ABC whitleblower Avidavit

[Fluffypants]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's pretty shocking Behavior. It's one thing to allow your paper to be biased or your media agency to favor one candidate or another but once you agreed to host a debate when you pull this crap you are interfering with an election. Honestly it should be illegal and they should face charges

At the very least if true the Trump campaign could sue for breach of contract. Then there will consequences where they will lose access to every Republican and if Trump wins he could have their press credentials stripped from their reporters and they won't be allowed in the press room. They sure as hell won't host another debate anytime soon, I doubt even the Democrats would trust them to host a primary debate.

[BeaverFever]

5 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

This is still very new and if true and this guy has the receipts he claims he does Disney is screwed.

 

4 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Harris dictated what questions couldn't be asked and that Trump be fact checked and not her.

She received "sample" question that essentially were the questions that would be asked just written differently.

Essentially said that the Harris campaign negotiated terms with ABC without Trumps knowledge.

Some were things like they would give her favorable angles during the split screen and that she was given a smaller podium than Trump to make her look bigger.

The kicker is he sent out the documents of what ABC was going to do before the debate, so he can show he had prior knowledge when his predictions came true.

 

Oh if some random stranger posted it on social media it must be absolutely true. Just like those 2020 election fraud affidavits

MAGAs are so hopelessly and pathetic gullible. It is absolutely hilarious. Trump lost the debate get over it.  Kamala didn’t dictate that Trump say crazy shit about immigrants eating dogs or having a meltdown over people leaving his rallies early. 

Edited September 18, 2024 by BeaverFever

[CdnFox]

18 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

 

Oh if some random stranger posted it on social media it must be absolutely true. Just like those 2020 election fraud affidavits

MAGAs are so hopelessly and pathetic gullible. It is absolutely hilarious. Trump lost the debate get over it.  Kamala didn’t dictate that Trump say crazy shit about immigrants eating dogs or having a meltdown over people leaving his rallies early. 

Dude it's not some random stranger on the internet, it's an affidavit. It's a legal document and a sworn testimony from an employee who was actually there.

And I'm quite certain if the roles were reversed you would be screaming to the High Heavens.

Sorry but this just is not acceptable. If you accept that you're going to moderate a debate it has to be fair and impartial.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No. You suck on this.

https://deadline.com/2024/04/cable-news-ratings-march-first-quarter-1235874337/

Fembot.

Wow, you failed math in college and had to drop out, cause you believe 

Quote

In primetime in March, Fox News averaged 2.14 million viewers,

is greater than

Quote

“World News Tonight” (7.747 million)

ABC viewers greater than 3X your FOS LIES and 10x more honest. LMAO

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

At the very least if true the Trump campaign could sue for breach of contract. Then there will consequences where they will lose access to every Republican and if Trump wins he could have their press credentials stripped from their reporters and they won't be allowed in the press room. They sure as hell won't host another debate anytime soon, I doubt even the Democrats would trust them to host a primary debate.

You know nothing about reality. Some employee and his affidavit means nothing.

[CdnFox]

31 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Wow, you failed math in college and had to drop out, cause you believe 

is greater than

ABC viewers greater than 3X your FOS LIES and 10x more honest. LMAO

You know nothing about reality. Some employee and his affidavit means nothing.

Ummm - the fox figures were for march.  Your abc viewers are for the year   LOLOLOL

No wonder you didn't include a link 

[Nationalist]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Wow, you failed math in college and had to drop out, cause you believe 

is greater than

ABC viewers greater than 3X your FOS LIES and 10x more honest. LMAO

As @CdnFox pointed out...you lied...again.

This is why, even without any diploma, I have been successful. I don't lie. I don't cheat. I live within and deal with reality.

You can wave your silly piece of paper around all you like. But a brief look into your posts exhibits a freak who is willing to do and say anything, no matter how stupid, in order to gain that which you desire. This sort of personality issue is very transparent and not the type of disorder needed or even wanted in positions of power.

The bottom line here is...

You're a fcking twit.!

[Fluffypants]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

Wow, you failed math in college and had to drop out, cause you believe 

is greater than

ABC viewers greater than 3X your FOS LIES and 10x more honest. LMAO

You know nothing about reality. Some employee and his affidavit means nothing.

I think what is telling is ABC's response, they only denied giving the questions to the Harris campaign. They didn't deny any of the other allegations.

 

[WestCanMan]

17 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

This is still very new and if true and this guy has the receipts he claims he does Disney is screwed.

Even the leftists here knew that Kamala was going to be given the questions in advance, and that certain topics would be avoided by the moderators. 

This isn't going to make a dent imo.

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Even the leftists here knew that Kamala was going to be given the questions in advance, and that certain topics would be avoided by the moderators. 

This isn't going to make a dent imo.

How many times did ABC say they wouldn't give her the questions? Maybe they didn't? What if the questions flowed the other way?

[WestCanMan]

It's scary that MSNBC is getting more views than CNN. 

They tell all the same lies, but MSNBC is their dumpster-born inbred cousin. 

12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

How many times did ABC say they wouldn't give her the questions? 

Makes no difference. No one is dumb enough to believe them.

 

[Black Dog]

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Even the leftists here knew that Kamala was going to be given the questions in advance, and that certain topics would be avoided by the moderators. 

This isn't going to make a dent imo.

Imagine being so stupid and clueless that you'd think that the only way a presidential candidate know they would get questions about immigration, abortion, foreign policy and the economy at a debate is if they got them in advance and not, you know, because they had a team that anticipated these obvious topics and drafted messaging. 

I have no doubt Trump was prepped on the same subjects but he's so unhinged and easily rattled that he couldn't stay on script.

