85.7% of Covid Deaths in Canada Were Among the Multi-Vaxed from Aug to Sept of 2022. Jabbing 85% of the Population Didn't Reduce Deaths

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

You are 100% correct but here, on repolitics, there are a couple dudes that cannot move on. Their life is wrapped up in conspiracy. LOL

Dude you post ass porn when people disagree with you, i don't thikn you're going to be in much of a position to critisize others's ability to 'move on'.

Further low minds like you are the first to bring up the sins of the past usually.  You think 'two years ago' is living in the past - what do you have to say to first nations people about the residential schools?

What an !diot.

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

not exactly related but we had our monthly meeting with the governor. Someone attempted to bring up this topic... Crickets. After 2 minutes of silence, we moved on. The person who tried to air the grievance about vax mandates just sat there in stunned silence. Keep in mind, we have a republican governor and thoroughly republican cabinet. The vax mandates were put in place by the past governor (a Democrat). It told me that folks are moving on from this topic. 

So what you're saying is that it's wrong for people to bring up the mistakes of the past and we shoudln't support people doing that.

You sure you want to go down that road?  

[impartialobserver]

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Dude you post ass porn when people disagree with you, i don't thikn you're going to be in much of a position to critisize others's ability to 'move on'.

Further low minds like you are the first to bring up the sins of the past usually.  You think 'two years ago' is living in the past - what do you have to say to first nations people about the residential schools?

What an !diot.

So what you're saying is that it's wrong for people to bring up the mistakes of the past and we shoudln't support people doing that.

You sure you want to go down that road?  

You assume that the mistakes of the past have not been addressed? By stopping the mandate and making it clear that it will not be brought back again.. that seems to address that. Besides can a governor undo the past... folks got the shot or not, all of which in the state service did so of their own volition. If they did not get the jab.. the consequence was that they had to get tested. No job loss, no financial penalty, etc. Even the testing was a toothless item.. if you did not get tested, rarely did anyone find out or really care. 

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You assume that the mistakes of the past have not been addressed? By stopping the mandate and making it clear that it will not be brought back again.. that seems to address that.

OMG no.

If someone was siphoning money from your bank account and killed your dog, then they agreed to stop forever, would that "address it"? 

The gov't stole our freedom to peddle a pseudovax, they forced young people who never needed the jab to take it, and a lot of those young people were grievously injured. People who were forced out of their jobs in hospitals still haven't been brought back, but the vax never really worked. Covid still went rampant in 2022 and we had more deaths, ifections and hospitalizations than ever that year. Has that loss of employment been addressed? 

Jesus Christ man, we're a long way from friendly terms with our government. The LPOC are my enemies. 

Quote

Besides can a governor undo the past... folks got the shot or not, all of which in the state service did so of their own volition.

In Canada we went way more fascist than you guys in the states. 

This is basically a shithole country with some nice roads and buildings now. 

[CdnFox]

53 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You assume that the mistakes of the past have not been addressed?

You literally just described  a situation where someone raised concerns and you blew him off in silence without addressing his concerns.

So yeah.

And obviously the guy wouldn't have brought it up if he felt there weren't outstanding issues.

Edited April 9 by CdnFox

[impartialobserver]

17 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You literally just described  a situation where someone raised concerns and you blew him off in silence without addressing his concerns.

So yeah.

And obviously the guy wouldn't have brought it up if he felt there weren't outstanding issues.

If I had already addressed it in the past and did not want to keep on doing so over and over again.. by your logic, I should just keep doing it. Lather, rinse, repeat. the governor did all that he could do.. he stopped the mandates and made sure that they were in the past. Lets hear what else he could have done... this should be entertaining

 

Edited April 9 by impartialobserver

[impartialobserver]

42 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG no.

If someone was siphoning money from your bank account and killed your dog, then they agreed to stop forever, would that "address it"? 

The gov't stole our freedom to peddle a pseudovax, they forced young people who never needed the jab to take it, and a lot of those young people were grievously injured. People who were forced out of their jobs in hospitals still haven't been brought back, but the vax never really worked. Covid still went rampant in 2022 and we had more deaths, ifections and hospitalizations than ever that year. Has that loss of employment been addressed? 

Jesus Christ man, we're a long way from friendly terms with our government. The LPOC are my enemies. 

In Canada we went way more fascist than you guys in the states. 

