ironstone

More from the face of the modern day Democratic party. Again, women and "birthing people"? She mentions men too.

Is the right to abortion a world wide right for women everywhere? Would you dare to be critical of any Muslim country for their abortion stance? How about Muslims that live in Canada or the US? Just out of curiosity did you feel there should be any limits on abortion or do you think it should have been allowed right up to the moment of birth ? Dems Bring Abortion on Demand until Birth Act to Vote (frc.org)

This is one of your Democratic supporters. So according to your side it's not just about women. The great AOC herself also stated that gender is fluid. There are all kinds of opinions coming out now but it seems that the abortion debate will be left up to the states to decide. Democratic states will continue to promote abortion, especially in black and brown neighborhoods it seems.

Yes Trudeau loves abortion at the same time he's flooding the country with immigrants because our population isn't growing fast enough. From cultures that predominantly oppose abortion no less.

I think it's way more accurate to say that in fact the Democrat party has drastically moved farther left in just the last couple of years. Far away from their roots. Calling them socialist is not much of a stretch either. You shouldn't mention slavery without admitting which party was the anti slavery party either, just for the sake of accuracy. Roe v Wade has been around a long time but it should be pointed out that Democrats were not satisfied with that, they wanted to pretty much remove any existing limits to abortion but they failed. Democrat Bill Legalizing Abortion Through All Nine Months, For Virtually Any Reason, Fails In Senate | The Daily Wire It was also pointed out that they could have achieved this during either Clinton's or Obama's first terms , but they did not act. Everyone on the government side should act like adults and strongly come out and condemn violence which we know is going to come. They haven't done it before so I'm not optimistic.

This is such a contentious issue with both sides. But one side has a long history of using very incendiary rhetoric which only makes things worse for everyone. Judges are already being threatened and the Democrats seem fine with it. This kind of talk is all too normal from people that should know better.

This is a very informative video about the mad rush to EV's. Should Ontario invest heavily in EV's because of the potential financial benefits to the province? Or is it because it will help save the planet? Or a bit of both? This guy covers a lot of the bases in this discussion and points out some huge red flags. He's certainly not anti-EV but more pro choice.

Why shouldn't we withdraw from these climate agreements when it's pretty clear they won't work at the end of the day? As usual, western democracies have to carry the financial load.

4 Democrats have often challenged election results as I have repeatedly pointed out in here. In fact when election results are challenged, it is usually the Democrats doing it and not the Republicans. I'm not convinced that the system is close to being fool proof. Turning off cameras at drop boxes, kicking out observers, bending the rules seems to be a rather common occurrence. From one Democratic insider: Former Democratic Governor Rod Blagojevich Calls Voter Fraud a 'Time-Honored Tradition' (townhall.com) Blagojevich explained how the Democratic apparatus allegedly operates to steal votes. "They control polling places, they stop votes when their candidate's behind, and then in wee hours of the morning, in the dark of night, the stealing starts," said Blagojevich. The reason the mainstream media is looking the other way, according to the former governor, is because the most important thing to them is defeating Donald Trump.

It was a very simple question in my opinion. Americans better off now under Biden? Or not? Are they worse off? I think we all know the answer to that. But perhaps you can't bring yourself to admit it because your hatred of Trump won't let you? Meanwhile, more on the leader of the free world. The president described as "perfect" by Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi gushes over Joe Biden: 'He's just perfect' - Washington Times Even Biden's own handlers clearly do not trust him to go off his leash. Another gem from Mark Dice ? :(Politics can be so frustrating but we do have to laugh sometimes!)

Rigging can take many forms. J6 Hysteria Is To Avoid Accountability For Rigging Of The 2020 Election (thefederalist.com) The propaganda press have also downplayed Zuckerberg’s staggering $419 million expenditure, or falsely presented it as non-partisan help to voters. Independent researchers have shown that the funding dollars overwhelmingly poured into Democrat counties, and particularly such counties in swing states. The money was used to enable the private takeover of government election offices, erasing the bright red line between campaign operations and government administration of elections. The massive grants were used to run Get Out The Vote operations through these government offices, in a manner that benefited Democrats in overwhelmingly disproportionate ways. The funds were used mostly to register Democrats to vote, encourage Democrats to vote, harvest Democrat ballots, cure defective Democrat ballots, count Democrat ballots, etc. No right-wing billionaire could have gotten away with even thinking about such an operation, but had he, the media would be all over it. A few hundred thousand dollars in Russian Facebook ads for both Clinton and Trump generated years of hysterical media coverage from the corrupt press. Yet Zuckerberg funding the private takeover of elections to secure Democrat victories has barely been mentioned — much less obsessed over — by most of corporate media.

