Why should we hate Nazis?

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, I am Groot said:

LOL. Turkey as a resident is not Turkey as a tourist. There's no freedom there anymore. There's no free press. And the first time you open your mouth to complain about anything the government is doing, you'll get to see the inside of a Turkish prison. Not to mention rising Islamism, the slaughter of the Kurds, and a corruption level that lets whole streets collapse during earthquakes because nobody bothers to meet building codes. 

You asked...I told you.

I have my reasons. 

[eyeball]

38 minutes ago, User said:

Nah, you know who you are and what you are doing, you like to play this game of strategic ambiguity because you know just outright admitting what you support is bad.

You figure it's good to have the family over for a BBQ and to watch and celebrate as shells explode in Gaza?

...strategic ambiguity...WTF is that?

LMAO!

[Venandi]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

...strategic ambiguity...WTF is that?

I think it's when, in support of your own political objectives and knowing it to be false, you accuse an entire family of gleefully attending a BBQ to watch HE shells explode in Gaza. 

How'd I do?

 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

You figure it's good to have the family over for a BBQ and to watch and celebrate as shells explode in Gaza?

...strategic ambiguity...WTF is that?

LMAO!

We all know exactly what he means of your entirely guilty

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Venandi said:

I think it's when, in support of your own political objectives and knowing it to be false, you accuse an entire family of gleefully attending a BBQ to watch HE shells explode in Gaza. 

How'd I do?

Terrible. The example I used to  define it actually happened, and it wasn't just one family but several.

I don't have a political objective, I'm disgusted at Users and his ilk for their's. Their attempts to be ambiguous are ridiculous if not utterly disconnected from reality.

[Army Guy]

53 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Terrible. The example I used to  define it actually happened, and it wasn't just one family but several.

I don't have a political objective, I'm disgusted at Users and his ilk for their's. Their attempts to be ambiguous are ridiculous if not utterly disconnected from reality.

This is just a snap shot on how war can change what you think is normal behavior into a new norm, watching airstrikes on bad guys, and cheering them on...

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Terrible. The example I used to  define it actually happened, and it wasn't just one family but several.

I don't have a political objective, I'm disgusted at Users and his ilk for their's. Their attempts to be ambiguous are ridiculous if not utterly disconnected from reality.

You constantly have a political objective and you have an absolute preference for the terrorists. You've made that exceptionally clear

[eyeball]

46 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

This is just a snap shot on how war can change what you think is normal behavior into a new norm, watching airstrikes on bad guys, and cheering them on...

All that differentiates the bad guys from the people launching airstrikes is that the latter are no longer considered terrorists. They've been normalized by people who caved to them decades ago and have been cheering them on ever since.

[eyeball]

36 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You constantly have a political objective and you have an absolute preference for the terrorists. You've made that exceptionally clear

No, like a lot of people I just have more concern for the underdogs and how unfairly they've been treated.

[CdnFox]

33 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No, like a lot of people I just have more concern for the underdogs and how unfairly they've been treated.

No you don't. It been quite clear as to why you feel the Palestinians were 100% justified in their October 7th attack and why you feel Israelis are bad people who deserve it.

You don't favor the underdog, you're an anti-semite and the racist Bigot who tries to hide and socially unacceptable feelings behind the pretense of rooting for the underdog.

That is not the same thing as rooting for the underdog

[User]

7 hours ago, eyeball said:

You figure it's good to have the family over for a BBQ and to watch and celebrate as shells explode in Gaza?

...strategic ambiguity...WTF is that?

LMAO!

Simple. You say just enough to support Hamas and the destruction of Israel... but then when called out pretend you don't really support those things and then immediately proceed to say more vague garbage that is in support of Hamas and the destruction of Israel. 

[eyeball]

21 minutes ago, User said:

You say just enough to support Hamas and the destruction of Israel..

Except when I say Palestinian you hear Hamas terrorist without any differentiation whatsoever.

Are you trying to be strategically ambiguous? Seriously?

LMAO!

[CdnFox]

Just now, eyeball said:

Except when I say Palestinian you hear Hamas terrorist without any differentiation whatsoever.

Are you trying to be strategically ambiguous? Seriously?

LMAO!

Except when you say Palestinian you mean its terrorist without any differentiation whatsoever. You've been quite clear you feel that they were exercising their human rights in the October 7th attack

[eyeball]

Just now, eyeball said:

and the destruction of Israel..

Israel is quite capably self destructing at the moment.

[eyeball]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Except when you say Palestinian you mean its terrorist without any differentiation whatsoever. You've been quite clear you feel that they were exercising their human rights in the October 7th attack

No when it comes to not differentiating between terrorists I point to the IDF and especially it's precursors that led the migration into Palestine with guns blazing.