This is basically a shithole country with some nice roads and buildings now. 

so what can the current governor do to address this issue in such a way to appease you? Keep in mind that he is only a governor and can't just impose his will. This should be interesting. 

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

If I had already addressed it in the past and did not want to keep on doing so over and over again.. by your logic, I should just keep doing it. Lather, rinse, repeat. the governor did all that he could do.. he stopped the mandates and made sure that they were in the past. Lets hear what else he could have done... this should be entertaining

 

 Then why did the guy bring it up? Obviously he still had concerns.

This is starting to sound more and more made up as you go.  "OH THE GUY WAS REALLY CONCERNED TO TALK ABOUT IT AND WAS SHOCKED!!! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!!! THAT HE WAS  MET WITH... SILENCE!!!!!"

But if as you say it had been thoroughly addressed - then he woudln't have brought it up.

Something you want to tell the class about your 'story'?

[impartialobserver]

Just now, CdnFox said:

 Then why did the guy bring it up? Obviously he still had concerns.

This is starting to sound more and more made up as you go.  "OH THE GUY WAS REALLY CONCERNED TO TALK ABOUT IT AND WAS SHOCKED!!! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!!! THAT HE WAS  MET WITH... SILENCE!!!!!"

But if as you say it had been thoroughly addressed - then he woudln't have brought it up.

Something you want to tell the class about your 'story'?

No. I think that the guy was trying to take advantage of a bit of a duldrum in the action. We only have a legislative session every 2 years and that ended last year. Economy is doing well, unemployment claims are back down to a typical level. My guess is that it seemed like a good time to dredge it back up and he was shut down. 

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

so what can the current governor do to address this issue in such a way to appease you? Keep in mind that he is only a governor and can't just impose his will. This should be interesting. 

"this should be interesting"  "this should be entertaining".

The hallmark of someone  who's not listening and doesn't care about the truth. Asking a question and dismissing the answer before it's even given. And from multiple people.

Maybe that's the question you should have been asking the guy who brought it up at your meeting? Maybe he's concerned the state would do it agian in the future. Maybe he'd like to see the creation of an official state response plan that addresses people's rights to be used in the future.

Who knows? You don't, because you were too busy being a pretentious jerk about it as you are now here.

But this is the problem - people don't listen. You've obviously decided this guy was a scumbag for bringing it up and closed your mind.

Now - we're used to seeing americans spread that kind of hatred and intolerance towards one another but it's a lot more shocking for us in Canada to see it happening here. But - here we are.

 

1 minute ago, impartialobserver said:

No. I think that the guy was trying to take advantage of a bit of a duldrum in the action. We only have a legislative session every 2 years and that ended last year. Economy is doing well, unemployment claims are back down to a typical level. My guess is that it seemed like a good time to dredge it back up and he was shut down. 

Why dredge it back up if it had been resolved. What did he want to discuss? There must have been something.  In his mind SOMETHING must be unresolved or why mention it.

[Moonbox]

37 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

But this is the problem - people don't listen. You've obviously decided this guy was a scumbag for bringing it up and closed your mind.

No.  People realized he was having a Karen moment, and did the polite thing.  They didn't engage.  

This is something you're no doubt familiar with.  🙃

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

so what can the current governor do to address this issue in such a way to appease you? Keep in mind that he is only a governor and can't just impose his will. This should be interesting. 

We don't have a governor here, we have a Fuhrer, and I'd like to see some accountability against members of our gov't, MSM and health system who pushed false narratives on us. 

I'd like to see the truth come out and have a serious conversation about what went on and why. 

There was never a time when any data supported a need for children or young adults to take the jab, ever. It wasn't safe, it wasn't effective enough to be useful, they didn't need it at all and it has never slowed the spread of covid. 

If it slowed the spread of covid at all then why did we have "the most infections ever" in Dec 2021 and Jan 2022 when the unvaxed were locked down and 85% of our country was jabbed? 

I've seen lots of rotten cork-soakers making the case that jabbing children was safe (which was a total lie) but I've never seen anyone attempt to make the case why they even needed it. 

I want to see the people who were covid fear porn mongers, liars, and snake-oil hucksters become social pariahs if not convicts.  

Young people were hurt. That never needed to happen. I want accountability for that. 

