Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/19/2017 at 8:13 AM, eyeball said:

Its not Muslims who are ultimately to blame for this. It's always the left.

But of course its not the really the lefts fault. It's the right for never ever ever doing anything about the left other that to whine about it.

Either shit, get off the pot or DO something about us.

The patriotic nationalists are trying to do something about it all. It is always the left that will not stop committing violence to try and stop the nationalists from achieving their goal of try to make America great again. I can never understand as to why when Trump says that he wants to drain the corrupt swamp the leftists fight against him. They are cutting their own throats the fools because they are trying to bring in a system where they may not be able themselves to get out there and demonstrate and fight for their right to speak or assemble freely one day.

Sometimes the we the people are their own worse enemy.  

Posted
41 minutes ago, Hal 9000 said:

I grew up being fed the fear of overpopulation and how irresponsible it was to have more than 2 kids, now we're told that we need more people, so bring in the muslims who are squeezing out 7-10 kids.  Thanks Trudeau (both of you).

 

Yup, and all those kids will be getting government checks from the Canadian taxpayer's tax dollars who are foolishly sitting back and allowing it to happen. Concerned Canadians should stop fearing being called the word racist. I wear it as a badge when I am called a racist.

Although this really has nothing to do with racism at all, and has more to do with a bunch of useless liberal snowflakes and guilt ridden Canadians who can be talked into believing that massive third world immigration is good for Canada and Canadians which we see today is not working at all. Massive immigration is more of a detriment to Canada and Canadians than any benefit. Multiculturalism stinks. Papa and kid trudeau were both a detriment to Canada and Canadians. They both have done more to try and destroy Canadian culture and replace it with other incompatible cultures than one could ever think was possible that anyone could do so. The majority of Canadians are asleep at the switch and appear to want to stay asleep and it is going to have to take a crash before they may finally wake up and realize that they have been made buffoons of all these decades. That day is what I wait for.  

Posted
5 hours ago, dialamah said:

We do regularly scream bloody murder about government policies that might encourage and support working people  having more kids - daycare, maternal and paternal leave, tax breaks, a livable minimum wage.  

Who says these policies are why people don't have more kids? If the cost of kids was an overriding factor then we would expect to see poor, working class Canadians having no kids, while rich or at least, upper middle class Canadians had tons of kids. That's not the case. In fact, while I haven't studied it, my impression is poorer Canadians have more kids than richer Canadians. In my neighborhood of private, detached houses, the only ones with bunches of kids are immigrants.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
2 hours ago, Hal 9000 said:

Does it not peak curiosity how a society of people so clearly leaning far-right, will come to Canada and vote Liberal?  

Their overriding reasons for voting are Canada's support of Israel and terrorism legislation, and opposition to niquabs and such. If the Conservatives tossed Israel under the bus and started promising things to the Muslims they'd get all their support. After all, Muslims are anti-abortion and anti-gay, so they can't be all that enthusiastic about voting Liberal or NDP.  I'd be interested in how those religious Sikhs, wearing turbans, in Trudeau's cabinet justified their support for abortion and gay marriage to their own temples, too. Most Indians ought to be in the Tory camp. But the Liberals were clever in promising more immigration, more family immigration, and more seniors to the Indo-Canadian community. And that was apparently an overriding concern.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
4 hours ago, GostHacked said:

That does not seem to answer the question I posed.  Try again.

This topic is not about Haitians.

  • Like 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
5 hours ago, dialamah said:

We do regularly scream bloody murder about government policies that might encourage and support working people  having more kids - daycare, maternal and paternal leave, tax breaks, a livable minimum wage.  

And no one's interested in the incentives.  

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted
On 20/08/2017 at 11:09 AM, DogOnPorch said:

 

He's on camera reciting the Shahada in front of male Muslim witnesses. He's a Muslim to THEM. If he's still a Catholic, he's going to Hell for that, I'd imagine...

Well he won't deny he's a Muslim now, cause we know what that means. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 20/08/2017 at 2:01 PM, dialamah said:

Perhaps if Conservatives stopped maligning Muslims every chance they got, they'd get more votes from them.

Marcus has clearly demonstrated that our immigration system primarily brings in people who can make economic contribution to our country

Asking for reasonable/responsible immigration is , again, not maligning.

And no Marcus hasn't. 

