Even after the murder of Cory Comparatore and Charlie Kirk, left wingers still try to play victim, accuse their opponents of stifling "free speech"

[WestCanMan]

5 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

once again proving how stupid consevatives are these fools  whined over cancel culture now   happy people getting fired over comments about kirk LOL ..

Nice try, dummy. 

As has been pointed out numerous times here, cancel culture firings are characterized as instances of people being blacklisted or fired for trivial things that they posted on FB 20 yrs ago, or for telling a joke that made a hypersensitive man-child cwy to his mommy.

This is an instance of a deranged loser just trampling on a dead man's grave and lying about hs murderer on national television, and theres no oversensitivity issue here. 

It was one thing for left4rds to spit on the graves of the Pulse Club dead, by pretending that the main cause of their deaths was guns instead of routine islamic hate, but at least guns were actually involved that time. The guy who killed Kirk wasn't a conservative, and we all knew who the killer was and why he did it in the first second that it happened. For Kimmel to lie and sleaze like that in that moment was waaaay beyond the pale. 

Even you would have to agree that what kimmel said was so gross that he should have been fired, it's just sad that the FCC might have had to force ABC to do the right thing. 

[Michael Hardner]

26 minutes ago, Politics1990 said:

once again proving how stupid consevatives are these fools  whined over cancel culture now   happy people getting fired over comments about kirk LOL ..

Please.

 

If they were really conservatives they would place some value on freedom.

 

I have many posters here on mute, have any self-described conservatives spoken against this?

[robosmith]

44 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

All the f'ng ret4rds who had no problem with the gov't forcing people to take an experimental jab that they didn't need are crying "fascism" now because a Goebbels acolyte was fired. 😂

You can't make this shit up. 

YOU JUST DID. 

No one here was "forced to take an experimental jab."

SOME like military and healthcare had to take it OR RESIGN.

Don't know what happened to CANUCKS but that's NOT RELEVANT HERE. 

[Shady]

15 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Please.

 

If they were really conservatives they would place some value on freedom.

 

I have many posters here on mute, have any self-described conservatives spoken against this?

If you think freedom is so important, why do you fight against it most of the time?  So you want conservatives to come to the rescue and place some value on freedom when you're in need of it, while you fight against freedom on a regular basis.   Pound sand.

[robosmith]

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Holy delusional BS, Batman.

Are you honestly stupid enough to think that the issue with Kimmel's diatribe was that it was critical of the president? 😂😆🤣😭😂

Buddy, being critical of, and even lying about the president, is a daily occurrence. No one even notices it anymore when CNN and MSNBC lie about Trump. The police would slip over to do a wellness check on them if they forgot to lie about him for twenty minutes. 

FYI this has NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH the fact that the rant was critical of Trump. 

It was libellous, hateful, entirely disrespectful to the deceased, utterly devoid of class, and sunk to an entirely new low in the already toxic political environment. 

You should be embarrassed that there's even a possibility that the FCC had to step in, in order for ABC to do the right thing. 

If there was an Emmy for "Most Repugnant and Vile Propaganda of the Year" Kimmel would have been the first person to win it aside from Joy Reid in the last fifty years (she was already winning as a toddler).

You don't even know what Kimmel said. He blamed MAGA for Kirk's death and MAGA does what Trump SAYS, so that's blaming Trump.

But that was ONLY THE LAST STRAW. Like Colbert (and Obama long before), Trump can't stand being made fun of.

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

What you mean "WE," white man? YOU ARE HILARIOUS.

Got news for you CANUCKS: You are NOT the arbiter of "TDS filth." LMAO 

Did I say white man?

What a fop.

[Moonlight Graham]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Find me an example of a leftist here taking a non-partisan approach on any topic here, ever.

At best they'll stop throwing sandbox insults and run away once the jig is up. 

What does this have to do with anything?  Lots of people on the left and right are unhinged in their partisan frothing at the mouth these days.

It's wrong for the POTUS to be bullying media networks to cancel TV shows whose comedian hosts say things the POTUS doesn't like politically.  It's completely insane.  It's wrong if the Democrat did it, it's wrong if a GOP did it.

You either believe in democracy or you don't.  Democracy isn't a team sport.

The Democrats and GOP are giant pieces of sh*t and people are busy arguing over which pile of manure smells less while defending their favoured manure pile even when "their party" smears poo all over America.  Let's rise up against poo!

5 hours ago, Deluge said:

Leftoids are always wrong, so it's best to treat all leftists with hostility, all of the time. 

The only way to fix that is to pull your heads out of the Left's ass and at least come to the proper center. 

Mike Hardner is a pretty good example of being at the center. 

 

@Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

[West]

25 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Please.

