ironstone

You clearly didn't watch the link I posted earlier, which showed a number of Democrats raising concerns about electronic voting integrity. They had every right to be voicing their concerns, even though they promptly stopped after the 2020 election. Prior to the 2020 election your side was trying to make the case that electronic voting was vulnerable. Van Jones was correct in that Russia collusion was a giant nothingburger. He wasn't the only one. Bret Stephens Is First In Big Media To Admit Russian Collusion Was A 'Hoax' (thefederalist.com) Pulitzer Prize-winning NY Times journalist admits Russian collusion story was a 'hoax' | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com But hey! They did get a Pulitzer for it right? Of course I have opinions of my own. And I have sources I trust more than others. Obviously this bothers you a great deal for some reason. All the arguments you try to make against me and my case also can be applied to you and your trusted sources like The View. I can't convince you, you cannot convince me. Stalemate. No harm in having a spirited debate however. But even that simple fact that everyone does not fall into line with your narrative really irritates you. I can't help that. Earlier I used the word "alleged" to describe internal Dominion emails. I should not have used that term as the internal emails from Dominion were obtained in the discovery process of the Dominion/FOX lawsuit. Those Dominion emails in which they admitted their system was full of vulnerabilities were genuine. Mark Dice did debunk this FOX internal email story. This was a documentary from HBO. HBO is owned by Warner Media LLC, which also happens to own CNN among others. I did get to see most of this documentary when it aired and it's very interesting. But this documentary wasn't mentioned very much after 2020. Go figure.?

Context is pretty important here and you clearly missed it. If Trump had said this in a private call to Russian leaders that's a different story. This public comment was clearly made in jest. News organizations push stories that they hope will attract attention and gain viewers or readers. You're crapping all over FOX for this story while ignoring all the other news outlets for falsely pushing Russian collusion even when they knew it wasn't true. One CNN contributor did admit it, to his credit. CNN's Van Jones Calls Trump-Russia Story 'Nothing Burger,' Newest Project Veritas Video Shows (newsweek.com) They flogged this story for years. False stories are not rare in the news industry. "Hands up, don't shoot" is another whopper. As for Dominion, I personally stand with those that had concerns about the security of electronic voting. Democrats question election results, voting machines - Washington Times Why do you guys believe it's only acceptable to question election integrity when it suits you? Suddenly OK To Question Election Integrity After Fake Votes Wrecked NYC Mayor Race (thefederalist.com)

Should I ask you about objective evidence for Russian collusion? Never mind, that would be pointless. If these internal Dominion emails shown on the video are false, then I suppose Dominion can successfully sue Mark Dice. Electronic voting is not infallible. You won't believe me but many Democrats have also said the same thing(all prior to 2020). I freely admit to having my biases, just as you clearly have yours. I even get why you guys would ridicule someone like Mark Dice. We don't trust sources from the other side.To be fair, I would ridicule Brian Stelter or Whoopi Goldberg.

I would guess that it is much more common in Democratic run cities.

I wouldn't rely on Wikipedia too much given the huge left wing bias they have. It's great for a lot of other information, but not political information. Anyone not on the political left is usually deemed to be a far right extremist. And you failed to address the alleged internal emails from the Dominion executives that admitted their system wasn't secure.

Urban voters typically have more crime as well. Homelessness. There are pros and cons to each side. 'Floating in a trash pit': tenters remain at Hastings camp | CBC News This is what can happen when progressives run amok.

Mark Dice addresses the Dominion angle in this video. It seems that even Dominion execs had serious doubts about their own system. Many Democrats also had misgivings about the integrity of electronic voting, but that was prior to the 2020 election. After it was over, they changed their tune completely.

I don't think too many homeowners are salivating at the prospect of an intruder or intruders breaking into their home. Who knows what kind of weapons the intruders may be carrying? What might they do to the homeowner? I can guarantee it won't be good. I bet law abiding homeowners in Chicago had the same rights as they do in Florida. But they have no such right. Why do lefties usually seem to take the side of the criminal?

I pretty much expected this to happen. The reaction to the convoy was overkill.

Some interesting articles on these balloons from Popular Mechanics. Chinese Spy Balloon: Why It Took So Long To Shoot Down, What’s Next (popularmechanics.com) Spy Balloons Are Also the New Secret Weapon of the United States (popularmechanics.com) Apparently they can be hard to detect and are likely much cheaper to produce.

You have placed all the blame on the homeowner. And you have decided that this homeowner was just itching to kill someone for no reason at all. You have also decided that the robbers had no intention to commit violence after they broke into the home, despite the brass knuckles. Joe Biden recently made the same kind of comment in that he suggested police should only ever shoot to incapacitate and never to kill. Shoot them in the leg or the hand right? That would be some superb marksmanship.

A culture of waste is built into the system in this country. At the end of every fiscal year for the government, every single agency scrambles to use up the current budget in order to maintain at least the same amount of funding for the next year. It's use it or lose it. No incentive to save taxpayer dollars. And I'm finding it hard to believe that the CRA is understaffed too.

