9/11: "Controlled demolition" of WTC towers

[jacee]

15-years-later-physics-journal-concludes-all-3-wtc-towers-collapsed-due-to-controlled-demolition

Renowned Physics Journal Concludes in New Study: All 3 WTC Towers Collapsed Due to Controlled Demolition

The new study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers.

The comprehensive study in Europhysics Magazine directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidence that seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative.

In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.

Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the governments story.

Perhaps most damning of all, the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the buildings collapse, it revealed signs of a controlled implosion. Additionally, Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust.

The authors of the study note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for the sudden collapse at free fall speeds directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance. These respected experts new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center.

Yes I'd say an impartial investigation is necessary, including investigation of who is responsible, why it was done, and criminal charges.

I expect there will be several types of responses here and elsewhere:

Those who just don't want to believe the truth.

Those who have a vested interest in hiding the truth.

And those who want to know the truth and pursue appropriate consequences.

A lot of people died.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks

People continue to die.

http://www.citylab.com/politics/2015/09/14-years-later-heres-what-we-know-about-911-and-cancer/403888/

Who did this?

Why?

How can they be held accountable?

.

Edited September 19, 2016 by jacee

[PIK]

Come on jacee. Answer me one question and this is a question I have asked many times and never got a answer. How did they wire the buildings without anyone knowing??? And the reason people think there is a conspiracy, is because they made it look so easy.

[jacee]

Come on jacee. Answer me one question and this is a question I have asked many times and never got a answer. How did they wire the buildings without anyone knowing??? And the reason people think there is a conspiracy, is because they made it look so easy.

I'm not an expert. I'm just presenting the findings of experts.

I believe it's been suggested before that there were secure infrastructure floors in the buildings not publicly accessible, and the logical places for placement of explosives. That answer has been given before. You ignored it I guess.

Do you want an impartial investigation to find the truth, poochy?

.

Edited September 19, 2016 by jacee

[Smallc]

It's all a giant cover up.

Yawn.

Experts can be crazy too.

[jacee]

It's all a giant cover up.

Coverup of what?

Clarify please.

Edited September 19, 2016 by jacee

[cybercoma]

Europhysics News is not an academic peer-reviewed journal; it's a magazine. Also, the editors published a caveat that the article contains speculation.

This is not groundbreaking scientific evidence. It's conspiracy narratives gussied up in scientific language without the credibility of scientific rigor.

[Boges]

Well, it appears, member jacee has removed her credibility on other issues by coming out as a 911 truther.

Edited September 19, 2016 by Boges

[cybercoma]

For more background on the article and its authors: http://www.skeptical-science.com/critical-thinking/scientific-proof-911-inside-job/

[overthere]

There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST.

That is surprising, since there have been countless cases of jetliners fully loaded with fuel flying at 400 mph directly into 110 storey buildings.

What puzzles me is the airliner that did not fly into the Pentagon. Where did it go? When will it land. They must have run out of peanut and pretzel snacks by now.

Does this study mention the central role of The Joos and Mossad?

[jacee]

Well, it appears, member jacee has removed her credibility on other issues by coming out as a 911 truther.

Just asking the questions.

I have no horse in the race.

.

[eyeball]

Who did this?

Why?

How can they be held accountable?

.

I've always been willing to admit that I wouldn't put such a crime past a right wing American government but I still cannot see how such a government could ever be competent enough to pull it off without cocking it up.

[bush_cheney2004]

Might best be placed in Canada/US relations.

We are supposedly allies in the 'war on terror'..

More like "Arts and Culture", as in works of fiction. And remember, most of the terrorists came from Canada, so I've heard.

[BC_chick]

I've always been willing to admit that I wouldn't put such a crime past a right wing American government but I still cannot see how such a government could ever be competent enough to pull it off without cocking it up.

Me too. It's not inconceivable, but the level of coordination it would take to cover up something like is not really conceivable.

Also, not only would I not put it past a right wing American government to do this, I'd go as far as saying the way the Bush administration ceased the moment to cook up a case against Iraq actually makes a strong case for the conspiracy theories.

[bush_cheney2004]

...Also, not only would I not put it past a right wing American government to do this, I'd go as far as saying the way the Bush administration ceased the moment to cook up a case against Iraq actually makes a strong case for the conspiracy theories.

The only problem with that theory is that the U.S. had already seized the moment in 1998 (Clinton), with public law and military attacks to affect regime change.

Edited September 19, 2016 by bush_cheney2004

[capricorn]

Cue the theme from "The Twilight Zone". LOL

[eyeball]

The only problem with that theory is that the U.S. had already seized the moment in 1998 (Clinton), with public law and military attacks to affect regime change.

I'm reminded more of the cartoon drawings of Saddam's underground fighter-jet bases and super-guns that were used by Pappy Bush to scare people into the 1st Gulf War.

[?Impact]

There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day

How many other fires were fuelled by 90,000 litres of jet fuel?

[ironstone]

Come on jacee. Answer me one question and this is a question I have asked many times and never got a answer. How did they wire the buildings without anyone knowing??? And the reason people think there is a conspiracy, is because they made it look so easy.

Huge planes fully laden with fuel crashing into the buildings ,the planes piloted by radical Islamist's.What else is there?

[jacee]

More like "Arts and Culture", as in works of fiction. And remember, most of the terrorists came from Canada, so I've heard.

Prove it.

(That's nonsense.)

.

[Derek 2.0]

Me too. It's not inconceivable, but the level of coordination it would take to cover up something like is not really conceivable.

Also, not only would I not put it past a right wing American government to do this, I'd go as far as saying the way the Bush administration ceased the moment to cook up a case against Iraq actually makes a strong case for the conspiracy theories.

Play it out though.......one would have to assume that the Bush Administration was able to cover-up this elaborate plot on 9/11.........but then was unable to "plant" several shipping containers worth of chemical/biological/nuclear weapons/materials in the far flung Iraqi desert for a "Ta-Da" moment after the Iraqi invasion........

[BC_chick]

Play it out though.......one would have to assume that the Bush Administration was able to cover-up this elaborate plot on 9/11.........but then was unable to "plant" several shipping containers worth of chemical/biological/nuclear weapons/materials in the far flung Iraqi desert for a "Ta-Da" moment after the Iraqi invasion........

I'm not sure if you read my post correctly but I'm essentially saying the same thing as you.

The level of coordination it would take to create a coverup of this magnitude is what makes the whole thing inconceivable to me (even if they wanted to).

[GostHacked]

I'm reminded more of the cartoon drawings of Saddam's underground fighter-jet bases and super-guns that were used by Pappy Bush to scare people into the 1st Gulf War.

Right, remember those huge complexes run by Bin Laden that were under some mountains? Oh how about those mobile chemical weapons factories that Hussein supposedly had.

[Derek 2.0]

I'm not sure if you read my post correctly but I'm essentially saying the same thing as you.

The level of coordination it would take to create a coverup of this magnitude is what makes the whole thing inconceivable to me (even if they wanted to).

No, you're five by five......I don't doubt though that intelligence failures (caused by Clinton administration spending cuts) and over compartmentalization of the ABC agencies was a major contributor........even the peace dividend at the end of the Cold War, which resulted in only a handful of (unarmed) fighters available to NORAD on 9/11.... and only them because they were in the midst of a major exercise.

[bush_cheney2004]

Prove it.

(That's nonsense.)

.

Yep...same as your OP....get it ?

[The_Squid]

Yep...same as your OP....get it ?

Jaycee seems to have issues with sarcasm and irony....