Budweiser hires trans spokesperson and the right loses their mind

[Americana Antifa]

8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

What are you talking about? BUSH won with a strong majority in the popular vote. Regan did. They pretty much ALL did. Trump was the exception and that's ONE TERM.

Again - she has to lie to make her point.

Damn, fascists lie a lot.

So here's what I actually said: "True. But when was the last time a Republican became president with the popular vote?"

That being said, look how far back you had to go. The last time a Republican won the popular vote was 2004. And that was actually a reelection, so Bush didn't even become president with a popular vote.

So my point stands. Most Americans are left-leaning liberals, which is why you need to go back over a decade to find a Republican who won the popular vote.

 

[Americana Antifa]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Actually i could come up wiht a lot more -but as you just noted there was no point because all you do is pretend the person isn't on the left or there's some other problem.

Do you know what the difference between leftists and liberals are?

Or are you just pretending that anyone who isn't a fascist is on the Left?

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

Damn, fascists lie a lot.

 

You sure do

You go back ONE PRESIDENT. Two elections. That's it.  But what you said is they CAN"T win without that. But they ALWAYS do. So your statement is a lie, isn't it.

 

[Zeitgeist]

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

True. But when was the last time a Republican became president with the popular vote?

If most Americans are right-leaning, why do Republicans need the electoral college to win? Why do they need gerrymandering?

Conservatives have been saying this for generations. It's always "this new generation is TOO FAR LEFT!" and "they're destroying the family!"

Something I find fascinating about history is how it repeats itself. Everything the Right is saying about trans people is just recycled from their attacks on gay people. Before that, it was the feminists who were destroying the family and harming children. It's the same shit over and over.

Thankfully, you're probably wrong. Conservatives have always been wrong on moral panics.

Not all of the left-wing governments” policies of recent decades have served us for the better.  I think affirmative action has gone too far and is backfiring with the lost generation of young men.  Gay marriage has complicated life for many kids though it has affirmed the lifestyles of many, I think.  I didn’t have a problem with legal weed until I saw the further decriminalizing of hard drugs.  Having zero limits on abortion and among the most lenient euthanasia laws in the world is making Canada look and feel increasingly dystopian.  Cancel culture is driven mainly from the left today.  The left also used the excuse of public safety to override many constitutional rights during the pandemic.  No doubt they’re trying again with “global warming” and calling all anti-war comments disinformation.  The left is literally destroying the West right now.  

Edited April 25, 2023 by Zeitgeist

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Americana Antifa said:

Do you know what the difference between leftists and liberals are?

 

Yes. I'm also quite aware you'll create fake definitions to suit your agenda that are complete bullshit.

Sorry kiddo - not all leftists are liberals but all liberals are leftists.  The fact that there's a spectrum doesn't change that.

I know you think of politics as being "one size fits all' - ALL conservatives are right wing fascists who ALL believe in pretty much the same thing, you've said that numerous times. Oh and that they're inferior humans.  But - the reality is that politics is more of a spectrum.

So yeah - sorry but they're on the left.  You can make up whatever little definitions you like but in the real world - that's how it is

[Americana Antifa]

52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yes. I'm also quite aware you'll create fake definitions to suit your agenda that are complete bullshit.

?

52 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sorry kiddo - not all leftists are liberals but all liberals are leftists.  The fact that there's a spectrum doesn't change that.

So what exactly do these terms mean? What defines leftists, liberals, and conservatives? What beliefs or policies does someone need to have to be in these categories?

[Americana Antifa]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

You sure do

You go back ONE PRESIDENT. Two elections. That's it.  But what you said is they CAN"T win without that. But they ALWAYS do. So your statement is a lie, isn't it.

 

They haven't since 2004. So I'm correct, Republicans can't win without the electoral college. That's why they're gerrymandering like crazy while also trying to restrict voting as much as possible.

[Americana Antifa]

1 hour ago, Zeitgeist said:

Not all of the left-wing governments” policies of recent decades have served us for the better.  I think affirmative action has gone too far and is backfiring with the lost generation of young men.  Gay marriage has complicated life for many kids though it has affirmed the lifestyles of many, I think.  I didn’t have a problem with legal weed until I saw the further decriminalizing of hard drugs.  Having zero limits on abortion and among the most lenient euthanasia laws in the world is making Canada look and feel increasingly dystopian.  Cancel culture is driven mainly from the left today.  The left also used the excuse of public safety to override many constitutional rights during the pandemic.  No doubt they’re trying again with “global warming” and calling all anti-war comments disinformation.  The left is literally destroying the West right now.  

