Devon Archer Transcript proves Joe had the Ukrainian prosecutor fired to help end the investigation into his son's energy firm Burisma

[Deluge]

On 8/3/2023 at 11:30 AM, SNOWFLAKE said:

I am guessing another indictment came down on Trump so we need another Hunter Biden thread as a distraction?

Am I close?

Nope. Nowhere near close. 

You're thinking: "Oh, f*ck, Trump is running again in '24. What in the f*ck do we have to do to stop this guy? How many bullshit cases do we have to drum up? Are we going to have to shoot him in the back of the head?". 

 

Edited September 7, 2023 by Deluge

[Nationalist]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And there's the pandora's box.

If trump gets back in and manages to put a few prosecutors and investigators of his choosing in key positions - then he will likely spend most of his free time in those 4 years attacking his 'opponents' and ruining their lives - and what can dems say? They created fake dossiers on him, broke the law trying to pin crimes on him, openly admitted that they were going to investigate him and his family till they 'got him', put out some pretty fake charges initially that were obviously vengence motivated - they can whine if he comes after them but that's it.  And it's not like he'll have to worry about re election.

And then the next dem tries to get revenge and the next republican - that door is open now and it's not likely to get shut.

Oh well.  Might keep politicians a little more clean anyway if they know their opponents will be looking for any reason to prosecute.

IMO...nobody in politics deserves to take revenge more than Trump.

These insolent little cult members have attacked him...his wife...his kids and anyone/everyone who had anything to do with him. Hell were it me...I'd be asking if those FBI jack-asses if they remember what Melania's panties smell like?

Edited September 7, 2023 by Nationalist

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Nope. Nowhere near close. 

You're thinking: "Oh, f*ck, Trump is running again in '24. What in the f*ck do we have to do to stop this guy? How many bullshit cases do we have to drum up? Are we going to have to shoot him in the back of the head?". 

 

If it comes to shooting people in the head...I believe the Clintons have a contact for that.

Just...trying to be helpful...

 

Edited September 7, 2023 by Nationalist

[Rebound]

31 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And there's the pandora's box.

If trump gets back in and manages to put a few prosecutors and investigators of his choosing in key positions - then he will likely spend most of his free time in those 4 years attacking his 'opponents' and ruining their lives - and what can dems say? They created fake dossiers on him, broke the law trying to pin crimes on him, openly admitted that they were going to investigate him and his family till they 'got him', put out some pretty fake charges initially that were obviously vengence motivated - they can whine if he comes after them but that's it.  And it's not like he'll have to worry about re election.

And then the next dem tries to get revenge and the next republican - that door is open now and it's not likely to get shut.

Oh well.  Might keep politicians a little more clean anyway if they know their opponents will be looking for any reason to prosecute.

Yeah. Like maybe you guys ought to vote for candidates who aren’t criminals. 
 

It’s not a surprise that Trump committed all of these crimes. He was already a known liar, a known sexual predator, a known fraudster all before he was elected.  What’s remarkable is that you people keep defending the indefensible.  
 

Trump did not accidentally have a few classified documents taken from the White House. He didn’t accidentally keep them. They weren’t minor documents.  No. Trump deliberately took these documents. They were classified at the highest levels.  He deliberately refused to return them and he deliberately lied to investigators and his own lawyers and the FBI about it.  
 

How do you get more guilty than that? 
 

And Trump was told the election was won by Biden. And fifty + court cases told him so. But no, he got fake electors in several states to claim they were actual electors, and to file falsified elector certificates. Those are crimes.  Of course you’re allowed to contest an election, but you can’t break the law to do it. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

And there's the pandora's box.

If trump gets back in and manages to put a few prosecutors and investigators of his choosing in key positions - then he will likely spend most of his free time in those 4 years attacking his 'opponents' and ruining their lives - and what can dems say? They created fake dossiers on him, broke the law trying to pin crimes on him, openly admitted that they were going to investigate him and his family till they 'got him', put out some pretty fake charges initially that were obviously vengence motivated - they can whine if he comes after them but that's it.  And it's not like he'll have to worry about re election.