Edited April 10 by WestCanMan

[impartialobserver]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

We don't have a governor here, we have a Fuhrer, and I'd like to see some accountability against members of our gov't, MSM and health system who pushed false narratives on us. 

I'd like to see the truth come out and have a serious conversation about what went on and why. 

There was never a time when any data supported a need for children or young adults to take the jab, ever. It wasn't safe, it wasn't effective enough to be useful, they didn't need it at all and it has never slowed the spread of covid. 

If it slowed the spread of covid at all then why did we have "the most infections ever" in Dec 2021 and Jan 2022 when the unvaxed were locked down and 85% of our country was jabbed? 

I've seen lots of rotten cork-soakers making the case that jabbing children was safe (which was a total lie) but I've never seen anyone attempt to make the case why they even needed it. 

I want to see the people who were covid fear porn mongers, liars, and snake-oil hucksters become social pariahs if not convicts.  

Young people were hurt. That never needed to happen. I want accountability for that. 

So in short... you have no actual ideas for policy. Ok, point taken. 

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

No.  People realized he was having a Karen moment, and did the polite thing.  They didn't engage.  

This is something you're no doubt familiar with.  🙃

Ahhh moonie, cultist of cultists, I envy you for your perpetual state of covid bliss.

Where you live it's always "safe and effective, and the pandemic ended in Feb 2022".

I can't help but feel like the "pandemic" was still going on when we were setting records for the number of covid deaths, hospitalizations, infections and ICU visits, but if Biden, Trudeau, our medical health journals and our MSM corporations all agree that the vaxed saved us, I see why you believe what you do. 

It takes a hefty amount of spine to think that the number of covid deaths is more significant than the opinions of some known liars and scumbags. 

[impartialobserver]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

"this should be interesting"  "this should be entertaining".

The hallmark of someone  who's not listening and doesn't care about the truth. Asking a question and dismissing the answer before it's even given. And from multiple people.

Maybe that's the question you should have been asking the guy who brought it up at your meeting? Maybe he's concerned the state would do it agian in the future. Maybe he'd like to see the creation of an official state response plan that addresses people's rights to be used in the future.

Who knows? You don't, because you were too busy being a pretentious jerk about it as you are now here.

But this is the problem - people don't listen. You've obviously decided this guy was a scumbag for bringing it up and closed your mind.

Now - we're used to seeing americans spread that kind of hatred and intolerance towards one another but it's a lot more shocking for us in Canada to see it happening here. But - here we are.

 

Why dredge it back up if it had been resolved. What did he want to discuss? There must have been something.  In his mind SOMETHING must be unresolved or why mention it.

Ok, first it was not my meeting. The governor meets with a select group and each person presents their small bit. Mine is unemployment insurance claims. My turn was over before this guy came up. His unsolicited idea was that we should retroactively pay those who opted to not get the vax and make some sort of statement. The guy is not aware that no one sacrificed pay.. they lost sick leave or vacation time if they went to the testing. I felt that we had already crossed that bridge and so no need to keep revisiting it. The governor (again Republican) just stared at him and said nothing. He is the one that needs to say something not me. I just stared out the window knowing that this was out of left field. 

18 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

No.  People realized he was having a Karen moment, and did the polite thing.  They didn't engage.  

This is something you're no doubt familiar with.  🙃

precisely. When he came into office.. he dealt with the covid issue. No need to keep revisiting it. Its over. 

[WestCanMan]

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

So in short... you have no actual ideas for policy. Ok, point taken. 

Policy isn't where this thing begins and ends. Policy comes from an in-depth understanding of what went on and why. 

We don't need another Fuhrer, even if it's a really brilliant, anonymous internet poster, telling everyone "exactly what happened and what we need to do now". 

Honestly,

1. we lacked the ability and direction to protect ourselves from an actual viral outbreak of deadly significance, so we need to look at that aspect of this, and
2. we lacked the honesty and sensibility to weigh all options fairly - we just caved to big pharma's scam. Trump's "all hands on deck" policy, of weighing the merits of off-patent drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin, other treatments like transplanting antibodies from covid survivors into infected people, etc, etc, etc was they way to go. I'd rather have a guy say "How can we get chemical treatments right into the lungs" than have a guy that says "There's only one possible solution, we have to ignore every other possibility. We will destroy people's careers if they dare to gainsay our plan. Let's get everyone in the same boat."

