-
Posts
9,313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
40
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Moonbox
-
In your imagination? Drop a link to one of these instances, rather than limply insisting on it over and over! π€‘π€‘
-
USA releases leadership of the world
Moonbox replied to godzilla's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Also Antifa and BLM. π€£ -
I still don't, and neither do you, otherwise you'd have spelled it out.
-
You don't really have to isolate anything. CBC's cable network viewership is declining both in absolute terms and in terms of relative viewership (ie. their share of the pie is shrinking rapidly). I think we can assume "not well" considering the CBC just laid off 25% of its workforce. Legacy media is struggling in general, but this is particularly notable considering the heavy subsidies they receive.
-
I don't think they'll try to impeach him again unless he does something egregious or traitorous, but they don't even need to. A second-term President who loses the House is a lame-duck who'll get stymied and filibustered for 2 years until he's done. I think he has 12-18 months to really swing his clout, after which House Republicans will really start focusing on their own re-elections. If Trump's popularity wanes in the meantime, that will only embolden opposition amongst them. Outside of his tariff ranting, so far I think he's having an okay time. Rounding up and deporting the illegals and crashing the monolithic public service will enjoy support at least until it starts affecting the daily lives and wallets of the average voter. A multi-front trade war yields almost immediate negative results and whatever (small) positive outcomes arise from it will lag years behind.
-
I don't disagree with any of that.
-
This sort of childish whining would make more sense if wasn't you that both started the exchange, AND went immediately ad-hominem. You have the self-awareness of a rock. We're now on page two of your useless moaning, and all on account of a benign question you refused (actually couldn't) answer. If you just want to rant out your feelings without being challenged, go write in your diary. π
-
Perhaps, but I think folks overestimate the strength of Trump's mandate and how far down stupid-road they'll all go before they start pumping the breaks. True enough, but rounding up and kicking out illegals, or taking the hammer to the bureaucracy is a bit different than starting pointless/costly trade wars with close allies, or taking over Gaza.
-
Judging by your record on this forum, you'd be safer assuming that anyone you're talking to has already done 10x more research than you have. That would save you a lot of frustration. Instead of all of this useless rambling, you could have just answered the question, or requote the previous answer that you keep insisting you totally provided. π
-
I kept it vague, because I don't clear data, but the longstanding editorial bias and support for the Liberal party predictably yields a lot of opposition. The widening trust gap amongst Conservatives for the CBC is even highlighted by your link: It's an interesting read, but the last few years have put into question how valuable and accurate this sort of polling research is. I'm more inclined to trust hard data about the precipitous drop in revenue and ratings for the CBC, despite large increases in public funding. There's a disconnect here.
-
Isn't that supposing that we somehow didn't know that already? Trudeau had already committed something like $1.5-2B on that in December. These "concessions" will fall in under that umbrella, and a fentanyl tsar is just a cheesy symbolic gesture. Me too, but I wouldn't hold your breath on US gun enforcement under a Republican President. Whatever happens on that file will be for our border services to figure out.
-
Maybe, but I doubt it. The problem with the CBC over the last 20-25 years has been twofold: 1) It is very partisan and very agenda-based. 2) Its programming generally sucks. As a result, it not only provides near-zero value to the majority of Canadians, it also aggravates and antagonizes a large portion f the population.
-
Actions cause reactions. That's how this sort of thing works. I'm not sure what you figure "worked" though. $200M may as well be nothing at this scale, and a couple of meaningless platitudes don't count for much, do they? A fentanyl czar? Really?