Conservatives Have Taken the Lead in Federal Polls

[myata]

Whaaat? In what stupidly brainless alt universe was it? Have they really went as dumb as their brethren down South blowing bubbles out of thin air then convincing themselves to believe in them? Oh stupid, stupid just so stupid oh well. 

And in this reality, early voting as at least a double of the last one. Little Pepe scrambled all over the wall with the tightly controlled message of lying and hate. No, we cannot allow that American bullsh*t here: everyone with a clear brain can see where it's heading.

[Barquentine]

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

How old are you? 

Old enough to know better. Smart enough to not care.

[Barquentine]

Please tell me it ain't so: 

Poilievre now invests in (VCE) Vanguard FTSE CDA IDX ETF, BTCC — Purpose Bitcoin ETF and VNRDF Vanguard FTSE CDA IDX ETF.

While Poilievre has repeatedly criticized Carney's involvement in Brookfield, one of the top assets in the (VCE) Vanguard FTSE Canada Index ETF is Brookfield Corporation.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Old enough to know better. Smart enough to not care.

Immature enough to talk like a little child, clueless enough to support a compulsive liar who prefers to live abroad than in Canada and locks people out of rallies in their own neighbourhoods.

I can't say what your actual age is, but we both know that you're not smart. 

[SpankyMcFarland]

I would have thought pollsters would want to be as accurate as possible in their results no matter what their own biases. Their businesses depend on presenting a realistic picture of what’s going on. We all know they have struggled in recent elections around the world to get it right and I’m sure they are cognizant of that. 

[Barquentine]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I can't say what your actual age is, but we both know that you're not smart. 

I'm smart enough to know I'm not smart. Can't say the same for you. You seem to like trading insults. You're just not very good at it.

[SpankyMcFarland]

Interesting perspective on the CBC panel today - Poilievre’s big, boisterous rally crowds are turning off the centrist voters he needs. 

[WestCanMan]

19 hours ago, Dave L said:

The only poll that counts is the one you vote in. 

Not true at all.

Polls are hugely influential, and the MSM relies heavily on polls as basically the only backup for their false narratives. 

Eg, of course Canadians cared about Trudeau's scandals. They were huge and reeked of arrogance and disdain for Canadian taxpayer money & Canadian values. But CBC et al would just downplay the intent and extent of the scandals and then post fake polling data to say "Look here! Canadians don't care" and then move on. 

CBC is lavishly rewarded for their slavish dedication to the LPOC, and polls are one of the main weapons in their arsenal. 

Quote

Poilievre is out of his league in this fight, he has never dealt with a crisis and has never held a job other than one of Politics. 

That's just a false generality. 

Our country is in crisis right now, in case you didn't notice, and has been for 9 years, and PP has been dealing with it like a pro that whole time. 

FYI a politician's main job is to present themselves as an unflappable, honest, professional and knowledgeable, and he has done that consistently for his whole political career. 

By contrast Carney gets caught in a major lie every week, his conflicts of interest are off the charts, he didn't live in Canada for the past ten years, he's always fumbling for answers and misspeaking, he's heavily intertwined with Chinese gov't agents and bankers, he lacks the fortitude to get rid of bad actors in the LPOC ranks, and he only has brief instances of seeming like he's good at what he's doing. So there's that.

Quote

Carney has had many real jobs. 

And he lies about what he acheived there.

Quote

He lead the Bank of England through Brexit. 

And the Bank of England didn't do well at all with Carney there. It was an exercise in fiscal mismanagement... Did you not know that? 

Record inflation... the worst in the G7 lol. Massive increase in the number of people living below the poverty line:

Quote

Poilievre says he will lower the deficit but in every promise he has made, the costs are more than the Liberal promises.   

Wrong. Maybe in a few "promises" that you look at, but you didn't even name any those phantom promises...

PP will cut the ridiculous immigration that costs us billions. We will stop giving away money to other countries like we hate it. We will stop bribing the CBC with billions of dollars...

There are more than 2 or 3 ways to save money when you run the country. 

 

Carney is NOT good at speaking in public. He lies constantly, and even the CBC can't cover for all of his lies. He has terrible judgment in who he allows to run as MPs. He has bungled all of his main jobs and just lied about his accomplishments. His conflicts of interest are of epic proportions. He has extremely close ties to the Chinese gov't. 

We've only been in a trade war with the US and China and he has has already moved a major company to the US and negotiated a $250M dollar loan from - basically - the Chinese gov't (they control the bank, in case you were wondering). 

No real Canadian trusts carney any further than they can throw China. 

 

Welcome to the forum... 😉

Edited April 11 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

41 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

I'm smart enough to know I'm not smart. 

I appreciate your brief spate honesty. 