Try to imagine how those who lived at the home must have felt when not one, but three criminals are in the personal space of the owner. Yes of course those on the left will immediately jump to the defense of the criminals. How is the homeowner supposed to react? The fact that at least one of them had brass knuckles is a clear indication that they came prepared to use violence against the occupants. It's awful that three young people are now dead but let's remember that the homeowner is the victim here.

Trump is the only declared candidate so far but I think there should be better and safer choices when the others declare their candidacy. I thought most of the 2016 Republican candidates were much stronger than the Democrat side. Trump was certainly a better President than Biden but he's not far behind in age. If the Republican nominee isn't Trump, will the MSM and big tech be just as vicious in their attacks? Probably.

Digging up dirt on political opponents is a tactic used by both Democrats and Republicans. Fabricating dirt on a political opponent is different. Are you suggesting that what Giuliani may have done is the Republican equivalent of the Steele dossier? It's all totally false? Consider the personal history of the individual in question, Hunter Biden. I just find it hard to dismiss what was found on the laptop given the true nature of the owner, Hunter Biden. His sordid lifestyle is pretty well known. He does have a long history of doing stupid things while under the influence of drugs. Fact: Hunter does get huge sums of cash from foreign governments. Ukraine, China, Russia, Kazakhstan. There may be more that we don't know about. Fact: Hunter gets all this money for influence peddling. Be realistic, what else does this stoner have to offer besides access to the Big Guy? Fact: Hunter has long had a serious problem with drug addiction. Not a reliable, competent person in any way.

That's kind of a misleading statement. The owner of the shop first tried to contact the owner to come and pick up the laptop. The shop owner was apparently not even 100% certain that it was Hunter that dropped off the laptop. He was not able to successfully reach the owner for a period exceeding 3 months. Now that laptop is considered to be abandoned by the owner and becomes the property of the repair shop owner. According to Isaac’s account, the FBI first made a forensic copy of the laptop, then returned weeks later with a subpoena and confiscated it. When he stopped hearing from the FBI, Isaac said he contacted several members of Congress, who did not respond. At that point, his intermediary reached out to Rudy Giuliani’s attorney, Robert Costello. Hunter Biden served defamation lawsuit days before his lawyer called for criminal probes (nypost.com) According to this link, the FBI had a forensic copy of the laptop well before Giuliani had it.

I think it is a huge stretch to suggest that the content was tampered with by the Russians or anyone else. Hunter would have be under 24hr surveillance by hostile agents. Then he is tailed to the computer repair shop and leaves the laptop there. The fact that he forgot about it indicates he may have been under the influence of drugs as we know he is prone to do. Then, the hostile agents, sometime over the course of many months, are able to somehow get to the laptop unnoticed and proceed to tamper with it somehow. Given the sordid and seedy details that have been made public from the contents of the laptop, it's perfectly reasonable to assume that every bit of it is true. Heavy drug use, hookers, LOTS of cash from foreign governments, many references to the "Big Guy". Hunter is no choir boy and he clearly has no moral compass. And this guy get's the kid gloves treatment by the media!

Didn't the laptop incident meet the legal requirements to be considered abandoned by the owner? The repair shop owner apparently tried for months to get a hold of Biden but was unsuccessful. First there were denials. The story was false/Russian disinformation. Now the truth is coming out in the open. Hunter Biden admits infamous laptop is his in plea for probe (nypost.com) Hunter Biden admits infamous abandoned laptop belongs to him | Washington Examiner

Warning! If you are woke, please do not watch this link as you will be triggered.? For the record, AI will likely have many benefits for us, but it will likely have it's share of negatives too.

Another segment on Chat GPT that the left will not watch. Charlie Asks AI to Write an Essay on Why Conservatives Shouldn't Have Free Speech | Charlie Asks ChatGPT to Write an Essay on Why Conservatives Shouldn't Have Free Speech What happens next will shock you. Subscribe to The Charlie Kirk... | By Charlie Kirk | Facebook

You clearly didn't watch the link I posted earlier. Therefore you will not understand the point I'm trying to make about Chat GPT.

I think if you're only interested in writing about things things that have nothing to do with being favorable to conservative politics, or things that do not go against the woke agenda, then Chat GPT will be just fine.?

Bills C-11 and C-18 should concern all Canadians - YouTube I'm not a YouTuber myself of course, but I have serious concerns about this Bill based on what I am hearing about it. And let's be open and honest about one thing. Justin Trudeau clearly has no qualms about using a heavy hand to stifle opposition.

In this video the author tried asking Chat GPT to write a poem about Donald Trump. It answers, "It is not in my capacity to have feelings or opinions on any specific person". But Chat GPT was able to write a glowing poem about Joe Biden. Next challenge, write a blog post about why Donald Trump is not a racist. Chat GPT can't/won't do it. Write a blog post about why Joe Biden is not a racist. Chat GPT once again comes up with a wonderful piece about how Joe Biden is not a racist. And it goes on with more examples. Do you not see a trend with Chat GPT? I'm pointing out a huge bias that is deliberately built into the system to benefit one side and that makes you upset? Yes, the tech behind it must be pretty impressive, but it's still limited somewhat by the inherent biases of it's creators.

No surprise here, but Chat GPT apparently has a built in left-wing bias. Woke AI!