Jump to content

Green leader Elizabeth May only became Canadian citizen at age 24


Recommended Posts

Quote

Green leader Elizabeth May only became Canadian citizen at age 24.

Yes but the Green Party is also a global political party so its completely natural that its leaders will be from Earth.

Get a freakin' grip people and try to keep your eye on some far more serious balls.

FFS.

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dougie93 said:

but I said world, not universe, pay attention.

You pay attention, in case you didn't notice words matter and 'the world is going to end' could mean anything without some sort of context or reality to ground it in.

I have little doubt the economy will collapse due to our planet's ecosystems and human societies breaking down but that doesn't mean the end of the world or does it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

You pay attention, in case you didn't notice words matter and 'the world is going to end' could mean anything without some sort of context or reality to ground it in.

I have little doubt the economy will collapse due to our planet's ecosystems and human societies breaking down but that doesn't mean the end of the world or does it?

I'm not the one asserting the end of the world nor economic collapse.  A Depression is a Depression, it's not a collapse, people still make out like bandits in a Depression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

I'm not the one asserting the end of the world

You're asserting other people are without substantiating what they mean by end of the world and then implying they're nuts for doing so without substantiating what the end of the world means to you.

You hear the phrase a lot and because it could mean anything, nothing or a lot it probably shouldn't be used at all.  It may not even be what the person said.  I haven't seen anything to suggest May meant the physical annihilation of the planet, have you because yeah, that would be nuts.

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

You're asserting other people are without substantiating what they mean by end of the world and then implying they're nuts for doing so without substantiating what the end of the world means to you.

You hear the phrase a lot and because it could mean anything, nothing or a lot it probably shouldn't be used at all.  It may not even be what the person said.  I haven't seen anything to suggest May meant the physical annihilation of the planet, have you because yeah, that would be nuts.

Whatever, according to the left I am a Nazi, after that, all further indictments by the left are meaningless.   Once I am a Nazi, I can pretty much do what I please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

Whatever, according to the left I am a Nazi, after that, all further indictments by the left are meaningless.   Once I am a Nazi, I can pretty much do what I please.

The right says the very same thing about me go figure.  I guess we're good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

I'm not the one asserting the end of the world nor economic collapse.  A Depression is a Depression, it's not a collapse, people still make out like bandits in a Depression.

Economic depressions are economical and they usually occur due to bad economic decisions, where we have a chance to end it. The climate discussion is about a non-reversal timeline.

The world will not end in a decade and I haven't heard May say that it will (perhaps you need to pay attention to what is being said, instead of creating a false narrative), but according to overwhelming research, there is a window (this window/timeline is different according to various research) we have to dramatically decrease the amount of CO2 we're releasing into the air in order to not hit the tipping point. This tipping point is when changing how we do things will not stop the climate disasters, which will result in economical disasters., that are already happening, and will only increase in numbers and ferociousness.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, marcus said:

Economic depressions are economical and they usually occur due to bad economic decisions, where we have a chance to end it. The climate discussion is about a non-reversal timeline.

Central planning will be totally ineffective, market forces are Darwinian forces, you can't control them with your central plans, doesn't matter which way you come at it, either Nazis or Bolshies, they will both fail, and then we will see what happens after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

Central planning will be totally ineffective, market forces are Darwinian forces, you can't control them with your central plans, doesn't matter which way you come at it, either Nazis or Bolshies, they will both fail, and then we will see what happens after.

I don't understand you name dropping Nazis and Bolshies. I find your comparisons and analogies to try to defame a movement to have a better and cleaner world to be pure b.s. Your resistance to improving humanity, evolving our system is so sad to witness.

I reject your defeatist shoulder shrug attitude. We have been able to reverse man-made disasters in the past. Remember the ozone layer?

The ozone layer is showing signs of continuing recovery from man-made damage and is likely to heal fully by 2060, new evidence shows.

The measures taken to repair the damage will also have an important beneficial effect on climate change, as some of the gases that caused the ozone layer to thin and in places disappear also contribute to warming the atmosphere. Phasing them out could avoid as much as 0.5C (0.9F) of warming this century.

