Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Matthew said:

Wishful thinking. Nothing Trump did or said during the debate communicated any admiration for the US or positive aspirations for the country.

You see what you wanted to see, like any true cultist would. 

At best, Kamala's 'good answers' were just instances where she successfully dodged a question, or replied with a hope and mirrors gimmick. 

Trump has already proven that he can run a successful economy and that he's effective for America on the foreign affairs side.

Her best zinger of the night was "I was endorsed by your former staffers" and he fired back with "That's because I fire people for incompetence, but you never fired anyone, not even the people who were associated with Afghanistan or the economic disaster". That was arguably the best comeback I've ever seen in political discourse. 

Think of the contrast: even during a highly successful administration, Trump expected more from people and fired underachievers, while the Biden administration just lies about their failures instead of making necessary changes and holding people accountable. The Dems are the epitome of what citizens don't like about politicians: they overspend, lie, shirk responsibility, and then just make idle promises.

Kamala's "I no longer believe in all the foolish things I believed in when I was just 55" didn't work on any but the most clueless of cultists. 

Edited by WestCanMan

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

You clearly haven't been to the Philippines, or any overpopulated country in Asia.

You're wrong. I have been to Manila and a port at the Southern end of the island.

And I didn't find any "hidden restaurants," but my hosts may have and I didn't notice cause they weren't "hidden."

On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

When a restaurant is hidden, they will not advertise. Their building will be among many others, tucked into obscurity. Building on top of building, and you truly need to know people who know about it, to get in. No foreigners will be able to find such an establishment. Not even most locals. Kind of like finding a drug dealer. Those who need to know them, will. These are illegal businesses.

Like I said. Hidden.

Ok, I can believe that illegal businesses are hidden.

On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

There were quite a few. She blatantly lied about the unemployment levels since the great depression,

What was the LIE? Quote it HERE.

On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

Trump signing an abortion ban, when he never stated anything of the sort, to him backing Project 2025, among other things.

He clearly backs 2025 and is just denying it NOW cause it hurts his election chances.

There's a reason so many of HIS people wrote it.

On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

There are quite a few blatant lies from her, avoiding tough questions, deflecting and literally taking zero ownership for her poor record at the border which she was appointed to.

You don't know her record of intervening in the source countries to make LONG TERM improvements.

No one expected her to stem the tide of MIGRANTS heading for the border, esp not when RepubliCONS keep LYING that the border is OPEN. She could NEVER set policy, ONLY make suggestions to the POTUS. Duh

On 9/12/2024 at 7:37 AM, Perspektiv said:

Kudos to her for mostly stretching the truth, vs blatantly lying for the most part, but to say she didn't lie, is a blatant lie.

Your IGNORANCE doesn't make what she said a lie.

53 minutes ago, Legato said:

Kamala's been spotted at Winners buying up all the flip flops.

But they're out of stock cause Trump already bought them up to paint them gold and sell them to YOU MAGA CULT.

Posted (edited)
On 9/12/2024 at 8:21 AM, Five of swords said:

Uh...Haitians eat people.

Prove it.

On 9/12/2024 at 8:21 AM, Five of swords said:

Why wouldn't they eat cats?

A very hungry man will eat almost anything to avoid starving, but in Ohio they have OPTIONS.

What I wonder is why people are getting bent out of shape over hunting geese. They aren't pets, and a lot of hunters eat them. 

Edited by robosmith
Posted (edited)
On 9/12/2024 at 9:30 AM, Old Guy said:

Perhaps he just couldn't squeeze one more lie out of his shrivelling brain. Imagine a guy his age trying to keep track of so many lies and then deliver them in just the right context. Poor guy. 

Trump has never kept track of his lies. That's why he's a really terrible, prolific, LIAR.

Edited by robosmith
Posted
On 9/10/2024 at 11:17 PM, herbie said:

As Kamala pointed out to him in the debate, she is not Biden.

