Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There is NO SS bureaucracy. The overhead on SS spending is <<2%, lDIOT.

THat's still 2.8 billion dollars.  I don't know that i'd say that's nothing. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's people like you that are the reason that Americans went for this. All you bring to the table is lies why would anyone listen to you?

You are the biggest liar on the forum. 95% of your posts are based off of lies.

Go back to Moscow, and collect your cheque, for the disinformation, RussianFox.

Posted
3 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

You are the biggest liar on the forum.

anytime you are wrong and I am right you call it a lie because you can't emotionally cope with the truth.

But that's not actually what lying is.

Lying would be like claiming that under harper medical transfers immediately dropped and then posting a graph that shows they immediately shot up :) 

I know, I know. You've done something mind meltingly stupid again and you are so embarrassed and buffered that now you want to chase me around the forum calling names in the hopes that it makes you feel better than learning to actually make an intelligent argument. How's that working out for you?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Why do you lie when it is so easily debunked?

Axios is reporting no cuts. Axios is as lwnj as it gets.

YOU'RE LYING. They are planning cuts as stated in YOUR CITE. They are not planning "sweeping cuts" YET.

Quote

Vivek Ramaswamy told Axios' Mike Allen at the Aspen Security Forum that it would be premature for his new efficiency commission — which he's co-leading with Elon Musk — to discuss sweeping cuts to Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.

Why it matters: Those programs are by far the biggest lines in the federal budget, making them ripe targets for a commission with a mandate to slash spending. But cutting entitlements is also the third rail of American politics.

Ramaswamy said Wednesday that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) will look for waste and fraud in those programs, including people receiving payments who shouldn't be.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

YOU'RE LYING. They are planning cuts as stated in YOUR CITE. They are not planning "sweeping cuts" YET.

 

Waste and fraud isn't a cut in spending. Stopping waste and fraud makes the money available for proper use...like paying claims. Which the programs are having trouble doing.

Why are you against stopping waste and fraud? Lmao...Are you such a simp for big government that you actually defend waste and fraud? .

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
34 minutes ago, robosmith said:

There is NO SS bureaucracy. The overhead on SS spending is <<2%, lDIOT.

No social security bureaucracy...

Bah ha ha ha ha...

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Why do you lie when it is so easily debunked?

Axios is reporting no cuts. Axios is as lwnj as it gets.

Right no cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid planned except for the planned cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid:

"Right now, there are hundreds of billions of dollars flowing out the door of all of those programs ending up in the hands of people who, even under the statute, should not be receiving those payments," Ramaswamy contended.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Waste and fraud isn't a cut in spending. Stopping waste and fraud makes the money available for proper use...like paying claims. Which the programs are having trouble doing.

Why are you against stopping waste and fraud? Lmao...Are you such a simp for big government that you actually defend waste and fraud? .

For being a smart guy, Elon Musk is pretty dumb about people. Chalk it up to neurodiversity if you like, but his gross mismanagement of Twitter/X is ample evidence of his unfitness to run the human side of of an enterprise. Right after the acquisition, before he understood the company at all, he  started cutting "unnecessary" roles and functions to disastrous results. Now we're going to replay that horror show on a national scale. 

Nobody likes waste and fraud. We just acknowledge that Musk is demonstrably unfit to make such judgments. 

  • Like 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

The-Mirror-Effect.jpg

Well it's not like anyone thought you'd come back with an intelligent response :)  Cry harder kiddo

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

For being a smart guy, Elon Musk is pretty dumb about people. Chalk it up to neurodiversity if you like, but his gross mismanagement of Twitter/X is ample evidence of his unfitness to run the human side of of an enterprise. Right after the acquisition, before he understood the company at all, he  started cutting "unnecessary" roles and functions to disastrous results. Now we're going to replay that horror show on a national scale. 

Nobody likes waste and fraud. We just acknowledge that Musk is demonstrably unfit to make such judgments. 

Lol

Posted
56 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Right after the acquisition, before he understood the company at all, he  started cutting "unnecessary" roles and functions to disastrous results. Now we're going to replay that horror show on a national scale. 

Narrator: There was no disaster. 

 

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Right no cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid planned except for the planned cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid:

OK. If you want to play stupid games that preventing waste, fraud, and abuse is a "cut" then yeah, its a cut. 

So... what is your point? You like waste, fraud, and abuse now?

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Right no cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid planned except for the planned cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid:

"Right now, there are hundreds of billions of dollars flowing out the door of all of those programs ending up in the hands of people who, even under the statute, should not be receiving those payments," Ramaswamy contended.

 

I debunked this before you even posted:

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Waste and fraud isn't a cut in spending. Stopping waste and fraud makes the money available for proper use...like paying claims. Which the programs are having trouble doing.

Why are you against stopping waste and fraud? Lmao...Are you such a simp for big government that you actually defend waste and fraud? .

