-
Posts
11,372 -
Joined
-
Days Won
17
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Moonlight Graham
-
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Read carefully: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot Yes we know you and your alter-ego Five of Swords are super racist Nazi lovers. -
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Because I just liked them. My parents couldn't care less what I played with. No because he's German and he acts like a dictator. -
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Trump is German. He's a dictator. That makes him literally a German dictator. I'm a Canadian. -
33% approval rating. https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/approval-trudeaus-performance-just-33-canadians-call-parliament-focus-cost-living I voted for him in 2015 to get rid of Harper who was turning into a goon, but definitely not since. He's been a lot worse than Harper as a goon and almost every other aspect.
-
Trudeau and his PMO behave like absolute goons and dictators. The Hill Times reports how Liberal MP's have been muzzled by the PMO and the the caucus chair from raising their concerns about Trudeau's leadership even behind closed door caucus meetings. Liberal MP said the MP's who spoke up to voice their concerns "should be applauded for their courage" (remember what happened to JWR and Jane Philpott?). And there's no formal leadership review process for the Liberal party. How do we have a democracy when there's such an obvious power hierarchy in our parties? Why do we have a PM more interested in personal power than the will of Canadians? https://www.hilltimes.com/story/2024/10/23/b-c-liberal-mp-weiler-read-a-letter-to-trudeau-and-caucus-on-behalf-of-dissenting-mps-calling-for-the-prime-ministers-resignation/439119/
-
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
But we're not androgynous at birth. I didn't enjoy playing with toy guns as a kid because social constructs made me. I didn't have a deep secret desire to play with Barbie's. He's quite literally a German dictator. Anyone who supports him at this point is a dictator-lover, hates democracy, and has been conned by a conman. Congrats. -
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
All 3 are an embarrassment. -
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
People can agree or disagree on whether they support these efforts or not, but the left has objectively made women more masculine and men more feminine over the last 60 years or so. Some mentally retarded feminists believe human nature is androgynous and feminine and masculine are complete social constructs. That's retarded. -
Have Democrats Given Up on Men?
Moonlight Graham replied to Deluge's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
They said the same thing on CNN or MSNBC last night (can't remember which), it doesn't really make any sense. I have no issues with a female POTUS or PM, but I don't really understand the "girl power" for Harris, she was a diversity hire as VP and then was gifted the nomination. Is it much of an achievement if something is gifted to you? Obama earned it. Hillary rode her hubby's name but was still won the primaries on popular ballot. -
The UN Partition Plan was never implemented. Why would any Arab Palestinians have needed to move anyways? It was a border plan, not a forced relocation plan.
-
I don't understand how you both want to reconcile the conquest of first nations several centuries ago with you also ignoring all land claims of Jews in Israel/Palestine. You seem to be doing the hypocrisy you accuse others of doing. I think first nations have claims here for land and so do non-Indigenous people, same with Arabs and Jews in the Holy Land. Then of course you change the goalposts and conveniently pick what "living memory" means, generations of trauma or whatnot, as if European Jews didn't have that. Would you have any problem with caucasian Canadians being kicked off certain pieces of indigenous land after a land claim went through? With maybe some compensation? A lot of progressives and NDP types would be ok with that. The UN Partition Plan didn't "violently and inhumanly" displace anyone. The violence came when Arabs broke the law and violently rioted and Arab foreign armies broke international law by attacking Israel upon declaring themselves a state. Then Israel broke the law by taking more land than was promised to them while defending those attacks. The Arabs and Palestinians ignored "jurisprudence" and tried to go by "might equals right". They set those rules and lost, then Israel went by the rules the Arabs wanted to go by and took more land by might. What Israel did wasn't legal or arguably just, but the Arabs and Palestinians don't get to cry about them breaking international law when they themselves refuse to abide by them. Them complaining in the UN about things like genocide and war crimes is also a joke. The Palestinians are lucky that Israel is civilized enough not to completely destroy Gaza etc. because they sure would bomb every Jew off the map if they had the power Israel had. The Jews want about half the portion of a small sliver of land of their indigenous territory and the Muslim Arabs get most of where they always lived plus have the rest of the middle east to live in. My ancestors moved from another continent to Canada and "got over it", the Palestinians can too as long as they're justly compensated.
-
These are red herrings. You stated we should keep to living memory. Your argument is that after the Arabs whose homes they left from the 1947-48 war are dead then Arabs don't have any more land/property claims in Israel proper and that indigenous people in Canada can't make land claims based on things that happened prior to "living memory" (with signed treaties being an exception?) Yes this is the argument you're making. No, international law via UN General Assembly vote created the 1947 UN Partition Plan as a compromise to the situation in British Mandate Palestine. Muslims there didn't like the decision so they started violence. After this started, a of couple of Zionist paramilitary groups also caused violence as you stated. I never stated that Zionists or Israel have always followed international law. But you only mention the times Israel and Zionist groups break the law and never seem to mentioned when Muslims do. The UN Partition Plan created a reasonable compromise and a 2-state solution and gave Muslim Arabs there tons of land including everything surrounding Jerusalem, but they still rejected it. Arab leadership were unwilling to accept any plan that resulted in Israeli state. Palestinians will never get this much land in any potential 2-state deal going forward. The public land in black was owned by the British via the mandate with most of it being arid desert and/or desert mountains/hills and therefore unused.
-
Israel/ Palestine has been fought over by different groups forever. Around 640 AD is when the Muslim empire conquered the area and more Jews fled.
-
Those arent goal posts that's just the fact of how long Muslims, Jews, and Christians have been fighting each other over the Holy Land. What you're saying is that in 30 years nobody can complain about their land being stolen. The indigenous people here as well. The tactic for Israel would just be to wait it out. The solution is a 2-state one as you've said, and obeying international law. The Arabs didn't accept that and attacked Israel, then Israel used that opportunity to take more than their legal share that was authorized for them.
-
1400 years and counting. Probably not going to get solved peacefully soon.
-
3rd world governments suck. They're run like the mafia. So we basically have very well- funded mobs running around the country killing and intimidating Canadians and funding or infiltrating politicians, parties, and governments. Trudeau booted the Indian reps when he was set to take the stand in the Hogue foreign interference inquiry. More cynical PR politics from the Liberals. Do they think Canadians are stupid?
-
Even evil rightwing governments that hate children and the poor like Alberta have dental and prescription drug coverage plans for low income and seniors. And dental is a provincial jurisdiction so the the feds can't "force" any provinces to do anything, they have to consent. https://www.albertadentalassociation.ca/for-the-public/dental-support-programs-for-albertans/ https://www.alberta.ca/drug-coverage-health-benefits