Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

People keep wanting to pin fascism down to a very specific demographic with very specific beliefs, but when a government hijacks the media, the courts, the police, elections, and inflicts their own forms of discrimination on the public in general, it's still fascism. 

We're not going to invent a new word for that style of governance every time a group with a different skin colour, religion, or political agenda takes over and hate mongers and discriminates against another. 

Islamists in Iran are fascists. Plain and simple. They're not blue-eyed Christians, but they check all the same boxes as the Nazis did. 

Demonrats are fascists. They don't openly hate Jews, and they're not Christians, but they fully control the media, their propaganda is violent, they control the FBI, they have weaponized the DOJ, they cheat on elections with impunity, and their ridiculous beliefs and punishments are being foisted on innocent citizens who are doing no harm to anyone. 

Sure, you could make the case that when Iran's gov't flogs women and throws them in jail for 20 years just for taking off their hijab, it's much worse than just denying people access to jobs because they're white, or chucking them off planes for misgendering someone with gender dysphoria, but it's still a core aspect of fascism when people are being subjected to real punishments for arbitrary and silly infractions. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

People keep wanting to pin fascism down to a very specific demographic with very specific beliefs, but when a government hijacks the media, the courts, the police, elections, and inflicts their own forms of discrimination on the public in general, it's still fascism. 

We're not going to invent a new word for that style of governance every time a group with a different skin colour, religion, or political agenda takes over and hate mongers and discriminates against another. 

Islamists in Iran are fascists. Plain and simple. They're not blue-eyed Christians, but they check all the same boxes as the Nazis did. 

Demonrats are fascists. They don't openly hate Jews, and they're not Christians, but they fully control the media, their propaganda is violent, they control the FBI, they have weaponized the DOJ, they cheat on elections with impunity, and their ridiculous beliefs and punishments are being foisted on innocent citizens who are doing no harm to anyone. 

Sure, you could make the case that when Iran's gov't flogs women and throws them in jail for 20 years just for taking off their hijab, it's much worse than just denying people access to jobs because they're white, or chucking them off planes for misgendering someone with gender dysphoria, but it's still a core aspect of fascism when people are being subjected to real punishments for arbitrary and silly infractions. 

"when a government hijacks the media, the courts, the police, elections, and inflicts their own forms of discrimination on the public in general,"

Oh...the irony

Posted
4 hours ago, Five of swords said:

National socialists were opposed to transgenderism.

Were they tho? I know they weren't big on gays, but i don't recall reading any actual policy regarding trans. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, Five of swords said:

I don't recall you reading anything at all

He said responding to a post which literally came from reading something he wrote  :) 

You really are the special kind of stupid aren't you  :) 

Setting your severe memory issues aside, once again no citations, just making shit up out of your ass.  Well i'm certainly shocked. 

Don't know why i was optimistic there 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Five of swords said:

National socialists were opposed to transgenderism.

Tweenkies ARE fascists at heart.

They all carry a grudge for being teased as little kids.

Karma will deal withem.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, herbie said:

Woke Nazis? Are they like Jumbo shrimp and Military Intelligence?

No, they're more like screaming homosexuals smothered in hate sauce. All the leftoids rave about them. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted

The whole pretext of this story seems fishy. Like when in the boarding process does anyone have a natural opportunity to refer to a flight attendant's gender?

Seems more likely to be a Karen situation. According to the airline she was trying to bring extra carry-ons including an entire car seat onto the plane. An argument occurred so it's possible mom was saying angry things at them. The captain himself said she was barred from the flight. They rescheduled her for the next one.

Then she makes a dramatic woe is me video for her 20k Instagram followers.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Matthew said:

The whole pretext of this story seems fishy. Like when in the boarding process does anyone have a natural opportunity to refer to a flight attendant's gender?

Seems more likely to be a Karen situation. According to the airline she was trying to bring extra carry-ons including an entire car seat onto the plane. An argument occurred so it's possible mom was saying angry things at them. The captain himself said she was barred from the flight. They rescheduled her for the next one.

Then she makes a dramatic woe is me video for her 20k Instagram followers.

 

Identity politics... Pass it by...

Posted
4 hours ago, Matthew said:

The whole pretext of this story seems fishy. Like when in the boarding process does anyone have a natural opportunity to refer to a flight attendant's gender?

Seems more likely to be a Karen situation. According to the airline she was trying to bring extra carry-ons including an entire car seat onto the plane. An argument occurred so it's possible mom was saying angry things at them. The captain himself said she was barred from the flight. They rescheduled her for the next one.

