Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Biden's out, and the DNC can't be seen to disenfranchise everyone who voted for Joe in the Primary, so Kamala's in. It's 95% now.

So who does she choose as VP? Another black woman, like M Obama? Hillary Clinton (unlikely imo, Hillary would dominate her).

The only Dem who doesn't appear to have crawled out of the primordial ooze is Joe Manchin, but he's an idependent now.

Bernie? No way. He's only popular from far left to crazier.

Who would play 2nd fiddle to Kamala?

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Biden's out, and the DNC can't be seen to disenfranchise everyone who voted for Joe in the Primary, so Kamala's in. It's 95% now.

So who does she choose as VP? Another black woman, like M Obama? Hillary Clinton (unlikely imo, Hillary would dominate her).

The only Dem who doesn't appear to have crawled out of the primordial ooze is Joe Manchin, but he's an idependent now.

Bernie? No way. He's only popular from far left to crazier.

Who would play 2nd fiddle to Kamala?

My guess is a loudmouth female governor or some soy guzzling white cuck from Congress. 

Posted

Are there any members of the Squad old enough that were also born in the US?😄

Seriously, they have such a weak bench.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Are there any members of the Squad old enough that were also born in the US?😄

Seriously, they have such a weak bench.

Maybe if Democrats had a deeper bench we could find someone who wrote a memoir but has almost no experience in politics or government. 

But hell, I suppose that's a pretty good resume for Republicans, who last ran a reality TV star with zero experience in politics and government. 

🙄

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Who would play 2nd fiddle to Kamala?

Reminds me of this. Imagine the laughter they would share:

 

Posted
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Biden's out, and the DNC can't be seen to disenfranchise everyone who voted for Joe in the Primary, so Kamala's in. It's 95% now.

So who does she choose as VP? Another black woman, like M Obama? Hillary Clinton (unlikely imo, Hillary would dominate her).

The only Dem who doesn't appear to have crawled out of the primordial ooze is Joe Manchin, but he's an idependent now.

Bernie? No way. He's only popular from far left to crazier.

Who would play 2nd fiddle to Kamala?

You're delusional.

Quote

 

image.png

2 hours ago, West said:

Democrats are in trouble if Kamala is their choice. She's not likeable

So what? Trump is a certified a-hole and misogynist.

Posted
31 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Maybe if Democrats had a deeper bench we could find someone who wrote a memoir but has almost no experience in politics or government. 

But hell, I suppose that's a pretty good resume for Republicans, who last ran a reality TV star with zero experience in politics and government. 

🙄

You could always throw a multi-decade career weasel like Shumer, Pelosi, Weinstein in there.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

You could always throw a multi-decade career weasel like Shumer, Pelosi, Weinstein in there.

Any one of those three would make a right pair if ever I saw one.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You could always throw a multi-decade career weasel like Shumer, Pelosi, Weinstein in there.

No, no, get this.  Hunter.  Wouldn’t that be hilarious?  She probably owes him a favour.  Nudge nudge, wink wink.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Hodad said:

But hell, I suppose that's a pretty good resume for Republicans, who last ran a reality TV star with zero experience in politics and government. 

When that is taken into consideration, he did pretty darn well right up until Covid. Compare that to the career politician's current record. A porous border, proxy war with Russia, very high cost of living, a more aggressive Iran...

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted

Kathy lee gifford?

Stormy daniels?

Or how about this -  In a stunning move, she announces her running mate will be.....  SARAH PALIN!!!!  And not just as her running mate... BUT AS HER LIFE MATE! Turns out they're in love!

BOOOM - picks up the gay and lesbian vote,  BOOM - picks up the 'straight guys who like to think of two women together' vote, which is all of them, BOOM picks up the intersectionals,  BOOM - picks up the christians who don't really mind other christians who violate the commandments vote, takes alaska and texas in a sweep and the remaining republicans are too confused about what the HELL is going on to even get out and vote. 

THAT is what a winning ticket for Kamala looks like 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
39 minutes ago, West said:

She'll probably go trans albino

Honestly you think the media would talk about trump or biden EVER? they would dominate the news cycle, victory in november, rush into the white house and lock the door.   I'm tellin' ya it's a winning ticket! 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Hodad said:

Maybe if Democrats had a deeper bench we could find someone who wrote a memoir but has almost no experience in politics or government. 

But hell, I suppose that's a pretty good resume for Republicans, who last ran a reality TV star with zero experience in politics and government. 

🙄

You ran Obama who had little experience and who never ran anything, at least Trump had experience running a large corporation.

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

You ran Obama who had little experience and who never ran anything, at least Trump had experience running a large corporation.

That's a good point. 

That proves something about politics generally. Trudeau, Obama, Trump. A bartender /teacher, community organizer, a bankrupt reprobate who did pizza hut commercials and was a game show host. 

 

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's a good point. 

That proves something about politics generally. Trudeau, Obama, Trump. A bartender /teacher, community organizer, a bankrupt reprobate who did pizza hut commercials and was a game show host. 

Your libbie roots are showing.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

You ran Obama who had little experience and who never ran anything, at least Trump had experience running a large corporation.

That's a pretty silly equivalence. Obama was running in the primary against MORE experienced candidates, but he had spent his career in politics and government, including 7 years as a state senator and 3 as a US senator. And still, both Republicans and Democrats  argued that he wasn't experienced enough. 

Then Republicans forgot all about that and decided, apparently, that media success is the only qualification one needs. I swear, they'd run Kim Kardashian if she were a gun nut.

Trump ran his businesses into the ground. He bankrupted 3---three!---casinos, FFS. The only reason he's solvent today is because he clowned for the world on "reality" TV. 

Don't get me wrong, I don't have any problem with people trying to make a buck on reality TV, but it's the complete opposite of qualifying one for the presidency of the most powerful country on Earth. 

You guys decided to make Mike Judge look like a damn Oracle, bringing Idiocracy to life far faster than anyone imagined.

And, for his part, Vance is not a total buffoon, but he's wildly unqualified to be on deck for the presidency, especially behind someone of Trump's age and fitness. Eh, I guess at least a memoire is an upgrade from reality TV. 🫠

Posted
23 hours ago, Hodad said:

Maybe if Democrats had a deeper bench we could find someone who wrote a memoir but has almost no experience in politics or government. 

But hell, I suppose that's a pretty good resume for Republicans, who last ran a reality TV star with zero experience in politics and government. 

Because Obama had soooooooo much experience. 

This is why you guys run from me. I consistently call you out for your double standards and hypocrisy. 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, sharkman said:

No, no, get this.  Hunter.  Wouldn’t that be hilarious?  She probably owes him a favour.  Nudge nudge, wink wink.

We are getting a lot of great ideas on VP pic for Kamala, no doubt.  But if she went with Hunter Biden, they wouldn’t even have to change the campaign signs that have already been printed up.

Biden/Harris would work just fine with those democrat fans that can’t break free of their Biden dependency.  And Hunter’s platform could include the slogan, “I’ll get drugs off the streets!”, and not even be lying!

😝

Posted
7 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

That's a good point. 

That proves something about politics generally. Trudeau, Obama, Trump. A bartender /teacher, community organizer, a bankrupt reprobate who did pizza hut commercials and was a game show host. 

 

 

 It does make the idea of experienced career politicians who know how things work look a lot better doesn't it. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...