Hodad Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 Guardian Senior members of Donald Trump’s cabinet have been involved in a serious security breach while discussing secret military plans for recent US attacks on the Houthi armed group in Yemen. In an extraordinary blunder, key figures in the Trump administration – including the vice-president, JD Vance, the defence secretary Pete Hegseth, the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard – used the commercial chat app Signal to convene and discuss plans – while also including a prominent journalist in the group. Signal is not approved by the US government for sharing sensitive information. Buttery males!!🤣 2 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 Yep. That's a major fùck up. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Popular Post Nationalist Posted March 25 Popular Post Report Posted March 25 Hegseth says none of this happened. 1 5 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Aristides Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 Any wonder the Five Eyes partners are wary of what they now share with the US. Quote
Hodad Posted March 25 Author Report Posted March 25 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Aristides said: Any wonder the Five Eyes partners are wary of what they now share with the US. After Hegseth promised them 100% security. This is honestly so dumb--on so many levels--our intelligence allies will understand exactly why their concerns were justified. Actually, their concerns were understated. Now they know. 35 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Hegseth says none of this happened. Well, maybe if Trump had hired someone trustworthy and qualified (instead of an abusive, drunk TV pundit) Hegseth would be right, and none of it would have happened. Oh, the road not taken... Edited March 25 by Hodad 1 Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 23 minutes ago, Hodad said: Well, maybe if Trump had hired someone trustworthy and qualified (instead of an abusive, drunk TV pundit) Hegseth would be right, and none of it would have happened. Oh, the road not taken... See... you couldn't just stick to the fact, nope, you had to inject your own lies. Quote
robosmith Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 53 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Hegseth says none of this happened. You're FOOL to believe Hegseth. Easy for him to deny it when if he didn't set it up, he would not know it happened. Until he checked the distribution list, IF he knows how to do that. LMAO Supposedly Mike Waltz set it up. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 Well that's pretty bad. I wonder how that even happens, like somebody must have realized that the reporter was there. Quote
robosmith Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, CdnFox said: Well that's pretty bad. I wonder how that even happens, like somebody must have realized that the reporter was there. It happened because Trump nominated INCOMPETENTS to his cabinet. Everyone else knew that, and you think you're so smart but can't figure that out.... LMAO 3 Quote
CdnFox Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 47 minutes ago, robosmith said: It happened because Trump nominated INCOMPETENTS to his cabinet. Everyone else knew that, and you think you're so smart but can't figure that out.... LMAO I'm smart enough to know that it's unlikely that the cabinet itself chose the platform or vetted the invitation list. Which makes me wonder how whoever did could possibly miss what was happening Quote
robosmith Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 43 minutes ago, CdnFox said: I'm smart enough to know that it's unlikely that the cabinet itself chose the platform or vetted the invitation list. Which makes me wonder how whoever did could possibly miss what was happening Obviously NO ONE vetted the invitation list. Probably Waltz just picked a previous one without looking at it. Quote
CdnFox Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Obviously NO ONE vetted the invitation list. Probably Waltz just picked a previous one without looking at it. Seems pretty unlikely. the staff isn't new, they're there to prevent this kind of thing. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea? 1 2 1 Quote
Legato Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 28 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea? Wow, who did that? Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 32 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea? Who could have foreseen the same people lying about Hegseth before now would still use this as an opportunity to keep lying about him? 1 Quote
robosmith Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, Legato said: Wow, who did that? Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮 1 1 Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 1 hour ago, User said: Who could have foreseen the same people lying about Hegseth before now would still use this as an opportunity to keep lying about him? You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward. 1 1 Quote
robosmith Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 22 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward. He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. 1 Quote
eyeball Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 1 minute ago, robosmith said: He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. I thought being a drinkin' fùckin' fightin' machine was a de rigueur qualification for military service. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
BeaverFever Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 (edited) 15 hours ago, Nationalist said: Hegseth says none of this happened. But of course it did happen amd the White House confirmed it and Hegseth knew it happened too because he was in the chat. But he did the usual MAGA scumbag response which not only is “LIE AND DENY”but to also go on the attack claiming fake news conspiracy, denouncing and smearing the reputation of the truth-teller. Edited March 25 by BeaverFever 3 1 Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 (edited) 48 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward. You have to ignore all the people he worked with on record saying he was not a drunk and listen to anonymous sources that were directly contradicted by the facts and evidence on the record. Why? Because you are a liar here. Edited March 25 by User 1 Quote
BeaverFever Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 (edited) 23 hours ago, CdnFox said: Well that's pretty bad. I wonder how that even happens, like somebody must have realized that the reporter was there. But it’s bigger than that because they should not be discussing and sharing these documents on a commercial app in the first place. There are very strict rules about this stuff. Unfortunately Trump has appointed people who are so grossly unqualified for the job not only do they not know or care about the rules they have open contempt for the very idea of rules… at least for rules applying to them. This attitude is part of MAGA culture. Edited March 26 by BeaverFever 1 Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 25 minutes ago, robosmith said: He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. OK, give us the names of all these people who saw and knew about his drunkenness. 1 Quote
Legato Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 51 minutes ago, robosmith said: Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮 Who did that? 1 Quote
User Posted March 25 Report Posted March 25 52 minutes ago, robosmith said: Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮 Name the "co-host" that said this. You can't. No one did. You have anonymous sources that were not a host, but just some random person affiliated with the show that has been refuted by the actual co-hosts who are on record. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.