On 20/08/2017 at 6:06 PM, dialamah said:

The hyperbole here makes me doubt this ..."Destroyed", "Collapsed", "Shambles" "Chaos" - those are emotionally laden words reflecting a belief; the facts are most likely quite different.   

This after you say we "raided" other countries for preferred immigrants.

On 20/08/2017 at 6:38 PM, dialamah said:

 

The sources I prefer do not use emotional words like "collapse" or "chaos", etc. even when they describe the issues.  They also describe steps the government is taking to alleviate the situation - something the right-wing on this board never do.  That's why I consider what you wrote hyperbole.   

The MSM makes their living using words like that. Also, please inform us of the steps being taken to clean up the mess they've created.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 8/21/2017 at 11:06 AM, Hydraboss said:

The whole immigration debate for me is about money; nothing more.

Me too, I find it unconscionable that we expect a borderless world through which our money can flow unimpeded but not human beings. Especially when the former causes so much of the latter to occur and as we knew it would. 

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Argus said:

Their overriding reasons for voting are Canada's support of Israel and terrorism legislation, and opposition to niquabs and such. If the Conservatives tossed Israel under the bus and started promising things to the Muslims they'd get all their support. After all, Muslims are anti-abortion and anti-gay, so they can't be all that enthusiastic about voting Liberal or NDP.  I'd be interested in how those religious Sikhs, wearing turbans, in Trudeau's cabinet justified their support for abortion and gay marriage to their own temples, too. Most Indians ought to be in the Tory camp. But the Liberals were clever in promising more immigration, more family immigration, and more seniors to the Indo-Canadian community. And that was apparently an overriding concern.

Is this your opinion or based on some survey or study that is non-biased with stringent controls?  if the latter, please cite. 

Edited by dialamah
Typo
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On ‎2017‎-‎08‎-‎22 at 11:50 AM, eyeball said:

Me too, I find it unconscionable that we expect a borderless world through which our money can flow unimpeded but not human beings. Especially when the former causes so much of the latter to occur and as we knew it would. 

Your assumption of the former causing the latter is nonsensical. If multi-nationals in fact have their way, they will assure cheap slave labour across the world and not just in the third or fourth world. In fact unimpeded flow of human beings makes them easier to be exploited and lowers their value as workers as they move into new markets with pre-existing restrictions and limitations as to the recognition of their skills. Elitist shmuks like you have no  clue how the middle and upper classes of other countries become our taxi drivers.. You think wer're  doing them a favour giving them false m messages of how are streets are paved with gold so they can come serve you at MacDonald's. You haven't a clue who free trade let alone borders favours. Not a damn clue..

Edited by Rue

I come to you to hell.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Rue said:

Your assumption of the former causing the latter is nonsensical.

No it's not.

Refugee crisis shows reality of globalization, says Germany's Schaeuble

Quote

The influx of hundreds of thousands of refugees into Europe is part of the reality of globalization, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said on Thursday.

 

The horrors of Europe’s migrant crisis are just another part of the new global economy.

Quote

The flood of migrants into Europe is just another stage of economic globalization. Today, information and images circle the world in a flash. Capital flows across borders toward cheap labor. Goods find their way to countries with disposable income. And increasingly, people who hate where they live, whether for economic or political reasons, can find out where they’d be better off and how to get there.

 

Globalization has lead to a lot of economic injustice and a flood of people seeking to escape it.  I don't blame them one bit and power to them.  I feel exactly the same way about environmental refugees fleeing climate change which is just as often as not also associated with pressures of globalization.

As I said earlier the lines between conflict, economic and environmental refugees have blurred to irrelevancy given how closely and often they intersect.  And as always, we haven't seen anything yet.

 

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
On 8/21/2017 at 0:17 PM, PIK said:

This is a white christian builtt country, that is why it is number 1 in the world. Why do you want to ruin that.

The white, "christian" built countries have all been built on totally unchristian actions. Why do you want to defend such evil?

Posted
23 hours ago, Rue said:

Your assumption of the former causing the latter is nonsensical. If multi-nationals in fact have their way, they will assure cheap slave labour across the world and not just in the third or fourth world. In fact unimpeded flow of human beings makes them easier to be exploited and lowers their value as workers as they move into new markets with pre-existing restrictions and limitations as to the recognition of their skills. Elitist shmuks like you have no  clue how the middle and upper classes of other countries become our taxi drivers.. You think wer're  doing them a favour giving them false m messages of how are streets are paved with gold so they can come serve you at MacDonald's. You haven't a clue who free trade let alone borders favours. Not a damn clue..