[Legato]

32 minutes ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Interesting perspective on the CBC panel today - Poilievre’s big, boisterous rally crowds are turning off the centrist voters he needs. 

Not perspective but outright bias.

[SpankyMcFarland]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Not perspective but outright bias.

There’s no question that rallies attract more committed voters. Most Canadians aren’t going to wait five minutes to hear some politician talk. 

Edited April 11 by SpankyMcFarland

[WestCanMan]

55 minutes ago, Legato said:

Not perspective but outright bias.

The CBC's critiques of Poilievre just reek of desperation:

• One of the 37,000 people who donated to PP's election fund didn't like Khalistani terrorists!
• PP's rallies are too big! "People" don't like that!

This is just embarrassing now. leftist Canadians are determined to finish destroying this country.

[Legato]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The CBC's critiques of Poilievre just reek of desperation:

• One of the 37,000 people who donated to PP's election fund didn't like Khalistani terrorists!
• PP's rallies are too big! "People" don't like that!

This is just embarrassing now. leftist Canadians are determined to finish destroying this country.

 

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

 

But the CBC's polls favour Carney, and that's all that matters to leftists here...

[CdnFox]

13 hours ago, eyeball said:

And lots fewer than everyone else.

It takes half the effort to Tell the truth as it does to lie. Course Connie needs to give more answers

Half as many as Carney and 2/3 fewer than Blanchette or Singh.

Quote

What fear, what crap? 

Your inherent fear of telling the truth, and the crap you constantly lie about.

 

 

Quote

You often hear people will move away from Carney once they get to know him. Is Poilievre afraid that Canadians might get to know him better?

Pierre has been letting Canadians get to know him for well over a year and change. Even after Justin left he was doing interviews and talking to the media while the only media that carney talked to was the American and British. Kearney wouldn't even sit down with the media during his so-called leadership race.

Everybody knows Poilievre. It's carney that's the unknown

[Army Guy]

1 hour ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

There’s no question that rallies attracted more committed voters. Most Canadians aren’t going to wait five minutes to hear some politician talk. 

CBC also did a story on the reported sizes of both liberal and Conservative rallies, and found both sides are inflating their numbers a lot...

 

[CdnFox]

18 hours ago, Dave L said:

With that attitude I doubt you have any friends. 

Lots, but they all like common sense and reason and have a healthy disdain for stupidity so you wouldn't like them

Quote

The only reason the Cons won the popular vote is because the right leaning west doesn't know how to vote for anyone other than a Con Man.

  LOLOL says the guy who supports the man behind Aga khan, snc, WE, and half a dozen other major corruption scandals and is currently pushing an niternational banker who used tax cheats to avoid income tax and who is beholden to bejing  

Yeah, i don't think you've got much ground to stand on there kiddo  

[eyeball]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Your inherent fear of telling the truth, and the crap you constantly lie about.

What truth, what lie?

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, eyeball said:

What truth, what lie?

Exactly. It's all the same to you. 

[Moonbox]

21 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Lots, but they all like common sense and reason and have a healthy disdain for stupidity so you wouldn't like them

Two problems:

1) If you had any friends, or anyone in your life at all, you wouldn't be battlemoding 24/7 on an internet forum.  

2) A healthy disdain for stupidity rules you out for any of these imaginary friends of yours anyway.  

🤣👍

[Michael Hardner]

3 hours ago, SpankyMcFarland said:

Interesting perspective on the CBC panel today - Poilievre’s big, boisterous rally crowds are turning off the centrist voters he needs. 

I'm sure those rallies turn off CBC panelists.  Beyond that, I don't know how they can assert that with any confidence.

[Barquentine]

12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I'm sure those rallies turn off CBC panelists.  Beyond that, I don't know how they can assert that with any confidence.

It's not the crowd size or the rallies themselves. It's the bragging about crowd size that's very Trumpy. And what does it matter if you get 12000 people in Edmonton who were already going to vote Conservative? It signifies nothing of import.

[Michael Hardner]

3 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

It's not the crowd size or the rallies themselves. It's the bragging about crowd size that's very Trumpy. And what does it matter if you get 12000 people in Edmonton who were already going to vote Conservative? It signifies nothing of import.

Well I never understood the strategy, but I'm not really the target either.

Regardless of how it appears to a CBC panelist, or to me (a conservative btw) I don't see how anyone can assert that it has the opposite effect unless they do some kind of survey.  Even then, it would be difficult.  

"In a survey of potential voters who are undecided, x% indicated that the large rallies will make them definitely not vote CPC"

That seems like a survey that would just produce a percentage of percentage of undecided about being undecided.

 

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Exactly. It's all the same to you. 

Except you're the ones treating everything as a lie.

 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

What truth, what lie?

I love it when you play stupid    well.... maybe "play" isn't the right word...