 

harris-biden-administration-where-written-in-name-wh.gov_.webp

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
On 9/13/2024 at 12:45 AM, Perspektiv said:

He lost it, there is no doubt. But Americans can easily see the odds were stacked against him during it. There was just no way he was winning that debate.

However, am a strong believer that numbers don't lie.

His final statement is going viral (on ABC no less), for a reason:

"She had 3 and a half years to fix the country. Why hasn't she done it?"

He failed in the debate, but salvaged himself in that one or two minute bit, which is getting an incredible amount of airplay.

This will resonate with America.

You were responsible for the border. You backed Biden on his performance on it, yet find yourself with a border crisis.

You were against several things through the bulk of your political career, but now are siding with Trump on them. IE fixing the border. 

Fracking. Being tougher on crime (after questioning the importance of the police at some points).

Politics is all about optics. She owned him throughout. He effortlessly pointed to her hypocrisy in seconds. 

I have said it before. Book it.

If she thinks its a wrap because she looked good in a debate where all portions of it turned the tables against Trump,  she will suffer the same fate as Clinton.

Everyone has said it's STILL VERY CLOSE.

Apparently you are OUT OF THE LOOP.

And Trump blaming her for POLICIES decided by Biden (and you believing that) is just ridiculous.

Meanwhile it was Trump who killed the BIPARTISAN border bill to save the issue for HIS CAMPAIGN, proves he never cared about a SOLUTION. Smart people know that; apparently you DO NOT.

Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

And Trump blaming her for POLICIES

She was the border appointee. Look at its state. She had full control of this.

She is flip flopping on so many of her stances. Franking, police among many others. 

People want someone they can nice in. She doesn't come across as sincere, which if she did, would likely easily pull away from Trump.

Difference is he is a blatant and obvious liar. She's far superior, when lying to your face that you have to research to catch it.

Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

They're the people that Trump and Harris were targeting during the debate. 

Demi cultists would still vote for Kamala even if she turned green, projectile-vomited, and started praying to Pazuzu on stage: "Even Satan's own wh0re is better than Trump hahaha."

Trump's supporters all know better than to vote for another 4 years of defund police, open borders, mostly peaceful protests, record-level inflation, and European/ME wars. 

It was just a small percentage of people who were undecided, and both candidates wanted those voters.

At the end of the day people saw that:

  • Trump is passionate about America
  • Kamala, who has reinvented herself in the last few months but still hasn't deigned to explain herself to Americans in any sort of interview, doesn't have an actual plan... just 'hope and mirrors'. 

Trump is passionate about selling America to the highest bidder, like Jared collected $2B from MBS after leaving the WH.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

She was the border appointee. Look at its state. She had full control of this.

No one in the US has control of how many MIGRANTS make the trip to the US border. Mexicans have SOME control, but generally not the money to tackle the problem, nor the motivation.

6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

She is flip flopping on so many of her stances. Franking, police among many others. 

Trump's flip flops make Harris' pale by comparison, but for some reason you give HIM A PASS. 🤮

6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

People want someone they can nice in. She doesn't come across as sincere, which if she did, would likely easily pull away from Trump.

What is "nice in"? LMAO

6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Difference is he is a blatant and obvious liar.

As I've said for a LONG TIME.

6 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

She's far superior, when lying to your face that you have to research to catch it.

Or maybe you're just IGNORANT of the FACTS.

Posted
37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Prove it.

A very hungry man will eat almost anything to avoid starving, but in Ohio they have OPTIONS.

What I wonder is why people are getting bent out of shape over hunting geese. They aren't pets, and a lot of hunters eat them. 

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199657681.001.0001/acref-9780199657681-e-8860#:~:text=Voodoo formerly involved human sacrifice,

Posted
11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump's flip flops make Harris' pale

But he moves the needle more as a candidate.

It would be in her best interest not to flip flop, or people will pick the flip flop or liar they know what they will get out of.

Posted
44 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump has never kept track of his lies. That's why he's a really terrible, prolific, LIAR.

