Moonbox

That's why I said "supposed" behavior. It's still just you projecting. It's still just you insisting on both what the behavior is, and what causing it. While you spiral out raving in paragraph form at the latest person laughing at you. 🙃

To have you of all people complaining about insults is a laugh. 90% of your posts are clueless, buffoonish b*tching and ranting, and then inevitably lashing and insulting the people who contradict or correct you. Meanwhile, you bounce around high-fiving the insults and tantrums of the biggest no-life troll this forum has ever seen Put me on ignore, or quit being a crybaby. Whining and moaning about the fight you keep running straight back to is babyshit. You're a joke.

If the supposed behavior is predicated on my apparent "losing", and you're the one who's determining who lost, it's absolutely the same thing. This is more retarded Fox donkey-logic. I'm sorry if your own words make you look stupid, but nobody does a better job of that than you. 🤡👍

Oh boy. This should be good. 😆 Yes. That's called inferential reasoning. If the books got removed shortly after being highlighted in a National Post article about AI spam and misinformation, and the AI that wrote it got something as basic as where Carney went to university wrong, it's probably wasn't very credible. No dumdum. The fact that Amazon, Indigo etc didn't issue press releases, or that the author can't be reached for comment on why the books were removed doesn't somehow (magically) make them credible. Maybe you have some insights on who the author is, or why anyone would trust self-published AI generated spam? No??? Thanks for the "logic" lesson! 🤡👌

In this thread you told me I was losing, and it's the same thing. In your little pea brain, you figure that if you insist hard enough that you're winning and the other guy is losing, this somehow manifests in reality. Unfortunately, we already know that this is a fool's game:

Why don't we try your logic for a change: Did they say they didn't remove them for errors? 🤡🤡🤡

All of this wailing and gnashing over being confronted by your own words: The amount of time you spend on this forum insisting to people they've lost to your belligerent stupidity is only matched in stupidity by the fact that by your own words this means they've beaten you. 🤣👌

Riiight, and that's why all three books were removed from sale by the vendors, and why the National Post published an article about them...because of their accuracy. With donkey-logic like that, it's no wonder you're able to convince yourself you win all these debates. 🤣

"If yOU haVE to teLL thE otHEr gUy he lOst, then He PrOBAbly WoN: If

You could have stopped there and we'd have had just as good a laugh as if you continued. Other than that they were AI-generated slop that got something as basic as where Carney went to university wrong, and that they were all taken down and removed from sale shortly after being released... CdnFox's intelijent and lernd conclusion: "YERP YERP TOTALLY LEGIT" 🤣

I'm just really glad that you kept yourself busy over the long weekend with friends/family/life activities. .... Oh wait...you're a complete no-life and you were pounding away at your keyboard the whole time.

I've demonstrated that it was it was written by AI, that Bloomberg discovered right at the beginning of the book that the AI couldn't get a detail as basic as where Carney went to university correct, and I've demonstrated that the book has been removed from sale/circulation by the vendors. Your donkey-brained conclusion: "Yerp yerp tortally legit source!" 🤡

Who's to say they weren't? I'd say the fact that the book's been completely removed from stores/vendors, and that looking it up yields this forum on the first page of a Google Search suggests there was something fishy about it. Not to you though...of course not. Speaking of a reasonable and thoughtful person, he/she wouldn't ask someone to find mistakes in a book that cannot even be found anymore. You and Army Guy can wallow in the intellectual muck together. 🫂

Then what do I need you for? Put me on ignore or stop whining. You're just embarrassing yourself.

Right, it was "just one mistake"... When the AI can't even the most basic facts straight, a reasonable and thoughtful human being would suspect that there'd be a great many other errors in those 388 pages. Nobody ever accused you of being thoughtful or reasonable though, so don't worry. I know it sucks being the sucker, so if you want to pretend that this book was legit despite the fact that it's been removed from sale everywhere and that this forum now comes up on the first page of a Google Search for it, go ahead. That doesn't change the reality. It doesn't change the fact that you didn't just fall for AI-generated slop. You paid for it.

Yes, it certainly can be. Check this out: It can also be used to program shovelware, to barf out and spam click-bait articles/videos and flood social media with propaganda (slop). Two things: 1) When the National Post publishes an article highlighting how this "author" published three different books within weeks of one another, when they weren't even capable of getting basic stuff right like where Carney went to university, and when the vendors all pull the books off the shelves within a few weeks, I'd say it strongly suggests the opposite. 2) Nobody else was foolish enough to fall for this and read it, let alone pay for it.

Exactly! and then Treebeard showed us much red there was in Alberta, because you're apparently so dumb that someone had to explain that the amount of paint on the map isn't important, but rather the number of seats won. When this level of stupidity is how you convince yourself that you're right, it's no wonder you think you're batting 100.00%

Yes, AI-generated slop that didn't even get a basic editing or fact-checking pass, self-published by a guy who released at least two other books on Carney within weeks of each other. If anyone was going to fall for that, of course it was you. Nobody spends more time on this forum crying about attacks and insults than you, and usually in the same breath as you're delivering attacks and insults. 🥴

At any moment you can put me on ignore. I'd be happy not hear from you. 👍

Right, like how the Conservatives "swept" the GTA? 🤡

The topic might change, but your "position" is the same in every thread: Step 1: Respond to disagreement by making up a retarded strawman to argue against Step 2: Squeal and moan about dishonesty when your opponent pushes back at your make-believe

The blind squirrel finds a nut once in awhile. Good job muppet. You finally got one. 👍 99/100 times, I'm pretty comfortable giving eyeball the benefit of the doubt over a chucklef*ck like you.

I already did you clown. If you can find anywhere where Eyeball is actually defending Hamas, or saying "rape is okay", go ahead and show us. Otherwise it's just the latest example of you dumbing and argument down and reframing it into a stupid enough strawman that you feel adequate to defeat it. 🤡 If I was running away from you, I wouldn't have engaged. The truth is you're a waste of time, because you never offer anything new. EVERY argument you get into: Step 1: Respond to disagreement by making up a retarded strawman to argue against Step 2: Squeal and moan about dishonesty when your opponent pushes back at your make-believe

It would be surprising not to see you squealing about dishonesty at the faintest hint of disagreement or opposition. Cute self-validating logic though: "I call you out for dishonesty because you're dishonest". 🥴👍 It's just too bad that you follow the same routine in every argument: Step 1: Respond to disagreement by making up a retarded strawman to argue against Step 2: Squeal and moan about dishonesty when your opponent pushes back at your make-believe EVERY TIME

..and look at that. User is squealing about dishonesty again when folks push back against his retarded strawman. 😆 Eyeball's a Hamas supporter...apparently...because that's what it means to question anything Israel is doing.