IF they make more as a cab driver here,  what kind of standard of living did they have back in their home country?

Money does in fact flow way more free across the globe compared to people.  As an example, I do not have a passport, so I cannot travel outside of Canada. But since I have a globally recognized credit card, I can purchase items from anywhere on the planet.

As long as entities like Walmart exist, there will be a lot of slave labour.

Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser

ohm on soundcloud.com

Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, eyeball said:

No it's not.

Refugee crisis shows reality of globalization, says Germany's Schaeuble

 

The horrors of Europe’s migrant crisis are just another part of the new global economy.

 

Globalization has lead to a lot of economic injustice and a flood of people seeking to escape it.  I don't blame them one bit and power to them.  I feel exactly the same way about environmental refugees fleeing climate change which is just as often as not also associated with pressures of globalization.

As I said earlier the lines between conflict, economic and environmental refugees have blurred to irrelevancy given how closely and often they intersect.  And as always, we haven't seen anything yet.

 

Nothing in what you provided proves your point if anything the opposite. As well what Ghost stated does not address the issue yo. The fact that third and fourth world migrants can now move about does not increase their economic value-they simply go where they think they have the best chance to eat and get shelter but they remain marginalized and without value in their new society.

Cycles of poverty are not broken without gradual change thorough education and training to make people self sufficient and able to sustain themselves.

If you don't provide programs that equip people with skills to adapt and survive, you simply set them up for failure.

For years we threw food at third world countries. It never got to the starving. It was intercepted by corrupt governments and the black market (organized crime).

We need to find a way to assure third and fourth world countries have an intelligentsia that remains behind to build the infrastructure of their nations and create self sufficiency at a grass roots level. The third and fourth world countries have no intelligentsia that remains or returns to build these countries.

Placing people in tents in Canada to appease one's guilt solves nothing. It creates a social problem. The winter comes, such people need warm shelter and food and they have no way to be self sufficient and necessarily get caught in dependent cycles on social benefits.

Such people are better off in their homelands  rebuilding their countries, i.e., the roads, the homes, the schools-in their homeland there is work to be done and no one to do it which is the case with Haiti. We are not talking about people who can not go home, we are talking about people who do NOT WANT to go home.

Why would I return to hard work when Trudeau is telling me to come to Canada and collect welfare? If I am a poor person sitting on my as collecting welfare is the lottery compared to returning home and having to work.

Enough with using the marginalized to appease the guilt of liberals, it  is not helping them-its using them to assuage guilt.

You want to help Haitiend, send them home, send them tents and temporary shelters in their homeland and food and tools and send people to help them rebuild.

Turning them into welfare recipients or taxi drivers or fast food servers in Canada helps no one.

Its one thing to help people to help themselves, its another  to trap them in never ending cycles of poverty we impose upon them under the assumption living in Canada on welfare is better than going home to rebuild the country.

I have ben to Haiti-I do note some people call it a shithole. That same shithole is a country and the future for many. Its only a shithole to arrogant people in Canada who look down on it. Yes they cut down trees and made it vulnerable to erosion. Yes it has had numerous corrupt violent governments.  It has to be the Master of its own destiny but feeling guilty for Haitiens having to rebuild their country won't help it. Guilt is horseshit. Guilt is what liberals act on after they feel someone is inferior to them. Guilt is a result of colonialist elitist racist horse shit.

There is nothing to feel guilty about. Haitiens are not victims. We define them as victims by giving them welfare. Stop calling them victims. Give them a shovel, a pick axe, a drill, tools, construction materials and stop calling them victims. Empowerment comes from pride of work, of overcoming obstacles, of having hope and pursuing that hope through positive actions.

Yesterday I watched Justin Trudeau complete with eye make up, mascara and new eye lashes, preening before the cameras. How the hell could he possibly understand digging a ditch is nothing to be ashamed of, rebuilding a country is hard work. For phack's sake the man was wearing mascara and actally had someone curl his eyelashes for the photo ops. There is no limit to this popinjay's  tenure. The only thing missing is a kerchief, a beauty mole on his cheek and a white powder wig.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Rue
  • Like 4

I come to you to hell.

