Moonlight Graham

The West Bank was controlled by Jordan and Gaza controlled by Egypt 75 years ago. Every Arab political entity including Palestinian leadership rejected the 2-state solution and its borders. Stop making up nonsense.

All it says is Hamas can play no part in it: https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/statements/2025/09/21/statement-prime-minister-carney-on-canada-recognition-state-palestine It also lies and says this isn't a reward for terrorism, which it obviously is.

I was curious so I clicked to view your reply. You're still on ignore, but your post was thoughtful so I'll reply. 1a. The issue is the basic math of it all. We have decades of trending reproduction/demographic numbers plus projections. Unless something very dramatic happens to reverse trends then it's clear that western civilization will cease to exist eventually. Am I a Nazi to not be thrilled about that, or sound the alarm? A Nazi is about racial superiority and domination, not mere existential subsistence which is a natural response for people of any society ever. 1b. Then is humanity doomed towards extinction? If any society survives, it's the ones that reject the culture and technology to the extent we've embraced them. Arab and African societies may inherit the earth based on the math, hard to say. 3. If you were to go to a party with many of your family and friends and while discussing women's rights you said that a woman's place was primarily in the home to raise children or that abortion was morally wrong, what would the reaction be? Many would be angry, many would call (or think) you a sexist, and guilt you into complying with their views. 4. I don't deny having morals. 5. We do have intellectual leadership. But is it any good? Are we led by the smartest and wisest, or the loudest who can scream in your ear to enforce compliance? The answer seems clear to me. 6. The debate here is really as you say, rights vs responsibilities. What do we value, and why? Having 2 children seems ideal and reasonable, but the biological laws of nature that govern the survival of every mammal species says it's not. Therein lies the rub. 7. The facts of the situation before us aren't wrong. Math doesn't lie. What people choose to value is up to them. But have they even heard the arguments, without the cries of "conspiracy theory!!". See how compliance is enforced through guilt and other methods? 8. Again, a conflict in values, and difficult choices to be made. 9. Maybe, who knows.

What if progressives hate themselves as much as conservatives hate immigrants? Not hate so much as "low valuation". The guilt and shame of being a white person telling a non-white person the word "no" is a powerful thing that shapes our society. The bleeding hearts don't like hurting people's feelings. But when do they care about their own?

"Earthling" is a submissive stance though. If your child comes home and says they cant celebrate Halloween at school anymore, you just lost some of your ability to practice your culture. Do you allow a guest into your home and allow them to change the colour of the drapes to better suit them? If you do it prevents arguments, but maybe you really liked those drapes... Nice guys, they always finish last. Aggressive people?...Arseholes. Being assertive is the reasonable compromise between the extremes. It's ok to stand up for yourself, but it won't make you as many friends because a lot of people don't like hearing the word "no". But were they really your friends in the first place? Sometimes there's more important things than being liked, and sometimes certain things are worth defending.

Statehood should be negotiated through peace talks. These did not occur. What guarantees does Canada have here? What conditions must be met and what if they're not? Canada has given up all of their leverage here for what exactly? More NDP votes?

No, it's silly to blame immigration for an issue that's self-inflicted. Progressive baby boomers like yourself have destroyed western civilization by embracing an ideology and reproductive technologies to an extreme level to the point of unsustainability, and guilting your peers and younger generations into embracing them as well, as if you ever had any idea what you were talking about. All the moralist hand-wringing won't save you from your historical legacy that will be studied for millennia because you all had the foresight of a gnat. It only took me a couple of decades to uncoil all the ideological propaganda and guilt-tripping i was subjected to since a very young age. You're an old man so you have no excuse. I don't have ideological loyalties, that's for children rooting for their favorite sports team, I'm loyal to the truth. There's no guilt-trip that can contain or control me if my loyalty is to facts and the truth. I'm a free man, I think and moralize for myself. Like a snail crawling along the edge of a straight razor. The horror, the horror! The left has been far more correct about climate change than conservatives since the left doesn't deny that science. However, according to your logic, it's just silly, reactionary and a little late in the day to be getting bent out of shape over something we've been aware of for decades. 🙂

Are you denying that immigrants are being brought in to replace older workers who have not given birth to enough children to replace themselves or grow the population? This isn't even a matter of debate. Is it politically incorrect to post facts the government itself would readily admit to?

Our society has come to a point where if you look at e.g. a TV show with 5 white cast members many recoil in horror at the racism of it all. Imagine recoiling in horror at a TV show with 5 Arab cast members in a country with a majority Arab population LOL. It's silly. Political correctness run amok.

It's not an invasion if they're welcomed. The question is who wants this many immigrants, besides businesses (who would logically want the maximum number possible to increase profits)? Demographic trends clearly show that western societies are trending towards extinction and are in need of immigration from non-western countries to replace them as their populations shrink. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's just basic math based on our reproduction rates. Banning or limiting immigration isn't even going to do anything other than delaying the inevitable. Westerners have decided they don't want enough children to sustain their societies and nothing will change until that changes.

