Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, West said:

Wasn't very trauma informed to Juanita Broadderick, Leslie Millwee and possibly many others too scared to come forward to have their alleged rapist up there giving a speech. 

That's because they knew they may not live long enough to see the monster fry. The democrat party is more than just a machine, it's an actual gang of rapists, murderers and devil worshippers. 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You're a true culture warrior.  Maybe the best signifier is that you blame one side for things...

I outlined why. 

Posted
10 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Who's husband was nearly killed by a crazy intruder

Crazy yes. But intruder? Not really. As I understand it, Paul let the guy in. I suspect DePape was a jilted lover and jealous of Nancy.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Crazy yes. But intruder? Not really. As I understand it, Paul let the guy in. I suspect DePape was a jilted lover and jealous of Nancy.

Stop watching ridiculous conspiracy videos. The trial is over, and its clear what happened.

 

Court of law > Newsmax

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

These days we all need to laugh sometimes. This clip sums up the night at the DNC.

Apparently, the night before, Bernie Sanders spoke and as usual he railed against billionaires. So of course the next person on stage after him is...a billionaire. But he's one of their billionaires so it's ok. I'm pretty sure that Bernie Sanders (Biden/Harris administration economic advisor) used to also rail against millionaires..until he himself became one.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/bernie-sanders-billionaires-dnc/

Still, even as the struggle continues, Sanders can take comfort in the fact that in the war for the soul of the party, he is winning.

Bernie Sanders is a great man.

Posted
30 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Stop watching ridiculous conspiracy videos. The trial is over, and its clear what happened.

 

Court of law > Newsmax

The trial is over...for Paul Pelosi. Rich San Francisco husband of the third in line for the Presidency at the time.

They called a Canadian hobo, a "far-right lunatic". Ya...a freaked out Canuck living in a dump of a motor home, is "far-right". What a farce.

And that's one of the biggest problems you Libbies have. You co-opted the media and the law and now all trust in them is lost.

But the truth always eeks out. Then you Libbies wind up having to eat crow.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

Bernie Sanders is a great man.

How so? It literally is the proverbial red flag when someone praises socialism/communism.

bernie-sanders-driving-suv-to-private-jet-to-give-speech-of-evil-capitalism-and-fossil-fuels.webp

Edited by ironstone

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
40 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The trial is over...for Paul Pelosi. Rich San Francisco husband of the third in line for the Presidency at the time.

They called a Canadian hobo, a "far-right lunatic". Ya...a freaked out Canuck living in a dump of a motor home, is "far-right". What a farce.

And that's one of the biggest problems you Libbies have. You co-opted the media and the law and now all trust in them is lost.

But the truth always eeks out. Then you Libbies wind up having to eat crow.

No, the problem, as always, is that you'll believe any unsupported claim--no matter how ridiculous-- that crosses your path and "feels" convenient. 

Like so many people of your generation (though not exclusive to your generation) you have no natural or learned ability to cope with a world of unfiltered information. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No, the problem, as always, is that you'll believe any unsupported claim--no matter how ridiculous-- that crosses your path and "feels" convenient. 

Like so many people of your generation (though not exclusive to your generation) you have no natural or learned ability to cope with a world of unfiltered information. 

Lol...ya...rrriiight...

The problem is, you id1ots keep lying to people who recognize lies when they hear them.

  • Thanks 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
6 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

It's already been proven in court, unlike your allegations against private citizen Bill Clinton.

You're not very good at this, small fry! 😔 

No it hasn't! 

Do you think lying makes you "good at it"?  My condolences to your husband :) 

When was trump convicted of it in court?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
4 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Try to keep up. Sticking your head in the sand just makes you look more stupid.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/05/09/nyregion/trump-carroll-rape-trial-verdict

Ummm - from your OWN LINK

The jury did not, however, find he had raped her, as she had long claimed.

So you not only were stupid enough to disagree with me without being sure you were right, you are actually stupid enough to PROVIDE THE PROOF YOU WERE LYING AND I WAS RIGHT TO BEGIN WITH!!!