 

[WestCanMan]

48 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Imagine being so stupid and clueless that you'd think that the only way a presidential candidate know they would get questions about immigration, abortion, foreign policy and the economy at a debate is if they got them in advance and not, you know, because they had a team that anticipated these obvious topics and drafted messaging. 

I have no doubt Trump was prepped on the same subjects but he's so unhinged and easily rattled that he couldn't stay on script.

 

Did you see the other half of the sentence, stupid? That they'd steer clear of other topics?

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Did you see the other half of the sentence, stupid? That they'd steer clear of other topics?

Oh I guess I wasn't clear enough: this affidavit is utter horseshit. It's not real. 

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

It's scary that MSNBC is getting more views than CNN. 

They tell all the same lies, but MSNBC is their dumpster-born inbred cousin. 

Makes no difference. No one is dumb enough to believe them.

 

Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

[WestCanMan]

38 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Oh I guess I wasn't clear enough: this affidavit is utter horseshit. It's not real. 

It's a signed affidavit, stupid. 

I could see you guys pretending it was horseshit if you had some kind of lofty standards that you had consistently upheld, but leftists have considered "an anonymous source inside the Trump campaign" to mean 'indisputable fact" on several occasions. You don't get to throw your arms up at a signed affidavit.

Edited September 18, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Black Dog]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a signed affidavit, stupid. 

No, it's a document some people are claiming is a signed affidavit, but the notary's signature and seal are blacked out, if they exist at all. Show me the signed and sealed document and we can go from there.

Quote

I could see you guys pretending it was horseshit if you had some kind of lofty standards that you had consistently upheld, but leftists have considered "an anonymous source inside the Trump campaign" to mean 'indisputable fact" on several occasions. You don't get to throw your arms up at a signed affidavit.

1. Again, it's not a signed affidavit.

2. It makes broad accusations but doesn't include any specific names or dates/times of when the events it claims occurred occurred or details of the conversations the alleged whistleblower was privy to (even though they claim to also have transcripts of secret recordings they made). The whole thing is incredibly amateurish.

[robosmith]

14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ummm - the fox figures were for march.  Your abc viewers are for the year   LOLOLOL

No wonder you didn't include a link 

You really are stupid @Nationalist. The figures for BOTH are PER NIGHT. Duh

And there is a LINK for both cites, you just have to read the thread, dummy.

6 hours ago, Nationalist said:

As @CdnFox pointed out...you lied...again.

This is why, even without any diploma, I have been successful. I don't lie. I don't cheat. I live within and deal with reality.

You can wave your silly piece of paper around all you like. But a brief look into your posts exhibits a freak who is willing to do and say anything, no matter how stupid, in order to gain that which you desire. This sort of personality issue is very transparent and not the type of disorder needed or even wanted in positions of power.

The bottom line here is...

You're a fcking twit.!

You just FAILED reading, like you FAILED math before.

https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/network-news/

Quote

 

 

Edited September 18, 2024 by robosmith

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

I think what is telling is ABC's response, they only denied giving the questions to the Harris campaign. They didn't deny any of the other allegations.

Maybe cause the other allegations mean NOTHING wrt dishonest debate moderation.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Imagine being so stupid and clueless that you'd think that the only way a presidential candidate know they would get questions about immigration, abortion, foreign policy and the economy at a debate is if they got them in advance and not, you know, because they had a team that anticipated these obvious topics and drafted messaging. 

I have no doubt Trump was prepped on the same subjects but he's so unhinged and easily rattled that he couldn't stay on script.

And likely Trump just was NOT LISTENING, cause he believes he already knows everything, or can make it up on the fly.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Did you see the other half of the sentence, stupid? That they'd steer clear of other topics?

Steering clear of irrelevant topics is de rigueur. You know what that means?

Obviously not, since you revel over them when they tar your political opponent. 

[robosmith]

36 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a signed affidavit, stupid. 

I could see you guys pretending it was horseshit if you had some kind of lofty standards that you had consistently upheld, but leftists have considered "an anonymous source inside the Trump campaign" to mean 'indisputable fact" on several occasions. You don't get to throw your arms up at a signed affidavit.

Do you know how many affidavits Trump presented in his court election challenges?

None were considered to be damning evidence IN COURT cause Trump LOST them all.

Edited September 18, 2024 by robosmith

[Chrissy1979]

Neither candidate answered any of the questions anyway, so what difference would it make, even if it were true?

Kamala's first question was about whether voters would consider themselves better off than four years ago. She responded by talking about what she plans to do in the next four years. How would knowing the question be an advantage?

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

How many times did ABC say they wouldn't give her the questions? Maybe they didn't? What if the questions flowed the other way?

Allegedly they didn't.  Allegedly they gave ones that were SIMILAR as "examples".  So they can claim they didn't give her the questions - but if the examples are so close to the questions as to make no difference then she'll be able to prepare anyway.  

 

26 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Neither candidate answered any of the questions anyway, so what difference would it make, even if it were true?

Kamala's first question was about whether voters would consider themselves better off than four years ago. She responded by talking about what she plans to do in the next four years. How would knowing the question be an advantage?

It's always an advantage. You can prep the answer, practice it, even have the answer market tested in focus groups. 

THat's  a lot harder when you don't know what the question is

[Chrissy1979]

What difference does it make to know a question if your answer doesn't address it at all?

 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a signed affidavit, stupid. 

I could see you guys pretending it was horseshit if you had some kind of lofty standards that you had consistently upheld, but leftists have considered "an anonymous source inside the Trump campaign" to mean 'indisputable fact" on several occasions. You don't get to throw your arms up at a signed affidavit.

No, it's a Twitter post. 🙄