So one side claims there is no evidence of election fraud to be found anywhere and the other side says there is evidence. On the internet each side can find links to prove or disprove fraud or not. I would suggest at the very least that it should be open to debate. From what I have read there seems to have been a lot of highly suspicious activity going on in the swing states. I don't think all of these claims have been fully investigated beyond the winning side in the election simply stating, nothing to see here/it didn't happen just move along. Special Counsel Finds ‘Widespread Election Fraud’ In Nursing Homes (thefederalist.com) Biden , or rather his handlers, want the feds to take over the administration of elections. This would be more great news for the Democrats as they generally favour making elections less secure. Such as not requiring ID to vote which is insane. Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections (thefederalist.com)

So the alternative is the federal government of the day, in this case the Democrats, will get to decide who votes. And when the time comes, it may be the Republicans setting the rules over who can vote. Perhaps they'll decide that it makes more sense to ask voters to provide proof of ID in every state.

So you're ok with anyone walking up to a voting station , no photo ID, no proof of any kind required and being allowed to cast a vote??

Voter ID Requirements | USAGov It is possible to still vote with a provisional ballot. Birth certificates, utility bills, bank statements. Now you're going to say many people have absolutely not one single piece of paper to help identify their identity. If they have nothing at all to verify identity then what prevents them from voting again and again? There has to be limits on who can and cannot vote if they can't prove who they are. I'm guessing you were/are strongly in favour of vax passports for people. How about showing a form of ID before purchasing a gun? That's reasonable isn't it?

I'm not sure if PP was totally wrong on his stance on the Bank of Canada. I'm no expert on crypto but one of my coworkers was up to over $250,000 from an investment of less than $10,000. That was before the market tanked though. Perhaps the appeal was that it was more or less outside of the control of governments. I think it's easier to understand when we invest in something more tangible, real bricks and mortar companies.

I asked you if you feel that asking for ID during the voting process is a form of voter suppression.

Can you be specific? When you say you want voting to be more inclusive and easier, does that mean you are opposed to voters being required to show proof of ID? Asking for ID is not a form of suppression, it's perfectly reasonable. To your second point I think you would probably be upset if the Trump Republicans wanted to take complete charge of the election process wouldn't you? "We have no issues period when it comes to elections( Canada)" Not exactly. LILLEY: Thousands of Canadian voter cards sent to dead, non-citizens | Toronto Sun

Misogynist or not, are Americans better off now after over 2 years of Joe Biden's Bernie Sander's type presidency? Are things better in the US? How about the impact of Biden's foreign policy so far? Right now, better or worse compared to Trump's term?

That's a pretty weak link. I read it as the Republicans wanting to make the voting process more secure while the Democrats position would make it less secure. Requiring ID and purging voter rolls of dead people and duplicate names makes perfect sense. It's also not unreasonable to allow only American citizens to vote. Newt Gingrich - Gingrich 360 - The Democrats Do Not Want Voting Integrity Asking for proof of ID is not voter suppression.

How did they want to make it more difficult for people to vote? And could you explain how it relates to the integrity of the voting process?

Trump held a lot of rallies with standing room only and people waiting outside hoping to get in. Biden also held rallies that were not quite as well attended to put it politely. I guess they were genuine because attendance of 2 people is still a rally, but technically the smallest rally possible. For the upcoming midterms I don't think the Republicans should take it for granted that they'll win big either. The Democrats have a plan which could allow them to pull off an upset even if Biden's poll numbers are still in the toilet at that time. Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections (thefederalist.com) They basically want a federal takeover the states role in elections.

I haven't really seen any solid debunking of the Biden diary but the MSM is pretty much ignoring it. For the Trump haters, how do you feel about the diary and it's contents? Given the undeniable fact that Biden is very touchy-feely with females and children what it written in this diary is extremely plausible. Or do you dismiss it outright? Just like Hunter's laptop has to be Russian disinformation?(<<<totally legit)

There have been sitting presidents before that were notorious womanizers. Bill Clinton, JFK. Even Biden has had an accuser which may have been the moment that the me too movement died. Her name was Tara Reade. And no it doesn't make it right no matter what side it's on.

1. Manchin and Sinema faced an awful lot of heat from within their own party for not marching in lockstep with the leadership. 2. Hillary is still always in the news. She tours and gives speeches. She still talks about the 2016 election being stolen. There are even rumours that she will run in 2024 since Biden won't be allowed to run again. She just won't go away?