FDA Admits Myocarditis Was A Side Effect

[gatomontes99]

46 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Maybe I don't "learn" all this conspiracy bullshit because I source real news instead of the random shit you read and immediately believe on Twitter? Just a theory. 
 

Again, there was no compensation for listing COVID as a cause of death. 

 

By the lowest count, 1600+ kids died of COVID in the US. It's a simple record to look up, but you want to claim it didn't happen. Good luck with that. 

Meanwhile... The vaccines were highly effective at preventing those serious outcomes.

Results: A total of 445 case patients and 777 controls were enrolled. Overall, 17 case patients (4%) and 282 controls (36%) had been fully vaccinated. Of the case patients, 180 (40%) were admitted to the ICU, and 127 (29%) required life support; only 2 patients in the ICU had been fully vaccinated. The overall effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against hospitalization for Covid-19 was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90 to 96); the effectiveness was 95% (95% CI, 91 to 97) among test-negative controls and 94% (95% CI, 89 to 96) among syndrome-negative controls. The effectiveness was 98% against ICU admission and 98% against Covid-19 resulting in the receipt of life support. All 7 deaths occurred in patients who were unvaccinated.

75 million kids in 2020. 1600 died with COVID. Fewer yet died from COVID. Even at 1600, that is 0.002% of the population. The ratio of risk to reward was skewed heavily in the wrong direction. We never should have recommended it for children. We only should have recommended it o er 30 with obesity or heart conditions and strongly recommended it over 55. That would have been appropriate.

[Hodad]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

When you look at these stats, dummy, just notice that the kids in Canada started dying 6x as fast after the kiddie doses started being administered in Nov 2021:

19 dead (0-19 yrs old, the first two categories on the left) in almost two full years (Jan 2020-Dec 2021), then the total went to 66 after only 11 more months Jan-Nov 2022).

More than twice as many kids died in half the amount of time after the vaxes were given to kids.  

After 5 years, are you really too farking dumb to understand the difference between numbers and rates and why the latter is the measure of efficacy? Really? After 5 years of pointing it out I can't imagine that ANYONE is that dumb. But I am am 100% certain you are that dishonest. You'd rather mislead people on matters of life and death than let go of your anti-vax dogma and be wrong on the internet. Jeebus. 

As always, it was unequivocally safer and smarter to be vaccinated. These are numbers from the same source you are using. -- If a person wanted to be hospitalized or wanted to die, they'd pick the high, unvaccinated line. And you've been telling people for 5 years that they should pick the dramatically worse line. GTFO.  

 

And in the US, where there are more dumbshits like you and the vax participation rate wasn't as high, the difference is even more stark. 

[User]

18 hours ago, Hodad said:

By the lowest count, 1600+ kids died of COVID in the US. It's a simple record to look up, but you want to claim it didn't happen. Good luck with that. 

And something like 2/3 of those deaths had underlying medical conditions that complicated things. 

The simple reality is that COVID was only a major risk for older people and people with underlying medical issues. 

 

[Hodad]

15 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

75 million kids in 2020. 1600 died with COVID. Fewer yet died from COVID. Even at 1600, that is 0.002% of the population. The ratio of risk to reward was skewed heavily in the wrong direction. We never should have recommended it for children. We only should have recommended it o er 30 with obesity or heart conditions and strongly recommended it over 55. That would have been appropriate.

🙄"With COVID"? The cause of death is the cause of death. It's documented. It's countable. 

And there's not a single confirmed child death attributed to the vaccines. 

So what math are you using to NOT recommend vaccination? I gave you the study that show how dramatically, even among children, the vaccines reduced risk of hospitalization, ventilation and death. What math, what facts are you using to to tell people that they should take the high risk road instead? There simply isn't a logical case to be made. Based on the data, across ages and regions, there's no significant downside to vaccination, and there's considerable upside. So what is the damn objection? 


The truth is that the anti-vax backlash is simple anti-authority, anti-science nonsense. It's a knee-jerk reaction that people are grasping at straws to rationalize and justify.

[User]

21 minutes ago, Hodad said:

So what math are you using to NOT recommend vaccination?

It was pretty obvious.  Most of the COVID deaths in children were because they already had some kind of existing medical issue that caused complications. Healthy young kids had a nearly non-existent insignificant risk of death from COVID. 

Get a vaccine or do not, I don't care, just saying it is no big deal either way for kids, unless they have underlying medical issues or complications of concern. 

Edited January 9 by User

[eyeball]

On 1/7/2026 at 2:08 PM, Goddess said:

Dead babies and children.

