DogOnPorch Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Point stands then: the very person in charge of looking for witches Islamophobes in the Motion 103 is the same person that imagines crosses burning on lawns where there are none. She's perfect. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
?Impact Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 1 hour ago, DogOnPorch said: Point stands then: the very person in charge of looking for witches Islamophobes in the Motion 103 is the same person that imagines crosses burning on lawns where there are none. She's perfect. Could you point out where she is mentioned in Motion 103? ...waiting ...waiting ...still waiting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 On 1/6/2018 at 3:46 PM, DogOnPorch said: What's a few fake KKK crosses burning on lawns between friends like you and Hedy...eh? 7 hours ago, Charles Anthony said: Folks, Avoid derailing the thread with personal banter. Yeah, what he said! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 Hedy Fry is perfect to run the witch-hunt. She sees crosses burning on lawns where there are none. Witches everywhere... She'll find them. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/cross-burning-furor-hits-liberal/article4145631/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddess Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 13 hours ago, DogOnPorch said: Hedy Fry is perfect to run the witch-hunt. She sees crosses burning on lawns where there are none. Witches everywhere... She'll find them. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/cross-burning-furor-hits-liberal/article4145631/ Wow, I never knew that about her. Quote "We can just go to British Columbia in Prince George, where crosses are being burned on lawns as we speak," she said to mark International Day for the Elimination of Racism. Later that day, Ms. Fry clarified her comments, saying that cross-burnings had occurred in the past. "I know of this because I was contacted immediately that these incidents occurred by the mayor of Prince George," she said. Prince George Mayor Colin Kinsley says he never told Ms. Fry such a thing and that there are no confirmed reports of cross-burnings in the city. When the Aryan Nation tried to recruit members there, municipal officials responded by creating a task force on hate activities, which won them the 2001 End Racism Award from the B.C. government. "This reference to cross-burnings in the city of Prince George is false," Mr. Kinsley said. Victor Bowman, president of the city's chamber of commerce, said Ms. Fry's comments are ludicrous. A government source said she resisted apologizing until she was forced to by the Prime Minister. I agree with the assessment in the article: Quote "It's one thing to make a stupid comment, but when you are the Minister of Multiculturalism how can you be so ignorant?" "She's supposed to be a champion of tolerance and acceptance and of inclusiveness," he said, "and instead she continues to drive divisiveness everywhere she goes." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted January 10, 2018 Report Share Posted January 10, 2018 11 minutes ago, Goddess said: Wow, I never knew that about her. I agree with the assessment in the article: She's perfect, as I mentioned. Can you imagine her NOT finding Islamphobia at every turn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbg Posted April 16, 2018 Report Share Posted April 16, 2018 On 1/2/2018 at 1:03 AM, ?Impact said: Sounds more sketchy than Stephen Harper and the Northern Foundation. What is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PIK Posted April 16, 2018 Report Share Posted April 16, 2018 14 hours ago, jbg said: What is? Fake news. What ever cred this guy had is now gone. This is up there with GW and Harper selling drugs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dialamah Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 Recently, the government defined anti-Semitism as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” Some are criticizing this definition as being overly broad and would disallow criticism of Isreal and is a chill to free speech, similar to criticisms made about M103. Do you agree that this definition is similar to M103 in terms of potentially eliminating valid criticism and reducing free speech? Are Jews, as a group, being singled out for special treatment by a government that is too eager to pander to minorities and immigrants? Was adopting this necessary, given that we already have laws addressing hate speech and hate crimes? Link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 Iqra Khalid's sole purpose re: M-103 was to introduce Sharia to Canada...and Sharia says: thou shalt not be critical of Islam (under pain of death according to the Holy Quran). She didn't introduce M-103 to protect Jews or Christians or Hindus or anybody else not Muslim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 On 1/10/2018 at 10:53 AM, DogOnPorch said: She's perfect, as I mentioned. Can you imagine her NOT finding Islamphobia at every turn? When you post, we can find it in spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 1 minute ago, GostHacked said: When you post, we can find it in spades. You're free to support M-103 and the implication of Sharia Law in Canada. I expect nothing less from you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 Oh ffs Sharia in Canada Will this hysteria ever end ? No it's so bad that a maniac was pushed to gunning down Muslims in Quebec and the racists respond by expressing concern over M103. These are agents of hate. Tag them as what they are. Tell people about this. It's getting worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Oh ffs Sharia in Canada Will this hysteria ever end ? No it's so bad that a maniac was pushed to gunning down Muslims in Quebec and the racists respond by expressing concern over M103. These are agents of hate. Tag them as what they are. Tell people about this. It's getting worse. You are also free to go to bat for Islam. I also expect this of you. Hint: Islam doesn't care if you're a kafir that supports the cult's objectives. You're still a dirty kafir. