gatomontes99 Posted August 27, 2024 Report Posted August 27, 2024 If she's elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called "un-American" during the Trump administration. There you go. She's endorsing his no tax on tips and his border wall. She's practically endorsing him. 1 2 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
gatomontes99 Posted August 28, 2024 Author Report Posted August 28, 2024 Harris also endorses Trump's opinion on EV mandates: The Harris campaign blasted out an email ahead of Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance’s Tuesday visit to Michigan, with campaign communications official Ammar Moussa writing that Vance would “undoubtedly lie” about things like the notion that “Harris wants to force every American to own an electric vehicle.” However, Harris backed EV mandates while serving in the U.S. Senate, and presided over the Biden administration’s massive spending and regulatory push to effectively force more EVs on the roads. She really is endorsing Trump. 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 She's going to have a messaging problem in a hurry. This is somewhat understandable. Most candidates get well over a year with their team to work out what their positions are going to be and then spend months fine tuning them. She can't just use Biden's stuff, everybody hates Biden So she's winding up with a bit of a mixed bag and sending mixed messages. And worse, no coherent plan for the country. She's going to wind up with a smattering of conflicting policies dropped here and there that don't come together to give a clear vision. One thing trump has always been decent at is creating a vision. If I'm elected then America will be seen as being great again, jobs will come back to this country from foreign lands, the dollar will improve and your buying power with it, and we will stop illegal immigration that threatens our nation and throw out violent offenders. That's pretty clear Kamalas America will.... Tax tips less? Promote, not promote, require EVS? She agrees inflation is bad but will make it worse by giving away free money? She'll build the wall? There's no consistency to it. There's no vision there's no interaction between the policies it's just a bunch of rent noise. Her best days are behind her. It gets tougher and tougher from here out. We will see you by the end of this week with the polls are saying as last week's convention finally shows up in the polling but after that she is going to struggle to gain any ground and very quickly she will begin to lose ground. So she better wind up six or seven points ahead of the game right now or she's toast Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
WestCanMan Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 Kamala is basically admitting that everything she and Biden did together was wrong. They were wrong on the economy, wrong about fracking, wrong about the wall, wrong about going after wait staff for tips, and their foreign policy in the ME and Europe sucked. So why would anyone vote for people who didn't have the intelligence and foresight to do things right the first time? Sure, she is finally coming around to Trump's way of thinking on these issues, now, but over the next 4 years there will be a lot of new decisions to be made, and ideally Americans would elect someone who gets these things right the first time, not someone who continually has to learn from her mistakes. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
CdnFox Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Kamala is basically admitting that everything she and Biden did together was wrong. They were wrong on the economy, wrong about fracking, wrong about the wall, wrong about going after wait staff for tips, and their foreign policy in the ME and Europe sucked. So why would anyone vote for people who didn't have the intelligence and foresight to do things right the first time? She's basically going to claim she was a hostage and had no power, but having seen it done wrong she's uniquely positioned to do it right. And of course what she will claim is that Biden did just fine really, but she can do even better than what he did and be so much even more Biden than Biden was and achieve peak binomic success with her new kamalanomics, which has all the socialism and twice the flavor of leading bidenomic products (and now enriched with Frauduline! ) She's in a weird position where she can't really say Biden was horrible. She has to say he was good, but she also has to say he was horrible and she will be better. But he wasn't horrible. But she will be better. But yeah that was horrible. The longer this campaign goes on, the better chances trump has got. He really has to come off the benches starting September 5th and just constantly and loudly and pervasively sell the message that his terms were good his next term will be better and that she is a disaster with no clear plan and no experience but with a socialist agenda. So far all she's managed is a 1.7% lead over him nationally and they're still fighting neck and neck in the battlefields. If trump plays a cool game with a clear message and forces her into the defensive he will be the next president Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted August 28, 2024 Author Report Posted August 28, 2024 She also endorses Trump's insulin price cap: 1 Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said: She also endorses Trump's insulin price cap: Insulin insurance price cap. I keep hearing people referring to this insulin price cap but that is not what it is. It's a deductible on the insurance for insulin. Insurers are not allowed to charge more than a $35 deductible for insulin on the insurance. The price of insulin is not regulated. It's worth mentioning because some people have suggested that this is an example of effective price control on medical services. It is not, the medical industry still makes the same as they always have in competition keeps the price in line. This is just a requirement that any insurance sold for health insurance must include a deductible of $35 or less for insulin Per month. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: She also endorses Trump's insulin price cap: Except Trump didn't do that, Joe Biden DID. Quote
CdnFox Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 Just now, robosmith said: Except Trump didn't do that, Joe Biden DID. Nope - trump did it first but put a time limit on it as a trial. Biden simply took what he did and made it permanent. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