I'm sure the hair sniffer and Kamelface keep track of their lies, and they must number in the tens of millions. 

Posted
2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I looked at the first three or four and found that the statements that you made there were not true.

The three or four what, was it the drought in Syria, the environmental degradation in Dafar or are you claiming that Lake Chad isn't shrinking. Perhaps you were taking issue with the first three or four words of the IPCC report. Or maybe its that literal thinking problem you have where by Climate change has to be solely the cause of the Syrian civil war or its not true. Contributing factor might be a phrase you can incorporate into your vocabulary.

46 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's an opinion, you've presented it as such, you've logically defended it, but we're not pretending it's fact. 

The IPCC link has lots of good information and all kinds of charts with data you could explore if you wanted but as I told you before answers are rarely simple. And by the way what's with the name calling? 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I'm sure the hair sniffer and Kamelface keep track of their lies, and they must number in the tens of millions. 

In which case what are your top ten lies she's told? That should be easy given you believe she has told tens of millions.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Seems you missed the word "FORMERLY." AKA, your claim is anachronistic.

Quote

Voodoo formerly involved human sacrifice and cannibalism;

 

32 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

But he moves the needle more as a candidate.

It would be in her best interest not to flip flop, or people will pick the flip flop or liar they know what they will get out of.

You mean what they've FORGOTTEN they suffered from? AKA COVID and economic collapse.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're "sure" of your DELUGINS.

I'm sure your head is up the left's ass. That's one thing I'm definitely sure of. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
Posted
56 minutes ago, Old Guy said:

The three or four what,

Statements. He. Claimed. The. AI. Made.

By old guy do you mean 'preschooler?"  My patience for stupid is relatively limited. 

Quote

was it the drought in Syria, the environmental degradation in Dafar or are you claiming that Lake Chad isn't shrinking.

None of them appear to be the reason for the wars. The conflicts in syria long predate the drought,  Darfar is a power struggle between two factions and has squat to do with climate change etc etc. 

It's like claiming the current conflict in israel/gaza is because 2023 was the hottest summer on record.  While that's true that it was the hottest summer, NO ... NO that was NOT the reason for that conflict. All the AI did was look for places that had both conflict and climate issues and then said ahhh the one is because of the other. 

1 hour ago, Old Guy said:

The IPCC link has lots of good information and all kinds of charts with data you could explore

Nope.  All of it is largely unsourced or its a conclusion drawn without presenting the data. 

And you don't offer a cite by saying "here's a link, there MIGHT be some relevant science in there somewhere  if you follow all the links".   It's like linking to the wikipedia home page and saying "wikipedia says i'm right, keep reading till you find it". 

What you posted was a promotional (or to be less kind, propaganda) page with very little to back it up. 

I asked for the science. Where's the research paper that says how many wars will start and shows its' modelling so we can check it? Where's the research paper showing what difference it would make to the climate in, say, 50 years if canada cut emissions 10 15 or 20 percent?  Hell we signed paris - where's the document showing how much achieving those goals would change the course of climate change?

Are you REALLY telling me we signed that and NOBODY thought to ask 'Has anyone looked into if this is worth it or not?"

If that's the case, what they're saying is that there is NO crisis at all, no emergency, and nothing we do will have any measurable effect. Which considering our size is probably correct. 

 

THAT is how science works.  You on the left frequently claim to be fans of science but you absolutely HATE  it unless it happens to coincidentally favor an opinion you have.  WHERE THE HELL IS THE SCIENCE?!?

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Seems you missed the word "FORMERLY." AKA, your claim is anachronistic.

 

You mean what they've FORGOTTEN they suffered from? AKA COVID and economic collapse.

Ah yes. 'Formerly-. Although I have seen videos of cannibalism in haiti, and many military vets stationed there are traumatized by it 

Posted
16 hours ago, Matthew said:

Wishful thinking. Nothing Trump did or said during the debate communicated any admiration for the US or positive aspirations for the country.

But you think the kamal did? She's a lying piece of garbage. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...