And then the next dem tries to get revenge and the next republican - that door is open now and it's not likely to get shut.

Oh well.  Might keep politicians a little more clean anyway if they know their opponents will be looking for any reason to prosecute.

Posting ^this BULLSHIT here will not make it come true, little boy.

You probably didn't hear about it, but FOS LIES had to pay $800M for making up the LIES you naively CONSUME.

Edited September 7, 2023 by robosmith

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Yeah. Like maybe you guys ought to vote for candidates who aren’t criminals. 
 

Ditto

Quote

It’s not a surprise that Trump committed all of these crimes. He was already a known liar, a known sexual predator, a known fraudster all before he was elected.  What’s remarkable is that you people keep defending the indefensible.  

Sorry - did you mean to say 'trump' or 'bill clinton'?  I can't tell.

Quote

Trump did not accidentally have a few classified documents taken from the White House. He didn’t accidentally keep them..  

Didn't run an illegal mail server and then lie about it either.  Ooopsie!

Quote

How do you get more guilty than that? 

See above.
 

Quote

And Trump was told the election was won by Biden. And fifty + court cases told him so. But no, he got fake electors in several states to claim they were actual electors, and to file falsified elector certificates. Those are crimes.  Of course you’re allowed to contest an election, but you can’t break the law to do it. 

If he committed a crime then  court will have to rule that he did.  But for 7 years your side has been saying he's 100 percent absolutely guilty of 'russian collusion' with evidence about to be released next week and he's definitely guilty and going to jail just you wait......  ' . And guess what.  Never happened.

Now you're making these claims. We'll see.  BUT - there is NO doubt that they have been TRYING to stick him with crimes that he did NOT do since day one.  People have even been found guilty of it.

So. No matter what the outcome of these court cases turn out to be (and i woudln't bet against trump just yet), he or whomever takes over from him will be 100 percent justified in going after democrats as hard as they can and digging for the SLIGHEST thing to try to prosecute them on. Becasue that IS what they've done with trump.

Sorry - yea reap what yea sew

[Nationalist]

39 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Posting ^this BULLSHIT here will not make it come true, little boy.

You probably didn't hear about it, but FOS LIES had to pay $800M for making up the LIES you naively CONSUME.

$800M...$800M...$800M

Hey @CdnFox, mind bumping the record player?

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Ditto

Sorry - did you mean to say 'trump' or 'bill clinton'?  I can't tell.

Didn't run an illegal mail server and then lie about it either.  Ooopsie!

See above.
 

If he committed a crime then  court will have to rule that he did.  But for 7 years your side has been saying he's 100 percent absolutely guilty of 'russian collusion' with evidence about to be released next week and he's definitely guilty and going to jail just you wait......  ' . And guess what.  Never happened.

Now you're making these claims. We'll see.  BUT - there is NO doubt that they have been TRYING to stick him with crimes that he did NOT do since day one.  People have even been found guilty of it.

So. No matter what the outcome of these court cases turn out to be (and i woudln't bet against trump just yet), he or whomever takes over from him will be 100 percent justified in going after democrats as hard as they can and digging for the SLIGHEST thing to try to prosecute them on. Becasue that IS what they've done with trump.

Sorry - yea reap what yea sew

The Mueller Report listed at least five clear, documented instances in which Trump committed obstruction of Justice.  
 

Why would someone interfere in an investigation if no crime occurred?  
 

“Russia, if you’re listening… you will be greatly rewarded.”

 

Frankly, I don’t know what makes this lunatic tick or why anyone’s falling for his nonsense. He puts on this con job that he’s not “part of the system,” when he’s been the system his whole life.  

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Posting ^this BULLSHIT here will not make it come true, little boy.

You probably didn't hear about it, but FOS LIES had to pay $800M for making up the LIES you naively CONSUME.

Ooops - i triggered you again didn't i

Sorry kiddo - it's all true. And i have no idea why you're bringing up fox - you seem to watch them more than i do.   i don't think i've ever seen more than a clip.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

$800M...$800M...$800M

Hey @CdnFox, mind bumping the record player?

