Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Why is it so important to you that I understand your point of view?

I don't share your views, probably never will and really don't much care if you do or not.

I make my decisions based on many things.

You are like an ex smoker being evangelistic and trying to convert everyone. Or even worse, you are like a vegan trying to make everyone feel bad for not eating their vegetables and bad on them for eating a cow. Thing is, smokers and non smokers and vegans and omnivores live together.

It is sad that you cannot accept that others are not as paranoid and negative as yourself. Trying to discuss anything with you always reverts to you being insulting at another position or opinion.

As I said in an earlier post, the definition of a nationalist is "Someone who's nationalistic believes their country is better than any other country." That, judging by your posts, comments and demeanour,  certainly does not describe you.

I wish I were an ex-smoker.

You seem to see the incorrectness of a lot of things...yet choose to argue for doing nothing about them. Instead you argue for...just accepting what is incorrect. Why? How can that sit well with your conscience? I couldn't and/or can't.

Perhaps that's one difference between a Nationalist...and whatever you are.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

The Liberals are trying to get this passed one way or another in order to regulate social media and streaming. If it's stalled now it will be resurrected again.  To me it means they want to limit what we can say and what we can see. How is that not going to be a form of censorship?

Nothing there yet. They tried something last year and got no where.

It can mean whatever you want it to mean but fact is, there is nothing there.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
Just now, Nationalist said:

I wish I were an ex-smoker.

You seem to see the incorrectness of a lot of things...yet choose to argue for doing nothing about them. Instead you argue for...just accepting what is incorrect. Why? How can that sit well with your conscience? I couldn't and/or can't.

Perhaps that's one difference between a Nationalist...and whatever you are.

Chuckle....incorrectness.... Chuckle

I am not arguing, just presenting dictionary definitions.

My consistence is clear.

What amuses me is how you keep caring that I don't agree with your take on things.

But hey, I don't care about your take as much as you disagree with me. It is OK for you to be dissatisfied but you type will never be satisfied anyway so why should anyone give in to you LOL

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Nothing there yet. They tried something last year and got no where.

It can mean whatever you want it to mean but fact is, there is nothing there.

If it doesn't concern you because it's not happened yet, will you be concerned  when it does pass? Or will you be fine with it ? 

The undeniable fact that they WANT to do this should be a gigantic warning sign to all Canadians.

  • Like 1

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
5 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Chuckle....incorrectness.... Chuckle

I am not arguing, just presenting dictionary definitions.

My consistence is clear.

What amuses me is how you keep caring that I don't agree with your take on things.

But hey, I don't care about your take as much as you disagree with me. It is OK for you to be dissatisfied but you type will never be satisfied anyway so why should anyone give in to you LOL

 

Give in? You think I'm discussing/arguing here to change your mind? I'm not. I do honestly hope the repercussions of this Libbie adventure don't harm you...which oddly enough they wouldn't.

Ya...incorrectness...once in a while even I can play political correctness. ;)

Your consistence? You mean your conscience don't you?

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, eyeball said:

You're failing. No teeth no bite. 

Really?

Have you seen the rage reviews Pixie-Dust got his last time out? Even the Euros are displeased.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Give in? You think I'm discussing/arguing here to change your mind? I'm not. I do honestly hope the repercussions of this Libbie adventure don't harm you...which oddly enough they wouldn't.

Ya...incorrectness...once in a while even I can play political correctness. ;)

Your consistence? You mean your conscience don't you?

 

Uhhh, you back again?? LOL

Of course you are trying to change my mind... otherwise you ould not keep coming back at me.

Yup, autospell issue.

Edited by ExFlyer

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
3 hours ago, Faramir said:

Wasn't Canada just a fiefdom of the Hudson Bay Company at one point?  Early Canada was a society of French speakers governed by Great Britain.

I would simply caution against falling for Canada

perhaps you have interests in Canada

but Canada is not something worthy of love

because it's just a collection of bureaucratic agreements to protect entrenched interests at your expense

to love Canada,  is like loving an psycho chick who wants to destroy your live

don't be a chump for Canada, I say

Posted
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Really?

Have you seen the rage reviews Pixie-Dust got his last time out? Even the Euros are displeased.

Yawn...why do I need to? I've never voted for the little douche.  You see a lot of displeasure with politicians around the world.  It's like this everywhere in the observable universe.  You're just finding this out now?

