Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, West said:

But the Trudeau crime cartel doesn't know accountability. And lefties are too vile to ask for it.

Excuse me? I'm a lefty and I'd like to outfit Trudeau with a body-cam and ankle-bracelet 24/7.

And fyi Trudeau is not a lefty.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
3 hours ago, Aristides said:

Where you been? That's old news. 

The date say December 13 2022. They say the following:

Quote

International Trade Minister Mary Ng apologized Tuesday after the federal ethics commissioner concluded she broke the rules by awarding a contract to a friend -- opening the door for the Opposition Conservatives to point out that it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings.

So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support.

Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, herbie said:

OMG they'll find out one day a Liberal MP paid his own kid to shovel the driveway! What a scandal!

A whole $20 misused in a conflict of interest. Outrage!!!

Wasn't it $17,000? And didn't the conservative minister point out this becomes a larger problem because "it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings."

I'm thinking if you added it all up you could shovel a lot of driveways.

Hell, you could buy a fleet of snow-blowers. And then some.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, eyeball said:

Excuse me? I'm a lefty and I'd like to outfit Trudeau with a body-cam and ankle-bracelet 24/7.

And fyi Trudeau is not a lefty.

Trudeau is not a lefty? Could you elaborate on that please?

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, West said:

Like many others in the Trudeau crime cartel, Mary Ng has broken ethics codes by grifting 10s of thousands of dollars and granting contracts to personal friends. 

https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/politics/2022/12/13/1_6192820.amp.html

Senator Housakos is calling for her to be removed. But the Trudeau crime cartel doesn't know accountability. And lefties are too vile to ask for it

 

Old news.

8 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

The date say December 13 2022. They say the following:

So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support.

Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news.

It's old and been resolved in the mean time. west juts has nothing new to whine about. LOL

Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition if the company is on the list, and the company was on the list and met the requirements ..

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

Trudeau is not a lefty? Could you elaborate on that please?

He's more into distributing power away from ordinary people and towards himself and the wealth gap has continued to increase on his watch.

Edited by eyeball

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Aristides said:

Where you been? That's old news. 

So who cares, right? This is Canada, after all. Yawn can you pass another beer.

Edited by myata

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition

AKA make rules for yourself and your buddies and it looks nice and right, the peasants will pay happily. All cheer good, transparent government!

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
28 minutes ago, myata said:

AKA make rules for yourself and your buddies and it looks nice and right, the peasants will pay happily. All cheer good, transparent government!

AKA Standing Offers.

The same rules for everyone and for all governments regardless who is in power. Conservative or Liberal or for every member of parliament and for every department in the civil service.

I am happy to enlighten you. Next time a little effort on your part would have gotten you the real answer instead of your conjecture. I know it is a lot to ask of you to get real information but hey....  LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
36 minutes ago, myata said:

So who cares, right? This is Canada, after all. Yawn can you pass another beer.

You are just another one of those living in the past LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
10 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

The date say December 13 2022. They say the following:

So what's your real problem? That the story is a couple of weeks old more or less or that it's not flattering to the guys you support.

Gee, I hope you're not saying we can no longer discuss it because in this case you've deemed 2 weeks old news.

I don't have a problem, I just thought it was funny one of you guys finally got around to looking at MSM to find out what was going on in the world. This story actually got a lot of attention. I don't support her, I think she should step down. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Wasn't it $17,000? And didn't the conservative minister point out this becomes a larger problem because "it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings."

I'm thinking if you added it all up you could shovel a lot of driveways.

Hell, you could buy a fleet of snow-blowers. And then some.

Exactly.. the losers who support the Liberals do so knowing their party are a bunch of thieves and don't care. 

These are just the ones who are caught

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, West said:

Exactly.. the losers who support the Liberals do so knowing their party are a bunch of thieves and don't care. 

These are just the ones who are caught

What BS. Much ado about nothing.

The Standing Offers are used everyday by every parliamentarian and department. It is used by every federal office throughout the country for goods and services under $25K.

Supply Arrangements are another way goods and services can be procured.

https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/laws-regulations/labour/interpretations-policies/standing-offers.html

This is common knowledge. Just because you don't know is not the fault of government nor is it a scam, it is your own ignorance of standard procedures.

No scam, just everyday business.

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

What BS. Much ado about nothing.

The Standing Offers are used everyday by every parliamentarian and department. It is used by every federal office throughout the country for goods and services under $25K. This is common knowledge. Just because you don't know is not the fault of government nor is it a scam, it is your own ignorance of standard procedures.

No scam, just everyday business.

The Liberals have been caught by the ethics commissioner several times now in just a short period of time for shady deals. Yet you don't care...

Posted
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Old news.

It's old and been resolved in the mean time. 

No. The Resolution is not old news. No more than a conviction to a charge is old news because the offence happened 1 or 2 years ago.

You don't seem to want people noticing the Ethics Commissioner did not decide in your girl's favor.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Old news.

It's old and been resolved in the mean time. west juts has nothing new to whine about. LOL

Besides, contracts under $25K can be given without competition if the company is on the list, and the company was on the list and met the requirements ..

It hasn't been resolved. She used her position to benefit a friend with taxpayer money. Twice.

Because she apologized it supposedly never happened. Not good enough from a cabinet minister.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

It hasn't been resolved.

"

International Trade Minister Mary Ng apologized Tuesday after the federal ethics commissioner concluded she broke the rules by awarding a contract to a friend -- opening the door for the Opposition Conservatives to point out that it's not the first time a Liberal cabinet minister has faced such rulings."

Notice that word in the quote above? Concluded. Look that one up if you're having trouble with it.

Posted
39 minutes ago, West said:

The Liberals have been caught by the ethics commissioner several times now in just a short period of time for shady deals. Yet you don't care...

So have the conservatives. So have plain old members of parliament regardless of political affiliation.

32 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

No. The Resolution is not old news. No more than a conviction to a charge is old news because the offence happened 1 or 2 years ago.

You don't seem to want people noticing the Ethics Commissioner did not decide in your girl's favor.

Ethics Commissioner....  LOL   See below

4 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

It's starting to get humorous how important it is to some Canadian lefties that nobody pay attention to the fact the Ethics Commissioner has come to a conclusion on this case.

When are you folks going to understand the ethics commissioner has no authority and is just an office of show business and of no consequence?

The office is what is the scam but, it has had it's benefits for both liberal and conservative governments. It is there to stroke governments that they feel they are doing something. Somewhat like you folks do to each other LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
18 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

So have the conservatives. So have plain old members of parliament regardless of political affiliation.

Ethics Commissioner....  LOL   See below

When are you folks going to understand the ethics commissioner has no authority and is just an office of show business and of no consequence?

The office is what is the scam but, it has had it's benefits for both liberal and conservative governments. It is there to stroke governments that they feel they are doing something. Somewhat like you folks do to each other LOL

Like I said.. you don't care about corruption 

Posted
30 minutes ago, West said:

Like I said.. you don't care about corruption 

Corruption? Where?

Please provide proof of a case of corruption. A office sse of Standing Offer or Supply Arrangement is corruption??

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,832
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Majikman
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...