West Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 Like many others in the Trudeau crime cartel, Mary Ng has broken ethics codes by grifting 10s of thousands of dollars and granting contracts to personal friends. https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/politics/2022/12/13/1_6192820.amp.html Senator Housakos is calling for her to be removed. But the Trudeau crime cartel doesn't know accountability. And lefties are too vile to ask for it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 Where you been? That's old news. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 42 minutes ago, West said: But the Trudeau crime cartel doesn't know accountability. And lefties are too vile to ask for it. Excuse me? I'm a lefty and I'd like to outfit Trudeau with a body-cam and ankle-bracelet 24/7. And fyi Trudeau is not a lefty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 OMG they'll find out one day a Liberal MP paid his own kid to shovel the driveway! What a scandal! A whole $20 misused in a conflict of interest. Outrage!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Dog Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 3 hours ago, Aristides said: Where you been? That's old news. The date say December 13 2022. They say the following: Quote International Trade Minister Mary Ng apologized Tuesday after the federal ethics commissioner concluded she broke the rules by awarding a contract to a friend -- opening the door for the Opposition Conservatives to point out that it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings. So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support. Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Dog Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 4 minutes ago, herbie said: OMG they'll find out one day a Liberal MP paid his own kid to shovel the driveway! What a scandal! A whole $20 misused in a conflict of interest. Outrage!!! Wasn't it $17,000? And didn't the conservative minister point out this becomes a larger problem because "it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings." I'm thinking if you added it all up you could shovel a lot of driveways. Hell, you could buy a fleet of snow-blowers. And then some. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 11 hours ago, eyeball said: Excuse me? I'm a lefty and I'd like to outfit Trudeau with a body-cam and ankle-bracelet 24/7. And fyi Trudeau is not a lefty. Trudeau is not a lefty? Could you elaborate on that please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 12 hours ago, West said: Like many others in the Trudeau crime cartel, Mary Ng has broken ethics codes by grifting 10s of thousands of dollars and granting contracts to personal friends. https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/politics/2022/12/13/1_6192820.amp.html Senator Housakos is calling for her to be removed. But the Trudeau crime cartel doesn't know accountability. And lefties are too vile to ask for it Old news. 8 hours ago, Infidel Dog said: The date say December 13 2022. They say the following: So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support. Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news. It's old and been resolved in the mean time. west juts has nothing new to whine about. LOL Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition if the company is on the list, and the company was on the list and met the requirements .. Edited December 31, 2022 by ExFlyer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, ironstone said: Trudeau is not a lefty? Could you elaborate on that please? He's more into distributing power away from ordinary people and towards himself and the wealth gap has continued to increase on his watch. Edited December 31, 2022 by eyeball Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 13 hours ago, Aristides said: Where you been? That's old news. So who cares, right? This is Canada, after all. Yawn can you pass another beer. Edited December 31, 2022 by myata Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myata Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition AKA make rules for yourself and your buddies and it looks nice and right, the peasants will pay happily. All cheer good, transparent government! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 28 minutes ago, myata said: AKA make rules for yourself and your buddies and it looks nice and right, the peasants will pay happily. All cheer good, transparent government! AKA Standing Offers. The same rules for everyone and for all governments regardless who is in power. Conservative or Liberal or for every member of parliament and for every department in the civil service. I am happy to enlighten you. Next time a little effort on your part would have gotten you the real answer instead of your conjecture. I know it is a lot to ask of you to get real information but hey.... LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 36 minutes ago, myata said: So who cares, right? This is Canada, after all. Yawn can you pass another beer. You are just another one of those living in the past LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 10 hours ago, Infidel Dog said: The date say December 13 2022. They say the following: So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support. Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news. I don't have a problem, I just thought it was funny one of you guys finally got around to looking at MSM to find out what was going on in the world. This story actually got a lot of attention. I don't support her, I think she should step down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted December 31, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 10 hours ago, Infidel Dog said: Wasn't it $17,000? And didn't the conservative minister point out this becomes a larger problem because "it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings." I'm thinking if you added it all up you could shovel a lot of driveways. Hell, you could buy a fleet of snow-blowers. And then some. Exactly.. the losers who support the Liberals do so knowing their party are a bunch of thieves and don't care. These are just the ones who are caught Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 40 minutes ago, West said: Exactly.. the losers who support the Liberals do so knowing their party are a bunch of thieves and don't care. These are just the ones who are caught What BS. Much ado about nothing. The Standing Offers are used everyday by every parliamentarian and department. It is used by every federal office throughout the country for goods and services under $25K. Supply Arrangements are another way goods and services can be procured. https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/laws-regulations/labour/interpretations-policies/standing-offers.html This is common knowledge. Just because you don't know is not the fault of government nor is it a scam, it is your own ignorance of standard procedures. No scam, just everyday business. Edited December 31, 2022 by ExFlyer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted December 31, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 1 minute ago, ExFlyer said: What BS. Much ado about nothing. The Standing Offers are used everyday by every parliamentarian and department. It is used by every federal office throughout the country for goods and services under $25K. This is common knowledge. Just because you don't know is not the fault of government nor is it a scam, it is your own ignorance of standard procedures. No scam, just everyday business. The Liberals have been caught by the ethics commissioner several times now in just a short period of time for shady deals. Yet you don't care... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Dog Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Old news. It's old and been resolved in the mean time. No. The Resolution is not old news. No more than a conviction to a charge is old news because the offence happened 1 or 2 years ago. You don't seem to want people noticing the Ethics Commissioner did not decide in your girl's favor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, ExFlyer said: Old news. It's old and been resolved in the mean time. west juts has nothing new to whine about. LOL Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition if the company is on the list, and the company was on the list and met the requirements .. It hasn't been resolved. She used her position to benefit a friend with taxpayer money. Twice. Because she apologized it supposedly never happened. Not good enough from a cabinet minister. Edited December 31, 2022 by Aristides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Dog Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 2 minutes ago, Aristides said: It hasn't been resolved. " International Trade Minister Mary Ng apologized Tuesday after the federal ethics commissioner concluded she broke the rules by awarding a contract to a friend -- opening the door for the Opposition Conservatives to point out that it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings." Notice that word in the quote above? Concluded. Look that one up if you're having trouble with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infidel Dog Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 It's starting to get humorous how important it is to some Canadian lefties that nobody pay attention to the fact the Ethics Commissioner has come to a conclusion on this case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 Like I said, it hasn't been resolved, more than just an apology with no consequences was required Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 39 minutes ago, West said: The Liberals have been caught by the ethics commissioner several times now in just a short period of time for shady deals. Yet you don't care... So have the conservatives. So have plain old members of parliament regardless of political affiliation. 32 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said: No. The Resolution is not old news. No more than a conviction to a charge is old news because the offence happened 1 or 2 years ago. You don't seem to want people noticing the Ethics Commissioner did not decide in your girl's favor. Ethics Commissioner.... LOL See below 4 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said: It's starting to get humorous how important it is to some Canadian lefties that nobody pay attention to the fact the Ethics Commissioner has come to a conclusion on this case. When are you folks going to understand the ethics commissioner has no authority and is just an office of show business and of no consequence? The office is what is the scam but, it has had it's benefits for both liberal and conservative governments. It is there to stroke governments that they feel they are doing something. Somewhat like you folks do to each other LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted December 31, 2022 Author Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 18 minutes ago, ExFlyer said: So have the conservatives. So have plain old members of parliament regardless of political affiliation. Ethics Commissioner.... LOL See below When are you folks going to understand the ethics commissioner has no authority and is just an office of show business and of no consequence? The office is what is the scam but, it has had it's benefits for both liberal and conservative governments. It is there to stroke governments that they feel they are doing something. Somewhat like you folks do to each other LOL Like I said.. you don't care about corruption Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExFlyer Posted December 31, 2022 Report Share Posted December 31, 2022 30 minutes ago, West said: Like I said.. you don't care about corruption Corruption? Where? Please provide proof of a case of corruption. A office sse of Standing Offer or Supply Arrangement is corruption?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.