Then she makes a dramatic woe is me video for her 20k Instagram followers.

 

Its like you didn't even read the article. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

Its like you didn't even read the article. 

I read the article, watched the ladys video, and then went and read several other sources.

Is your normal habit to just consume a piece of propoganda and then take it at face value?

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Matthew said:

I read the article, watched the ladys video, and then went and read several other sources.

Is your normal habit to just consume a piece of propoganda and then take it at face value?

An allegation from a single person, which is implied to show a significant example of a whole social trend.

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Matthew said:

I read the article, watched the ladys video, and then went and read several other sources.

Is your normal habit to just consume a piece of propoganda and then take it at face value?

Your question: " Like when in the boarding process does anyone have a natural opportunity to refer to a flight attendant's gender?"

was clearly explained in the article you now claim to have read... 

"The mother-of-one claims a United employee who identified as a female became visibly shaken when Longoria - who was distracted by her son having a meltdown -  said 'thank you, sir,' as the employee handed her back her boarding passes."

Your timing on the video is not what was said in the article either. She made the video before they agreed to get her another flight. 
 

4 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

An allegation from a single person, which is implied to show a significant example of a whole social trend.

 

Wait... do you not think it is a big social trend right now with pronouns and gender identity? 

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, User said:

was clearly explained in the article you now claim to have read... 

"The mother-of-one claims a United employee who identified as a female became visibly shaken when Longoria - who was distracted by her son having a meltdown -  said 'thank you, sir,' as the employee handed her back her boarding passes."

And maybe it was as simple as that, and maybe this person was unjustly treated as they claim.

But it sounds like there was actually a whole dispute that occurred which the lady conveniently left out of her video performance aimed at her army of fellow Instagram karens.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Matthew said:

But it sounds like there was actually a whole dispute that occurred which the lady conveniently left out of her video performance aimed at her army of fellow Instagram karens.

Of course there was a dispute that occurred, she explained that... wait for it, in the article you claim to have read. 

Most people are not video recording at the moment, so it is not a matter of conveniently leaving it out of her video—she was not videotaping what would have been a normal boarding experience. 

 

  • Thanks 1

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

Of course there was a dispute that occurred, she explained that... wait for it, in the article you claim to have read. 

It honestly hurts just watching this. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

I can see the woman "misgendering" someone if she was distracted. I actually had did that once with a little person assuming she was a child because all I saw was a short person and I was in a hurry. Same things happens with fat people being mistakenly called pregnant and vice versa.

Ive misgendered people who weren't even trying to be a different gender.

Lets be honest most men trying to be women look like men trying to be women, some pass pretty well. Women seem to be able to pass as men a little bit better when trying for some reason.

And all the non-binary and dumbass fake genders that require all kinds of different pronouns can just f off.

Luckily for me I just call everyone dude doesn't matter male or female or whatever.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

I can see the woman "misgendering" someone if she was distracted.

I agree, and flight attendants deal with hundreds and hundreds of customers day in and day out and one of them accidently says "sir," the captain of the plane is not going to take the extrodinary step of banning the passenger.  It's not impossible, but it's just extremely unlikely barely plausible. Clearly more ocurred that got her in trouble.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Matthew said:

I agree, and flight attendants deal with hundreds and hundreds of customers day in and day out and one of them accidently says "sir," the captain of the plane is not going to take the extrodinary step of banning the passenger.  It's not impossible, but it's just extremely unlikely barely plausible. Clearly more ocurred that got her in trouble.

That isn't how it played out though, from what she claimed in the article. Again, it is like you didn't even read the article. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Matthew said:

I agree, and flight attendants deal with hundreds and hundreds of customers day in and day out and one of them accidently says "sir," the captain of the plane is not going to take the extrodinary step of banning the passenger.  It's not impossible, but it's just extremely unlikely barely plausible. Clearly more ocurred that got her in trouble.

Well air canada is apologizing today and saying it was unacceptable behavior.  Soooooo.... 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
10 hours ago, User said:

That isn't how it played out though, from what she claimed in the article. Again, it is like you didn't even read the article. 

 

 

“According to her claim.” The claim of an “Instagram wannabe star”. 

Is United Airlines going to ban someone for life because they thought a woman was a man, and then apologized about the mistake? Of course not. Is that what actually happened? We do not know. A woman claims it happened. She also claims she had so much carry on baggage that she needed a flight attendant’s help just to get it all onto the plane, so… maybe she had too much? Plausible, yes?

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...