Argus Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 15 hours ago, JamesHackerMP said: Funny we forgot to steal any...must've slipped our minds. And Turkey was OK with attack Syria to stop Kurdish 'terrorists' who had never crossed the border into Turkey before anyway. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
GostHacked Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 On 9/24/2018 at 5:29 AM, bush_cheney2004 said: No...the Americans have only grown stronger with additional military conflict(s). The USA was born with war, expanded with war, and is now the world's lone military superpower. Let's see the USA go toe to toe with Russia or China. Quote
JamesHackerMP Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 I doubt that would be a good idea. (I'm reminded of Slim Pickens/Dr. Strangelove). Quote "We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!" "I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!" [Yes, Minister]
GostHacked Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 17 hours ago, JamesHackerMP said: Funny we forgot to steal any...must've slipped our minds. OH but we did .. We stole their ability to control their oil and how it's traded and what currency it is traded in. http://theconversation.com/iraq-what-happened-to-the-oil-after-the-war-62188 Quote
GostHacked Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 On 9/22/2018 at 7:56 AM, paulagnes1745 said: If that war was wrong, why didn't Canada save the people of Iraq? In fact, why didn't the world stopped America? And when I say stop I don't mean protesting, I mean "stop it".... You referring to the 1991 war or the 2006 war? Quote
JamesHackerMP Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 (edited) Think you can give some evidence that doesn't come from what seems to be a blog rather than a "news source"? Interesting you should mention the 1991 war. Everyone lined up behind GHWB to take pot shots at Saddam because....the world's oil supply was in jeopardy. Edited December 31, 2018 by JamesHackerMP Quote "We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!" "I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!" [Yes, Minister]
GostHacked Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 24 minutes ago, JamesHackerMP said: Think you can give some evidence that doesn't come from what seems to be a blog rather than a "news source"? What news source can I put up that you would be comfortable with? 24 minutes ago, JamesHackerMP said: Interesting you should mention the 1991 war. Everyone lined up behind GHWB to take pot shots at Saddam because....the world's oil supply was in jeopardy. Well there were two separate wars, one lead to the other. And During 1991 The supply was not in jeopardy, only who controls it. Quote
JamesHackerMP Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 exactly: Saddam wanted to control as much of the world' oil as possible, which put in JEOPARDY. Quote "We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!" "I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!" [Yes, Minister]
taxme Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 2 hours ago, GostHacked said: Let's see the USA go toe to toe with Russia or China. That would be a stupid and costly mistake for America and for the people of the world. Yet that was the plans of the democrats if Hillary became president. She wanted a war with Russia the bloody fool. Thank the Lord she never became president. Some of us here may be dead right now. Quote
taxme Posted December 31, 2018 Report Posted December 31, 2018 On 9/25/2018 at 8:12 PM, Zeitgeist said: Actually accepting legitimate refugees is a good thing to do as long as the country can afford it, which it can. So can America. I don't get it where you think that accepting any and all refugees is a good thing for any country. Canadians for one cannot afford to accept any more legal or illegal refugees anymore. We are bloody broke. And besides Canada is full to the rim already. Canadians need a break from all of this massive immigration that is going on into Canada. it is really starting to screw up everything in Canada. Give me a break. 1 Quote
GostHacked Posted January 2, 2019 Report Posted January 2, 2019 On 12/31/2018 at 4:42 PM, JamesHackerMP said: exactly: Saddam wanted to control as much of the world' oil as possible, which put in JEOPARDY. Incorrect, Hussein was tired of the OPEC oligarchs controlling everything, and wanted to start trading oil in another currency to reduce the dependency on the petrodollar to buy oil. Same with Qadaffi, the Gold Dinar was going to be used to trade oil. Libya met the same fate as Iraq. Even when Iraq started trading oil in Euros back in 2000 much of the banks and the US and the UN worked against Iraq. The sanctions since the 1991 war devastated Iraq's ability to sell oil and then dump that money back into their nation. Yes we know Hussein squandered a lot of the money on luxury for him and his family, but it took TWO wars and 15 years to depose him. Qadaffi on the other hand used all the oil profits to help the people of Libya. Health care and education all covered by the state. And many things were in place to help Libya's youth not just survive but thrive. And now how are they doing? Prove me wrong. Quote
GostHacked Posted January 2, 2019 Report Posted January 2, 2019 On 12/31/2018 at 4:55 PM, taxme said: That would be a stupid and costly mistake for America and for the people of the world. Yet that was the plans of the democrats if Hillary became president. She wanted a war with Russia the bloody fool. Thank the Lord she never became president. Some of us here may be dead right now. You got more war anyways. But the whole war on terror has been a mistake for USA and the world. 1 Quote
paxamericana Posted January 2, 2019 Report Posted January 2, 2019 1 hour ago, GostHacked said: You got more war anyways. But the whole war on terror has been a mistake for USA and the world. You say that but I don't see any more 747 flying into skyscraper... most of the terrorism we get is home grown now. Europe on the other hand, is the direct result of letting massive influx of vetted immigrant from the middle east into their liberal western democracy. Also anyone who kill or kidnap American citizens usually gets hunted down by our special ops unit. As long as there are people who want to chant death to america then I see no problem helping them meet their god sooner. 2 Quote