Posted
2 hours ago, hot enough said:

The white, "christian" built countries have all been built on totally unchristian actions. Why do you want to defend such evil?

We won they lost,that is how it works. But thru history the victor has never done what we have done in helping the losers.  With all the billions given to native affairs and yet it seems very little was ever spent on the people. It has been stolen by the chiefs and it;s councils. That is the problem today. Nothing to do with whites.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted
1 hour ago, Rue said:

Nothing in what you provided proves your point if anything the opposite. As well what Ghost stated does not address the issue yo. The fact that third and fourth world migrants can now move about does not increase their economic value-they simply go where they think they have the best chance to eat and get shelter but they remain marginalized and without value in their new society.

Cycles of poverty are not broken without gradual change thorough education and training to make people self sufficient and able to sustain themselves.

If you don't provide programs that equip people with skills to adapt and survive, you simply set them up for failure.

For years we threw food at third world countries. It never got to the starving. It was intercepted by corrupt governments and the black market (organized crime).

 

Why are you pretending that you care, Rue?

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, PIK said:

We won they lost,that is how it works.

That is not at all how it works. If you were a body that was informed Nuremberg would have alerted you to that. Genocide is genocide. 

Quote

But thru history the victor has never done what we have done in helping the losers.  With all the billions given to native affairs and yet it seems very little was ever spent on the people. It has been stolen by the chiefs and it;s councils. That is the problem today. Nothing to do with whites.

I see that you are not a well informed person. It has everything to do with whites. Whites are, largely, the very people who committed the genocide.

Edited by hot enough
Posted
4 hours ago, Rue said:

Nothing in what you provided proves your point if anything the opposite.

The point is that my suggestion is not nonsensical - ie it has merit given the learned sources I've provided to oppose your dismissal.

The point that globalization is one of the major ingredients in the list of causes behind the unfolding migrant/refugee/immigrant crisis stands...a crisis that was predicted, by lefties, back when globalization was being feted by righties.

The feteing of course involved a lot of silly baseless ridicule for any lefty suggestions or concerns if I recall.  

 

See? There it is

Quote

Enough with using the marginalized to appease the guilt of liberals, it  is not helping them-its using them to assuage guilt.

This nonsensical statement reflects on the sensitized feelings most illiberal people have towards any suggestion that justice and lack thereof in the economy is anything to be concerned about.  It most definitely is as evidenced by the numbers of people fleeing injustice.

Appeasing the illiberal desire to continue ignoring injustice just isn't on, especially when that desire contains so much bellicosity towards the left and its far better sense of what constitutes justice. As with criminal justice right-wing prescriptions for economic justice seem more weighted with sheer vindictiveness than anything.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
13 hours ago, eyeball said:

The point is that my suggestion is not nonsensical - ie it has merit given the learned sources I've provided to oppose your dismissal.

The point that globalization is one of the major ingredients in the list of causes behind the unfolding migrant/refugee/immigrant crisis stands...a crisis that was predicted, by lefties, back when globalization was being feted by righties.

The feteing of course involved a lot of silly baseless ridicule for any lefty suggestions or concerns if I recall.  

 

See? There it is

This nonsensical statement reflects on the sensitized feelings most illiberal people have towards any suggestion that justice and lack thereof in the economy is anything to be concerned about.  It most definitely is as evidenced by the numbers of people fleeing injustice.

Appeasing the illiberal desire to continue ignoring injustice just isn't on, especially when that desire contains so much bellicosity towards the left and its far better sense of what constitutes justice. As with criminal justice right-wing prescriptions for economic justice seem more weighted with sheer vindictiveness than anything.

We agree that globalization is one of the major ingredients in the list of causes behind unfolding migrant movements. Globalization the word means the shrinking of borders or the lessening of their significance. Travel does that. Airplanes do that. The internet does that. The cell phone does that. boats with geographic proximity do that.

The point though is its too simple to say just Globalization. Weather, famine, draught, civil war disease, of course they all play into it. We also know because we've seen it demonstrated, if a multi-national can move an operation to a country with cheap labour and no environmental or safety regulations off they go and ironically to socialist people's republics like China and Vietnam or to Bangladesh, Mexico, Philippines, Cambodia.