 

If they were really conservatives they would place some value on freedom.

 

I have many posters here on mute, have any self-described conservatives spoken against this?

Thou shall not murder.. one of the 10 I try to live by. 

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

What does this have to do with anything?  Lots of people on the left and right are unhinged in their partisan frothing at the mouth these days.

It's wrong for the POTUS to be bullying media networks to cancel TV shows whose comedian hosts say things the POTUS doesn't like politically.  It's completely insane.  It's wrong if the Democrat did it, it's wrong if a GOP did it.

You either believe in democracy or you don't.  Democracy isn't a team sport.

The Democrats and GOP are giant pieces of sh*t and people are busy arguing over which pile of manure smells less while defending their favoured manure pile even when "their party" smears poo all over America.  Let's rise up against poo!

@Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

Mike Hardner is a diehard climate scare tactician. I'm sure the Left is quite proud of his work. 

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

What does this have to do with anything?  Lots of people on the left and right are unhinged in their partisan frothing at the mouth these days.

Enough of the bothsideism, MG. 

BLM's 'mostly peaceful" riots, forcing people to vax, openly calling for the other side to be harassed in public, condoning assassination comments and severed-head effigies, condoning protests at SCJ's homes, condoning a witch hunt against the president, condoning FBI crimes, condoning the attacks at the WH, etc, etc, etc, VS what MG? 

When did you see the GOP condone a violent riot? Or an actual assassination comment/attempt? When did the right condone a protest at someone's home? When did the right say that the riot at the capitol was ok? 

What the F do you have MG? Because no one seems to be able to provide examples of it, you just keep saying "Bofe sidz dew it."

What do conservatives do, MG. I wanna see it, and see examples of conservative leaders condoning such behaviour. 

Quote

@Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

And I'm Santa Claus.

Edited September 18, 2025 by WestCanMan

[Michael Hardner]

3 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

@Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

You know me.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Did I say white man?

What a fop.

So you're completely IGNORANT of The Lone Ranger, too. Figures that's how far your Canuck IGNORANCE extends.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

What does this have to do with anything?  Lots of people on the left and right are unhinged in their partisan frothing at the mouth these days.

It's wrong for the POTUS to be bullying media networks to cancel TV shows whose comedian hosts say things the POTUS doesn't like politically.  It's completely insane.  It's wrong if the Democrat did it, it's wrong if a GOP did it.

You either believe in democracy or you don't.  Democracy isn't a team sport.

The Democrats and GOP are giant pieces of sh*t and people are busy arguing over which pile of manure smells less while defending their favoured manure pile even when "their party" smears poo all over America.  Let's rise up against poo!

@Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

It's BLANTANTLY ILLEGAL to use government powers for POLITICAL PURPOSES.

And quelling dissent is NOTHING if its NOT POLITICAL.

3 hours ago, West said:

Thou shall not murder.. one of the 10 I try to live by. 

Kimmel getting the shaft has nothing to do with murder Trump has been looking for ways to quell his dissent like forever.

[Moonlight Graham]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Enough of the bothsideism, MG. 

BLM's 'mostly peaceful" riots, forcing people to vax, openly calling for the other side to be harassed in public, condoning assassination comments and severed-head effigies, condoning protests at SCJ's homes, condoning a witch hunt against the president, condoning FBI crimes, condoning the attacks at the WH, etc, etc, etc, VS what MG? 

When did you see the GOP condone a violent riot? Or an actual assassination comment/attempt? When did the right condone a protest at someone's home? When did the right say that the riot at the capitol was ok? 

What the F do you have MG? Because no one seems to be able to provide examples of it, you just keep saying "Bofe sidz dew it."

What do conservatives do, MG. I wanna see it, and see examples of conservative leaders condoning such behaviour. 

So you think Trump and PP's sh*t don't stink?   I'm not interested in your p*ssing match.  Sorry, i'm on team "ethical" and team "non-idi0t".  There's a lot idiocy and corrupt nonsense and violence and whatever else to go around, and i'm going to call it out, it doesn't matter where it comes from.  BLM riots, Jan 6 riots, "stop the steal", the mountains of BS that Trudeau pulled.  I'm not hooking my wagon to any trash political party.  I have my political leanings but i'm not supporting any of the crappy politicians or terrible parties in either country.  Trash people defend trash behaviour, that's the long and short of it.

When a politician does something undemocratic, that's your enemy.  Don't excuse this oaf for censoring talk show hosts who criticize him and behaving like a 3rd world dictator.  If Trump can't take criticism he's in the wrong job.

[West]

36 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It's BLANTANTLY ILLEGAL to use government powers for POLITICAL PURPOSES.

And quelling dissent is NOTHING if its NOT POLITICAL.