gatomontes99 Posted August 28, 2024 Author Report Posted August 28, 2024 6 hours ago, robosmith said: Except Trump didn't do that, Joe Biden DID. Nope: In the first few days of his 2021 term, U.S. President Joe Biden was quick to issue nearly a dozen executive orders aimed at reversing many of the policies of former President Donald Trump, from rejoining the World Health Organization to recommitting the U.S. to the Paris climate accord. And, as the 46th president took pen to paper, he required that all federal rules pending review that were submitted under the previous administration be frozen for at 60 days — among them, one aimed at reducing the cost of insulin and EpiPens. It is important to note that the freeze is temporary. Headlines run by some conservative-leaning news publications — such as The Federalist and The National Law Review — made the freeze appear to be a more permanent change, which remains to be determined. So Biden suspended the Trump rule and then brought it back and claimed it as his own. Sorry to ruin your fantasy world. Not sorry. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Nationalist Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 Huh...so the world of the terminally stupid is crumbling. Tampon Tim and his stolen valor. Kamala and her pure stupidity. The only ideas rattling around in Kamala's head, are Trump's. Brandon must have taught Kamala how to plagiarize. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 23 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: If she's elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called "un-American" during the Trump administration. There you go. She's endorsing his no tax on tips and his border wall. She's practically endorsing him. What a stupid b*tch. LOL!!! 9 hours ago, robosmith said: Except Trump didn't do that, Joe Biden DID. Good 'ol roboshill. Always willing to die on the hill of woke. lol Quote
ironstone Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 Not many progressives posting on this thread. They must surely be too embarrassed to admit that Harris is copying Trump policies. They can only twist and squirm so much when avoiding the uncomfortable truth. Quote "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell
West Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 You need orderly immigration so that your infrastructure and public services don't collapse as what we see now. Quote
robosmith Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Nope: In the first few days of his 2021 term, U.S. President Joe Biden was quick to issue nearly a dozen executive orders aimed at reversing many of the policies of former President Donald Trump, from rejoining the World Health Organization to recommitting the U.S. to the Paris climate accord. And, as the 46th president took pen to paper, he required that all federal rules pending review that were submitted under the previous administration be frozen for at 60 days — among them, one aimed at reducing the cost of insulin and EpiPens. It is important to note that the freeze is temporary. Headlines run by some conservative-leaning news publications — such as The Federalist and The National Law Review — made the freeze appear to be a more permanent change, which remains to be determined. So Biden suspended the Trump rule and then brought it back and claimed it as his own. Sorry to ruin your fantasy world. Not sorry. Trump had four years to implement his plan, but did NOTHING until the election was IMMINENT. Sorry to ruin YOUR fantasy, but Trump's plan was different and VOLUNTARY. AKA temporary. Quote The Inflation Reduction Act Provisions The Inflation Reduction Act, which Congress passed and Biden signed into law in August 2022, included an insulin provision that went further than Trump’s voluntary initiative. The act did cap out-of-pocket costs of insulin for Medicare patients at $35 per month. But whereas the Trump program applied only to certain Medicare Part D plans, the act mandated that all Medicare drug programs cap out-of-pocket insulin costs — including those in what’s known as Medicare Part B, which pays for medical equipment such as insulin pumps. The act’s insulin provisions took effect Jan. 1, 2023, for Part D plans and July 1 of that year for Part B. The act also mandated that the out-of-pocket price cap apply to all insulin products a given Medicare plan covers, not just a subset. Taken together, those provisions mean a far greater number of Medicare beneficiaries stand to benefit from the act’s insulin provisions — including people receiving insulin via a pump, who were left out of the Trump-era program. 1 hour ago, Deluge said: What a stupid b*tch. LOL!!! Good 'ol roboshill. Always willing to die on the hill of woke. lol Always willing to correct your errors and post the TRUTH. 3 hours ago, Nationalist said: Huh...so the world of the terminally stupid is crumbling. Tampon Tim and his stolen valor. Kamala and her pure stupidity. The only ideas rattling around in Kamala's head, are Trump's. Brandon must have taught Kamala how to plagiarize. Who taught you to be STUPID? 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 15 hours ago, CdnFox said: She's basically going to claim she was a hostage and had no power, but having seen it done wrong she's uniquely positioned to do it right. And of course what she will claim is that Biden did just fine really, but she can do even better than what he did and be so much even more Biden than Biden was and achieve peak binomic success with her new kamalanomics, which has all the socialism and twice the flavor of leading bidenomic products (and now enriched with Frauduline! ) I don't blame her for telling the lies, I blame the MSM for pretending they make sense, and I blame cultists for believing everything she says no matter how stupid it is. 1 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
Deluge Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 4 minutes ago, robosmith said: Always willing to correct your errors and post the TRUTH. Always willing, but never able... 1 Quote
Rebound Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 15 hours ago, gatomontes99 said: Harris also endorses Trump's opinion on EV mandates: The Harris campaign blasted out an email ahead of Republican Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance’s Tuesday visit to Michigan, with campaign communications official Ammar Moussa writing that Vance would “undoubtedly lie” about things like the notion that “Harris wants to force every American to own an electric vehicle.” However, Harris backed EV mandates while serving in the U.S. Senate, and presided over the Biden administration’s massive spending and regulatory push to effectively force more EVs on the roads. She really is endorsing Trump. Why not just say what’s true? There is no policy which, in your false words, “forces every American to buy an electric vehicle.” Republicans lie more than they tell the truth. You certainly do. So obviously, you must think that telling the truth won’t convince people. But it’s your lies that convince me that your side, especially MAGA, cannot be trusted. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