  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
24 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yawn...why do I need to? I've never voted for the little douche.  You see a lot of displeasure with politicians around the world.  It's like this everywhere in the observable universe.  You're just finding this out now?

No I'm opposing it. How do you know the mechanics of the universe. Dont be grandiose. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

why was the 2003 Iraq war so much more legitimate

Based on what scale the invasion of Iraq is more legitimate? The UN? UN is a bit of a dirty joke, while UN is located in New York and is being funded by the US government this is not surprising that it accepts war in Iraq but not Ukraine.

Most of the things that the UN does or say are hypocritical, no need to go far, their latest joke was that (because of the check of money that the Saudis have paid the UN) the UN called those who are defending their soil, country and families as terrorists in Yemen and other than condemning the Saudi for waging this ongoing 8-year war and blockade on the Yemenis that resulted in death of so many kids and families and caused acute famine there, it condemns Yemen that why did you resist against the invasion of your country?!! 

The US attacked Iraq cause it lied to the people of the world and said "they have nukes", at least Russia didn't lie about the cause of its invasion. 

16 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

 and with so fewer casualties.

One million Iraqi civilians killed by the US and NATO bombings, hmm, is that fewer than Ukraine? Maybe those ordinary people were enriching non-existent uranium in their homes? 

No war that is waged based on "greedy" is legitimate no matter Russia starts it or American, and the US is the worst by far (!!), because it has waged countless wars and killed countless people in all over the world, since they have gotten power the world hasn't been at peace..... and, hmm, the US is still killing people in different countries...

Edited by User47
  • Like 1
Posted

You have to wear a mask because I'm offended. 

You have to call your wife your spouse because I'm offended

You have to call a pregnant woman a pregnant person because I'm offended

You have to pay attention to whatever the million changing terms there are for native because I'm offended

You can't say all lives matter because I'm offended

You have to call someone by their preferred pronoun because I'm offended

You have to cancel Roseanne because I'm offended. 

You cant say that joke because I am offended

At what point does it stop being about politeness and more about control and manipulation?

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Who??

It's pathetic that you weigh in on this topic so often and so passionately yet you are so oblivious of the topic at hand.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
2 hours ago, User47 said:

Based on what scale the invasion of Iraq is more legitimate? The UN? UN is a bit of a dirty joke, while UN is located in New York and is being funded by the US government this is not surprising that it accepts war in Iraq but not Ukraine.

Most of the things that the UN does or say are hypocritical, no need to go far, their latest joke was that (because of the check of money that the Saudis have paid the UN) the UN called those who are defending their soil, country and families as terrorists in Yemen and other than condemning the Saudi for waging this ongoing 8-year war and blockade on the Yemenis that resulted in death of so many kids and families and caused acute famine there, it condemns Yemen that why did you resist against the invasion of your country?!! 

The US attacked Iraq cause it lied to the people of the world and said "they have nukes", at least Russia didn't lie about the cause of its invasion. 

One million Iraqi civilians killed by the US and NATO bombings, hmm, is that fewer than Ukraine? Maybe those ordinary people were enriching non-existent uranium in their homes? 

No war that is waged based on "greedy" is not legitimate matter Russia starts it or American, and the US is the worst by far (!!), because it has waged countless wars and killed countless people in all over the world, since they have gotten power the world hasn't been at peace..... and, hmm, the US is still killing people in different countries...

Sorry, I see myself responsible for the words I say, just couldn't forget... 

Yeah, I know all that. I was being facetious. 

I'm not one of the people here that's frothing at the mouth about Ukraine, acting like it's the greatest atrocity of the millennium.

IMO Americans are embarrassing themselves right now with their hypocritical bullshit. They act like this is a genocide when 1,000x more people died in Iraq. I find it amusing that Americans said that there were WMDs in Iraq and that turned out to be a lie, and then Americans said that there weren't bioweapons research labs in Ukraine which also turned out to be a lie. I think that Russia has better reason to mount an aggressive defence in Ukraine than the US did to mount an aggressive defence in Cuba in '62. That's just my opinion, but in any event, it's not like the two circumstances are completely dissimilar. 

I think that American politicians just wanna feed their military industrial complex so that they can get some kickbacks. They see Ukraine as a proving grounds for their older ordnance so that they 1) can sell some of it to other NATO members and 2) so that they can get some money from taxpayers to replace what they're using in Ukraine and build their nex-gen stuff. 

Baby needs a new pair of shoes ?

