Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guardian

Senior members of Donald Trump’s cabinet have been involved in a serious security breach while discussing secret military plans for recent US attacks on the Houthi armed group in Yemen.

In an extraordinary blunder, key figures in the Trump administration – including the vice-president, JD Vance, the defence secretary Pete Hegseth, the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard – used the commercial chat app Signal to convene and discuss plans – while also including a prominent journalist in the group.

Signal is not approved by the US government for sharing sensitive information.

 

Buttery males!!🤣

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yep. That's a major fùck up.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Any wonder the Five Eyes partners are wary of what they now share with the US.

After Hegseth promised them 100% security. This is honestly so dumb--on so many levels--our intelligence allies will understand exactly why their concerns were justified. Actually, their concerns were understated. Now they know.

35 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Hegseth says none of this happened. 

Well, maybe if Trump had hired someone trustworthy and qualified (instead of an abusive, drunk TV pundit) Hegseth would be right, and none of it would have happened. Oh, the road not taken...

Edited by Hodad
  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Well, maybe if Trump had hired someone trustworthy and qualified (instead of an abusive, drunk TV pundit) Hegseth would be right, and none of it would have happened. Oh, the road not taken...

See... you couldn't just stick to the fact, nope, you had to inject your own lies. 

 

 

 

Posted
53 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Hegseth says none of this happened. 

You're FOOL to believe Hegseth. Easy for him to deny it when if he didn't set it up, he would not know it happened.

Until he checked the distribution list, IF he knows how  to do that. LMAO

Supposedly Mike Waltz set it up.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's pretty bad. I wonder how that even happens, like somebody must have realized that the reporter was there.

It happened because Trump nominated INCOMPETENTS to his cabinet.

Everyone else knew that, and you think you're so smart but can't figure that out.... LMAO

  • Thanks 3
Posted
47 minutes ago, robosmith said:

It happened because Trump nominated INCOMPETENTS to his cabinet.

Everyone else knew that, and you think you're so smart but can't figure that out.... LMAO

I'm smart enough to know that it's unlikely that the cabinet itself chose the platform or vetted the invitation list.

Which makes me wonder how whoever did could possibly miss what was happening

Posted
43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I'm smart enough to know that it's unlikely that the cabinet itself chose the platform or vetted the invitation list.

Which makes me wonder how whoever did could possibly miss what was happening

Obviously NO ONE vetted the invitation list. Probably Waltz just picked a previous one without looking at it.

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Obviously NO ONE vetted the invitation list. Probably Waltz just picked a previous one without looking at it.

Seems pretty unlikely. the staff isn't new, they're there to prevent this kind of thing. 

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea?

Wow, who did that?

Posted
32 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea?

Who could have foreseen the same people lying about Hegseth before now would still use this as an opportunity to keep lying about him?

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Legato said:

Wow, who did that?

Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

Who could have foreseen the same people lying about Hegseth before now would still use this as an opportunity to keep lying about him?

You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward.

He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. 

  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. 

I thought being a drinkin' fùckin' fightin' machine was a de rigueur qualification for military service.

  • Haha 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Hegseth says none of this happened. 

But of course it did happen amd the White House confirmed it and Hegseth knew it happened too because he was in the chat.
 

But he did the usual MAGA scumbag response which not only is “LIE AND DENY”but to also go on the attack claiming fake news conspiracy, denouncing and smearing the reputation of the truth-teller. 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

You have to pretend he never worked for FoxNews or was a drunk? That must be awkward.

You have to ignore all the people he worked with on record saying he was not a drunk and listen to anonymous sources that were directly contradicted by the facts and evidence on the record. 

Why?

Because you are a liar here. 

 

Edited by User
  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's pretty bad. I wonder how that even happens, like somebody must have realized that the reporter was there.

But it’s bigger than that because they should not be discussing and sharing these documents on a commercial app in the first place. There are very strict rules about this stuff. Unfortunately Trump has appointed people who are so grossly unqualified for the job not only do they not know or care about the rules they have open contempt for the very idea of rules… at least for rules applying to them.  This attitude is part of MAGA culture. 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Thanks 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

He's probably referring to the wives and mistresses Hegseth abused, because way too many people SAW, and KNEW about his drunkenness. 

OK, give us the names of all these people who saw and knew about his drunkenness. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮

Who did that?

  • Like 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Did FOS LIES not tell you about Hegseth's drinking problem? Maybe it was too embarrassing that his FOS LIES CO HOSTS often smelled liquor on his breath when he showed up for the weekend morning show. 🤮

Name the "co-host" that said this. 

You can't. No one did. You have anonymous sources that were not a host, but just some random person affiliated with the show that has been refuted by the actual co-hosts who are on record. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,891
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    armchairscholar
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...