Jump to content

Moonbox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    9,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by Moonbox

  1. Yes, a lot of them go nowhere, and he compulsively derails even his own threads with his fragile performances, but the derailing is the bigger issue. Unless you move to a different topic, you can't avoid him. He's always there. You can hardly have a discussion here without him puking all over the place, and he requires no particular dance partner. As soon as the first person disagrees with his 10-IQ reasoning, the performative jackassing begins, and the thread is no longer about anything but fragile Fox's ego.
  2. Okay that's better. At least now we have something specific to talk about. Now let's put it into context. If yesterday and the day before were "slow days" as you say, are we to assume that today was not? If we combine this with the past two days' gains, we're looking at an area equal to 2-3 average sized Canadian farms, taken after 3 days of fighting (and presumably ~3000 casualties), on a 1000 km war front. What military doctrine teaches "advancing is advancing", and that losing entire battalions worth of soldiers is worth a single farmer's field? 🤔
  3. Normally I would, but he's like a malaria carrier. I can spare myself the direct effect of his belligerent stupidity, but not from infecting every other part of the forum I'd still see all of his topic spam. He'd still be derailing every thread he joins with his fragile blustering and desperate need for acknowledgement. His puke would still be everywhere, ignore feature or not.
  4. LOL. You don't make anyone cry. The only thing that's notable about you on this forum is how much of a deadbeat loser you are. There are plenty of other people just as stupid as you here, but nobody has less going on in their life than you. You're just a pest.
  5. Did you? Because the word "could" only showed up a single time, in three different sources. That doesn't matter for you though, because clownworld works differently than reality. 🤡🤡🤡
  6. Gaining ground, yes. KMs a day, definitely not. We're talking meters. YOU ARE READING IT WRONG. I already explained how this is WRONG, and I even showed you a screenshot, with the legend. HERE'S ANOTHER ONE. Either you're color blind, or you're bad at reading maps. You tell us. This heroic success is about 200m, and it's one of only two such instances on the entire 1000km front line. This is the progress Russia is making daily, and all for the low-low cost of ~1000 casualties a day.
  7. Wasn't a typo. You reasoned it out and everything! 🤣 Chalk it up as another example of you being a blustering buffoon. 👌 You're the biggest no-life loser this forum has ever seen, and it's not even close:
  8. Is this what you're talking about? You're a treasure trove of truly retarded statements. 🤣
  9. From Russian soldiers and deserters: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/01/18/theyre-just-choosing-where-to-die-when-russias-poorly-trained-stormtroopers-retreat-russian-barrier-troops-gun-them-down/ https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-soldiers-say-blocking-units-placed-behind-them-stop-retreat-2023-3 https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/human-wave-tactics-are-demoralizing-the-russian-army-in-ukraine/ MSM FAKE NEWS right? If it's not from Russia Today, or Tucker Carlson, it just ain't true in clownworld.
  10. Just another example of muppet-logic, from the biggest no-life this forum has ever seen.
  11. This is what's funny. These soldiers are so motivated that Russian commanders employ blocking units behind their assaults that shoot their own retreating soldiers. Russia has low morale, but highly motivated troops 😆...that's good shit.
  12. I suppose it's easy for you to feel that way when you just ignore and blow past any criticism of your reasoning, without even acknowledging it. Evidently, that's also what you seem to do when confronted with facts that contradict your chosen narrative. See below: YOU picked that place on the map, and it's ironically the place where the Russians are making the most progress. Anywhere else, and the "gains" are even more underwhelming. You cannot do the same to make your point, because what you're claiming is not real. Now, instead of rambling off another useless 5 paragraph essay, nut up and show us a place where the Russians are advancing kilometers per day, as you've claimed. Alternatively, you can save yourself some time and acknowledge that your misinformed on that.
  13. The obvious and public examples lends credibility to the ones behind closed doors. As you say, he's a circus clown that attacks people. He also has literally zero credibility, so it's fascinating to see people like you try to rationalize why you'd give him the benefit of the doubt. The endless parade of critics he has from his former inner circle should raise questions for a reasonable mind, but instead: I couldn't have said that better myself.
  14. You are not even a citizen, but a poor Russian mud-person, subject of a small, sad, murderous little clown: Comrade, you need to work harder. You are not convincing anyone. You are not worth the potatoes the apparatchiks are paying you.