I think that particular record is scratched enough as it is

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

The Mueller Report listed at least five clear, documented instances in which Trump committed obstruction of Justice.  
 

Nope.  Not a one. There were instances he felt might be but  trump was never charged and in fact all the experts I heard (outside of cnn) agreed it probably didn't cross that line at all in fact, and even Mueller had to admit it had NO effect on the investigation - which found ZERO evidence of "collusion" or conspiracy or anything like that.

And the fact you'd need to lie about that to make your point proves you don't have a very good point.

Quote

Why would someone interfere in an investigation if no crime occurred?  

Because the FBI are a bunch of intrusive a-holes who had already had convictions for trying to illegally investigate him and he didn't feel like cooperating.  Not giving the FBI everything they want and admitting guilt on demand is "obstruction" according to them
 

Quote

“Russia, if you’re listening… you will be greatly rewarded.”

 

THat's your evidence?  ROFLMAO - well that certainly does explain why he's in jail.  Oh wait......

 

The steele dossier was faked by dems. The investigation was based on that and was politically motivated. They had texts from fbi agents saying they'll do what it takes to end his presidency. The courts found an fbi agent guilty of falsifying documents to try to persecute and prosecute him. Numerous prosecutors have said they'll investigate him (and his family ) until they get him for SOMETHING.

There is NOTHING you can say or ANY evidence you can point to that isn't tanted by that history.  Until a judge has him in a courtroom and all the appeals are exhausted - he hasn't done anything.  you've been wrong way too often and your side has committed far too many crimes and lies trying to get him to be believed in the slightest.

 

Quote

Frankly, I don’t know what makes this lunatic tick or why anyone’s falling for his nonsense. He puts on this con job that he’s not “part of the system,” when he’s been the system his whole life.  

Your con job is no different in the slighest. He lies - you lie.  He makes dumbass claims - you make dumbass claims. As an outsider looking in you both look like you're nuts.

But so far only one side has tried to corruptly use the power of law to prosecute a political rival, and has done so for years.

So.  There you go.

 

[Rebound]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nope.  Not a one. There were instances he felt might be but  trump was never charged and in fact all the experts I heard (outside of cnn) agreed it probably didn't cross that line at all in fact, and even Mueller had to admit it had NO effect on the investigation - which found ZERO evidence of "collusion" or conspiracy or anything like that.

And the fact you'd need to lie about that to make your point proves you don't have a very good point.

Because the FBI are a bunch of intrusive a-holes who had already had convictions for trying to illegally investigate him and he didn't feel like cooperating.  Not giving the FBI everything they want and admitting guilt on demand is "obstruction" according to them
 

THat's your evidence?  ROFLMAO - well that certainly does explain why he's in jail.  Oh wait......

 

The steele dossier was faked by dems. The investigation was based on that and was politically motivated. They had texts from fbi agents saying they'll do what it takes to end his presidency. The courts found an fbi agent guilty of falsifying documents to try to persecute and prosecute him. Numerous prosecutors have said they'll investigate him (and his family ) until they get him for SOMETHING.

There is NOTHING you can say or ANY evidence you can point to that isn't tanted by that history.  Until a judge has him in a courtroom and all the appeals are exhausted - he hasn't done anything.  you've been wrong way too often and your side has committed far too many crimes and lies trying to get him to be believed in the slightest.

 

Your con job is no different in the slighest. He lies - you lie.  He makes dumbass claims - you make dumbass claims. As an outsider looking in you both look like you're nuts.

But so far only one side has tried to corruptly use the power of law to prosecute a political rival, and has done so for years.

So.  There you go.

 

“Russia, if you’re listening… you will be greatly rewarded.”

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

“Russia, if you’re listening… you will be greatly rewarded.”

A string walks into a bar, the bartender just looks at him and says: "Sorry, we don't serve strings here."

The string walks outside, loops himself into a knot, tousles his end to make it all frizzy, and walks back in. The Bartender looks at him and says: "Hey, aren't you the piece of string that just walked in here a minute ago?"

