claims of 100% safe and 95% effective, the shaming, the coercion of people who faced zero risk.

The parents of dead children never consented to "a very small chance this could kill your child who faces zero risk."
They only consented after intense pressure to what they were told was essentially ZERO lethal risk.

Once you accept that healthy children were killed by a government sponsored, forced intervention - the lies just look like a death machine that funneled families into something they never consented to and were told did not exist.

Normal people understand this, even if psychopaths like the author of this article, eyeball, robo, and their ilk, do not.

Now that these psychopaths have had stubborn denial of ANY child deaths taken away from them, they want to shift the narrative from "no kids died" to "OK, OK.  Some kids died but it was worth it."

They will only disclose the truth to the MINIMUM extent necessary.

SICK.

 

Edited December 11, 2025 by Goddess

[Goddess]

51 minutes ago, User said:

“Pandemics” do not care about anything. They are not sentient beings. 

Science doesn't actually care about anything either.

It's why we have established medical ethics, or at least we USED to have them up until the covid years.

Each person has to weigh the cost/benefit/risks of medical interventions for themselves.

Maybe you get cancer and the Dr tells you that you have a 25% chance of surviving with extremely aggressive treatment.  A 28 year old may make a different assessment for themselves than someone who is 80.  It may be worth it when you're 28.  But like my grandfather, an 80 year old may choose 6 more months of peace and saying goodbye to family, over 9 months of surgeries, chemo, hospital visits and pain....and refuse treatment.

If parents had been told the truth and governments had not coerced and shamed, would any parent have repeatedly jabbed their babies and children with a potentially lethal shot, for a disease for which they faced zero risk?  If parents were told outright "This shot provides no benefit to your child and there is an X% chance they die from it and/or an X% chance become disabled for life", how many parents would have done it?

Science cannot make those choices for us.  And governments, who are beholden to outside corporations, SHOULD NOT.

The psychopaths here can poo-poo this all they want, but they can't get away from......DEAD BABIES.

Edited December 11, 2025 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

19 hours ago, Goddess said:

Not Mandatory ≠ Unavailable, you fearmongering cow.

No one has interfered with anyone's ability to get a HepB shot, if they want one.

 

 

That's not all that's wrong with her post: she also said that he was

• "throwing out decades of established science",

which is an absolute fabrication. The truth is that:

• RFKJr and his legion of concerned medical professionals (not just RFK)
• were "challenging decades of
• what appeared to be established science,
• with a mound of verified clinical data,
• which appears to debunk the aforementioned 'established' science.

If the Elizabeth Warrens of the world were winning, then you'd still end up being exiled for saying that the earth goes around the sun, and we would still be treating half of our medical conditions with leeches and bat wings.

And at the end of the day, it's just like you said... No one is being denied medication, that medication is just being downgraded to an "as needed" basis. 

It bears repeating what was said 1,000,000 times during covid: Questioning science is how you do science. If you are not allowed to question it, then it is not "science".

 

Never let the mindless cultists and trolls on this forum make you question your beliefs or they way you research things. They have all the understanding of bugs looking up at the Sears Tower.

[Goddess]

5 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's not all that's wrong with her post:

Yes, far from it.  Nobody should listen to anything she says on this topic.  She's a Big Pharma shill:

Warren's Claim to Be Clean of Big Pharma Money Falls Apart as It's Revealed They Give Her Millions

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Yes, far from it.  Nobody should listen to anything she says on this topic. 

Fixed it for ya.

Quote

She's a Big Pharma shill:

Warren's Claim to Be Clean of Big Pharma Money Falls Apart as It's Revealed They Give Her Millions

• "Warren took $822,573 between 2019 and 2020 from employees or PACs affiliated with pharmaceutical and health product companies, though not from the companies themselves, according to Open Secrets."

That's anywhere from 1 to 2 years, max, from her political career that spans decades, and that's just what they caught her on, it's not necessarily all the ill-gotten gains that she and her family have received over those 2 years.

We can only guess how much money they've lavished on her family members that Open Secrets didn't manage to detect or prove. Eg, there's no law saying that her vastly underqualified daughter can't get hired as a secretary or consultant for Pfizer and make $400K/yr, or get $90K plus a huge pension, full medical and dental benefits, university scholarships for their kids, ample vacation time, work from home with no real expectations of work performed, access to corporate getaways and vacations for free, etc.

It's like when Trudeau was offering WE millions of taxpayer dollars to host events, and in turn Trudeau's mom was paid $350K for speaking engagements there plus she received $150K in expenses, yet Morneau was the one deemed to have a conflict of interest because his daughter worked there 40 hrs a week for $30k/yr 🤣 Apparently working full-time for $30k/yr = proof of a scam, but getting paid $350K plus $150k in expenses for a few speaking engagements is entirely legit 🤣.  You know that CBC never questioned how many times she spoke, and for how many hours, to make all that money? They never questioned how she racked up $150,000 in expenses? How mush does orange juice cost on her flights? Does she drink water that's distilled from virgin tears? 

