Obama is clearly a Muslim and that's a disgrace to America

[West]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

[TreeBeard]

Do you think anyone who criticizes Israel is a Muslim?

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Do you think anyone who criticizes Israel is a Muslim?

Ahhh - more dishonest questioning.

Do you think NO ONE who criticizes isreal is muslim?

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

1. Maher is far from "hardline Democrat."

2. Your LINK is BROKEN. Must be FOS LYING AGAIN retraction.

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

I don’t disagree with Obama. He tried for eight years to work with Netanyahu, who gave him the finger the whole time, up to and including addressing Congress without getting permission or even asking the State Dept. It was a big F-you to Obama, and lo and behold, it hasn’t worked out well for Israel.  
 

Trump’s plan was to send an Orthodox Jew to create a “peace plan” with Israel, present it to the Palestinians and tell them “take it or leave it,” and if course that got him a middle finger too.  
 

Maybe it’s just not possible, but frankly, Netanyahu has been far far too antagonistic to the Palestinians  

 

Edited November 11, 2023 by Rebound

[Michael Hardner]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

I don’t disagree with Obama. He tried for eight years to work with Netanyahu, who gave him the finger the whole time, up to and including addressing Congress without getting permission or even asking the State Dept. It was a big F-you to Obama, and lo and behold, it hasn’t worked out well for Israel.  
 

Trump’s plan was to send an Orthodox Jew to create a “peace plan” with Israel, present it to the Palestinians and tell them “take it or leave it,” and if course that got him a middle finger too.  
 

Maybe it’s just not possible, but frankly, Netanyahu has been far far too antagonistic to the Palestinians  

 

Great post.  The hard of thinking will demand that Israel and the US take a hard line, when that is the strategic failure before us.

Netanyahu's arrogance and assumptions that the world will support them no matter what ... led them here.

[robosmith]

22 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Great post.  The hard of thinking will demand that Israel and the US take a hard line, when that is the strategic failure before us.

Netanyahu's arrogance and assumptions that the world will support them no matter what ... led them here.

I think he's assuming the US will support them no matter what and that's ALL they need. He's wrong about that.

[Aristides]

7 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

Maher is a democrat but he doesn't hesitate to criticize them. There is a lot he doesn't like about the current party but not enough to join the Trump Cult.

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

That crrrrrrazy, Obama, saying what every thinking person already understands. So controversial!?

"If there’s any chance of us being able to act constructively to do something, it will require an admission of complexity and maintaining what on the surface may seem contradictory ideas that what Hamas did was horrific, and there’s no justification for it. And … that the occupation and what’s happening to Palestinians is unbearable,” Obama said in an interview on the podcast “Pod Save America.”

For sure, only a Muslim could possibly think that.?

Edited November 12, 2023 by Hodad

[reason10]

7 hours ago, West said:

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-scolds-obamas-moral-equivalency-israel-hamas-he-really-disappointed-me.

Even the most hard line Democrats are turning on Barry

Obama gave the Middle East ISIS. He gave Iran BILLIONS to finance the act of terror in October that those rag headed animals perpetrated on the Jews.

Hitler would be proud.

[CdnFox]

30 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That crrrrrrazy, Obama, saying what every thinking person already understands. So controversial!?

"If there’s any chance of us being able to act constructively to do something, it will require an admission of complexity and maintaining what on the surface may seem contradictory ideas that what Hamas did was horrific, and there’s no justification for it. And … that the occupation and what’s happening to Palestinians is unbearable,” Obama said in an interview on the podcast “Pod Save America.”

For sure, only a Muslim could possibly think that.?

I love that when obama says it it's "everyone knew that" and when fox news says it its "FOS LIES!!!! (useless without proof!!!)

[West]

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

Obama gave the Middle East ISIS. He gave Iran BILLIONS to finance the act of terror in October that those rag headed animals perpetrated on the Jews.

Hitler would be proud.

Donnie was correct when he said Barry is the founder of ISIS

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, reason10 said:

Obama gave the Middle East ISIS. He gave Iran BILLIONS to finance the act of terror in October that those rag headed animals perpetrated on the Jews.

Hitler would be proud.

Obama didn't "give" ANY money to Iran, knucklehead.

And that's the "reason" you posted NO EVIDENCE for you ignorant claim.

In REALITY, Obama removed sanctions which FROZE Iranian money in foreign banks in exchange for limits on Iran's nuclear development.

On January 16, 2016, the International Atomic Energy Agency verified that Iran has completed the necessary steps under the Iran deal that will ensure Iran's nuclear program is and remains exclusively peaceful.