The string says: "No, I'm a frayed knot."

Do you get it? I'm a frayed knot? (sounds like: "I'm afraid not" ?)

Guess what else.... Pieces of string can't actually walk and talk, and they can't tie themselves in knots or tousle their ends either. It's just a joke, but for some reason I feel like I need to explain that to you. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

“Russia, if you’re listening… you will be greatly rewarded.”

Ahh - so basically you have no defense to what i said and  you feel mindlessly parroting the same meaningless mantra over and over will somehow convince people of something other than you're merely a parrot.

Well... you do you i guess  

[taxme]

On 9/6/2023 at 12:00 PM, Rebound said:

The Judge who signed the Mar a Lago search warrant was appointed by Trump.

The FBI Director who approved the search warrant was appointed by Trump. 
 

Every witness in the cases against Trump are Trump-selected Republicans.  
 

The judge who gave Enrique Tarrio 22 years was appointed by Trump.

The judge who will hear Trump’s Florida trial was appointed by Trump.   

There have been many "Judas" appointed by Trump that turned their backs on Trump. But sometimes, the law is there and the judge has to follow the law. We must wait and see as to what will happen to Trump. I say nothing will happen to Trump. 

[Rebound]

43 minutes ago, taxme said:

There have been many "Judas" appointed by Trump that turned their backs on Trump. But sometimes, the law is there and the judge has to follow the law. We must wait and see as to what will happen to Trump. I say nothing will happen to Trump. 

Are you saying that Donald Trump is free to violate laws, and he’s allowed to shoot someone in broad daylight if he wants to?

[WestCanMan]

On 9/7/2023 at 8:31 AM, Nationalist said:

If it comes to shooting people in the head...I believe the Clintons have a contact for that.

Just...trying to be helpful...

 

Sometimes people have accidents that just look like murders. Like the guy who fell down an elevator shaft, onto a bunch of bullets.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Are you saying that Donald Trump is free to violate laws, and he’s allowed to shoot someone in broad daylight if he wants to?

Trump shoots people all the time, but his favourite thing is starting wars. He started some nuclear wars when he was president. It's all on your favourite news site, I'm sure. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Trump shoots people all the time, but his favourite thing is starting wars. He started some nuclear wars when he was president. It's all on your favourite news site, I'm sure. 

Then there was that time he invented syphilis.

[Rebound]

On 9/7/2023 at 8:59 PM, CdnFox said:

Ahh - so basically you have no defense to what i said and  you feel mindlessly parroting the same meaningless mantra over and over will somehow convince people of something other than you're merely a parrot.

Well... you do you i guess  

Mantra? That’s what Donald Trump said. I didn’t say it. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Mantra? That’s what Donald Trump said. I didn’t say it. 

When you repeat it again and again - then it's your mantra.

Sorry - i guess i should have realized you'd need that explained to you.  I sometimes forget your intellectual level is so low.  My bad.

[Nationalist]

Yaaa...the Libbies have been trying to "get Trump" for 8 years now and the results...

Trump is more popular than ever, Joe Biden is toast and his last surviving son is burnt toast.

Good job Libbies.

Edited September 15, 2023 by Nationalist

[Rebound]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Yaaa...the Libbies have been trying to "get Trump" for 8 years now and the results...

Trump is more popular than ever, Joe Biden is toast and his last surviving son is burnt toast.

Good job Libbies.

Do you seriously believe Hunter Biden will serve a single day in jail for lying on a gun application and filing his taxes late?  

[Nationalist]

25 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Do you seriously believe Hunter Biden will serve a single day in jail for lying on a gun application and filing his taxes late?  

Yes. I also think that this is the tip of the iceberg and Ol' Joe is going to be completely destroyed.

[Rebound]

37 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Yes. I also think that this is the tip of the iceberg and Ol' Joe is going to be completely destroyed.

You

Have

No

Evidence

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Rebound said:

You

Have

No

Evidence

You

Have

No

Intelligence