It's not racist to protect your culture. Nobody wants immigrants to go to residential schools. Stop feeling guilty for defending your culture. You've been brainwashed to believe it's "racist" to do so. None of these societies where these people you mention come from would accommodate our culture or language if we moved there. They aren't Nazis and neither am I. If you stepped foot on an indigenous reserve you would do so with respect and would do anything they asked when you're on their turf to respect their culture and their practices, or leave. Are they racist Nazis? You'd do the same if you moved to another country like those of the ethnicities you mentioned. You do so because you hold their cultures with much more respect than you do your own. This is why your type of thinking is submissive, weak, guilt-ridden, and self-loathing. Do you think Canada or Britain or France or Italy etc have cultures less worthy to maintain and protect than India, China, Saudi Arabia, or anywhere else where non-caucasians live? Of course you do. You've internalized racism against your own race as less worthy and so have many others. And if you happen to not be a caucasian Canadian at all then wouldn't that make you a racist?

Multiculturalism has been a disaster in Canada for several centuries. Anglo vs French vs indigenous has caused many problems. Some cultures, like Germans, Italians etc, have been able to assimilate without many major issues, save some security concerns during WWI and WW2. Other cultures may not pose much of a problem for unity until they become political. For instance, it's a problem if you're voting for a political candidate because of their ethnicity.

I googled this quote, it doesn't seem to exist. Is it a paraphrase? Do you have a cite?

And that happens in red states more than blue states why? Black people are poor, they have no fathers and their homes are single-income, they overwhelmingly live in former slave states. they have access to guns and they shoot people when they commit crime. Do you think St Louis, Memphis, New Orleans, Detroit, Baltimore have the highest murder rates "because of Democrats"? LOL Go educate these people and they'll do much better. But Americans won't because their education system sucks and is very expensive. Americans are dumb, they want their guns and their student debt, so they get the society they deserve. Now go argue about it for another 50 years and see if anything changes.

This is all cringe and not worthy of a response.

You could get the reverse results if you do red state vs blue state. The most relevant thing i think is poverty rates, cost of living.

It's very possible Freeland and others were bounced because she in particular is bad for the brand. At the very least she needs to be seen and heard as little as possible and taking her out of cabinet does that. Let's remember that the Liberal Party isn't just Carney, it's some weird machine where unknown unelected people are getting in a room and discussing PR and governing strategy. Trudeau was too green and too unintelligent to make all the decisions that were made for him and Carney is even greener. The Democrats seem to function similarly. Anyways, the fewer Trudeau-era Ministers the better.

So you think Trump and PP's sh*t don't stink? I'm not interested in your p*ssing match. Sorry, i'm on team "ethical" and team "non-idi0t". There's a lot idiocy and corrupt nonsense and violence and whatever else to go around, and i'm going to call it out, it doesn't matter where it comes from. BLM riots, Jan 6 riots, "stop the steal", the mountains of BS that Trudeau pulled. I'm not hooking my wagon to any trash political party. I have my political leanings but i'm not supporting any of the crappy politicians or terrible parties in either country. Trash people defend trash behaviour, that's the long and short of it. When a politician does something undemocratic, that's your enemy. Don't excuse this oaf for censoring talk show hosts who criticize him and behaving like a 3rd world dictator. If Trump can't take criticism he's in the wrong job.

What does this have to do with anything? Lots of people on the left and right are unhinged in their partisan frothing at the mouth these days. It's wrong for the POTUS to be bullying media networks to cancel TV shows whose comedian hosts say things the POTUS doesn't like politically. It's completely insane. It's wrong if the Democrat did it, it's wrong if a GOP did it. You either believe in democracy or you don't. Democracy isn't a team sport. The Democrats and GOP are giant pieces of sh*t and people are busy arguing over which pile of manure smells less while defending their favoured manure pile even when "their party" smears poo all over America. Let's rise up against poo! @Michael Hardner is a diehard conservative.

Hey now the FCC pressures talk shows to get cancelled when a bad comedian says something the POTUS doesn't like. That's quite different than a Super Bowl nipple. But yeah keep defending the bullying goon. If they were concerned about "lies" then Trump's press conferences would have been cancelled a long time ago.

Quoted for truth. https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/brendan-carr-abc-fcc-jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-1236522406/

Well the White House didn't shoot Charlie Kirk (most likely) but they did have something to do with pressuring ABC to silence Kimmel: https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/brendan-carr-abc-fcc-jimmy-kimmel-charlie-kirk-1236522406/ https://www.npr.org/2025/08/25/nx-s1-5515480/fcc-abc-nbc-reviews More people should start taking sides based on what's right vs wrong rather than which party or their followers are involved.

Does the left have any thought leaders (who aren't politicians)? I couldn't really think of any. Is anybody allowed to think independently on the left, or are they all just required to comply to the hivemind or else get cancelled? I suspect the thought leaders are university profs and student activists and the compliance is spread from there.

However she works for this government it shouldn't be in front of a microphone since her speaking skills are terrible, so this is good.

Well: https://www.businessinsider.com/geraldo-rivera-to-charlie-kirk-stop-denying-trump-loss-2020-12 And he organized the sending of 80 busses full of Trump supporters to the Capitol on Jan 6 and was subpoenaed by the Jan 6 committee for it, where he exercised his 5th amendment right: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33r4kjez6no He also led a "stop the steal" rally.