  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
44 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

think that American politicians just wanna feed their military industrial complex so that they can get some kickbacks. They see Ukraine as a proving grounds for their older ordnance so that they 1) can sell some of it to other NATO members and 2) so that they can get some money from taxpayers to replace what they're using in Ukraine and build their nex-gen stuff. 

Sure, every war is a good opportunity for America to make more money, no matter who starts that, no matter how many die...these American MSM are 24/7 lying, even about America let alone others.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's pathetic that you weigh in on this topic so often and so passionately yet you are so oblivious of the topic at hand.

What is pathetic is you throw out names of non  existent persons to try and make yourself valid.

I respond to your posts and if they are off topic, it is you doing the driving  LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
11 hours ago, User47 said:

Based on what scale the invasion of Iraq is more legitimate? The UN? UN is a bit of a dirty joke, ....

....

The US attacked Iraq cause it lied to the people of the world and said "they have nukes", at least Russia didn't lie about the cause of its invasion. 

One million Iraqi civilians killed by the US and NATO bombings, hmm, is that fewer than Ukraine? Maybe those ordinary people were enriching non-existent uranium in their homes? 

.....

Sorry, I see myself responsible for the words I say, just couldn't forget... 

A little less exaggeration and emotion.

Fact "460,000 deaths in Iraq as direct or indirect result of the war including more than 60% of deaths directly attributable to violence. March 2003 to June 2011 ." 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Body_Count_project

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Fact "460,000 deaths in Iraq as direct or indirect result of the war including more than 60% of deaths directly attributable to violence. March 2003 to June 2011 ." 

Wikipedia? The liar propaganda machine you mean? That's not a source! 

One year ago Wikipedia said a different thing (??), what a waste I don't have the screenshot, Reuters is not a source to me but if it is to you have look at the link, I have talked to eyewitnesses who saw their homes and families gotten perished in front of their eyes. 

"Violence" hmm, who had guns? 

Wikipedia is being edited by the agents of Tel Aviv, even their sources aren't credible and trustable. 

Edited by User47
Posted
36 minutes ago, User47 said:

Wikipedia? The liar propaganda machine you mean? That's not a source! 

One year ago Wikipedia said a different thing (??), what a waste I don't have the screenshot, Reuters is not a source to me but if it is to you have look at the link, I have talked to eyewitnesses who saw their homes and families gotten perished in front of their eyes. 

"Violence" hmm, who had guns? 

Wikipedia is being edited by the agents of Tel Aviv, even their sources aren't credible and trustable. 

Just calling you out for BS. Before you state claims, better check your sources.

OK, don't like that one, how about this one that claims even less casualties 

https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

 

or this one that claims less than Wikipedia too . https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Or this one

https://www.statista.com/statistics/269729/documented-civilian-deaths-in-iraq-war-since-2003/

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Just calling you out for BS. Before you state claims, better check your sources.

OK, don't like that one, how about this one that claims even less casualties 

https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi

 

or this one that claims less than Wikipedia too . https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

Or this one

https://www.statista.com/statistics/269729/documented-civilian-deaths-in-iraq-war-since-2003/

"Reported death" is difference from the real record, have you heard that an American soldier raped an Iraqi 5 year old kid and then burnt she and her family in their home? No you never hear about the crimes your countries have done, such deaths and most of the deaths due to bombardments aren't recorded as reported death, that's why these figures are phony and not credible. 

Edited by User47
Posted
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

What is pathetic is you throw out names of non  existent persons to try and make yourself valid.

OK, he's a fictional character and the police just beat up a mannequin that looks like he would look if he was a real person. 

Quote

I respond to your posts and if they are off topic, it is you doing the driving  LOL

I don't know why I even respond to your posts, they are mostly drivel LOL. 

  • Like 1

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
47 minutes ago, User47 said:

"Reported death" is difference from the real record, have you heard that an American soldier raped an Iraqi 5 year old kid and then burnt she and her family in their home? No you never hear about the crimes your countries have done, such deaths and most of the deaths due to bombardments aren't recorded as reported death, that's why these figures are phony and not credible. 

Huh?

You were called out for the beating of a trucker claim.

What a deflection LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Russell Brand is very tuned in to what’s going on in Canada.  Interesting that some foreigners know exactly what’s afoot in Canada while some Canadians have no idea.

I had no idea Canada's government censors the news.

What's the name of the legislative Act that legalizes and regulates this censorship?

  • Haha 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,906
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Henry Blackstone
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Doowangle earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Doowangle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...