 

[impartialobserver]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Policy isn't where this thing begins and ends. Policy comes from an in-depth understanding of what went on and why. 

We don't need another Fuhrer, even if it's a really brilliant, anonymous internet poster, telling everyone "exactly what happened and what we need to do now". 

Honestly,

1. we lacked the ability and direction to protect ourselves from an actual viral outbreak of deadly significance, so we need to look at that aspect of this, and
2. we lacked the honesty and sensibility to weigh all options fairly - we just caved to big pharma's scam. Trump's "all hands on deck" policy, of weighing the merits of off-patent drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin, other treatments like transplanting antibodies from covid survivors into infected people, etc, etc, etc was they way to go. I'd rather have a guy say "How can we get chemical treatments right into the lungs" than have a guy that says "There's only one possible solution, we have to ignore every other possibility. We will destroy people's careers if they dare to gainsay our plan. Let's get everyone in the same boat."

 

so again no ideas or solutions... just some talking. 

[WestCanMan]

28 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

so again no ideas or solutions... just some talking. 

If we disagree on what happened and why, how can we possibly come to an agreement on what to do in the future? What kind of solution would you like me to propose, io? 

Open, public conversations among leading virologists and epidemiologists about what to do in the future? Who chooses them: Fauci? Trudeau? Biden? CNN and MSNBC? The Lancet and NEJoM? 

I'd argue that if you put all of them in a room you should fill it with water. 

We NEED a heavy dose of sunlight. We need some disinfectant, STAT.  

Buddy, I know for a fact that there are a dozen people from this site who will just keep saying "Vax-fascism solved this problem, and it's the model for what to do in the future. We will rely on expensive vaccines from Moderno and Pfizer to save us from every pathogen that comes out from now 'til doomsday." 

How do you move forward with intelligent dialogue in a room where half the people are still cultists? 

• The path of Fauci The Righteous was beset on all sides
  By the inequities of chuds and the tyranny of dirty anti-vaxers 
  Blessed is He who, in the name of charity and good will
  force-vaxed the weak despite the threat of myocarditis and death
  for he is truly his brother's keeper and the jabber of small children
  And I will strike down upon thee
  With great vengeance and furious anger
  The Dr Raoults of this world who attempt to find cheap, effective alternatives
  And you will know my name is Lord Fauci
  When I lay my lockdowns upon thee

Step 1 in solving a problem - and there was definitely a whole host of HUGE problems - is always to identify the problem. 

These guys say there was no problem, so the truth is still at bay. The next pandemic is on pace to be handled exactly like this one was, and if that's the case then we might as well pray for God to help us all because science has deserted us. 

Edited April 10 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

No.  People realized he was having a Karen moment, and did the polite thing.  They didn't engage.  

This is something you're no doubt familiar with.  🙃

Sure - I have to go through your 'karen' moments all the time. But even tho they're annoying to put up with i still listen to what you say.

[WestCanMan]

io: take your brain here for a second...

Think back to Nov 2019, before you ever heard the word covid. 

Your mind is a blank slate...

On the very first day of that month in Nov 2019, and even before that, Fauci already knew that he had funded research on a coronavirus, to make it more transmissible among humans, at the Wuhan BSL4 lab. 

Then when covid broke out, he stood there in front of the camera, talking to every American you know, every American you don't know, and everyone who died of covid, and said "The virus came from a wetmarket, where a bat and an intermediary species, like a pangolin for instance, were in close proximity..."

Where I come from, that's called a FOG KING CONFLICT OF INTEREST. It's also a fabrication. 

If you grab a globe, that spinning replica of the earth we all had in our classroom at school, from your office and poke it with a pin, the Wuhan BSL4 lab and the wetmarket will both fit in the hole it makes. That's how close they are. Poke it as lightly as you want, they'll still both fit. But somehow Fauci just knew that his virus wasn't the one that's infecting everyone, and people were banned from social media for even saying "BSL4". Uh-huh.

Last I heard, his virus was still the most likely culprit., and that's from the FBI, the most leftist of all organizations in America.  

[Moonbox]

26 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sure - I have to go through your 'karen' moments all the time. But even tho they're annoying to put up with i still listen to what you say.

Listening to stupid people isn't a productive use of time.  That's why Bubba was met with awkward silence at impartial's meeting.  That's why so many of your thread topics are ignored and fade away, stillborn, into the back pages.  It's why people lose interest in threads once you start talking about your muffins and your butthurt.  Nobody derails and strangles a thread like CdnFux.   🥱

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Moonbox said:

Listening to stupid people isn't a productive use of time. 