First world countries now have citizens who have been brought up expecting a specific standard of living and we see it New Canadians immediately expect a house in the suburbs, a bmw or audi in the driveway, everyone bused to school, free medical and dental care and benefits for when they are not back in their home countries during the winter months. That's a generalization but its become true. We have ghettos of convenient Canadians who use Canada and do not build Canada. They've been told fro, the get go this hypehanated existence of one foot in the homeland and one in Canada is acceptable.

I don't think you build a country that way. I think immigrants who built this country knew they could not travel back and forth and get benefits and were on their own and they would sink or swim and bloody well learned to swim, They had to be self sufficient. There's a way to give a signal that when people come here, its not a convenient place to put one foot in and one foot out and use and I don't think Trudeau is the leader to provide that  message because he's never had to work a day in his life. He comes from a fantasy world where everything is taken for granted. He portrays himself as self-made because he grew up on the Trudeau trust fund and in Ottawa and was a drama teacher for barely a year.

As for Eye's comment about liberals desiring to  not ignore injustice they do just that. Throwing welfare at Haitiens and putting them in tents ignores what has to be done. Its patronizing, its racist,  its what soft sheltered liberals do to ignore the reality that life is unfair and will always be unfair and people have to learn to deal with that not throw welfare benefits at it and put people in tents thinking that makes it o.k. and justifies their own privileges which they feel guilty for.

Liberalism is ineffective. It doesn't build or motivate it molly coddles. People when faced with hardship need substantial, practical help not lip service and some coins thrown at the like a beggar in the street No I do not think throwing a dollar at an alcoholic on the street or a supposed homeless person does anything but assuage my own guilt, and no guilt I do not have.

The homeless, the mentally ill that end up on the street, the corruption, the wide spread inequality in the world, its a constant and its not going away. So one must pick and choose constructively what they want to do in life and grow up with this bullshit that they can remain in Mama's basement, feel guilty, think if they whine about how sad  life is, it makes it better.

I am a strong supporter of ngo's and npo's teaching self sufficiency at the appropriate geographic places. Creating tent cities is bullshit. Its just the recycled exercise of placing aboriginals in reserves.

Liberals don't marry or  hire Haitiens or live with them. They use them as pawns. They send them their old clothes and tell them to be grateful Bwana sent his underwear for them to wear.

People do not benefit from pity. They need food, tools, to rebuild their nations after catastrophes.

 

  • Like 1

I come to you to hell.

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, hot enough said:

 

I see that you are not a well informed person. It has everything to do with whites. Whites are, largely, the very people who committed the genocide.

I remain silent to 99.99% of your posts now because you have lowered yourself to the point of sheer stupidity on this board.. Your attempt now to pose as an anti white militant is without a doubt the most stupid thing you have evidenced with your words even more stupid then suggesting the melting point of steel is a type of steel. Now you pose as a non white militant blaming whites for the world's turmoil? What Zionists and the USA didn't get you any attention so now you expand your target to  try attract comments? This is how you get attention? Lol.

Finish it. If you are going to come on here and pose as an anti white racist, and make race an issue, and smear white people, point out your race, ethnicity, religion, economic class. You provide nothing but immature, hateful remarks that not even the turmoils of reaching puberty can justify.

Anyone can come on this board and engage in racial stereotypes or anti semitic stereotypes. Its an idiot's game and you play it. The only difference between you and Taxme is the angle your heads slant at.

Now when you come back and explain how black and Muslim you are and what a victim you are, the liberals can at least come on the board and join you with some heartfelt lipservice.

I love it.  Listen stop being such a putz-you want to insult a white person, the word is cracker, spaz dancer, albino, goose, beluga whale, milky way, vanilla guerilla,  pink stuff, flat butt, square head, no lips, yellow fangs, teeny weeny, but not whitey. Gawd that was painful. Whitey.  Yah I know man you from dah hood. You dah man.

 

Edited by Rue
  • Like 2

I come to you to hell.

Posted
18 hours ago, Rue said:

Nothing in what you provided proves your point if anything the opposite. As well what Ghost stated does not address the issue yo. The fact that third and fourth world migrants can now move about does not increase their economic value-they simply go where they think they have the best chance to eat and get shelter but they remain marginalized and without value in their new society.

Cycles of poverty are not broken without gradual change thorough education and training to make people self sufficient and able to sustain themselves.

If you don't provide programs that equip people with skills to adapt and survive, you simply set them up for failure.

For years we threw food at third world countries. It never got to the starving. It was intercepted by corrupt governments and the black market (organized crime).