Enjoy your celebration.

Please. You view every death as a triumphant vindication.

[WestCanMan]

On 1/9/2026 at 9:02 AM, User said:

And something like 2/3 of those deaths had underlying medical conditions that complicated things. 

The simple reality is that COVID was only a major risk for older people and people with underlying medical issues. 

Not sure why I'm posting this here, you're not gonna believe it anyways, but this, again, is from Health Canada's own f'ing site: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/45-28-0001/2020001/article/00087-eng.htm

• Healthy young adults, adolescents and children who contracted the virus have been the least likely to develop severe complications from COVID-19, including death. In fact, 100% of the COVID-involved deaths of Canadians under the age of 45 as of July 31 had at least one other disease or condition certified on the medical certificate of death. 

That's from all the way back in July 2020, so there's definitely a much bigger data set out there somewhere, but that's what came up for Canada. 

You might have to copy that text into google to get it to come up again, I just used that link and it took me to a page about race/income and covid. 

You probably don't "remember", but one of my most common challenges to vaxtards was to find some proof that young, healthy people even needed the jab.

That paragraph above clearly screams "NO", and maybe that's why I didn't find an updated version of it... It's not profitable for big pharma if articles keep coming out saying "35% of the population doesn't need the jab at all."

[Goddess]

20 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Healthy young adults, adolescents and children who contracted the virus have been the least likely to develop severe complications from COVID-19, including death. In fact, 100% of the COVID-involved deaths of Canadians under the age of 45 as of July 31 had at least one other disease or condition certified on the medical certificate of death. 

They were so desperate, they had to lie about it, too.

COVID-19: Hinshaw says 14-year-old's death not due to COVID-19, province will prioritize full review before reporting | Edmonton Journal

 

Thinking people asked at the time, "Why the hell would they test a boy dying of brain cancer for covid, on his deathbed?"

Hinshaw only came clean about it because the family raised a stink.

[Goddess]

There were 2 opposing studies that came out - one saying vaccinated kids got myocarditis more than unvaccinated kids and another (Pharma paid for) study that said "Covid-19 increases the risk of myocarditis more than the shots", which is the oft-repeated line from people who didn't care if kids died from the shots.

In both studies, I remember the sample sizes were significant, but personally, I would go with the study by independent scientists and not the one paid for by the company that has paid the biggest fines in history for fraud and has gotten caught multiple times forging data.

To each their own, I guess.

I would have to look it up, but I remember the numbers were so minimal.  It was like just over 2.0(?) per 100,00 vs. like 1.0 out of 100,000.

But let's go with those numbers from that study.

You're talking a 0.00002% vs a 0.00001% chance.

It doesn't change the fact that, why would kids have to take it at all?

Stop pushing drugs for profit based on less than 1% of 1%. 😠

And given that vaccination DOES NOT PREVENT C-19 disease, the statement that "Covid-19 increases the risk of myocarditis more than the shots"......is irrelevant.

Edited January 14 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

54 minutes ago, Goddess said:

They were so desperate, they had to lie about it, too.

COVID-19: Hinshaw says 14-year-old's death not due to COVID-19, province will prioritize full review before reporting | Edmonton Journal

 

Thinking people asked at the time, "Why the hell would they test a boy dying of brain cancer for covid, on his deathbed?"

Hinshaw only came clean about it because the family raised a stink.

From your article:

• Hinshaw said the province has been including all deaths in which COVID-19 is suspected as either a primary or secondary cause in order to accurately capture the impact the virus is having. That included cases with a recent diagnosis of COVID-19, even if the cause of death was still under investigation. 

🤢🤮

Additionally, anyone who recently had the jab and then suddenly died for no apparent reason was automatically not included in vaccine deaths stats until there was a really really lengthy investigation. Like, years later. 

[Goddess]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Additionally, anyone who recently had the jab and then suddenly died for no apparent reason was automatically not included in vaccine deaths stats until there was a really really lengthy investigation. Like, years later. 

They said they deliberately suppressed those deaths so as not to cause "vaccine hesitancy".

I don't think they really needed to worry.

In Warman Shopper's Drug Mart, there was a woman who dropped dead immediately after getting the shot and a week later, a younger man in a Saskatoon WalMart pharmacy also, and in both cases......everybody else stayed in line for the shot.

That's peak brainwashing right there.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

In Warman Shopper's Drug Mart, there was a woman who dropped dead immediately after getting the shot and a week later, a younger man in a Saskatoon WalMart pharmacy also, and in both cases... everybody else stayed in line.  That's peak brainwashing right there.

CBC: "🥳"