CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 20 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: AI Overview Useless. Everything Groot said was correct. And they have come right out and said so Here you go seeing as you like ai Nobody will build a pipeline to nowhere - Google Search Carney knows this, the industry has told him flat out publicly and privately that unless he changes the regulation they don't believe that he will make good if they spend the millions of dollars it takes to create a proposal 21 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Yeah...OK ??? LOL Well at least you admit that you're wrong but that was pretty obvious. You must feel pretty ashamed that you had to have it pointed out to you twice Carney has been claiming that he was trying to get a pipeline built and sucking up to the oil Industries and really trying to make an effort but in reality he has done the exact opposite. If he had worked with first nations, remove the tanker band and the anti-pipeline bills as he could have in the first few weeks we probably have a pipeline proposal accepted by now Instead he left the antique pipeline bills in place, pissed off the first nations in DC, and has done everything he can to avoid a pipeline well at the same time talking about how he's going to build baby build Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 10 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Useless. Everything Groot said was correct. And they have come right out and said so Here you go seeing as you like ai Nobody will build a pipeline to nowhere - Google Search Carney knows this, the industry has told him flat out publicly and privately that unless he changes the regulation they don't believe that he will make good if they spend the millions of dollars it takes to create a proposal Well at least you admit that you're wrong but that was pretty obvious. You must feel pretty ashamed that you had to have it pointed out to you twice Carney has been claiming that he was trying to get a pipeline built and sucking up to the oil Industries and really trying to make an effort but in reality he has done the exact opposite. If he had worked with first nations, remove the tanker band and the anti-pipeline bills as he could have in the first few weeks we probably have a pipeline proposal accepted by now Instead he left the antique pipeline bills in place, pissed off the first nations in DC, and has done everything he can to avoid a pipeline well at the same time talking about how he's going to build baby build Yup...as expected .... 🤦♂️ Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
CdnFox Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: Yup...as expected .... 🤦♂️ You expected truth and honesty and facts that made you look stupid yet again, confirming that you're an underage and illiterate child with no actual world experience? Well frankly so did I so I can't blame you 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
ExFlyer Posted February 28 Report Posted February 28 48 minutes ago, CdnFox said: You expected truth and honesty and facts that made you look stupid yet again, confirming that you're an underage and illiterate child with no actual world experience? Well frankly so did I so I can't blame you Back to being a degenerate pedophile LOSER I see. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
eyeball Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 (edited) 5 hours ago, ExFlyer said: If there was interest... A big if...most credible estimates say demand for oil will peak between now and 2035 and start dropping after that. Everyone's jumping up and down about getting on a bandwagon who's best before date is decades behind us. Canada's blown it...we should have hired Norway to show us how to nationalize, if not run, our oil industry for us 50 years ago. We're clearly to stupid. That said I note Norway is also unable to do anything about their DST either so... Edited March 1 by eyeball 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Back to being a degenerate pedophile LOSER I see. No, back to pointing out you're wrong, uneducated and childish. YOU'RE the one with the pedophile fixation Is this because your mom is always trying to get you to 'hang out' with men for money? (maybe you should be ex-fancy?) 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CDN1 Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 (edited) This is disgusting. CBC & Liberals can eat shit. Edited March 1 by CDN1 1 Quote
ExFlyer Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 10 hours ago, eyeball said: A big if...most credible estimates say demand for oil will peak between now and 2035 and start dropping after that. Everyone's jumping up and down about getting on a bandwagon who's best before date is decades behind us. Canada's blown it...we should have hired Norway to show us how to nationalize, if not run, our oil industry for us 50 years ago. We're clearly to stupid. That said I note Norway is also unable to do anything about their DST either so... We did have a nationalized oil, it was called Petro-Canada. Petro-Canada was founded in 1975 by the federal government under Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau as a Crown corporation to nationalize a portion of the oil industry It was established to increase Canadian control over energy resources, which were dominated by foreign firms during the 1970s oil crisis. It operated as a state-owned entity until privatization began in 1991. The company was heavily criticized by the Progressive Conservatives and many Albertans as unwarranted federal interference. The government of Brian Mulroney began privatizing it in 1991, with the final federal stake sold in 2004, leading to its merger with Suncor Energy in 2009. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ExFlyer Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 (edited) 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: No, back to pointing out you're wrong, uneducated and childish. YOU'RE the one with the pedophile fixation Is this because your mom is always trying to get you to 'hang out' with men for money? (maybe you should be ex-fancy?) WOW!!! You have sunk to a newest low!! You have been calling me a child, a teenager, a kid, a 15 year old for well over a year now....and you continue to do so. That makes you a child porn fanatic. Hence I call you a pedophile. You accuse my dead mother to "get you to 'hang out' with men for money?" claiming my mother sells me to other men for money??? That a new low, even for you. That makes you a complete degenerate. You are far away a truly perverted sexual deviate and the folks on here that jump on your wagon, defend you and that abide to your perversion are equally degenerate. Edited March 1 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