Seriously - do you need help getting your pants on in the morning? Do they make you wear one of those bike helmets before you're allowed outside? 

What the hell is wrong with you that you'd literally post proof you were wrong while insulting others for "Sticking their heads in the sand"? LOLOLOL :) 

And you join a long line of truly dense lefties who are kind enough to provide links that show they're wrong.  You must have to fail an iq test to be accepted as part of the woke or something :) 

well done :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Sexual abuse is rape. Grabbing by the pus-sy is rape.

Sorry kid - the jury specifically found he did NOT rape her.  Swing and a miss :)  you can't lie your way out of it :)  

you are literally that stupid - you literally claimed he had been found guilty of rape- and provided proof he had very specifically not been found guilty of rape. Well done. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Only you Libbie @Black Dog. He has a "thing" for young kids. Typical Libbie warped mind and morality.

You have a thing for your own kids, freak. Question is, which one do you want to f*ck more, the girl or the boys?

  • Downvote 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, West said:

Not if it's consensual. Duh

Not even if it's not.  It's not rape - it's sexual assault if it's not consensual. 

The jury found she was not raped for a good reason. 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
7 hours ago, Black Dog said:

You have a thing for your own kids, freak. Question is, which one do you want to f*ck more, the girl or the boys?

Huh...you really are a dog aren't ya.

Meh...I guess impotence will do that.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

If I find something distasteful, boring, obscene, etc.. I pay it no mind. This is like saying, "man, that beer tastes like a$$ ... but go ahead and order me up a 12 pack of it". If the DNC is so terrible then why are certain posters watching stuff about it and reading stuff about it.... Seems a bit masochistic or hypocritical to me. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

If I find something distasteful, boring, obscene, etc.. I pay it no mind. This is like saying, "man, that beer tastes like a$$ ... but go ahead and order me up a 12 pack of it". If the DNC is so terrible then why are certain posters watching stuff about it and reading stuff about it.... Seems a bit masochistic or hypocritical to me. 

Because a 12 pack of beer that goes unpurchased wont destroy your life. The DNC will.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
9 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

the DNC destroyed your life... why are you on here then? Or are you being a bit of a drama queen?

Well, we could talk about the anecdotal evidence like Laken Riley and how her and her family's life was ruined. We could also talk about the lives of hundreds of people that were targeted by the FBI for attending school board meetings to oppose DNC values. Or maybe we could talk about the financial statistics like inflation and the destruction of personal savings. We could also talk about the international instability that was born of weak policy and financing terrorist organizations.

You can't name one thing the unDemocratic party did that improved life in America and abroad. But I could go on and on about the policies and poor decisions that have seriously harmed us in very real ways.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Well, we could talk about the anecdotal evidence like Laken Riley and how her and her family's life was ruined. We could also talk about the lives of hundreds of people that were targeted by the FBI for attending school board meetings to oppose DNC values. Or maybe we could talk about the financial statistics like inflation and the destruction of personal savings. We could also talk about the international instability that was born of weak policy and financing terrorist organizations.

You can't name one thing the unDemocratic party did that improved life in America and abroad. But I could go on and on about the policies and poor decisions that have seriously harmed us in very real ways.

Way to go off into the weeds... so the DNC destroyed your life (your lack of a rebuttal implies this) and yet you are here wasting your time. Some strange priorities. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Way to go off into the weeds... so the DNC destroyed your life (your lack of a rebuttal implies this) and yet you are here wasting your time. Some strange priorities. 

The first time I used "your" was colloquial."Your" meant anyone that might read what I wrote. Since the forum is open to read only, that means anyone in the world. But more so, it was meant to include those that might vote. The context makes that clear.

Your focus on semantics illustrates that you understand Dem policies harm Americans. You just dont want to address the truth. So you find some alternate meaning and pretend that is what we should focus on.

 

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,904
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TheGx Forum
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...