Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Rebound said:

After telling Democrats to stop posting hate speech, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to post hate speech:

I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!!!

This is, literally, hate speech.  
 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113142103182027626

So...the girl that sings about all the bad decisions she made is supposed to influence us on her next decision?

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

So...the girl that sings about all the bad decisions she made is supposed to influence us on her next decision?

Yes, I think it’s better to get advice from someone who admits their mistakes than from someone who never admits to making mistakes. 

  • Like 2

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
Just now, Rebound said:

Yes, I think it’s better to get advice from someone who admits their mistakes than from someone who never admits to making mistakes. 

You mean like Joe, who never fired a single person for doing a bad job or Trump that fired multiple people for doing a bad job?

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
8 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You mean like Joe, who never fired a single person for doing a bad job or Trump that fired multiple people for doing a bad job?

Trump only fired people on reality TV. In real life he never had the balls to fire anyone himself. He had others do the dirty work preferably when the person being fired was far away.

Posted
12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You mean like Joe, who never fired a single person for doing a bad job or Trump that fired multiple people for doing a bad job?

Trump didn’t fire his senior government officials for doing bad jobs, he fired them for not being sufficiently loyal to Trump over the laws and Constitution. 
 

For instance, he didn’t fire the Director of the FBI for doing a bad job, he fired him for investigating election interference and not dismissing charges against Michael Flynn. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Trump only fired people on reality TV. In real life he never had the balls to fire anyone himself. He had others do the dirty work preferably when the person being fired was far away.

Comey?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Yes, I think it’s better to get advice from someone who admits their mistakes than from someone who never admits to making mistakes. 

I think you're screwed either way so maybe you should be listening to someone else :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

So...the girl that sings about all the bad decisions she made is supposed to influence us on her next decision?

There is no influencing you MAGA CULT who ONLY listen to and believe der leader.

2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You mean like Joe, who never fired a single person for doing a bad job or Trump that fired multiple people for doing a bad job?

Trump had to fire them cause they broke the LAW and that's HIS schtick.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

There is no influencing you MAGA CULT who ONLY listen to and believe der leader.

That opinion is USELESS without FACTS!!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is no influencing you MAGA CULT who ONLY listen to and believe der leader.

Trump had to fire them cause they broke the LAW and that's HIS schtick.

That should be 'den leader'.

Posted
14 hours ago, Rebound said:

After telling Democrats to stop posting hate speech, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to post hate speech:

I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!!!

This is, literally, hate speech.  
 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113142103182027626

That's not "hate speech".

If he'd say something like, 'Taylor Swift should be shot'. That would be "hate speech".

Grow up limpy.

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)

Bette Midler said that Taylor Swift should sue him for this.

 

Quote

Bette Midler has accused former president Donald Trump of "putting a hit" out on singer-songwriter Taylor Swift and suggested she should sue him.

https://www.newsweek.com/bette-midler-responds-donals-trump-post-about-taylor-swift-1954531

🤣

I really shouldn't laugh though. This will probably be the next indictment.

Edited by CouchPotato
Posted
1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

Bette Midler said that Taylor Swift should sue him for this.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/bette-midler-responds-donals-trump-post-about-taylor-swift-1954531

🤣

I really shouldn't laugh though. This will probably be the next indictment.

LOL  -  "He's paying someone to actually kill me and my life is in danger!!!!  i should sue.... "  

Yeah that's a pretty normal response. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
23 hours ago, Rebound said:

After telling Democrats to stop posting hate speech, Donald Trump took to Truth Social to post hate speech:

I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!!!

This is, literally, hate speech.  
 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113142103182027626

Taylor swift is white so there is no such thing as hate speech against her.

1 hour ago, CouchPotato said:

Bette Midler said that Taylor Swift should sue him for this.

 

https://www.newsweek.com/bette-midler-responds-donals-trump-post-about-taylor-swift-1954531

🤣

I really shouldn't laugh though. This will probably be the next indictment.

Will nobody rid me of this troublesome singer?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

Will nobody rid me of this troublesome singer?

Ok, i might not think much of you most of the time but, impressive reference :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
11 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ok, i might not think much of you most of the time but, impressive reference :) 

I don't know where you heard that reference but I dontbelieve for a second that a person with your reading comprehension could no anything about the history of the concept of the divine right of kings and how it evolved in the .edieval period 

Posted
On 9/16/2024 at 6:49 PM, Rebound said:

I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!!!

This is, literally, hate speech. 

Your stupidity is at such a ridiculous level that it qualifies as hate speech. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

NOOOO not WILBUR?!?!!?

So she DOES eat pets. Must be out of cat. 

Wilbur the pig was not a pet.  

Man, you don’t even have a 2nd grade level education. Sad!

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
17 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Your stupidity is at such a ridiculous level that it qualifies as hate speech. 

What is ridiculous is for you to pretend to be an authority about classifying the identification of hate speech as hate speech.

That OPINION means less than NOTHING.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Wilbur the pig was not a pet.  

Man, you don’t even have a 2nd grade level education. Sad!

They diidn't eat him, they did't breed him, they took him to compete in contests...  what the hell else WOULD you call him?  

You can't even tell the difference  no WONDER you people wind up eating pets :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...