Recovery from the holes and thinning caused by aerosol chemicals has progressed at a rate of about 1% to 3% a decade since 2000, meaning the ozone layer over the northern hemisphere and mid-latitudes should heal completely by the 2030s, if current rates are sustained.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, marcus said:

Economic depressions are economical and they usually occur due to bad economic decisions, where we have a chance to end it. The climate discussion is about a non-reversal timeline.

The world will not end in a decade and I haven't heard May say that it will (perhaps you need to pay attention to what is being said, instead of creating a false narrative), but according to overwhelming research, there is a window (this window/timeline is different according to various research) we have to dramatically decrease the amount of CO2 we're releasing into the air in order to not hit the tipping point. This tipping point is when changing how we do things will not stop the climate disasters, which will result in economical disasters., that are already happening, and will only increase in numbers and ferociousness.

 

While I agree that much needs to be done, I think we’re in dangerous and largely rhetorical territory when some argue that there should be an economic penalty imposed by government for production that produces greenhouse gas emissions, since our very existence is a carbon footprint.  I worry that such rhetoric and policy will only hasten the fight for resources and the fear response to keep those with the means to protect themselves safe.  It’s already happening.  The cost of living is high.  Housing costs are outrageous.  If someone is penalized for living in a more affordable home far from the city because there are no transportation options apart from driving a vehicle, I don’t think it’s right to pile on more costs.  

I don’t think we can lose by adding green tech to building codes or building rapid transit.  Positive incentives can’t lose, as long as the tech we fund or incentivize is actually profitable.  

Edited by Zeitgeist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2019 at 6:21 PM, Dougie93 said:

The Post National State is actually isolationist.

Canadian delusions are so out of whack with realpolitik that is has to be.

 

Just vote for Blackface in the upcoming election and your wish will come true. Canada blows up. It's goodbye Canada. Hopefully, only conservatives will survive after Canada blows up. May is a very stupid woman who is totally clueless at to how a country should be run. Trying to get rid of everything that made this country great is not the route to go. But try to make a Greenie environmentalist  and socialist like May understand this is truly an exercise in futility. Jobs will disappear. Unemployment gone thru the roof. But hey, at least the trees are still around. LOL.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, taxme said:

Just vote for Blackface in the upcoming election and your wish will come true. Canada blows up. It's goodbye Canada.

My Canada is already gone and it ain't coming back.   I live like the Iroquois now, just me here on my Reservation and the Great Mother across the sea.

God save the Queen and Her Mohawk Warriors.    Commie Confederation is dead to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/6/2019 at 11:09 AM, Dougie93 said:

My Canada is already gone and it ain't coming back.   I live like the Iroquois now, just me here on my Reservation and the Great Mother across the sea.

God save the Queen and Her Mohawk Warriors.    Commie Confederation is dead to me.

Commie confederation will only get worse if the likes of dictators like Blackface, May or Singh get to be the prime mistakes of Canada term in office. You ain't seen nothing yet if anyone of them becomes the dictator of Canada, pardner. They will be coming for your property and your guns in the next round. There is not much left of the old Canada and it will really get worse after anyone of those fools ever become your prime mistake of Canada. Even your beloved Queen will not be able to save your ass. You better hope that a man like Bernier becomes the PM of Canada, and not May. Socialist Greenies like May does not believe that you should own property, or own a gun, and there goes your vehicle also. You will be biking your way around wherever you have to go. You should be safe and allowed to own an electric bike. LOL. 

Edited by taxme
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

That's 100% wrong. Where did you get that info from?

 

Ontario raises the third most taxes per capita but receives the least of any province in federal tax revenue per capita.  It’s a massive outflow of Ontario tax dollars to the rest of Canada.  I know there are different ways of measuring contributions, but keep in mind that while Alberta receives the second least, she doesn’t collect as much tax from her people as other provinces.  She certainly benefits from oil revenue, but in terms of transfers to provinces, per capita Alberta contributes modestly.  Of course that changes with oil prices.  Quebec certainly receives the most in transfers, yet she also taxes her people the most.  While Quebecers pay very low university tuition and daycare costs at the user fee level, they pay in other ways, though housing is cheaper in Quebec   

Ontario receives lowest total revenue per capita in Canada

Canadian provinces receive revenue from taxation, resource royalties, transfers from the federal government and other sources including profits from government business enterprises and user fees. In 2017, these sources generated $10,415 in total revenue per person in Ontario, the lowest in Canada.

