Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Collect/Harvest votes = voter fraud. Very hard to prove. I have laid it out in other threads how you would do this and not rely on probabilities and subjectivity. To prove this.. you have to have every single ballot and connect it back to the voter. Not as easy as you think. I have worked cases in unemployment insurance where we go through every single claim... 65,000 of them and verify every single detail (name, address, ssn, ein, wages, taxes paid) and it took 2 years.. Millions of votes, this would be a monstrous undertaking. 

Edited by impartialobserver
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 9/18/2024 at 11:43 AM, impartialobserver said:

Collect/Harvest votes = voter fraud. Very hard to prove. I have laid it out in other threads how you would do this and not rely on probabilities and subjectivity. To prove this.. you have to have every single ballot and connect it back to the voter. Not as easy as you think. I have worked cases in unemployment insurance where we go through every single claim... 65,000 of them and verify every single detail (name, address, ssn, ein, wages, taxes paid) and it took 2 years.. Millions of votes, this would be a monstrous undertaking. 

That's why voters need to show their ID's at their voting precincts before they vote. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/17/2024 at 9:11 PM, August1991 said:

1. The Dems know how to collect/harvest votes

Wink wink, nudge nudge.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
On 9/17/2024 at 9:19 PM, August1991 said:

I disagree,

What do you mean?

I mean the number of workers required to raise food has declined precipitously since the industrial revolution.

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's why voters need to show their ID's at their voting precincts before they vote. 

Because you believe ID's can't be faked and there aren't numerous other CHECKS in the voting systems.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. Because you believe ID's can't be faked

2. and there aren't numerous other CHECKS in the voting systems.

1. That's a pretty stupid comment to make. Do you have PROOF of that numb nuts? No? Then it's best that you stfu. 

2. Oh, you must be talking about Dominion's red vote in, blue vote out, CHECK. Yes, I'm sure that is your favorite feature of the voting systems. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
On 9/18/2024 at 10:43 AM, impartialobserver said:

Collect/Harvest votes = voter fraud. Very hard to prove. I have laid it out in other threads how you would do this and not rely on probabilities and subjectivity. To prove this.. you have to have every single ballot and connect it back to the voter. Not as easy as you think. I have worked cases in unemployment insurance where we go through every single claim... 65,000 of them and verify every single detail (name, address, ssn, ein, wages, taxes paid) and it took 2 years.. Millions of votes, this would be a monstrous undertaking. 

we do it all the time in Canada. It's not as hard as you think. A layered approach tends to get it done. we used to have questions  about fraud but it's been a lot of years since it came up. A small amount is detected and investigated every election and it's never significant but the system is tight enough that everyone accepts that it would be very hard to do it with any scale such that it would influence the election and not be detected. 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Deluge said:

That's why voters need to show their ID's at their voting precincts before they vote. 

Just because you show the ID does not mean that the ballot has the name, address, SSN, etc of the voter on it. Just because you have a volunteer check off a box is not enough for 100% accuracy. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Because you believe ID's can't be faked and there aren't numerous other CHECKS in the voting systems.

It is almost impossible to fake enough IDs and registrations to allow enough fake people to vote at an election such that it would make a difference without being detected. you're talking about thousands of id's in most cases. 

Like i said, we do it in Canada. Surely if we can figure it out the US can as well? 

Posted

Make no mistake - she will be your next president.

Like that woman in Argentina. The second one.

Trump? No chance. The Dems have created votes in Pennsylvania. Kryptonite

====

Xin - Putin. The EU. I fear a world disaster - like the Titanic.

====

This is not 1930s appeassement.

Posted
On 9/18/2024 at 1:43 PM, impartialobserver said:

Collect/Harvest votes = voter fraud. Very hard to prove. I have laid it out in other threads,,,

In some States, the Democrats have made our federal Canada Census form like your Election ballot.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, August1991 said:

Make no mistake - she will be your next president.

Like that woman in Argentina. The second one.

Trump? No chance. The Dems have created votes in Pennsylvania. Kryptonite

====

Xin - Putin. The EU. I fear a world disaster - like the Titanic.

====

This is not 1930s appeassement.

They are going to cheat.

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/17/2024-election-counting-swing-states

Republicans need to scrutinize every single ballot. These bastards are already telling us they intend to cheat.

Edited by Nationalist
  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

They are going to cheat.

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/17/2024-election-counting-swing-states

Republicans need to scrutinize every single ballot. These bastards are already telling us they intend to cheat.

^^Links to an article about Trump's bogus fraud claims and his attempt to steal the election, but not smart enough to understand that. 🤦‍♂️

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 9/20/2024 at 10:53 AM, Deluge said:

1. That's a pretty stupid comment to make. Do you have PROOF of that numb nuts? No? Then it's best that you stfu. 

2. Oh, you must be talking about Dominion's red vote in, blue vote out, CHECK. Yes, I'm sure that is your favorite feature of the voting systems. ;) 

3. You believe ONE factor is "numerous." LMAO

Posted
45 minutes ago, Hodad said:

^^Links to an article about Trump's bogus fraud claims and his attempt to steal the election, but not smart enough to understand that. 🤦‍♂️

I actually don't care what Trump thinks about this. I don't wanna see another mess of an election. 

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
On 9/20/2024 at 1:53 PM, Deluge said:

1. That's a pretty stupid comment to make. Do you have PROOF of that numb nuts? No? Then it's best that you stfu. 

2. Oh, you must be talking about Dominion's red vote in, blue vote out, CHECK. Yes, I'm sure that is your favorite feature of the voting systems. ;) 

Dominion did nothing wrong. That’s why Fox had to pay them $787 million. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Dominion did nothing wrong. That’s why Fox had to pay them $787 million. 

Dominion is a piece of shit vote rigging system that was greenlit by Hussein Obama. Fox paid because they knew our judicial system is corrupt and they wouldn't have had a showball's chance in hell. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 9/21/2024 at 8:55 AM, Nationalist said:

They are going to cheat.

https://www.axios.com/2024/09/17/2024-election-counting-swing-states

Republicans need to scrutinize every single ballot. These bastards are already telling us they intend to cheat.

Cheat?

The Dems are not going to cheat.

The Dems are going to collect ballots the same way we in Canada collect census forms.

I have compared this idea - a US vote/ballot and a Canadian census form. Very similar. Both are complicated with many questions.

Now, imagine if I could pay people to help you complete your form.....

That's not cheating.

 

Edited by August1991
Posted

With mail-in ballots, it is now impossible for a Republican to win in any urban county.

Most of America is now like California and Illinois - Cook County.

She will win Michigan because of Wayne County.

She will win Pennsylvania because of Philadelphia.

Posted (edited)

President Harris? She reminded me first of Kim Campbell.

Now I fear that she may be an Isabel Peron.

Anyway, Harris is no Thatcher. Nor Rodham. Nor Indira Gandhi. Nor Golda Meir.

Edited by August1991

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,896
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    postuploader
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User earned a badge
      One Year In
    • josej earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • josej earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...