Oh i don't mind - you're entertaining if nothing else

But joking aside, the vast majority of intelligent people will tell you the same thing:  Even stupid people have important knowledge to share, if you know how to listen.  Intelligent people don't discount them out of hand.

Of course - you wouldn't have known that  

T

Quote

hat's why Bubba was met with awkward silence at impartial's meeting. 

Really    I think you're projecting a bit. Impartial didn't say he was stupid. Or a 'bubba' (ahhh the dehumanizing of the left). 

And you weren't at the meeting.

So you just assume anyone who says something you don't want to talk about must be stupid and a 'bubba'.  This is why you wind up looking like a fool so often - you just don't know how to pay attention to anything that doesn't feed your confirmation bias.

Quote

That's why so many of your thread topics are ignored and fade away, stillborn, into the back pages.  It's why people lose interest in threads once you start talking about your muffins and your butthurt.  Nobody derails and strangles a thread like CdnFux.

LOL - Oh look,  you're mimicking the ass porn guy   Always striving for those intellectual heights aren't you  

actually most of my threads do pretty well.   and some are really just to get information out there anyway. But yeah - lots of them go dozens of pages.

And making fun of you is always worth some time - i'd have to pay to see a real comedy act

Whereas your threads.....  oh... wait. You don't start threads.  in fact you really don't contribute at all.  About 80 percent of your posts are chasing after me trying desperately to gain some ego back, you really have nothing to bring to the table. But i do love that you've set aside "Your posts are too long" and are now going for "your threads have insufficient replies in some cases"  as your primary critique

Having you around always makes me feel increadibly intelligent   It's what keeps me coming back. Mind you i suspect a particularly dense bullfrog would feel smart after a conversation with you

 

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 actually most of my threads do pretty well.   and some are really just to get information out there anyway. But yeah - lots of them go dozens of pages.

You don't have to answer to moonbox lol. It's not like he's ever proven himself ble to have a reasonable back-and-forth with anyone he disagrees with. 

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

We don't have a governor here, we have a Fuhrer, and I'd like to see some accountability against members of our gov't, MSM and health system who pushed false narratives on us. 

I'd like to see the truth come out and have a serious conversation about what went on and why. 

There was never a time when any data supported a need for children or young adults to take the jab, ever. It wasn't safe, it wasn't effective enough to be useful, they didn't need it at all and it has never slowed the spread of covid. 

If it slowed the spread of covid at all then why did we have "the most infections ever" in Dec 2021 and Jan 2022 when the unvaxed were locked down and 85% of our country was jabbed? 

I've seen lots of rotten cork-soakers making the case that jabbing children was safe (which was a total lie) but I've never seen anyone attempt to make the case why they even needed it. 

I want to see the people who were covid fear porn mongers, liars, and snake-oil hucksters become social pariahs if not convicts.  

Young people were hurt. That never needed to happen. I want accountability for that. 

Good luck with that. Meanwhile, back in reality, people around the world are grateful for the millions of lives saved and untold economic devastation averted. 

[Zeitgeist]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

io: take your brain here for a second...

Think back to Nov 2019, before you ever heard the word covid. 

Your mind is a blank slate...

On the very first day of that month in Nov 2019, and even before that, Fauci already knew that he had funded research on a coronavirus, to make it more transmissible among humans, at the Wuhan BSL4 lab. 

Then when covid broke out, he stood there in front of the camera, talking to every American you know, every American you don't know, and everyone who died of covid, and said "The virus came from a wetmarket, where a bat and an intermediary species, like a pangolin for instance, were in close proximity..."

Where I come from, that's called a FOG KING CONFLICT OF INTEREST. It's also a fabrication. 

If you grab a globe, that spinning replica of the earth we all had in our classroom at school, from your office and poke it with a pin, the Wuhan BSL4 lab and the wetmarket will both fit in the hole it makes. That's how close they are. Poke it as lightly as you want, they'll still both fit. But somehow Fauci just knew that his virus wasn't the one that's infecting everyone, and people were banned from social media for even saying "BSL4". Uh-huh.

Last I heard, his virus was still the most likely culprit., and that's from the FBI, the most leftist of all organizations in America.  