Deluge Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Rebound said: Why not just say what’s true? There is no policy which, in your false words, “forces every American to buy an electric vehicle.” Republicans lie more than they tell the truth. You certainly do. So obviously, you must think that telling the truth won’t convince people. But it’s your lies that convince me that your side, especially MAGA, cannot be trusted. Why install policy when you can just give manufacturers no place to go except to your kind of car? Edited August 28, 2024 by Deluge Quote
Nationalist Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 43 minutes ago, robosmith said: Trump had four years to implement his plan, but did NOTHING until the election was IMMINENT. Sorry to ruin YOUR fantasy, but Trump's plan was different and VOLUNTARY. AKA temporary. Always willing to correct your errors and post the TRUTH. Who taught you to be STUPID? Great arguments there Tweenkie-poo. I think it's obvious who the stupid one is here... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Goddess Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Trump had four years to implement his plan, but did NOTHING until the election was IMMINENT. He had the plandemic to deal with. Insulin was likely a bit further down in the priority list at the time. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
WestCanMan Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 52 minutes ago, Rebound said: Why not just say what’s true?There is no policy which, in your false words, “forces every American to buy an electric vehicle.” https://money.com/states-banning-gas-powered-cars/#:~:text=At least eight states plan to ban sales,participating states beginning with the 2035 model year. 8 States Now Plan to Ban Gas-Powered Car Sales Quote Republicans lie more than they tell the truth. You certainly do. 🤣 You lying f'ing weasel. https://www.theverge.com/2023/4/10/23677157/ev-rules-epa-emission-standards-biden-ice-gas-car-end The end is nigh for gas-powered cars The Environmental Protection Agency is preparing to unveil strict new standards to boost EVs — and effectively phase out the sale of internal combustion engine vehicles. On Wednesday, the Environmental Protection Agency plans to announce tough new tailpipe emission standards designed to effectively force the auto industry to phase out the sale of gas-powered cars. It’s an ambitious — and risky — move by the Biden administration to cement its climate goals by boosting the sale of electric vehicles while also ushering in the end of the era of the internal combustion engine (ICE). But it won’t be as easy as banning the sale of gas-powered cars or mandating that companies only sell vehicles with electric powertrains. Rather, the new EPA rules would set an emissions limit on the total number of new cars each automaker sells in a year. That limit would essentially ensure that two-thirds of vehicles they sold in the US by 2032 would be EVs, according to a report by The New York Times. The full details are expected to be released on Wednesday. While it's true that's not a 100% ban across the entire US, if only 1/3 of all vehicles sold can be gas-powered, the price will become exorbitant, and put them out of reach for most people. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
WestCanMan Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Trump had four years to implement his plan, but did NOTHING until the election was IMMINENT. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/articles/congress-didnt-act-on-prescription-drug-prices-so-president-trump-did/ Congress Didn’t Act on Prescription Drug Prices. So President Trump Did. Just because Trump couldn't get sleazy Dems to vote to do the right thing doesn't mean he didn't do everything he could. The Dems just opposed everything, including the "racist" wall that Kamala is now pimping. The President [trump] signed four sweeping executive orders on Friday, which together will significantly lower the cost of prescription drugs while increasing access to life-saving medications such as insulin: The first order directs federally qualified health centers to pass along massive discounts on insulin and epinephrine from drug companies to low-income Americans. The second order will allow the safe, legal importation of prescription drugs from Canada and other countries where the price for identical drugs is lower. The third order will prohibit secret deals between drug manufacturers and pharmacy “benefit manager” middlemen, ensuring patients directly benefit from available discounts at the pharmacy counter. The fourth order ensures the United States pays the lowest price available among economically advanced countries for Medicare Part B drugs. The United States often pays 80 percent more for these drugs than other developed nations. Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid. Ex-Canadian since April 2025
gatomontes99 Posted August 28, 2024 Author Report Posted August 28, 2024 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump had four years to implement his plan, but did NOTHING until the election was IMMINENT. Sorry to ruin YOUR fantasy, but Trump's plan was different and VOLUNTARY. AKA temporary. Always willing to correct your errors and post the TRUTH. Who taught you to be STUPID? You just refuse to come to reality, don't you? Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted August 28, 2024 Report Posted August 28, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, ironstone said: Not many progressives posting on this thread. They must surely be too embarrassed to admit that Harris is copying Trump policies. They can only twist and squirm so much when avoiding the uncomfortable truth. Or they just try to reimagine it. 22 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You just refuse to come to reality, don't you? robo actually pays to shill. He's already had his head examined but the experts are still stumped. Edited August 28, 2024 by Deluge Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.