Kimmel getting the shaft has nothing to do with murder Trump has been looking for ways to quell his dissent like forever.

Biden sent the feds after Charlie Kirk for simply campaigning against him. The left stuck a bullet in his neck. Spare me the sob story about that low life Kimmel. 

https://x.com/Girlpatriot1974/status/1968484543221969103/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1968484543221969103&currentTweetUser=Girlpatriot1974

 

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, West said:

Biden sent the feds after Charlie Kirk for simply campaigning against him.

No HE DID NOT.

Joe Biden has never even spoken about "sent the feds" for ANYTHING. Duh

Unlike Trump, Biden let his DoJ operate independently, as REQUIRED FOR JUSTICE. 

4 hours ago, West said:

The left stuck a bullet in his neck. Spare me the sob story about that low life Kimmel. 

You're LYING. Robinson is NOT "the left" Duh

4 hours ago, West said:

https://x.com/Girlpatriot1974/status/1968484543221969103/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1968484543221969103&currentTweetUser=Girlpatriot1974

Try again

[Nationalist]

10 hours ago, robosmith said:

So you're completely IGNORANT of The Lone Ranger, too. Figures that's how far your Canuck IGNORANCE extends.

So...no I didn't...so you post irrelevant chickenshit.

[Michael Hardner]

10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

So you think Trump and PP's sh*t don't stink?   I'm not interested in your p*ssing match.  Sorry, i'm on team "ethical" and team "non-idi0t".  There's a lot idiocy and corrupt nonsense and violence and whatever else to go around, and i'm going to call it out, it doesn't matter where it comes from.  BLM riots, Jan 6 riots, "stop the steal", the mountains of BS that Trudeau pulled.  I'm not hooking my wagon to any trash political party.  I have my political leanings but i'm not supporting any of the crappy politicians or terrible parties in either country.  Trash people defend trash behaviour, that's the long and short of it.

When a politician does something undemocratic, that's your enemy.  Don't excuse this oaf for censoring talk show hosts who criticize him and behaving like a 3rd world dictator.  If Trump can't take criticism he's in the wrong job.

Well said.

[WestCanMan]

14 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

So you think Trump and PP's sh*t don't stink?   I'm not interested in your p*ssing match.  Sorry, i'm on team "ethical" and team "non-idi0t".  There's a lot idiocy and corrupt nonsense and violence and whatever else to go around, and i'm going to call it out, it doesn't matter where it comes from. 

More childish BS, MG? 

Buddy, YOU GUYS SUPPORTED VIOLENT RIOTING FOR 6 MONTHS IN 2014, ALL OF 2015, ALL OF 2016, THE FIRST MONTHS OF 2017, SUPPORTED CALLS FOR ASSASSINATION, AND THEN SUPPORTED RIOTS FOR 3 MONTHS IN 2020.

NO CONSERVATIVES SUPPORTED RIOTING N JAN 6TH, WEASEL. NONE. TRUMP SENT 3 TWEETS IN 3 HRS TO END IT.

HOW CAN YOU EQUATE

• "FULLY SUPPORTED BLM VIOLENCE AND DESTRUCTION FOR 3+ YEARS", TO
• "NEVER SUPPORTED EVEN ONE MINUTE OF RIOTING AT THE CAPITOL"?

HOW IS THAT "BOTH SIDES ARE DOING IT"?

You're the one making that claim, MG. Defend it. You tell me where all the support for rioting at the capital came from. Who condoned it? Who said it was no big deal while it was happening. WHERE IS THE EQUIVALENCY MG? WHERE IS IT???????

You tell me how much rioting the Dems and their MSM supported, condoned, excused, etc.

Then do the GOP/Fox.

Tell me how they're equal, MG. Because I'm calling you a liar, 100%.  

That's not to mention how much they incited, inflamed, or the time that they even withheld video of Floyd's arrest to keep the rioting going. After that video got leaked, G Floyd riots ended almost instantly. There was never another G Floyd riot after that. 

[WestCanMan]

Leftists: for your edification...

• Bothsidesism: Bothsidesism, also known as false balance, is a media bias where journalists present opposing viewpoints as equally valid, even when the evidence strongly supports one side. This can mislead the public by creating a false perception of controversy on issues that are largely settled 

•  

  False Equivalency: A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed, faulty, or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called "comparing apples and oranges."

FYI, just because there was a single conservative riot doesn't mean that conservatives are as bad as leftists, who had thousands of riots in the past ten years. Especially when the conservative riot was totally unsupported by 99% of conservatives while the leftist rioters had universal, blind support from their cult.

 

[Moonlight Graham]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

More childish BS, MG? 

