Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/musk-election-giveaways-legal-questions-1.7357898

This from the people who thought handing out bottled water to people lined up for the polling places was election interference.

From your cite:

Quote

It is a federal crime to pay people with the intention of inducing or rewarding them to cast a vote or to get registered, an offence punishable by prison time. The prohibition covers not only monetary expenditures, but also anything of monetary value like liquor or lottery chances, a Justice Department election-crimes manual says.

Experts divided 

Legal experts are divided on whether the giveaway violates federal laws.

"There is certainly an argument that this falls within the scope of a federal prohibition on paying a person to vote or register to vote," said Daniel Weiner of the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice. "This is part of a pattern of him skating up to the edge of election laws that we've seen in the past several weeks."

Musk skirting, if not breaking, the law just like Trump has done for DECADES. 🤮

Of course, he can afford very good lawyers and may need them. 

Posted

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

This from the people who thought handing out bottled water to people lined up for the polling places was election interference.

It literally is. You have a group of people who are isolated in a location they have to be in, in order to vote. They are a captive audience. Now you have political campaigns interacting with those people as they are going in to cast their votes, at the polling location, engaged in electioneering. 

They are not just innocent people handing out bottles of water. 

I swear, you guys will try to come up with any lame comparison and excuse, no matter how outlandishly absurd it is. 

 

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Musk skirting, if not breaking, the law just like Trump has done for DECADES. 🤮

Of course, he can afford very good lawyers and may need them. 

So... where is he doing the things that are against the law you cited?

 

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

From your cite:

Musk skirting, if not breaking, the law just like Trump has done for DECADES. 🤮

Of course, he can afford very good lawyers and may need them. 

Indeed I think he is skirting the law. But that's not provable. So...

Ahhh...you don't like it when Republicans play your own tricks on you. Lol...tough.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
27 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

It is legal to pay someone to get others to register, but it is a Federal crime to pay someone to register to vote or to vote.

  • Like 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

It's only open to swing state voters and you have to register to vote to be eligible, what the f*ck do you think this is about dumb. dumb.

 
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

No, it's to join Musks America PAC. It was given away at a rally.

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Indeed I think he is skirting the law. But that's not provable. So...

Ahhh...you don't like it when Republicans play your own tricks on you. Lol...tough.

You're LYING. I have no "tricks" wrt elections. Duh

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

Sure. Musk is just throwing away $MILLIONS for no reason. NOT.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

The money was a lottery for those in attendance at a rally. It had nothing to do with voting or registering to vote. Unlike Democrats that have paid people to register to vote in the past. Why did they do that? Because ballots, not voters, win elections.

You got entered in a contest to sign a petition. Had nothing to do with voter registration and nothing to do with who you decided to vote for..

Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING. I have no "tricks" wrt elections. Duh

Sure. Musk is just throwing away $MILLIONS for no reason. NOT.

Lol...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, West said:

You got entered in a contest to sign a petition. Had nothing to do with voter registration and nothing to do with who you decided to vote for..

You had to sign on to his PAC to be entered in the contest. How else would they know who was entered.

Edited by Aristides
Posted

WaPo: Former GOP lawmakers, officials call on AG Garland to investigate Musk

WaPo (archived: https://archive.ph/5tTQL ) - Former GOP lawmakers, officials call on AG Garland to investigate Musk

Quote

The Justice Department confirmed that Attorney General Merrick Garland got the letter but declined to say whether the agency is investigating Musk or his PAC.


Former Republican lawmakers, advisers and Justice Department officials have called on Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate tech billionaire Elon Musk for awarding cash prizes to voters in swing states if they sign his political organization’s petition, according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post and sent to Garland on Monday.

The letter argues that the large prizes set up by Musk, a vocal supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump, violate federal voting laws that prohibit paying people to register to vote.
Musk announced Saturday that his political group, America PAC, would use a lottery to award $1 million each day until the election to a registered voter who signs a petition saying they support free speech and the right to bear arms. Only voters registered in seven swing states — including Pennsylvania, Georgia and Nevada — are eligible for the prizes.

The former officials who signed the letter to Garland and Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry argue that Musk’s petition is disguising a voter drive in which he essentially bribes people to register.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that Musk should be investigated and that his ploy raises “serious questions.” Multiple legal experts have also expressed concern, although some say his focus on the First and Second Amendments could keep him on the right side of the law

Even Republicans know IT'S ILLEGAL. 💡

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

You had to sign on to his PAC to be entered in the contest. How else would they know who was entered.

No, you signed a petition supporting the constitution. Theoretically Democrats could support the constitution but not likely I will admit

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Aristides said:

No, it's to join Musks America PAC. It was given away at a rally.

Either way, it wasn't to vote or to register to vote.

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is nothing illegal about paying someone to sign a petition to my knowledge.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Either way, it wasn't to vote or to register to vote.

There is nothing illegal about paying someone to sign a petition to my knowledge.

They had to REGISTER AND sign the meaningless petition to be eligible.

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

They had to REGISTER AND sign the meaningless petition to be eligible.

No they didn't. They had to sign the petition.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
14 hours ago, Rebound said:

It is legal to pay someone to get others to register, but it is a Federal crime to pay someone to register to vote or to vote.

You mean like ACORN did?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/18-former-acorn-workers-have-been-convicted-or-admitted-guilt-in-election-fraud

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

That’s the problem when you pay people to register voters… they become incentivized to create fake registrations. And… what happened with ACORN? It’s gone. 

So you can’t say that this sort of thing is bad and then decide it’s acceptable. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

That’s the problem when you pay people to register voters… they become incentivized to create fake registrations. And… what happened with ACORN? It’s gone. 

So you can’t say that this sort of thing is bad and then decide it’s acceptable. 

Lol...it was Libbies who thought this and other crap was just fine when it was stacked for their candidate. 

You dumb fcks...you wanted to play hardball...welcome to hardball.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,907
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    derek848
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...