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

SS/Medicare are NOT "entitlement programs," they are paid FOR by workers and paid out TO workers over 65 based on their employment HISTORY. Duh

More people collecting, but apparently not enough people paying into the fund to meet projected demand.

Looking solely at the trust fund that covers retirement and survivor benefits, Social Security will only be able to afford scheduled payments in full until 2033, roughly the same projection as last year. At that time, the fund’s reserves will be depleted, and continuing income will only cover 79% of benefits owed.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

For being a smart guy, Elon Musk is pretty dumb about people. Chalk it up to neurodiversity if you like, but his gross mismanagement of Twitter/X is ample evidence of his unfitness to run the human side of of an enterprise. Right after the acquisition, before he understood the company at all, he  started cutting "unnecessary" roles and functions to disastrous results. Now we're going to replay that horror show on a national scale. 

Nobody likes waste and fraud. We just acknowledge that Musk is demonstrably unfit to make such judgments. 

Twitter is still running. It now has thousands of fact checkers that add community notes and do it for free. It has tackled a lot of the bots (you can't get them all). It has gotten rod.of tje government interference and exposed it for what it was. You don't like that he allows conservative, liberal and moderate voices to ne heard and they all have to be truthful or suffer a community note. X has become a tremendous free speech outlet. Embrace it. It's good for everyone.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
15 minutes ago, ironstone said:

More people collecting, but apparently not enough people paying into the fund to meet projected demand.

Looking solely at the trust fund that covers retirement and survivor benefits, Social Security will only be able to afford scheduled payments in full until 2033, roughly the same projection as last year. At that time, the fund’s reserves will be depleted, and continuing income will only cover 79% of benefits owed.

Yes, however it's complicated.  They could adjust it to project to 100%.  It won't be "bankrupt"

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I debunked this before you even posted:

Quote

Waste and fraud isn't a cut in spending. Stopping waste and fraud makes the money available for proper use...like paying claims. Which the programs are having trouble doing.

Why are you against stopping waste and fraud? Lmao...Are you such a simp for big government that you actually defend waste and fraud? .

Yeah that's a semantic trick: just call any spending you don't like "waste" and voila.

It's also very funny that you clowns want to go after "fraud" in social security but also want to gut the IRS to prevent it from going after tax cheats. 

27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Twitter is still running. It now has thousands of fact checkers that add community notes and do it for free. It has tackled a lot of the bots (you can't get them all). It has gotten rod.of tje government interference and exposed it for what it was. You don't like that he allows conservative, liberal and moderate voices to ne heard and they all have to be truthful or suffer a community note. X has become a tremendous free speech outlet. Embrace it. It's good for everyone.

The only way you can believe any of this is if you;'re not actually on Twitter.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah that's a semantic trick: just call any spending you don't like "waste" and voila.

 

Or just call any waste that you like semantics and voila

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah that's a semantic trick: just call any spending you don't like "waste" and voila.

It's not semantic. If you go to the grocery store with $100 to buy food and buy candy, chips and soda it could be argued you wasted your money. Now, you take the candy, soda and chips back and buy chicken, rice and brocoli. You cut waste and fraud but didn't cut the budget. Instead, you used the money correctly. Making SS and Medicare work properly is not making a budget cut.

5 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's also very funny that you clowns want to go after "fraud" in social security but also want to gut the IRS to prevent it from going after tax cheats.

Who said that? I know of plans to simplify the tax code so that it is far easier to enforce and far harder to cheat. I also know of push back on thousands of new ARMED IRS agents. But that was about this weird need to have accountants armed. How is that necessary?

8 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

The only way you can believe any of this is if you;'re not actually on Twitter.

Half of the threads I start come from X. It is just easier than doing the quote function on a mobile browser.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

It's not semantic. If you go to the grocery store with $100 to buy food and buy candy, chips and soda it could be argued you wasted your money. Now, you take the candy, soda and chips back and buy chicken, rice and brocoli. You cut waste and fraud but didn't cut the budget. Instead, you used the money correctly. Making SS and Medicare work properly is not making a budget cut.

Ah but you see I don't think for a second that any of these people involved are interested in that outcome.

Quote

Who said that?

Vivek Ramaswamy for one.

Quote

know of plans to simplify the tax code so that it is far easier to enforce and far harder to cheat. I also know of push back on thousands of new ARMED IRS agents. But that was about this weird need to have accountants armed. How is that necessary?

They aren't accountants. They are special agents who investigate financial crimes, money laundering, tax-related identity theft and terrorist financing. 

Quote

Half of the threads I start come from X. It is just easier than doing the quote function on a mobile browser.

Well then I'm not sure how you can be on X and not see that it sucks shit. It's mainly bots, dropshipping ads and a heaping helping of Nazis.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I left it because it was buggy as hell and my feed was constantly screwed up.

There's that as well.

Me: "I want to see posts from the people i follow in chronological order."

X: "F*ck you, you get antisemitism and porn bots."

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,906
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Henry Blackstone
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...