That's all wrong, but who cares? Retards like you were wrong in the past and you're wrong now. Society is still moving to the Left, your moral panics about women and gay people couldn't stop that. You can keep crying, maybe that'll work.

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

?

So what exactly do these terms mean? What defines leftists, liberals, and conservatives? What beliefs or policies does someone need to have to be in these categories?

Why would you care? The truth doesn't serve your purposes so you'll just make it up anyway.

I'm content knowing that everyone reading this has a pretty good idea of what left and right is and where conservatives and liberals sit on those spectrums. If you choose to be dishonest about  it then they'll know. Saying that liberals are right wing would be a pretty good example

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

They haven't since 2004. So I'm correct, Republicans can't win without the electoral college.

Uhhh no.  They win without the college in every election they win. So they do win without the college always. Trump's election was the exception .

the fact that there's a long time between elections doesn't change that. Your statement that they can't win without the college is in fact a lie, they almost exclusively win without the college.

[Americana Antifa]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Why would you care? The truth doesn't serve your purposes so you'll just make it up anyway.

I'm content knowing that everyone reading this has a pretty good idea of what left and right is and where conservatives and liberals sit on those spectrums. If you choose to be dishonest about  it then they'll know. Saying that liberals are right wing would be a pretty good example

Hey, what a surprise, no answer! You're so predictable. ?

Like I said, this is a common fascist strategy. Whoever isn't a fascist, you say is on the Left. It's a way of moving the overton window as far Right as possible. Obama governed like a moderate Republican, but the Republicans still claimed he was a far-left socialist. This moved the overton window on the national stage, at least when it came to economics. Thankfully, the younger generations are seeing through this.

[Americana Antifa]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Uhhh no.  They win without the college in every election they win. So they do win without the college always. Trump's election was the exception .

the fact that there's a long time between elections doesn't change that. Your statement that they can't win without the college is in fact a lie, they almost exclusively win without the college.

If that was true, you wouldn't need to go all the way back to 2004 for an example of that.

[CdnFox]

13 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

If that was true, you wouldn't need to go all the way back to 2004 for an example of that.

Why not. Elections are only held every 4 years. so to go back 2 elections is going to be 8 years period.

Prior to 2008 the dems didn't win one for that long as well so... you saying the dems can't win an election without the college?

Hell if we're going by time, it would be just as fair to say the republicans have been winning elections without the college for hundreds of years now.

But please - continue.  It's always fun showing how retarded your arguments are    Here's the left's thinking at work kids, pull up a chair and grab some popcorn, it's better than the monkeys at the zoo

[Zeitgeist]

53 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

That's all wrong, but who cares? Retards like you were wrong in the past and you're wrong now. Society is still moving to the Left, your moral panics about women and gay people couldn't stop that. You can keep crying, maybe that'll work.

I’ll be perfectly frank: If people with your views run our governments for enough time to enact your insane ideas on gender and communism, our liberal democracy would collapse like a house of cards and you’d be reporting to the local Communist Party of China police station to beg for clemency.  Oh, and they wouldn’t give it to you, because your views are anathema even in most communist countries.  

Edited April 25, 2023 by Zeitgeist

[ironstone]

3 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Damn, fascists lie a lot.

So here's what I actually said: "True. But when was the last time a Republican became president with the popular vote?"

That being said, look how far back you had to go. The last time a Republican won the popular vote was 2004. And that was actually a reelection, so Bush didn't even become president with a popular vote.

So my point stands. Most Americans are left-leaning liberals, which is why you need to go back over a decade to find a Republican who won the popular vote.

 

You should be aware that US elections are decided by the electoral college system. That was in order to give broader representation across the country and not absolute power to the most populous states.

[BeaverFever]

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You provide proof that I was right

False. 
 

 

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You clearly said there was an organized boycott

No I clearly said they called for and attempted a boycott no different than the many other fake and failed boycotts republican stooges have staged over the years. How are you so dense you don’t get it?

 

10 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Never happened.

