Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Impeachment is a political...not criminal...process.

Trump was acquitted...."Hitler" was not.

 

Like McConnell said to justify not biting the bullet, there is the DoJ to handle what he refused.

The thing you forget is, compared to Hitler, Trump is still in the process. Jack Smith will have the last laugh.

 

Posted
Just now, robosmith said:

Like McConnell said to justify not biting the bullet, there is the DoJ to handle what he refused.

The thing you forget is, compared to Hitler, Trump is still in the process. Jack Smith will have the last laugh.

 

 

That's fine, except you have already convicted Trump as another "Hitler", when nothing close to that is in the works.

The funny part is that Canada's government actually invoked the Emergencies Act over far less....so is Trudeau also another "Hitler"?

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

How about the opinion of one Alan Dershowitz on this Trump indictment? Dershowitz is a liberal, he did not vote for Trump either. Unlike many liberals, he has always called for the equal application of the law.

 

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted

How times have changed!

20 Times Leftists Feigned Outrage Over Trump And 'Lock Her Up' (thefederalist.com)

Regarding Hillary Clinton and the chants of "lock her up".

“In a democracy, you can’t threaten to jail your opponents,” said former President Barack Obama in 2016. “We have fought against those kinds of things.”

MSNBC’s Joy Reid called the “Lock her up” chant “peak authoritarianism,” opining that “countries that lock up whoever dared to run against the autocrat are the kinds we used to send election monitors to.”

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
10 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

That's fine, except you have already convicted Trump as another "Hitler",

I said he is the CLOSEST ANALOGY to Hitler. So far you've FAILED to cite any OTHER POTUS who followed Hitler's path MORE CLOSELY.

Whether Trump CONTINUES along that path, depends on whether he can recruit the cadre of ruthless thugs that enabled Hitler to eventually become DICTATOR.

10 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

when nothing close to that is in the works.

YOU and I do NOT know "what is in the works."

10 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

The funny part is that Canada's government actually invoked the Emergencies Act over far less....so is Trudeau also another "Hitler"?

Not familiar. I think I would have heard about it, IF Trudeau tried to overturn an election.

Posted
3 hours ago, ironstone said:

How about the opinion of one Alan Dershowitz on this Trump indictment? Dershowitz is a liberal, he did not vote for Trump either. Unlike many liberals, he has always called for the equal application of the law.

 

Indicting people for falsified business records IS ROUTINE in NYC.

Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

How times have changed!

20 Times Leftists Feigned Outrage Over Trump And 'Lock Her Up' (thefederalist.com)

Regarding Hillary Clinton and the chants of "lock her up".

“In a democracy, you can’t threaten to jail your opponents,” said former President Barack Obama in 2016. “We have fought against those kinds of things.”

MSNBC’s Joy Reid called the “Lock her up” chant “peak authoritarianism,” opining that “countries that lock up whoever dared to run against the autocrat are the kinds we used to send election monitors to.”

"Lock her up" BEFORE charges even filed, is completely different from INDICTMENT.

Posted
6 hours ago, ironstone said:

How about the opinion of one Alan Dershowitz on this Trump indictment? Dershowitz is a liberal, he did not vote for Trump either. Unlike many liberals, he has always called for the equal application of the law.

 

Liberal?

Dershowitz was Trump’s defense attorney during his first impeachment. 
liberal my ass. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Liberal?

Dershowitz was Trump’s defense attorney during his first impeachment. 
liberal my ass. 

Douchowitz is LIBERTARIAN and mostly represents criminal DEFENDENTS like he did for OJ.

So he is heavily biased in favor of CRIMINALS.

  • Like 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Douchowitz is LIBERTARIAN and mostly represents criminal DEFENDENTS like he did for OJ.

So he is heavily biased in favor of CRIMINALS.

Not so, but  Alvin Bragg and all other Soros funded DA's are clearly soft on violent crime. You clearly do not believe in due process for all. Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. Oh wait...it was!

Trump Refused To Jail Clinton. Democrats Have No Such Restraint (thefederalist.com)

Soft-on-crime Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has downgraded more than half his felony cases to misdemeanors — while also managing to lose half of the felony cases that do reach court. Since taking office on Jan. 1, Bragg has downgraded 52% of felony cases to misdemeanors — compared to 39% in all of 2019.

So while crime is out of control in NYC, Alvin Bragg often reduces felonies to misdemeanors allowing those criminals back onto the street. In Trump's case, he turns a misdemeanor into a felony.

Please tell us why robosmith happens to know more about the law than Alan Dershowitz.?

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Not so, but  Alvin Bragg and all other Soros funded DA's are clearly soft on violent crime. You clearly do not believe in due process for all. Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. Oh wait...it was!

Trump Refused To Jail Clinton. Democrats Have No Such Restraint (thefederalist.com)

Nothing ^here about Trump interfering in the DoJ to save Hillary from prosecution.

The FACT is, Comey said NO ONE has ever been prosecuted for the unintentional misstorage of unmarked classified material. That is WHY Hillary was not prosecuted.

