Moonbox

The Charter and Constitution outline some rights. Statutes and Legislation outline others. It's the second part that you can't quote, because it's make-believe. 🤡

That sure is some articulate criticism you have there. 😐

You dropped a link, but no quotes or references to what you're saying. More useless make-believe from our resident know-nothing. 🤡🤡

The question remains, what is it about this that you find so outrageous? Not much of an answer I'm afraid. If you were actually concerned about the behavior rather than just the partisan angle, you'd have also brought up shameless Putin-shill and authoritarian Viktor Orban, who's "attacked" the Biden administration, openly endorsed Trump (who subsequently lavished him with farcical praise during the last Debate) and who wined and dined him at Mar-a-Lago. The "visuals" for that don't look so hot either. I think you may actually believe what you're saying, but it's just blind partisanship. The whole reason for remaining neutral regarding foreign elections is to not pre-emptively antagonize the other side (who may end up winning). If JD Vance hadn't spent the last year undermining the Ukrainian war effort and making it clear he'd throw them under the bus, Zelensky would have nothing to say about him. Had Zelensky spoken out against the Democrats, we'd not hear a peep out of you over it. What bothers you about this is the angle.

The right of landlords spelled out in Provincial Statute. A 5+ page tantrum and a bunch of useless ranting doesn't magically reorganize reality and the Law to save you from this shockingly stupid claim. Here's a refresher for you below: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/06r17/v8 Residential Tenancies Act of Ontario: Purposes of Act 1. The purposes of this Act are to provide protection for residential tenants from unlawful rent increases and unlawful evictions, to establish a framework for the regulation of residential rents, to balance the rights and responsibilities of residential landlords and tenants and to provide for the adjudication of disputes and for other processes to informally resolve disputes. 2006, c. 17, s. 1. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Who cares? You're drawing petty, irrelevant distinctions that only matter because it goes against your tribe. It's outrageous that a wartime leader from a nation under attack and whose enemy is trying to kill him is being transported in a military plane? Really??? Not ignored - dismissed as hypocritical, partisan commentary. You're ignoring that Vance has been actively undermining Zelensky and Ukraine vs Russia - something you've argue against on this forum yourself. It's not okay for Zelensky to respond? Or is just not okay for him to respond in...Pennsylvania? Is peddling deranged nonsense like Haitians kidnapping pets and cooking them not...radical?

People are voting for that Orange Baboon, not the Republican Party. It's nothing but sycophants and weaklings now, and most of them can't get re-elected if they speak out against him. Look at how they scramble and cope with all of the batshit things he says, desperately trying to reconcile it with reality somehow. "Okay, they weren't literally kidnapping and eating pets, but Trump was rightly pointing out the immigration crisis in Springfield..." 🙄

The GOP invites Netanyahu, he delivers a clearly partisan speech, dines at Mar-a-Lago with Trump, and this is OKAY. Viktor Orban attacks Biden and his administration, pals up with Putin, hangs out with Trump at Mar-a-Lago and endorses Trump, this is also OKAY. Zelensky gives an interview where he says Vance (who's been arguing for some time that Ukraine should roll over and make concessions to Putin, and who's also been claiming Haitians are kidnapping and eating pets) is too radical...and this is NOT OKAY. Interesting logic there mister. The line in the sand is...what? That it was Pennsylvania?

Miami's quarterback has a brain injury, their backup's name is Skylar (he also got injured), and so they're playing with a dude who wasn't even better than...a Skylar! As for CFL scores, I'm willing to believe they're not low scoring. I'm pulling from years-old memory and my utter lack of interest in the League doesn't make me much of an authority on what it's up to today. 😆

No, there isn't. There may be a video of a grill with meat on it, and some clowns calling it cat, but that's it. A guy carrying roadkill off the street...that's evidence of cats and dogs being kidnapped and eaten? LOL What evidence? People saying goofy shit online is evidence now? Oookay.

Maybe, but you had the Republican Nominee raving about Haitian illegals kidnapping pets and eating them during a televised debate, which is every bit as ridiculous. Those living under Trump's reality distortion umbrella (numbering far more than the .001%) believe it because he said so, or because they saw a video on Twitter, but the more reasonable among Republican voters are left having to cope with the cognitive dissonance of their candidate regularly saying batshit nonsense.

You're saying it's not??? The whole system is compromised. The courts, the media, the FBI, the administration...all run by lizards.

My guess is it would be really easy for CRA to investigate their own employees on this because they already have the information at their fingertips. As for the rest of the federal public sector...well...the Liberals really need those votes. 😑

Your audience is yourself, and nobody else...so I guess you're right in a way. 🤡

If you're saying categorically retarded things, that's the best response you're going to get. You're literally too stupid to debate with.

Yap yap yap yap yap. 🙄

Oh you sweet innocent child. This is way too smart and complex for the person you're responding to.

So...let's get this straight: You felt compelled to rehash a previous discussion in which at least three people laughed you out of the conversation, but I'm the one who just can't help myself. I need to admit that I'm wrong, because...you quoted the Kazakh Prime Minister? Or because you said so? 🙄 That's some funny shit man.

Like so much of the rest of your useless natter, insisting on something doesn't make it true. 🤡

You can make up whatever dumb nonsense you like, everyone can see it's coping after you made yourself look like an assclown. How many threads can you get laughed out of today, do you figure? More than yesterday, or less? It'll be entertaining regardless!

Have a couple more conversations with the guy. You'll figure it out pretty quick. 😆

You're not the first person to tell him that, or even the 10th, and you won't be the last.

I have to say, I've come to appreciate your posts more and more over the last year, even if I frequently disagreed with you. Whatever your positions are, they're at least very clearly your own. You're not just another ignorant opinion shouter regurgitating tribal mantra. I always get a laugh out of the geniuses who've never opened an economic textbook try to teach us about trickle-down economics, and how sheltering the wealth and reducing the taxes of the ultra-rich who are exporting their jobs to Bangladesh is good for them.

It said nothing about missiles whatsoever. Once again, you're just making up what you want your sources to say. Regardless, you're unironically citing the Kazakh Prime Minister proclaiming Russia's military as invincible, while it faceplants in Ukraine. 🤣 You haven't shown squat. Dumping dozens of useless/irrelevant news articles doesn't somehow re-organize reality and re-draw the maps for you. Even on the hottest part of the front, Russian progress is measured in meters per day. At no point over the last two years have they managed any sort of sustained progress beyond that, and what little there has been has been highly local. At Russia's current rates of advance, they'll complete their conquest of Ukraine in around 1000 years. That's the math, and it doesn't give a shit about your snowflake opinion. You complained I wasn't reading your longwinded rants. I told you why. If you're too lazy to organize your thoughts and write concisely, you're wasting nobody's time but your own. Barfing out cites that don't say what you pretend they do is similarly worthless. I always get a chuckle out of this sort of clueless whine-post though. You're complaining that I argue to the death while you...argue to the death. It's kind of like crying like a child about marshmallow insults after you just finished calling another poster retarded. Look at the mirror and grow up.

Yes, we both know the truth. You've said some utterly ridiculous, easily-disproven things and fully humiliated yourself...again. All that's left now is your flailing and pitiful attempts to re-arrange reality to try and save face. It's all there, in black and white. Your coping mechanism doesn't require much of a response. 🤡