[Army Guy]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No, like a lot of people I just have more concern for the underdogs and how unfairly they've been treated.

Those underdogs are terrorist or terrorist supporters....

[eyeball]

Just now, Army Guy said:

Those underdogs are terrorist or terrorist supporters....

The precursors to the IDF that you support were underdogs too.

What point are you trying to make here?

[Army Guy]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The precursors to the IDF that you support were underdogs too.

What point are you trying to make here?

Same as always you and others on here support terrorism in in the form of palestine and it's people........got nothing to do with under dogs....

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

...terrorism in in the form of palestine...

We simply support Palestinians in the pursuit of settling their legitimate grievances. You choose to regard anything that has to do with that as terrorism and of course anti-Semitism. You've boxed yourself in from every side by your own rhetoric and now you can't think straight.

[Army Guy]

Just now, eyeball said:

We simply support Palestinians in the pursuit of settling their legitimate grievances. You choose to regard anything that has to do with that as terrorism and of course anti-Semitism. You've boxed yourself in from every side by your own rhetoric and now you can't think straight.

OOOKKK, your right, anything coming out of palestine is a terrorist, or terrorist supporter....don't worry your ear marked as a terrorist supporter no boxing in or anything like that , simply a terrorist supporter....me i sleep wonderfully every night with my choices in life... 

[Moonlight Graham]

We're told to hate Nazis because they were totalitarian racial supremacist warmongers who tried to conquer the globe through military violence and genocide the races they viewed as genetically inferior.  Seems logical to dislike them.

Communists haven't behaved much better.  They're totalitarians who enslave every worker with high ability and steal the product of their labor and give it to those with low ability.  Naturally people with high ability want to leave communist countries to keep their labor, so communists have to ban people from leaving their country without permission (enslavement).  That's why they need to erect walls to keep people in.  They also ban any other political party who might compete with them, control the media and freedom of expression in order to brainwash people towards their BS, and disallow other human rights that may threaten their power.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No when it comes to not differentiating between terrorists I point to the IDF and especially it's precursors that led the migration into Palestine with guns blazing.

No you don't. You claim that all Jews and some Canadians are terrible evil horrible no good very bad people and that any of the terrorists that attacked them are justified

I know you enjoy playing these little semantic games thinking that somehow others will look at you and think you're not just a sap for the violent extremists in the middle east but realistically anyone over the age of 12 can see right through you.

 

[Moonlight Graham]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

No when it comes to not differentiating between terrorists I point to the IDF and especially it's precursors that led the migration into Palestine with guns blazing.

Can you be specific?

My understanding of the history is that members of the Jewish diaspora began legally buying land (under the Ottoman land code laws of 1858, not British laws) and moving to Palestine prior to 1948. Then the UN General Assembly voted to create a 2-state solution in 1947, which included Israel.  When Israel declared itself a state in 1948 the Arab Palestinians and neighbouring Arab countries attacked Israel/Jews.

In 1939 the population of Palestine was 1.5 million.  About 1 million were Arabs and 500,000 were Jews.

[Moonlight Graham]

57 minutes ago, eyeball said:

We simply support Palestinians in the pursuit of settling their legitimate grievances. You choose to regard anything that has to do with that as terrorism and of course anti-Semitism. You've boxed yourself in from every side by your own rhetoric and now you can't think straight.

The problem is even when Israel was following international law they were still attacked by Palestinians and other Arab countries.  People on the left have the false assumption that Hamas attacks Israel due to things like the illegal West Bank settlements and blocking movement and trade, the same thing leftists disagree with Israel about.   But that's not true, the goal of Hamas and most Palestinians and Arab Muslims is to destroy the state of Israel and re-conquer all of Israel/Palestine, and it has been such since the creation of Israel in 1948.

I support justice for Palestinians but also justice for Israelis.  Leftists only seem to focus largely on the injustices against Palestinians because Israel is a far more powerful entity.  The Arab world including Palestine is filled with many intolerant anti-semitic warmongers but western leftists paint them as victims.  There's a lot of hatred and violence to go around here.

You yourself believe Jews arrived in Palestine "guns blazing".  How?  Mandatory Palestine was controlled by the British from 1920-1948, as were the migration policies.  Jews legally bought land from Arab landowners under Ottoman-era land laws and were granted a state by vote of the UN General Assembly in 1948.

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Army Guy said:

don't worry your ear marked as a terrorist supporter

Like a tattoo you mean?

In any case as I said earlier you support terrorists well. Don't kid yourself.

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

No you don't. You claim that all Jews and some Canadians are terrible evil horrible no good very bad people and that any of the terrorists that attacked them are justified

No, you're saying this not me.