4 hours ago, West said:

Donnie was correct when he said Barry is the founder of ISIS

You are just as ignorant as R10.

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

In REALITY, Obama removed sanctions which FROZE Iranian money in foreign banks in exchange for limits on Iran's nuclear development.

So... you're saying obama removed sanctions and gave iran access to that money?  Sooooo .... how exactly is that different than him giving them money? Exactly?

[Aristides]

12 hours ago, reason10 said:

Obama gave the Middle East ISIS. He gave Iran BILLIONS to finance the act of terror in October that those rag headed animals perpetrated on the Jews.

Hitler would be proud.

Bush gave the Middle East ISIS when he invaded Iraq in 2003 and disbanded Saddam’s Republican Guard. It’s origins predate Obama.

Edited November 12, 2023 by Aristides

[reason10]

3 hours ago, Aristides said:

Bush gave the Middle East ISIS when he invaded Iraq in 2003 and disbanded Saddam’s Republican Guard. It’s origins predate Obama.

That is a LIE. It was Obama who pulled out of Iraq and left all that military hardware for those raghead murderers to use.  It was Obama who made that nuclear deal with Iran, giving them BILLIONS in American cash,  a lot of which financed that attack on Israel.

Are you just plain STUPID?

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

So... you're saying obama removed sanctions and gave iran access to that money?  Sooooo .... how exactly is that different than him giving them money? Exactly?

Are you stupid? It was THEIR MONEY. Your own post says it: "gave ACCESS."

Relaxing sanctions is NOT "GIVE money" just like applying sanctions is NOT "take." Duh

Edited November 12, 2023 by robosmith

[robosmith]

22 minutes ago, reason10 said:

That is a LIE. It was Obama who pulled out of Iraq and left all that military hardware for those raghead murderers to use.  It was Obama who made that nuclear deal with Iran, giving them BILLIONS in American cash,  a lot of which financed that attack on Israel.

Are you just plain STUPID?

You are so stupid you POST ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION.

And you're a LIAR. It was NOT "American cash," nor was any WORKING military hardware left behind.

You're really on a roll of complete dishonesty today, as usual, TOP TROLL. ?

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you stupid? It was THEIR MONEY. Your own post says it: "gave ACCESS."

Relaxing sanctions is NOT "GIVE money" just like applying sanctions is NOT "take." Duh

So they were given access to their own money to further develop nuclear capability which could include weapons. That was why the sanctions were imposed. 

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Are you stupid? It was THEIR MONEY. Your own post says it: "gave ACCESS."

 

"Gave".  So - the us had control over it and 'gave' that back to them.

So i asked what's the difference  and it looks like you weren't able to answer that.

so - you're basically saying you know that he DID give it to them and there IS no difference.   But you're angry about it and don't want to admit obama messed up and helped give funding back to the iranians.

Got it  

Quote

Relaxing sanctions is NOT "GIVE money" just like applying sanctions is NOT "take." Duh

No, it specifically says that they 'unfroze' assets.  So that's not just sanctions.

Try not to think of this too hard - you're drooling again  

Edited November 12, 2023 by CdnFox

[Aristides]

3 hours ago, reason10 said:

That is a LIE. It was Obama who pulled out of Iraq and left all that military hardware for those raghead murderers to use.  It was Obama who made that nuclear deal with Iran, giving them BILLIONS in American cash,  a lot of which financed that attack on Israel.

Are you just plain STUPID?

Stupid maybe but not flat out ignorant like you.

[reason10]

20 hours ago, Aristides said:

Stupid maybe but not flat out ignorant like you.

Ignorant defines someone who denies the facts.   You deny facts.

[reason10]

23 hours ago, robosmith said:

You are so stupid you POST ZERO EVIDENCE for your ^OPINION.

And you're a LIAR. It was NOT "American cash," nor was any WORKING military hardware left behind.

You're really on a roll of complete dishonesty today, as usual, TOP TROLL. ?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-administration-acknowledges-1-7-billion-transfer-to-iran-was-all-cash/

Hey, STUPID. Even the left wing CBS news says it was all CASH. It wasn't rials, it was pallets of AMERICAN TAXPAYER FUNDED CASH.

https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/06/04/Fog-War-US-Has-Armed-ISIS

U.S. Shoots Itself In the Foot By Accidentally Arming ISIS

According to Reuters, the U.S.-made weaponry that fell into enemy hands including 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles, at least 40 M1A1 main battle tanks, 74,000 machine guns, and as many as 52 M198 howitzer mobile gun systems, plus small arms and ammunition. 