ironstone Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 8 hours ago, CDN1 said: This is disgusting. CBC & Liberals can eat shit. That is pathetic. Canada already takes in more people from India than any other country by a wide margin. If this trend continues, Canada will become India 2.0. And all signs point to this trend continuing with this Liberal government. 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
I am Groot Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 18 hours ago, ExFlyer said: AI Overview Which is based on mainstream media reports and contains no actual thinking. Yes, he signed an MOU. And no, he has changed NONE of the regulations or laws. Which is why Enbridge just recently said they're not doing anything unless those get changed. On 2/28/2026 at 7:59 AM, ExFlyer said: Yeah....that has been debated and dropped for 50 years...by every government in power. It wasn't urgent before. Now it is. He has the constitutional authority to do it. On 2/28/2026 at 7:59 AM, ExFlyer said: NB will not allow fracking either. NB can suck a bag of dicks. Provinces that refuse to exploit their own oil and gas reserves should get nothing in transfers from the provinces that do. That includes Quebec. 1 Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
ExFlyer Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 (edited) 8 minutes ago, I am Groot said: Which is based on mainstream media reports and contains no actual thinking. Yes, he signed an MOU. And no, he has changed NONE of the regulations or laws. Which is why Enbridge just recently said they're not doing anything unless those get changed. Which is based on all data available. I use AI to garner all information from all sources. If you are saying AI is selective to sources...please prove your allegations. If it is incorrect, please provide the corrections. Clearly you have a special data source and it would be nice if you shared it or at least let AI in on it To change laws...you need house approval and since conservatives are stalling any progress on any bills...there is sits According to AI: "As of March 2026, the Canadian Conservative Party is actively using legislative tools to challenge or delay several government bills," "In late 2025, the party fulfilled a promise to stall legislation by forcing marathon, all-night voting sessions in the House of Commons. Despite general obstruction, the Conservatives have expressed a willingness to work with the government to fast-track bills that address foreign tariffs and protect Canadian sovereignty" Edited March 1 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Solipsistik Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 56 minutes ago, I am Groot said: Yes, he signed an MOU. And no, he has changed NONE of the regulations or laws. Which is why Enbridge just recently said they're not doing anything unless those get changed. It seems like MOUs are Carney's version of "bullshit-baffles-brains." Quote
eyeball Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 4 hours ago, ExFlyer said: We did have a nationalized oil, it was called Petro-Canada. Yup, and people hated it as I recall. But after listening to conservatives, especially from Alberta, it seems they're practically begging Canada to bring it back. 1 Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
LinkSoul60 Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 9 hours ago, CDN1 said: This is disgusting. CBC & Liberals can eat shit. There is none left to find.... you've cornered the market on shit. 1 Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 1 Report Posted March 1 1 hour ago, I am Groot said: Yes, he signed an MOU. And no, he has changed NONE of the regulations or laws. Which is why Enbridge just recently said they're not doing anything unless those get changed. It's not up to the federal government to change any laws or regulations right now. Per the MOU the balls in Smith's court to do the due diligence and summarize by July 1. She needs indigenous partnership buy-in, BC's buy-in, route assessment, private financing, and carbon policy alignment with the pathways project. Good luck... Gather you're of the mindset to say f'ck em all and repeal route and tanker bans regardless of the people that are most impacted... They'll adapt. 1 Quote
Goddess Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 World travel tripled under the Liberals. Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 17 minutes ago, Goddess said: World travel tripled under the Liberals. It's a big world.... Are you suggesting they should have been more like Poilievre who just now thinks we should deepen our foreign relationships....could have saved a lot of money staying home. Ever wonder why Poilievre always seems to a year behind in what he's espousing? 1 Quote
Goddess Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 11 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: Are you suggesting they should have been more like Poilievre who just now thinks we should deepen our foreign relationships When did Poilievre say we should not deepen foreign relationships? 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 37 minutes ago, Goddess said: When did Poilievre say we should not deepen foreign relationships? My point was is that he's always a year behind. He should have been talking about that last year instead of complaining about Carney's trips. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: It's a big world.... With lots of big expensive hotels and lots of $1,000 a plate airline food apparently And they never got anything for all of this work and travel. Except they boosted their own name and promoted their own brand. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Legato Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said: It's a big world.... Are you suggesting they should have been more like Poilievre who just now thinks we should deepen our foreign relationships....could have saved a lot of money staying home. Ever wonder why Poilievre always seems to a year behind in what he's espousing? Still frightened of Poilievre I see. 1 1 Quote
Goddess Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 29 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said: My point was is that he's always a year behind. He should have been talking about that last year instead of complaining about Carney's trips. I heard him talk about it at the rallies.....?? You watch CBC for your main news source, don't you? 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
LinkSoul60 Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 16 minutes ago, Legato said: Still frightened of Poilievre I see. That's got kind of old, don't you think... 1 Quote
LinkSoul60 Posted March 2 Report Posted March 2 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Goddess said: I heard him talk about it at the rallies.....?? You watch CBC for your main news source, don't you? I'll look through multiple channels but for quick hits on what's happening in the world, yes CBC. Rebel News or similar....that off the main stream for you? Edited March 2 by LinkSoul60 1 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.