Figure 1: Ontario total revenue per capita lowest in Canada

Figure 1: Ontario total revenue per capita lowest in Canada

Source: Statistics Canada and FAO.

Accessible version

Tax revenue

Despite receiving the lowest total revenue per capita in Canada, Ontario’s tax revenue is above the average of other provinces. In 2017-18, Ontario generated $7,936 in tax revenue per person, below that of only Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador.

 

Figure 2: Ontario generated relatively high per capita tax revenues

Figure 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2019 at 7:28 PM, eyeball said:

Yes but the Green Party is also a global political party so its completely natural that its leaders will be from Earth.

Get a freakin' grip people and try to keep your eye on some far more serious balls.

FFS.

She's running for PM.  All the leaders running are from Earth.  Her primary job is to protect and manage Canada's interests, and some of those happen to be global interests as well.

And despite what she says, she cannot save the earth.  Canada is responsible for only 1.6% of global GHG emissions.  Even if she by miracle managed to slice Canada's emissions in half, that's 0.7% reduction.  Despite what we do it's going to come down to the US and China who together are responsible for almost 50% of global emissions.

I'm for helping to fight and reduce climate change.  I'm not for doing so by decimating the economy like May wants to while the US stands around and does jack all.

Edited by Moonlight Graham
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

She's running for PM.  All the leaders running are from Earth.  Her primary job is to protect and manage Canada's interests.

LOL !

Yeah, okay,  sure. 

Greta Thunberg Cult of the Personality. 

Church of Climate Doom.

Tickets to Heaven.

Millenials are the dumbest f@ckin' generation in the history of the world.

Yeah, they make great soldiers.  But that's because they are the Ultimate Suckahs.

Since the Germans in World War Two that is.

Sieg Heil, Hipster Neck Beards.  Mwahahaha.

Bow down before the Boomer elites whom you serve. You're gonna get what your deserve

Cause you just keep on drinking the Kool-Aid, you can't help yourselves apparently.

Head like a hole.  Black out your soul.  I'd rather die than give you control, Gen Why.

Helicopter parented Infantilized man babies.

Another Participation Trophy to signal your Virtue to State Run Mommy.

<spits tobacco juice>

 

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

She's running for PM.  All the leaders running are from Earth.  Her primary job is to protect and manage Canada's interests, and some of those happen to be global interests as well.

And despite what she says, she cannot save the earth.  Canada is responsible for only 1.6% of global GHG emissions.  Even if she by miracle managed to slice Canada's emissions in half, that's 0.7% reduction.  Despite what we do it's going to come down to the US and China who together are responsible for almost 50% of global emissions.

I'm for helping to fight and reduce climate change.  I'm not for doing so by decimating the economy like May wants to while the US stands around and does jack all.

I think that you must have meant to say that "China and India do jack all, right?  Was that just a little slight against America on your part by chance? California use to be known as smog city, but not anymore. They cleaned up their emissions act. All May and other fools like her will never be able to stop global warming because China and India do not care about global warming anyway. Maybe they know that global warming has nothing to do with fossil fuels and SUV's at all but more to do with , according to NASA, the earths solar orbit that brings us a little closer to the sun. Anyway, it is time for the likes of May to quit with her foolish global warming games because only fools will listen to her. I am not giving up on my so called global warming lifestyle when so many billionaires like D. Suzuki, Al Gore and Leo Decrapio as examples do not. Canadians can be so easily manipulated and brainwashed by their politicians and the media, and are quit capable of getting most of them into a bloody panic over nothing. Meanwhile, their own country is going to hell, and they could careless. Most Canadians are dumb about so many things.it's down right pathetic to say the least. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, taxme said:

 Canadians can be so easily manipulated and brainwashed by their politicians and the media, and are quit capable of getting most of them into a bloody panic over nothing

Democrats too.   The left has become a religion.  Faith based.    Virtue signalling for their Tickets to Heaven.  Secular Popery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...