It did happen and I proved it. Now your new fallback argument is that Bill O’Reilly isn’t Republican lmao how desperate are you?  You must really be losing sleep jerking off to them trannies all night long. He was the Tucker Carlson of the time, Fox’s top propagandist and behind-the-scenes Republican powerbroker   

Republicans tried and failed to boycott France,  period  

 

[CdnFox]

27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

False. 
 

True I'm afraid. Lying about it won't help.

27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

 

No I clearly said they called for and attempted a boycott no different than the many other fake and failed boycotts republican stooges have staged over the years. How are you so dense you don’t get it?

So - you didn't say they called for an organized boycott, you said they called for an organized boycott.

Well i'm glad we could clear that up.  You're an !diot.

27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

It did happen and I proved it.

With a saturday night live skit and a bumper sticker?

Never happened kid.

 

27 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Republicans tried and failed to boycott France,  period  

And yet you can't find one who talked about it. Amazing.

Never happened kid.  And you know that.  If you dug SOOOO hard that all you could come up with was a 'boycott france' bumper sticker someone had and you coudln't even find ONE actual republican talking about it then YOU KNOW it never happened.

sorry to burst your delusions kiddo. Better luck with your next baseless delusion.

[OftenWrong]

Just saw that another person at Budweiser got shit-canned, heh heh heh. Nice.

It's the kind of cancel culture, we here on the right can really approve of! Go get 'em, beer drinkers!

My question is, which beer did they switch over too? Certainly a manly beer, I would imagine. Maybe overly manly, since their reaction to the horror of finding out, Bud is the beer preferred by transvestites.

Something absolutely un-malty, given we are talking about Budweiser fans here.

Coors light wins, IMO

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Just saw that another person at Budweiser got shit-canned, heh heh heh. Nice.

It's the kind of cancel culture, we here on the right can really approve of! Go get 'em, beer drinkers!

I'm actually a little surprised they're torching people. Nobody's really called for that.  I think they're hoping if they just sacrifice a few people to show they're sorry then people will forgive them. I suppose scapegoating is a time honoured tradition at big companies.

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

My question is, which beer did they switch over too? Certainly a manly beer, I would imagine. Maybe overly manly, since their reaction to the horror of finding out, Bud is the beer preferred by transvestites.

Funny thing  is - she mentioned she doesn't drink beer.  

1 hour ago, OftenWrong said:

Something absolutely un-malty, given we are talking about Budweiser fans here.

Coors light wins, IMO

There is literally no such thing as a 'manly light beer'.   And what's the frikkin point anyway - it's like 'low fat lard'. Makes no sense.

[Nationalist]

16 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Funny how I'm not instinctively a bigot, but you are.

What's the determining factor?

You're just someone who wants to blame their bigoted behavior on "instinct" when in reality It's just the way you were brought up.

 

Not funny at all Barb. I simply see things for what they are. I don't deny reality.

But if social acceptance is so important to you, that you will deny reality, then I pity you.

[Nationalist]

15 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Look at the year. This was back in 2021. Since then, the Republicans got their cheeks clapped in the midterms. The over-the-top transphobia and the revelation that Republicans still want a national abortion ban has woken a lot of people up.

Again, look at the individual issues. Even a lot of Americans who consider themselves Republican are centrist or left-leaning on the actual issues.

Lol...even in the face of the evidence you beg for, you carry on your charade.

Meh...woke SJWs...you're all a bunch of lyin' Tweenkies. It is what it is...sad that humans can stoop so low.

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Not funny at all Barb. I simply see things for what they are. I don't deny reality.

But if social acceptance is so important to you, that you will deny reality, then I pity you.

You treat people who are different than you like scum. In America, we are all equal. And untill you learn that, then you are the problem my friend. 

[CdnFox]

Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

You treat people who are different than you like scum.

Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot. 

It's hard to convince people that they shouldn't treat others like scum when all you do is treat others like scum.

And once again when it comes to hyporisy - lefties for the win!

[CrakHoBarbie]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

sad that humans can stoop so low.

You mean so low as to think they are better than homosexuals? Your kind are digging a hole. 

[CdnFox]

Just now, CrakHoBarbie said:

You mean so low as to think they are better than homosexuals? Your kind are digging a hole. 

Maybe he means so low that they'll lecture others about not accepting other people's differences while berating other people's differences.