Buddy, YOU GUYS SUPPORTED VIOLENT RIOTING FOR 6 MONTHS IN 2014, ALL OF 2015, ALL OF 2016, THE FIRST MONTHS OF 2017, SUPPORTED CALLS FOR ASSASSINATION, AND THEN SUPPORTED RIOTS FOR 3 MONTHS IN 2020.

NO CONSERVATIVES SUPPORTED RIOTING N JAN 6TH, WEASEL. NONE. TRUMP SENT 3 TWEETS IN 3 HRS TO END IT.

HOW CAN YOU EQUATE

• "FULLY SUPPORTED BLM VIOLENCE AND DESTRUCTION FOR 3+ YEARS", TO
• "NEVER SUPPORTED EVEN ONE MINUTE OF RIOTING AT THE CAPITOL"?

HOW IS THAT "BOTH SIDES ARE DOING IT"?

You're the one making that claim, MG. Defend it. You tell me where all the support for rioting at the capital came from. Who condoned it? Who said it was no big deal while it was happening. WHERE IS THE EQUIVALENCY MG? WHERE IS IT???????

You tell me how much rioting the Dems and their MSM supported, condoned, excused, etc.

Then do the GOP/Fox.

Tell me how they're equal, MG. Because I'm calling you a liar, 100%.  

That's not to mention how much they incited, inflamed, or the time that they even withheld video of Floyd's arrest to keep the rioting going. After that video got leaked, G Floyd riots ended almost instantly. There was never another G Floyd riot after that. 

This is all cringe and not worthy of a response.  

[gatomontes99]

Quote

Disney’s top executives reportedly decided to shelve Jimmy Kimmel after he planned to double down on his divisive claims about the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.

Kimmel sparked anger from many conservatives after he falsely said during his Monday monologue on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” that the assassin, Tyler Robinson, was on the political right and mocked President Donald Trump’s response to Kirk’s death. Disney CEO Bob Iger and Disney Entertainment co-chairwoman Dana Walden made the executive decision to indefinitely suspend Kimmel’s program after worrying his planned monologue for Wednesday night would worsen the situation.

Kimmel reportedly planned to say on-air that his words were purposefully being misinterpreted by conservatives, according to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ). He also planned to specifically address Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chair Brendan Carr’s warning during his appearance on “The Benny Johnson Show,” where he said that he could pull the licenses of ABC-affiliated networks over inappropriate and insensitive remarks about Kirk’s assassination.

Walden reportedly spoke to Kimmel about his plan on Wednesday, according to The WSJ. After her conversation with Kimmel, she and other senior executives discussed the potential backlash they could face and the safety risk of the staff on Kimmel’s show, who had reportedly been receiving threatening emails. These reasons reportedly led Walden and Iger to remove Kimmel’s show from the airwaves.

MSN/Daily Caller quoting the WSJ

ABC/Disney seem to be saying that the FCC comments did not sway their decision making. 

Edited September 19, 2025 by gatomontes99

[WestCanMan]

41 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

This is all cringe and not worthy of a response.  

That's because the post it was responding to wasn't worthy of a response, MG. All you did was say "Both sides are equal, nyeh!", and "Do you think Poilievre's shit doesn't stink?"

Grow up, and debate like an adult if you don't want to be talked down to, or bullied, or whatever it is you feel. 

Tell us what makes you think that the GOP also supports violent riots, MG. 

Give us some examples of right-wing celebrities talking about how cool it would be to kill Biden, Harris, Obama, or Clinton, and then some examples of other conservatives passing it off as comedy. 

You just wanna say "I, Moonlight Graham, do hereby declare both sides to be equally guilty of inciting/supporting riots & extreme violence against political opponents. And so it shall be written!" but I'm sorry, only leftists consider such talk to be evidence of something. 

Show us some examples, because as it stands, you've just made a declarative sentence which is completely absurd on its face. And when look at how much evidence was provided here that runs contradictory to your statement, it's reasonable to consider your statement to be a lie until it is at least somewhat supported.

And FYI, a statement like "Do you think that PP's shit doesn't stink?" doesn't qualify as "evidence" 🤣

[User]

On 9/18/2025 at 3:24 PM, Michael Hardner said:

I have many posters here on mute, have any self-described conservatives spoken against this?

I speak against you and others putting people on ignore all the time. Yes. 

 

2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

This is all cringe and not worthy of a response.  

So why are you responding?

[User]

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

ABC/Disney seem to be saying that the FCC comments did not sway their decision making. 

Of course. The FCC guy saying what he did muddied the waters, but the folks on here can't get past their TDS to even consider the possibility that Kimmel was already a shitting late-night host on his way out and that maybe, just maybe, there was an organic outrage over his comments from people that was already in the works before the FCC guy said anything.