impartialobserver

Sus.. is just a cowards way of making an accusation but putting in some wiggle room. To show some integrity.. you would say, "because I have absolutely no evidence to connect the two, going to leave it at that"

one can fake a notary. Not saying it is fake but one can do it. Only way that I would believe this is if I had the document in my hand. Just seeing it on the internet does not pass the sniff test.

Maybe you should venture away from here. I am talking about political chat forums and discussions in general. I can agree with someone in general but call them out for not being objective/empirical enough.

I am not going to have this pointless debate. In general (not just this forum), I find that both sides have folks who throw out opinions like this and have no evidence. They rely on you simply believing them and when you don't immediately.. the attacks start.

In this case, there is no source and no evidence of any kind. But folks believe what they want to believe.. regardless of there being any evidence (video, audio, documentation).

Saying that Harris is connected to the crimes of the Sean Combs is well.. braindead. This is one reason why folks have lost faith in politics. The partisan supporters have such a lack of intellect that they can't be taken seriously.

Back to the topic, The kids of today are exposed to such a greater volume of information than those of gen x or earlier. I know that some will say that it is due to inferior morals and other arbitrary nonsense. The internet, technology, and more comfortable lives in the West has made for different outcomes. We can sit on the sideline and say that they are just immoral, stupid, and blah, blah, blah but that is beyond simplistic.

I know that some will view this as "oh, he is for Kamala Harris" but as someone who deals with legal documents.. this has the feel of a hoax. Some obvious formatting errors.

Back to the topic.. This supposed foray into crypto is very light on details. Lots of speculation but not much that is concrete.

Folks have watched too much TV and have too wild of imaginations...

Your post is subjective and therefore expecting someone to see it the same way is simply not realistic.

Collect/Harvest votes = voter fraud. Very hard to prove. I have laid it out in other threads how you would do this and not rely on probabilities and subjectivity. To prove this.. you have to have every single ballot and connect it back to the voter. Not as easy as you think. I have worked cases in unemployment insurance where we go through every single claim... 65,000 of them and verify every single detail (name, address, ssn, ein, wages, taxes paid) and it took 2 years.. Millions of votes, this would be a monstrous undertaking.

Hmmm.. expecting a civilized discussion when you start with this ^^^^. I know what your response will be. In short.. because person xyz (myself in this case) does not see it in the same way, they are ignorant, has their head in the sand, and is lacking intelligence. Unsolicited advice.. if you want someone to actually engage in a conversation, you have to move beyond this. I get it.. you do not like Trump. Neither do I.

True. Nothing more American than ceaseless whining and complaining. The day after the election... I will bet a small sum that one or all of the following words/phrases pops up 1. impeachment 2. Voter fraud 3. Russians 4. recount.

48 more days and then we get to whine/complain about something else.

Been on an old school punk rock binge

Yeah... this is one of the example of Trump's verbal diarrhea. If he had bothered to think this through, do some research, etc.. then he would not be looking dumb. This is the primary reason that I can't respect him.

You are expecting a lot. The new American way is to fire away and have strong opinions and if you actually know the full story.. is unimportant. Anyways, back to the topic. Trump's crypto business seems to be in the "idea" stage so not much really to say.

Alan Dershowitz, the constitutional scholar known for his pro-Israel advocacy, said he was concerned about whether Hayes would be treated fairly. “They rushed to judgement against the man who was the victim of the assault and they didn’t charge the other man,” said Dershowitz, who noted that he has not been asked to take a role in the case. “They should have charged him immediately. Self-defense is complicated but assault is not.”

Just some casual internet searching and its unclear (at least to me) what he exactly has in mind. Hence, why it helps to wait a day or two before firing away.

Impeachment... I would think that folks would tire of this but I know that they never will. Nothing more American than the lust for faux outrage and ceaseless whining.

Ryan routh.. from what I have read is not someone that fits nice and neatly in one political box. His mental stability is definitely in question though. As to any conspiracy theories.. nothing yet even comes close to proving any of them.

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/looking-cash-trump-launches-new-family-crypto-project-rcna171431

A bit oversensitive, are we.. thousands of internet forums, millions of contributors. This is just one of them and 20 out of millions is miniscule.

Not sure. If someone was to successfully kill DJT.. it would be a sad day. I have no respect for the man but always thought that America was above political violence. Lets hope that this is the last assassination attempt