  15. The whole point of a debate is to read what the other person is saying, and respond to that. You're not doing that. You're just full-quoting me and repeating yourself, without even acknowledging my arguments about your (IMO) poor reasoning. As as an example of your bad conclusions, just refer to anything regarding these maps and the near-zero progress the Russians are making. You're definitely not reading these right. Here's an example of "recent gains" in the last 24 hours. They barely ever show up on these maps, because they're hard to confirm in that short a time span. As for Chasiv Yar, the place where Russia is concentrating hardest, here is the ACTUAL progress Russia is making, according to YOUR SOURCE. In 65 days, the Russians have moved forward 2.7km. That's 41m a day, and this is where Russia is advancing the fastest, and concentrating the hardest. Sad Vlad is throwing away 1000+ of his worthless donkey soldiers daily, so the Russian army can advance the distance I walk to go have a beer across the street on my neighbor's porch. At this pace, it will be two years before Russia reaches Kramatorsk, the closest city of any importance, and they'll lose over 600,000 more soldiers (4x the population of Kramatorsk itself). "Advancing is advancing" is utter bullshit, and I think you know that. I've said it multiple times before, and you've ignored it over and over, but Russia runs out of manpower and equipment long before Ukraine runs out of land at this rate - and this is with US aid delays.
  16. They're meters per day. I offered to review those maps with you and show you, because you keep referring to them but can't seem to read them properly.... Unsurprisingly, you ignored my offer, just like you avoided any of the other points I made. 🤷‍♂️
  17. Sure. I'm just telling you that you're not going to get any intelligent responses from him. He's literally a paid Russian troll, and he's been caught before copypasting the same garbage on other Western country's forums. "Something something, Anglo-Khazarian Nazi something something..." You can tell when he posts here that he's just copypasting trollfarm content, just because of the format of the text he uses. Athos buddy, you need to work harder. Mother Russia is disappointed in your feeble efforts.
  18. You are talking to a paid Russian troll farm employee.
  19. Your sources and the information they provide are not the problem. It's the conclusions that you draw from them. That's a pretty goofy thing to say when you're not even acknowledging the points I'm making. No it really didn't. The map you provided was an interactive present-day outline of the battlefront. That's it. It doesn't illustrate "recent gains". They do archive previous days' maps, however, so we can do that comparison for ourselves. I'll tell you what. Why don't you pick a point on that map, anywhere, and I'll go dig up the old ones from June so we can compare them side to side. How does that sound? Let's see how great you're doing backing up your posts with your sources....
  20. Once again you've uselessly dropped a wall of text repeating the same things you've already said a half dozen times, while somehow managing to avoid acknowledging even a single argument I made. Right...🙄 When Russia captures the outhouse on the corner of Yuri's farm at the cost of several hundred soldiers and numerous armored vehicles, it's totally worth it because "advancing is advancing". How are you even taking yourself seriously saying this sort of nonsense? What a freaking joke.
  21. and what about the will of the people in Russia? Nevermind, I forgot. Putin has 89% approval rating, everyone loves the special military operation, Russia's soldiers are super motivated and are happy their lives are wasted frivolously. The country is not driving itself even deeper into an accelerating demographic decline either. Everything is GREAT. 🙄
  22. You've already decided on a narrative, and you're going to ignore all evidence and reasoning that contradicts it. See: They're not. You've looked at the maps, and to see these "steady advances" (measured in meters) you have to zoom the map in to the point where you see individual houses. The best part is it's all being gained for the low low cost of 1200 dead and wounded a day. Russia runs out of manpower long before the Ukrainians do, and decades before the Ukrainians run out of land, at that rate. "Advancing is advancing" is a stupid thing say in that context, especially as former army, when you actually know better. If the Russian arty is doing its job, it wouldn't be suffering 10x the casualties despite firing 10x more shells than the Ukrainians, and they'd actually be advancing (more than a few feet per day). "but but but 80% of the Ukrainian casualties are caused by Russian artillery" is not a counterpoint. All that means is that Russians suck worse at everything else. Yes, that's the one thing that we agree on. Economically, NATO and the West can trickle tiny, barely noticeable fractions of their budgets towards Ukraine, and evidently that's enough to foil Russians, who are pouring ~30% of their GDP into it. Step up support just a little bit, and the Russians can't keep up. They'll go bankrupt, and you and I will never notice the money sent to Ukraine. THOSE are the economies of scale we're looking at here. Russia is a dirt poor shithole full of servile mud people. The only thing Russia has going for it is that it has more lives to throw away, and Sad Vlad's desperate propaganda efforts to make the situation seem hopeless to simple minds in the West (with you obliging him).
  23. You responded to my posts, not my points. Responding to my points requires you to actually acknowledge and address the specific things I'm saying, rather than full-quoting me and just repeating what you've already said. Your beliefs have no bearing on the debate, but do seem to taint your reasoning. The sources you've provided aren't necessarily false. It's the conclusions that you draw from them that's the problem.
  24. I'll have to take your word on that. Nobody knows skience better than you. 🙄
×
×
  • Create New...