OTOH, Trump is ON RECORD stating he had NO INTENTION of returning MARKED classified documents which he knew he'd taken to Mar-a-Lago.

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Soft-on-crime Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has downgraded more than half his felony cases to misdemeanors — while also managing to lose half of the felony cases that do reach court. Since taking office on Jan. 1, Bragg has downgraded 52% of felony cases to misdemeanors — compared to 39% in all of 2019.

So while crime is out of control in NYC, Alvin Bragg often reduces felonies to misdemeanors allowing those criminals back onto the street. In Trump's case, he turns a misdemeanor into a felony.

Thanks for YOUR OPINION.

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Please tell us why robosmith happens to know more about the law than Alan Dershowitz.?

I never said I "know more about the law." Can you read? Or just making up crap strawmen?

I said he is biased in favor of the specialty from which he makes most of HIS MONEY. AKA, representing wealthy DEFENDANTS.

Posted
13 hours ago, robosmith said:

The FACT is, Comey said NO ONE has ever been prosecuted for the unintentional misstorage of unmarked classified material. That is WHY Hillary was not prosecuted.

Is that why her home was never in danger of being raided? Nobody has explained why a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations gets turned into a felony in Trump's case while Obama and Clinton merely paid fines for their campaign finance violations.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
45 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Is that why her home was never in danger of being raided? Nobody has explained why a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations gets turned into a felony in Trump's case while Obama and Clinton merely paid fines for their campaign finance violations.

Why did his personal lawyer do time? 

Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

Is that why her home was never in danger of being raided? Nobody has explained why a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations gets turned into a felony in Trump's case while Obama and Clinton merely paid fines for their campaign finance violations.

IF it truly is "past the statute of limitations," IT WILL BE KICKED OUT. But I doubt you know the law better than Bragg.

Posted
2 hours ago, ironstone said:

Is that why her home was never in danger of being raided? Nobody has explained why a misdemeanor past the statute of limitations gets turned into a felony in Trump's case while Obama and Clinton merely paid fines for their campaign finance violations.

Statute of limitations? So you’re basically agreeing he’s guilty, if that’s your defense.  
 

Beyond that? Nobody has explained because the indictment so far has been sealed. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
On 3/30/2023 at 5:35 PM, Rebound said:

A grand jury in New York has indicted Donald Trump over his role in hush money payments made to porn star Stormy Daniels. These are the same crimes which landed Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen in prison. 
 

Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time, Donald! 
 

“When you guys put somebody in the car and you’re protecting their head you know, the way you put their hand over their head. Like, 'Don’t hit their head and they’ve just killed somebody, don’t hit their head.' I said, 'You can take the hand away, OK?' “

The prosecutor suborned PERJURY. Cohen is LYING. He LIED UNDER OATH.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, reason10 said:

The prosecutor suborned PERJURY. Cohen is LYING. He LIED UNDER OATH.

 

He LIED FOR TRUMP'S BENEFIT as HIS LAWYER.

He had nothing to gain personally except a prison sentence.

Posted
25 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump charged with 34 felonies for falsifying business records. Felony enhancement related to campaign finance violations. More to come.

Thirty-four beautiful felonies!

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted

i just had to put a towel under my monitor to catch all the drool from those suffering from TDS.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/3/2023 at 10:21 AM, robosmith said:

I said he is the CLOSEST ANALOGY to Hitler. So far you've FAILED to cite any OTHER POTUS who followed Hitler's path MORE CLOSELY.

Whether Trump CONTINUES along that path, depends on whether he can recruit the cadre of ruthless thugs that enabled Hitler to eventually become DICTATOR.

YOU and I do NOT know "what is in the works."

Not familiar. I think I would have heard about it, IF Trudeau tried to overturn an election.

Lol...such a scared little tortured soul. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Legato said:

i just had to put a towel under my monitor to catch all the drool from those suffering from TDS.

Don't worry, the end is near for any "suffering," due to scofflaw Trump avoiding accountability for his crimes.

And your suffering from denial is about to commence assuming your cognitive dissonance allows you to face the FACTS. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...such a scared little tortured soul. 

The current FACTS strongly suggest that Trump will FAIL in his efforts to subvert democratic elections here.

Your torture is already commencing as Trump BEGINS to face the music for his crimes.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

34 felonies man, wasn't even aware there are so many. What a circus, and any regular folk you talk with, they will just remember it was over an actress payment. 

So no gag order, he will post as he should, this is what the court decided, and more publicity, more publicity, more publicity, more publicity for Trump. Exactly what he wants. 

Well, this case won the primary for Trump in the Republican primary. Now if the economy goes bad, going against Biden can turn a gamble for Biden and for the United States of America. 

They're basically the same crime repeated 34 times, elevated to felonies by violation of NY campaign finance laws.

Should pols be able to HIDE FACTS by lying on official business records? I suppose Trump could have avoided this by paying out of pocket. By the time the payments were traced back to him personally, the election might have been over.

He MADE it illegal by using business funds and lying about it on official records.

I wonder if all the twists in the plot to hide the transactions is strong evidence it was a campaign expenditure. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,832
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Majikman
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...