We need to find a way to assure third and fourth world countries have an intelligentsia that remains behind to build the infrastructure of their nations and create self sufficiency at a grass roots level. The third and fourth world countries have no intelligentsia that remains or returns to build these countries.

Placing people in tents in Canada to appease one's guilt solves nothing. It creates a social problem. The winter comes, such people need warm shelter and food and they have no way to be self sufficient and necessarily get caught in dependent cycles on social benefits.

Such people are better off in their homelands  rebuilding their countries, i.e., the roads, the homes, the schools-in their homeland there is work to be done and no one to do it which is the case with Haiti. We are not talking about people who can not go home, we are talking about people who do NOT WANT to go home.

Why would I return to hard work when Trudeau is telling me to come to Canada and collect welfare? If I am a poor person sitting on my as collecting welfare is the lottery compared to returning home and having to work.

Enough with using the marginalized to appease the guilt of liberals, it  is not helping them-its using them to assuage guilt.

You want to help Haitiend, send them home, send them tents and temporary shelters in their homeland and food and tools and send people to help them rebuild.

Turning them into welfare recipients or taxi drivers or fast food servers in Canada helps no one.

Its one thing to help people to help themselves, its another  to trap them in never ending cycles of poverty we impose upon them under the assumption living in Canada on welfare is better than going home to rebuild the country.

I have ben to Haiti-I do note some people call it a shithole. That same shithole is a country and the future for many. Its only a shithole to arrogant people in Canada who look down on it. Yes they cut down trees and made it vulnerable to erosion. Yes it has had numerous corrupt violent governments.  It has to be the Master of its own destiny but feeling guilty for Haitiens having to rebuild their country won't help it. Guilt is horseshit. Guilt is what liberals act on after they feel someone is inferior to them. Guilt is a result of colonialist elitist racist horse shit.

There is nothing to feel guilty about. Haitiens are not victims. We define them as victims by giving them welfare. Stop calling them victims. Give them a shovel, a pick axe, a drill, tools, construction materials and stop calling them victims. Empowerment comes from pride of work, of overcoming obstacles, of having hope and pursuing that hope through positive actions.

Yesterday I watched Justin Trudeau complete with eye make up, mascara and new eye lashes, preening before the cameras. How the hell could he possibly understand digging a ditch is nothing to be ashamed of, rebuilding a country is hard work. For phack's sake the man was wearing mascara and actally had someone curl his eyelashes for the photo ops. There is no limit to this popinjay's  tenure. The only thing missing is a kerchief, a beauty mole on his cheek and a white powder wig.

IMHO, you have an extremely accurate view of what foreign aid is and does, vs. what is needed.    Worth repeating your post.

Ancedotally:  my best friend has been wildly successful in business, and his wife feels obligated to distribute a significant proportion of their wealth to "disadvantaged" in other countries.   She is no fool, and will not send money or food, but had prided herself in sending literally thousands of bicycles, most of which got distributed directly to those who could use them (we think).   I carelessly made a disparaging comment while adding a pair brand new, multi-thousand dollar 3 wheelers to the mix while stuffing a container full of hundreds of bikes gleened from police auctions.   They were shocked and it fell upon me to explain my disdain: the cost spent on way overpriced new bicycles in the container could have bought enough tooling to set up to manufacture their OWN bicycles.   Giving them finished goods might have made my friends FEEL better, but they just fostered a society and culture of dependence.  The now send tools, tubing, gearsets, etc.

  • Like 3
Posted
26 minutes ago, hot enough said:

That's because you are an intellectual coward, Rue.

Don't forget that he "hates science" too.  No sense insulting someone if you're not prepared to do it right.

Thanks,

  • Like 1

"racist, intolerant, small-minded bigot" - AND APPARENTLY A SOCIALIST

(2010) (2015)
Economic Left/Right: 8.38 3.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.13 -1.23

Posted
21 minutes ago, hot enough said:

That's because you are an intellectual coward, Rue.

Ok Scooby Doo and pretending you are not white means what exactly?  Lol.  Whitey. Man oh man. Go check out who Rooster was on Baretta the t.v. show or Antonio Fargas on Starky and Hitch. Leave "Whitey"  to them and do yourself a favour, get out of Mama's basement.

 

 

I come to you to hell.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,857
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Tony Eveland
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...