Although al-Abadi and other Iraqi and U.S. officials haven’t attached a dollar sign to the lost weaponry and vehicles, a back-of-the-envelope calculation of those losses might look something like this: 

• 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles @ $70,000 per copy. Total: $161 million
• 40 M1A1 Abram tanks @ $4.3 million per copy. Total: $172 million
• 52 M198 Howitzer mobile gun systems @ $527,337 per copy. Total: $27.4 million
• 74,000 Army machine guns @ $4,000 per copy. Total: $296 million 

 

The grand total comes to $656.4 million, but experts say those losses represent just a portion of the many hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of U.S.-supplied military equipment that has fallen into ISIS’s hands and is being used against the U.S. and allied forces on the ground in Iraq and neighboring Syria. 

 

BEING USED AGAINST THE US AND ALLIED FORCES....

You can't use broken weapons and hardware against anyone, you MORE ON.

You have LOST this argument,  Adolf.

23 hours ago, robosmith said:

Are you stupid? It was THEIR MONEY. Your own post says it: "gave ACCESS."

Relaxing sanctions is NOT "GIVE money" just like applying sanctions is NOT "take." Duh

It was NOT their money. Iran committed an act of WAR on November 1979. They are lucky the United STates didn't NUKE their rag headed asses, like we did the LAST idi0ts who committed an act of war on use.

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, reason10 said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-administration-acknowledges-1-7-billion-transfer-to-iran-was-all-cash/

Hey, STUPID. Even the left wing CBS news says it was all CASH. It wasn't rials, it was pallets of AMERICAN TAXPAYER FUNDED CASH.

https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/06/04/Fog-War-US-Has-Armed-ISIS

U.S. Shoots Itself In the Foot By Accidentally Arming ISIS

According to Reuters, the U.S.-made weaponry that fell into enemy hands including 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles, at least 40 M1A1 main battle tanks, 74,000 machine guns, and as many as 52 M198 howitzer mobile gun systems, plus small arms and ammunition. 

Although al-Abadi and other Iraqi and U.S. officials haven’t attached a dollar sign to the lost weaponry and vehicles, a back-of-the-envelope calculation of those losses might look something like this: 

• 2,300 Humvee armored vehicles @ $70,000 per copy. Total: $161 million
• 40 M1A1 Abram tanks @ $4.3 million per copy. Total: $172 million
• 52 M198 Howitzer mobile gun systems @ $527,337 per copy. Total: $27.4 million
• 74,000 Army machine guns @ $4,000 per copy. Total: $296 million 

 

The grand total comes to $656.4 million, but experts say those losses represent just a portion of the many hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of U.S.-supplied military equipment that has fallen into ISIS’s hands and is being used against the U.S. and allied forces on the ground in Iraq and neighboring Syria. 

 

BEING USED AGAINST THE US AND ALLIED FORCES....

You can't use broken weapons and hardware against anyone, you MORE ON.

You have LOST this argument,  Adolf.

It was NOT their money. Iran committed an act of WAR on November 1979. They are lucky the United STates didn't NUKE their rag headed asses, like we did the LAST idi0ts who committed an act of war on use.

 

It is unfortunate that you don't know what "sanctions" mean, nor that the method of payment says NOTHING about the source.

The "cash" was from Iranian bank accounts which WERE FROZEN by sanctions. AKA, THEIR MONEY NOT "taxpayer funded." Duh

Thanks for admitting how stupid you are by doubling down on your lDIOCY.

[reason10]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

It is unfortunate that you don't know what "sanctions" mean, nor that the method of payment says NOTHING about the source.

The "cash" was from Iranian bank accounts which WERE FROZEN by sanctions. AKA, THEIR MONEY NOT "taxpayer funded." Duh

Thanks for admitting how stupid you are by doubling down on your lDIOCY.

I just show everyone how much you don't know. And that payment of money FINANCED THE NEW HOLOCAUST last October. Obama PAID for that Holocaust with those BILLIONS in American tax dollars, CASH.

Those sanctions you are weeping crocodile tears about occurred many presidents ago, and were a consequence of Iran committing an ACT OF WAR against the United STates. Reagan, KKKlinton, two Bushs, NONE of them even considered giving Iran a bunch of cash. It took the TRAITOR OBAMA to pay those ragheads and finance their acts of terror.

It's unfortunate you are such a NAZI, who hates Jews so much that you'll lie all day long.

Edited November 13, 2023 by reason10