taxme Posted January 2, 2019 Report Posted January 2, 2019 4 hours ago, GostHacked said: Incorrect, Hussein was tired of the OPEC oligarchs controlling everything, and wanted to start trading oil in another currency to reduce the dependency on the petrodollar to buy oil. Same with Qadaffi, the Gold Dinar was going to be used to trade oil. Libya met the same fate as Iraq. Even when Iraq started trading oil in Euros back in 2000 much of the banks and the US and the UN worked against Iraq. The sanctions since the 1991 war devastated Iraq's ability to sell oil and then dump that money back into their nation. Yes we know Hussein squandered a lot of the money on luxury for him and his family, but it took TWO wars and 15 years to depose him. Qadaffi on the other hand used all the oil profits to help the people of Libya. Health care and education all covered by the state. And many things were in place to help Libya's youth not just survive but thrive. And now how are they doing? Prove me wrong. No one can prove you wrong. This is what happens to any leader of any country who dares to take on and go against the globalist international banker elite and their new world order. You get removed and maybe even murdered. But there are so many who are clueless to this well known fact. Anyone here want to try and prove us wrong? Go ahead, make your day. Quote
taxme Posted January 2, 2019 Report Posted January 2, 2019 2 hours ago, paxamericana said: You say that but I don't see any more 747 flying into skyscraper... most of the terrorism we get is home grown now. Europe on the other hand, is the direct result of letting massive influx of vetted immigrant from the middle east into their liberal western democracy. Also anyone who kill or kidnap American citizens usually gets hunted down by our special ops unit. As long as there are people who want to chant death to america then I see no problem helping them meet their god sooner. Terrorism appears to be down thanks in part to Trump and his immigration policy. At least that is what I have observed so far over the last two years. Yes/no? Quote
GostHacked Posted January 3, 2019 Report Posted January 3, 2019 20 hours ago, paxamericana said: You say that but I don't see any more 747 flying into skyscraper... most of the terrorism we get is home grown now. Europe on the other hand, is the direct result of letting massive influx of vetted immigrant from the middle east into their liberal western democracy. Also anyone who kill or kidnap American citizens usually gets hunted down by our special ops unit. As long as there are people who want to chant death to america then I see no problem helping them meet their god sooner. They do not need planes to fly into buildings to further their goal. And USA Special Ops are a joke. It took them years to locate Bin Laden and taken him out when they had multiple chances before. And when they did hit the Bin Laden compound in Pakistan, the USA had to sacrifice one of their new hi-tech helicopters because they damaged it during landing. Quote
JamesHackerMP Posted January 3, 2019 Report Posted January 3, 2019 You think our special forces are a joke, eh? Where do you get this from? Quote "We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!" "I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!" [Yes, Minister]
GostHacked Posted January 3, 2019 Report Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, JamesHackerMP said: You think our special forces are a joke, eh? Where do you get this from? You are right, I should give it to them for creating so many problems for them to solve. Quote
JamesHackerMP Posted January 3, 2019 Report Posted January 3, 2019 Just now, GostHacked said: You are right, I should give it to them for creating so many problems for them to solve. And you just dodged my question. Quote "We're not above nature, Mr Hacker, we're part of it. Men are animals, too!" "I know that, I've just come from the House of Commons!" [Yes, Minister]
paxamericana Posted January 4, 2019 Report Posted January 4, 2019 10 hours ago, GostHacked said: They do not need planes to fly into buildings to further their goal. And USA Special Ops are a joke. It took them years to locate Bin Laden and taken him out when they had multiple chances before. And when they did hit the Bin Laden compound in Pakistan, the USA had to sacrifice one of their new hi-tech helicopters because they damaged it during landing. You can blame obama and bill clinton for that. They knew where he was they just didn't want to pull the trigger. Do you know how much it cost to train one seal team? Also who are you comparing our spec ops to? They are the best in the world by a wide margin. The helicopter was lost due to un planned for physical phenomenon call vortex ring state caused by tall walls and high temperature. Quote
Dougie93 Posted January 24, 2019 Report Posted January 24, 2019 SOCOM obviously the best in terms of a combination of mass and excellence, but pound for pound I'd actually take the Aussies; SOCAUST > JSOC . Quote
Carlus Magnus Posted February 26, 2019 Report Posted February 26, 2019 The US spends over $600 Billion in defense, over 3% of their GDP. Canada spends $20 Billion, aobut 1.25% of their GDP. Europe, including the UK and Commonwealth have been happy to let the US be the world police. This also Canadians and Europeans largely functional Auxillaries to the Imperial Armies of the US. This doesn't mean Canada should not be proud of their forces, they should. Many auxillary troops gained fame in past empires, the Romans had the Numidians and the Brits had Ghurkas. Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 26, 2019 Report Posted February 26, 2019 13 hours ago, Carlus Magnus said: The US spends over $600 Billion in defense, over 3% of their GDP. Canada spends $20 Billion, aobut 1.25% of their GDP. Europe, including the UK and Commonwealth have been happy to let the US be the world police. This also Canadians and Europeans largely functional Auxillaries to the Imperial Armies of the US. This doesn't mean Canada should not be proud of their forces, they should. Many auxillary troops gained fame in past empires, the Romans had the Numidians and the Brits had Ghurkas. I am the Gurkhas, the Gurkhas is me, I am an auxiliary indeed, to the Declaration of Independence preamble and associated Empire of Liberty, through the United Kingdom United States Security Agreement, founded in the fires of the Second World War. But as such, I am perfectly capable of defending the British Crown in North America, from Nevada as well. Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 26, 2019 Report Posted February 26, 2019 Bear in mind, I am a classically liberal limited government conservative. I am not a totalitarian. Agreements with states, are by contract alone. Outside the bounds of those contracts? Homo Sapiens Sapiens apex predator male, North German Protestant King of Virginia, since 1757; live free or die. Quote
Dougie93 Posted February 26, 2019 Report Posted February 26, 2019 My ancestor was after all press ganged to come to British North America in 1757, but as he had not entered into a contract to invade Nouvelle France for the Crown, he jumped ship upon arrival at Halifax harbour, wherein he went on to be a merchant sea captain, sailing in the Triangle Trade as private enterprise. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.