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said: You are also free to go to bat for Islam. Hysterical folks tend to frame things as binary, just saying. I pointed out that your people are murdering Muslims and you're worried about Sharia law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 22 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: Hysterical folks tend to frame things as binary, just saying. I pointed out that your people are murdering Muslims and you're worried about Sharia law. I find it amusing that you kiss Islam's azz in hopes of a good deal. My people? Who are my people again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 4 hours ago, dialamah said: Recently, the government defined anti-Semitism as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” Some are criticizing this definition as being overly broad and would disallow criticism of Isreal and is a chill to free speech, similar to criticisms made about M103. Do you agree that this definition is similar to M103 in terms of potentially eliminating valid criticism and reducing free speech? Are Jews, as a group, being singled out for special treatment by a government that is too eager to pander to minorities and immigrants? Was adopting this necessary, given that we already have laws addressing hate speech and hate crimes? Link. They just need to go into more detail about the "certain perception of Jews" part and then it's no longer "overly broad". The perception they are talking about is that Jews as a group are "controlling, manipulating, greedy, evil group" but they're too afraid to define what anti-Semitism entails. It would be fine to be critical of an action carried out by Israel, but not fine to say that the action was part of an evil Jewish conspiracy to deprive muslims of their rightful homeland. In general what you get for anti-Semitism is people making claims that the US and Israel are evil, manipulating aggressors who are always flexing on the poor Palestinians and the Palestinians just want peace and what's rightly theirs. The truth is that if the Jews get what they want they'll have 1% of the middle east. If Hamas gets what they want there will be no more jews alive in the middle east. Hamas leaders and many other prominent muslims have said over and over again that genocide in Israel is their goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: Hysterical folks tend to frame things as binary, just saying. I pointed out that your people are murdering Muslims and you're worried about Sharia law. I am suspecting (I cannot confirm because I would not want to speculate and get in trouble from C.A.) that he wants to kill them before they kill us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 38 minutes ago, GostHacked said: I am suspecting (I cannot confirm because I would not want to speculate and get in trouble from C.A.) that he wants to kill them before they kill us. Paranoia isn't a value though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 18, 2019 Report Share Posted July 18, 2019 7 hours ago, dialamah said: Recently, the government defined anti-Semitism as "a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” Some are criticizing this definition as being overly broad and would disallow criticism of Isreal and is a chill to free speech, similar to criticisms made about M103. Do you agree that this definition is similar to M103 in terms of potentially eliminating valid criticism and reducing free speech? Are Jews, as a group, being singled out for special treatment by a government that is too eager to pander to minorities and immigrants? Was adopting this necessary, given that we already have laws addressing hate speech and hate crimes? Link. I agree. (with your comment. I haven't read the link) I don't care if someone criticizes Jews any more than I do when they criticize Muslims. They can all suck it up and stop being such snowflakes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Halal Posted July 19, 2019 Report Share Posted July 19, 2019 This might prove interesting to some, given this guy's virtue signaling. https://www.cjnews.com/news/canada/islamist-allegations-surface-after-mp-given-key-role Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argus Posted July 19, 2019 Report Share Posted July 19, 2019 On 7/18/2019 at 1:05 PM, Michael Hardner said: Hysterical folks tend to frame things as binary, just saying. I pointed out that your people are murdering Muslims and you're worried about Sharia law. Why is it that progressive would rather set themselves on fire than ascribe even the tiniest trace of guilt to Islam for the continuing terrorist attacks by Muslims, but one or two attacks by the far right on Muslims instantly turns them into hysterics and becomes the fault of all conservatives or anyone who disrespects Islam? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.