Eyeball, hodad and the other cultists here are either completely ignorant or willing participants in basic evil. 

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Goddess said:

Science, like......

• The corona virus knows if you're sitting or standing in a restaurant.
• You can get the virus buying nails at your local Mom & Pop hardware store, but not if you buy them from Home Depot.
• "You will NOT get covid if you get these shots!" (It was never tested for transmission.)
• Children face the same risk of dying as 90 year olds.
• 2 year long lockdowns and school closures do not affect children in any way.
• If some children have to die to save octogenarians, then it's all worth it.

No vaccine stops infection or transmission. They ONLY give your immune system a head start in fighting it off.

The KEY ADVANTAGE is a keeping the infection at such a low level it doesn't kill you and many don't even notice they're infected.

[gatomontes99]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Because pandemics only care about SCIENCE, NOT RFKjr pandering to conspiracy theorists.

The science has always been that the coronavirus family always gets weaker with age. 

[Goddess]

Let's say the official narrative is correct and go with those numbers:

Officially, 1 in 2,600 kids who get the covid shot develop myocarditis, a life-long, life-threatening injury.

Now think Disneyland.

Top rides move 20-30,000 people and kids per day.

That's 11 kids per day, suddenly getting heart damage.

How long before the rides would be shut down and investigated?

 

[User]

On 12/15/2025 at 12:42 PM, Goddess said:

Officially, 1 in 2,600 kids who get the covid shot develop myocarditis, a life-long, life-threatening injury.

Where are you getting these "official" numbers from? 

You are also living on the fear-mongering innuendo of lifelong, life-threatening injury, so how many of those who develop myocarditis develop this?

[Goddess]

Now that we are (sort of) allowed to talk about this, lots of these stories are popping up on social media.

 

Her mother provides the vax batch numbers, which I plugged into How Bad Is My Batch?.com and I screenshotted the results. Holy shit.

 

Some batches were worse than others, which tells us they were experimenting with formulas. On your children. On your pregnant wives. Before cov1d, children and pregnant women were OFF LIMITS. Medical ethics, the Nuremburg code, all that stuff we threw out the window.

 

AUBRYNN'S STORY:

My daughter, Aubrynn, was 17 years old.

She was selected for a school trip from July 9 to July 22. The vaccine was mandatory for the trip. She was the only one in our family who received it, despite our pleas not to. She was vaccinated on June 7 and again on June 28, 2022.

She left for her trip, and on July 18 she texted me that she did not feel well. We did not hesitate. We immediately drove from Michigan to New York to bring her home. We arrived the next day, which was also our three year old’s birthday. We celebrated with cake and ice cream. Later that night, Aubrynn and I shared some soup together before she went to bed.

The next morning, I took her to urgent care. We waited for hours. At one point, she managed to sit up and quietly asked me, “Did they call me yet?”

Before we even understood what was happening, my daughter collapsed from cardiac arrest.

She was airlifted to Children’s Hospital. She was placed on an ECMO machine and treated with Remdesivir. Her body began shutting down. Her limbs turned black from lack of blood flow. Infections spread. Her kidneys failed.

On August 6, we were told there was nothing more they could do.

We were forced to make the impossible decision to turn off the machines. We had to let our daughter go.

I am sharing this because Aubrynn mattered. Her life mattered. Her story matters. She was not just a number or a statistic. She was my child. And I will spend the rest of my life speaking her name and telling the truth about what happened to her.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Goddess]

These are the faces of the children killed by Big Pharma.

In case you were thinking it's just 10.

10 is just the start.

Her batch number:

Her face:

 

 

[WestCanMan]

On 12/11/2025 at 9:09 AM, Goddess said:

NOW they tell us.

Yes, Some Children May Have Died From COVID Shots - The Atlantic

But don't overreact.

When you say "Don't overreact", are you saying that:

•  @eyeball, @ExFlyer, and @Hodad shouldn't throw a "Some children are dead and we're not " party? Or
• Are you telling those clowns not to firebomb the Atlantic for uttering anti-vaxer hate-propaganda from a cult-approved platform?

I'm not sure which one you meant by that.

[Hodad]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

When you say "Don't overreact", are you saying that:

•  @eyeball, @ExFlyer, and @Hodad shouldn't throw a "Some children are dead and we're not " party? Or
• Are you telling those clowns not to firebomb the Atlantic for uttering anti-vaxer hate-propaganda from a cult-approved platform?

I'm not sure which one you meant by that.

Oh, you're not fooling anyone. We all know damn well that you don't subscribe to the Atlantic, and that you didn't read the article. There's no room for new information in your tiny info bubble. Just copy and past some more of your standard debunked grievances and move on.