Moonbox

We did read it. That's how we know it doesn't say what you said it did. I'm not sure if you're actually that dishonest, or if you're just too drunk on your own Kool-Aid that you can't post a citation without confusing yourself and getting it wrong. Either way, it's uncanny how consistently you're misrepresenting your sources and citations. If making sure you have zero credibility was your goal, well done.

HOW TO ENSURE NOBODY READS YOUR POSTS OR PAYS ATTENTION TO YOU, 101 -David Jeffry Spetch 01/29/2025

This is pretty standard fare for the guy at this point. There's obviously something to the story - something even to be annoyed or angry about, but the consistency with which the guy misrepresents (or misunderstands?) the sources he quotes is astounding.

I think it's funny how one little reaction was enough to send you spiraling into your boiler-plate tantrum, complete with gratuitous re-imaginings of past debates you clowned yourself in. 🤣👍

I think he's referring to a topic I wrote back in late 2022, outlining why the Russian army faceplanted so hard, and predicting Putin's downfall. The fact that Russia's invasion was already a miserable failure even back then was lost to him, as it is now. The one thing I was definitely wrong about was how brainless and futile the average Russian citizen is, and how long they'd die for a criminal who cares nothing for lives.

I must admit that I've had little faith that Trump will be supportive of Ukraine and won't throw them under the bus. I'm tentatively optimistic by his threats of additional sanctions...

Yep, that's what they decided to do. That's what the article you linked said... Oh wait...🙄

Reading your attempts at original thought are good entertainment. More conspiracy clown word-salad please. You haven't said anything about George Soros yet. I think there's room to fit it in. 🤣

Gee, you change the subject a lot - seems to coincide with you making a clown out of yourself. Still waiting for Odessa to fall...any day now...right!? 🤡🤡🤡

You thought the video was relevant, but didn't care to tell us why. Okay buddy- boy 👍 No, I'm just recalling how you argued (at length) that getting people to eat bugs and own nothing was their platform. I can pull up that quote if we need it as well. Regardless, for someone who doesn't care about the WEF either way, you sure have a lot to say about it. 🙄

Referencing Russian GDP "growth" as evidence of the strength of its economy is exceptionally (but on-brand) stupid considering it's all being achieved via state-funded military spending. The Russian trash they produced for the battlefield in 2024 counted for their GDP, but all they have to show for it now is a bunch of shrapnel and wreckage in Ukraine, and a whole lot of debt and inflation at home. 🤡🤡🤡

I guess my point is that it doesn't seem like you had one when you dropped another irrelevant video link with no commentary. I watched it, and the only interesting thing that struck me was that it was straight out of Davos/WEF, which was funny coming from a guy who's argued they're trying to make us eat bugs.

Rebuffed, because Putin is a criminal dictator who terrorizes and murders his own people, invades his neighbors and stands against most European values. Shocking. Russia is in the process of floundering further and further into isolated, failing obscurity. Are they in Odessa yet? 🤡🤡🤡

It's too bad for you that we don't all have goldfish memories and can't quickly and easily find examples of you ranting against the WEF with uninformed conspiracy garbage. It makes it more memorable, and thus very easy to find, when you mistake Klaus Schwab for George Soros in your super-well-informed and regurgitated conspiracy rant and you dig your heels in over it even after being corrected. But sure...sometime over the last couple years you went from them apparently wanting us to eat bugs to not caring about them one way or the other. Okay buddy boy.

Nope, I just thought it was weird seeing you quote WEF attendees how awful the group apparently is.

You do realize you're quoting a video from the WEF, right? 😑

Doesn't know, and also doesn't care to know. Whatever the orange blob says is true.

Tell us that you don't understand how the economy and how tariffs work without actually telling us. 🙄

None of those MPs deserve to keep their seats. I highly respect Mark Carney and under normal circumstances I'd probably consider voting for him, but not while the chucklef*cks that enabled Trudeau and clucked and nodded at every dumb thing he said/did for 10 years are still pretending they have something of value to offer the country. I think it was a really poor decision for him to run for the Leadership. The only reason I can think of is that he wants to be there for the 2029 election.

Not just a paper-tiger - a complete shit hole led by criminal thugs and populated by servile donkey-people. The incompetence of Russian military leadership is only matched by the dispirited futility of the Russian thrall-soldier. We haven't seen military ineptitude like this since Gadhafi tried to invade Chad, with his soviet tanks beaten off by pickup trucks.

He says, immediately after parroting: Tell us again about how I'm chasing after you, the omnipresent stink that hangs around every thread and cannot be avoided. 🤡🤡🤡

That's the best part of this circus-act you perform in your mind. Not only do the citations that prove you wrong somehow (magically) prove your point after a bunch of useless wailing and carrying on, said wailing and carrying on also somehow (magically) proves the other person is having a tantrum! 🤣👍

He doesn't have to do much of anything. He just has to make a show of it and say he did. The detachment from reality with MAGA voters is fascinating. Even when they know what he's saying is absurd/wrong/awful, they just sort of mentally discard it. Like Build-A-Bear, Trump is a different person to every MAGA voter. You take the parts you LIKE, and you pretend the parts you DON'T LIKE were just jokes and don't include them in your version of TrumpyBear.

I was on a video call with a rating agency's chief economist last Monday (a Texan), and he said they were giving long odds that Trump will actually follow through with much of the dumb shit he said he'd do. They were giving 10% probability at blanket across-the-board tariffs, as these would immediately boost inflation and anger voters while providing next to no benefit to the economy, but the big tariffs on China are a lot more likely (with a lot more rationale behind them). The one thing the US system has going for it is the midterms, and the House isn't going to go along with some of the more useless and self-destructive stupidity Trump is inclined to chase.

The only thing more simple is Wastecanman's reasoning skills. I don't have many people on ignore on this forum, but he was the first - the harbinger of the clown parade that invaded this forum over the last decade.