Anyone who is a critical thinker and reasonably intelligent knows that much happened in the pandemic response that should not have.  Early on governments had the excuse of trying to be prudent and protecting populations through measures like social distancing and perhaps even masking.  Once the vaccines became available, the excuse for lockdowns disappeared, but really lockdowns should’ve been questioned and the freedom of movement preserved throughout the pandemic.

Mandating vaccination with a new untested vaccine was wrong.  Requiring vaccine passports for travel, work, and even use of private services was a massive violation of constitutional rights that was unnecessary.  Pushing vaccines for young people and subjecting them to mandatory schooling from home was bad. Accommodation’s could’ve been made for immune compromised teachers, children, and workers who needed to keep a safe distance from people.

The efficacy of the vaccines was proven to be low later on and they became unnecessary for most people by the time omicron rolled around.  There’s no justification for mandatory vaccination at that stage, but really they never should’ve been mandatory.

It’s highly likely that C-19 originated in a lab doing gain of function research.  Foolishly and irresponsibly, our governments were allowing such research to take place with foreign adversaries.  It’s obvious that governments are leaning on the excuse of national security to redact or hide what happened from citizens, though the threat to national security was the research and existence of the labs and partnerships with foreign researchers.

I think that the reality is probably worse than what I said above.  Nevertheless, populations were berated with fear mongering propaganda constantly.  Many people including many posters on here are in denial of what happened and they will likely remain so.  It’s simply too painful to admit and people want to believe what they are told.

I say all of this as someone who is triple vaccinated and believed most of what I heard from media, even when much of it was scripted and the science on treatments was somewhat inconclusive.  So much suppression of speech took place.  The unfair maligning of invermectin is just one example of a false narrative being elevated by agencies to the level of official truth.

We should all be very concerned about ceding more authority to the WHO.  We should also put tremendous pressure on governments to explain what happened at our biolabs, to make sure that liberties can’t be removed again, and to ensure that unaccountable organizations and international bodies aren’t imposing policies on Canadians.

Edited April 10 by Zeitgeist

[Venandi]

6 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

I think that the reality is probably worse than what I said above.  Nevertheless, populations were berated with fear mongering propaganda constantly.  Many people including many posters on here are in denial of what happened and they will likely remain so.  It’s simply too painful to admit and people want to believe what they are told.

Yup, I sure hope we learn from that.

After reading all  the comments here and considering Canada’s covid response in general, I decided to go looking for something we actually got right. Something I could look at and say “yup, I get it, that made perfect sense… good job.”  So regardless of my personal feelings about the vaccine itself, the national response in general, the hateful and divisive rhetoric, or the clubbing of individual rights like a baby seal on an ice flow, I did a little digging.

It occurred to me that maybe our timely acquisition of the vaccine (in sufficient quantities) and acquiring the required number of ventilators (on short notice) would be the bright spot I was looking for.

Nope…

A few minutes worth of searching suggested that (altogether) we disposed of some 53 million vaccine doses at a total cost of $1.6 billion. That’s not the stuff we gave away either, apparently “disposed of" actually means disposed of.

So... I got to wondering, If maintaining vaccine efficacy required inoculation at  9 month intervals, did the people who cheered when their neighbours got fired actually roll up their sleeves and do what they demanded their neighbours do?

Well, apparently not, only 15% of Canadians stayed current and up to date. I suppose that opinions on “WHY” may vary but mine is that the rabid pro-vax community no longer believed their previous messaging. And since that messaging was so hateful (IMO), I would have expected a bit more effort on their part.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/just-15-of-canadians-got-updated-covid-vaccines-this-fall-new-figures-show-1.7064240

Then there's the ventilator thing. Yes this is from Rebel news but I don’t care about sources, I care if the information is true or not. Decide for yourself:

https://www.rebelnews.com/hundreds_of_unused_ventilators_purchsed_by_feds_sold_for_scrap

And with that my search for something “well done” came to a sad conclusion.  It does take me back to my original (day one) premise though… do your own threat assessment, then do what’s right for you with my full blessing.

After that, all you needed to do to get along with me was absolutely nothing… just extend that same courtesy to me. It amounted to minding your own business and leaving me alone, you couldn't even do that.

It could easily have been the bright spot I was searching for… it wasn’t though. It was actually the worst part of all this   

Edited April 10 by Venandi