ABC whitleblower Avidavit

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, Black Dog said:

No, it's a document some people are claiming is a signed affidavit, but the notary's signature and seal are blacked out, if they exist at all. Show me the signed and sealed document and we can go from there.

1. Again, it's not a signed affidavit.

2. It makes broad accusations but doesn't include any specific names or dates/times of when the events it claims occurred occurred or details of the conversations the alleged whistleblower was privy to (even though they claim to also have transcripts of secret recordings they made). The whole thing is incredibly amateurish.

An affidavit with a few redactions still greatly exceeds your accepted standard of proof, dingus. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

An affidavit with a few redactions still greatly exceeds your accepted standard of proof, dingus. 

ABC is saying the affidavit is legit, even though they're denying the charges. So it's a real affidavit

[Black Dog]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

An affidavit with a few redactions still greatly exceeds your accepted standard of proof, dingus. 

Again: it's not an affidavit. It's a document some internet rando is pretending to be an affidavit.

13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

ABC is saying the affidavit is legit, even though they're denying the charges. So it's a real affidavit

LOL prove it. 

Edited September 19, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

56 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

😭 pwoove it

🕺

[Black Dog]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

🕺

Give me your credit card and SIN numbers you gullible old b!tch.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Give me your credit card and SIN numbers you gullible old b!tch.

Visa number is 8008135 and sin # is 1. I'm pretty old. 

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Visa number is 8008135 and sin # is 1. I'm pretty old. 

Yeah that much is obvious.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Yeah that much is obvious.

Yup. By the amount of wisdom I accumulated. 

Thanks. 

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Yup. By the amount of wisdom I accumulated. 

Thanks. 

It's more about how media illiterate and susceptible to falling for obvious scams you are.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's more about how media illiterate and susceptible to falling for obvious scams you are.

ABC fell for it too, and they are the last ones who want to admit to that. 

[Black Dog]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

ABC fell for it too, and they are the last ones who want to admit to that. 

ABC has never confirmed the "affidavit" is legitimate, they've only addressed the bullshit claims it contains.

 

Edited September 19, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

ABC has never confirmed the "affidavit" is legitimate, they've only addressed the bullshit claims it contains.

ABC knows it's all true, dummy. 

[impartialobserver]

I know that some will view this as "oh, he is for Kamala Harris" but as someone who deals with legal documents.. this has the feel of a hoax. Some obvious formatting errors. 

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

ABC knows it's all true, dummy. 

Because some dink on the internet posted a word doc? OK Boomer.

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

some dink on the internet 

Apparently you and crakhobarbie come here for the same thing. 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

Apparently you and crakhobarbie come here for the same thing. 

Making fun of retarded Boomers who fall for scams? Yup.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Black Dog said:

Making fun of retarded Boomers who fall for scams? Yup.

Said the guy who believes Biden is the president 🤣. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Again: it's not an affidavit. It's a document some internet rando is pretending to be an affidavit.

 

They say it was sworn by a notary public . That would make it an affidavit. Up to you to prove it wasn't then

 

[Black Dog]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

They say it was sworn by a notary public . That would make it an affidavit. Up to you to prove it wasn't then.

ABC? No they didn't.

Edited September 19, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

20 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

ABC? No they didn't.

It's not that hard to get something notarized, true or not.

Dr Ford went all the way to DC and lied in front of congress, dummy. 

[Black Dog]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's not that hard to get something notarized, true or not.

Dr Ford went all the way to DC and lied in front of congress, dummy. 

Which makes the fact that this fake thing doesn't seem to be actually notarized even funnier.  

[impartialobserver]

one can fake a notary. Not saying it is fake but one can do it. Only way that I would believe this is if I had the document in my hand. Just seeing it on the internet does not pass the sniff test. 

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

ABC? No they didn't.

Why would abc say it? they're not the ones who are presenting the affidavit. 

You really don't understand how ANY of this works do you?  You don't even know what an affidavit is apparently. 

[Black Dog]

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Why would abc say it? they're not the ones who are presenting the affidavit. 

Did you suddenly forget the part where you claimed (without evidence as usual) that ABC said the "affidavit" was legit?

See I had assumed because of that that the "they" you were referring to was ABC, but it could have been that you were talking about the people disseminating it, but that's dumb because you're essentially taking their word at face value without any evidence. Which would be on brand for you.

Quote

You really don't understand how ANY of this works do you?  You don't even know what an affidavit is apparently. 

Lol you literally think its an affidavit just because they said it is. Here's a hint, dipshit: it's on the people saying it's an affidavit to demonstrate proof that it is. 

Edited September 19, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Which makes the fact that this fake thing doesn't seem to be actually notarized even funnier.  

Like I said: by YOUR standards, that thing qualifies as incontrovertible evidence. That's because leftards accept things like "an anonymous source close to the Trump administration said..." as absolute proof that something happened. 

It's weird that you can laugh at that, when it greatly exceeds your standards.