-
Posts
41,510 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
351
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CdnFox
-
It's true. But in practical terms you increase the level of difficulty to get a pipeline through by an order of magnitude if you don't have support from the provinces and the people that is passing through. Now I think most British Columbians actually do support the idea of a pipeline. Polling suggests i'm right. But the government can't support it because their voters will freak out. And first nations currently aren't supporting it for whatever reason And the way that the government is going about it seems deliberately intending to inflame both of those parties. Nothing makes the first nations more angry than being left out of discussions and Eby Already has that whole "Last kid pics for the team every time" Thing going on and is going to be furious that he's being considered to be irrelevant. On top of potentially losing his job if his base backs out on him. My suspicion is carney is going to negotiate a deal but it will be done in such a way that if resistance is met in British Columbia it will be unlikely to proceed forward. By the time smith truly realizes she's being played carney will have moved on
-
Sure that's pretty much the same thing ππππ It's Sunday. You're supposed to stop with the NyQuil by this point.
-
You guys are amateurs. That's becoming daily headline in Canada, and often the career criminal doing the offense was caught earlier in the day and released only to reoffend that afternoon Many of these guys have 22 prior arrests since January, you're going back to 2016. I would certainly feel a lot worse for you if we hadn't already been numbed to the whole concept by our insane liberal system here
-
Meme/Cartoon of the Day
CdnFox replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
-
It is absolutely insanely hilarious that has their final last-ditch attempts the liberal supporters are attempting to suggest that all of the problems that Canada face are because the conservatives pointed it out. Like, if we had just kept our mouths shut none of this terrible stuff that is a direct result of liberal policy would be happening. The sad reality is there's not a lot of good things to point to when it comes to Canada right now. The liberals have essentially eroded almost every aspect of our society be it economic, food security, housing security, Down to even how close we are as a nation. It is a sad truth that trump did more for Canadian Unity than the liberals have in the last 11 years, and even that only lasted briefly. But of course, none of that would be true if I hadn't just mentioned it. It's all my fault because I brought it up, otherwise we'd be fine
-
Pedo said his friend was also a pedo
CdnFox replied to TreeBeard's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You're foaming kiddo Oh look, a leftie who's losing an argument is having weird sexual fantasies and references again. πππ Shocked! Shocked i am! Sigh. It's like the moment you realize you can't make an intelligent argument you regress to grade 4. -
Trump knew about Epstein sexual abuse
CdnFox replied to Barquentine's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
so you can't answer the question and you realize you look like a twat, and you're very angry about it and you want it to be my fault. Gotcha. And I rarely trash Canada, and trashing the current government means you love Canada, people that don't love Canada think the current government is doing great. Remind me, what was your opinion about the current government again? As a matter of fact I don't always defend trump at all, and have drawn fire from some of the people here who are stronger trump supporters for my criticisms. I frequently point out things about him that I think are bad or terrible. I constantly point out the fact that he lies a lot. I have been very critical of this tariff policies and not just because Canada is on the receiving end but for the reasons that ronald Reagan would have been critical of them. I have frequently noted that I am not necessarily a trump supporter, I just think he was better than the other choices. So what you're doing now is lying and attempting to cast me in a light that allows you to dehumanize me and not actually address the issues I raised. This is what the weak minded do. This is what zealots do when they're following their cult of choice. You have closed your mind and stopped thinking and you're trying to come up with a defense for that. "I DON'T HAVE TO THINK FOR MYSELF BECAUSE CdnFOX IS A POOPY HEAD!!!!" Honestly. I'll be staying here and quite frankly you and the rest of your ilk are doing horribly. The country is a disaster economically, crime is through the roof, and divisions have split our country apart. You're fiddling while Rome Burns. I'm organizing the fire brigade. Wait till you see what happens when we eventually get in, because one thing history shows for sure is the longer you delay that kind of thing in the longer you continue with the kind of left wing corruption and harm the more viciously the pendulum swings to the right when it swings Ask the Americans -
He had nothing to do with it. He was told this is what we want to do and what we're doing, he said sure Again no matter who was prime minister the same thing would have happened at the same moment. Nice try kiddo
-
Is Quebec Becoming The New Evil Empire?
CdnFox replied to Zeitgeist's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
LOL ahh yes your usual freak out when you realize the left is doing something stupid They're banning religion outdoors, no mention of berets -
OOOooopse - i broke him again. He's stuck in repeat mode That's his OTHER way of admitting he lost So what's the plan big guy, just spam the channel looking like a tard with some cheezy gifs you spent a half hour finding and then insisting you just don't care about how people feel about you? ROFLMAO!!!!!!! Amusingly that commercial was for Life cereal, and just like Exflyer's life that bowl's gone soggy But he'll never get the joke, that commercial came out 4 decades before he did (he's probably desperately trying to google it now )
-
Pedo said his friend was also a pedo
CdnFox replied to TreeBeard's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Pedophilia is inappropriate sexual acts with children under the age of puberty (usually 12). The only reason you're using that term is because it sounds worse than the actual truth. And that means you are the one that's claiming what he actually did isn't that bad. You're so okay with it that you had to create a fake crime that he never did in order to make it sound as bad as you'd like it to be. Once again three beard is a hypocrite. I'm sure we're all shocked. We can pretty much hear you foaming at the mouth from here Well it's the weekend, I guess you've earned your NyQuil -
No, you would agree with that, but in reality i don't see it as being any worse than actually doing it and trying ot hide it. If anything it's worse that they did the same thing and covered it up. At least voters can hold trump accountable if they want, he's not pretending it didn't happen. Essentially what you're saying is that the crime isn't the doing of the thing, the crime is that he's admitting to doing the thing whereas others tried to hide the fact that they were doing the thing unsuccessfully It reminds me of the Spartans who used to teach their kids that it wasn't wrong to steal, it was wrong to get caught. Davis again because it is so critical and hopefully those of you on the left you still have some reasonable nature's to you will understand, once you decide it's ok for YOUR side to cross a line and go beyond what is acceptable, you give permission for the next guy to decide how and where HE"S going to cross the line, and HE will decide what is or isn't acceptable. And nobody is going to be interested in YOUR opinion at that point because you were the ones who decided to abandon the line in the first place (that would be the collective 'you' of course not you personally per se ) Democrats stood idly by while obama and Hillary conspired to create fake intelligence reports to go after their political rival with absolutely no real evidence and that was obvious from the beginning. Democrats stood idly by while their leaders arranged for what can only be called "designer" charges that had never ever been laid before to be brought against trump. The democrats cheered when prosecutors went after trump and his money for civil fraud where there was not a single person complaining and no actual fraud had taken place. The democrats were ecstatic about the idea of having a judge keep trump's name from the ballots in violation of the constitution. Now you don't get a say. If the democrats ever form power again then if their supporters are smart they will make sure the party understands That they need to reset things and they need to be the ones to say "WE will stop doing this, we will break the cycle and we are going to establish the rules again", and then live with it. But they can't expect to break the rules and then demand that the other side plays by them when it's their turn
-
Once you say it's acceptable at all, then you lose the ability to say to others where THEY should draw the line. And that's the problem. And i do remember the prosecutor in trump's case RUNNING on the idea that he would go after trump and saying so directly. So how is that different? And i remember kamala suggesting SHE would go after trump and would be good because 'she's used to dealing with criminals" etc. So nope. At this stage if you didn't raise a ruckas back then about those politicians doing it then you can't say boo now.
-
That dog don't hunt. Either it's wrong or it's not. And if you are willing to turn a blind eye to it when it's convenient under the excuse that it's only a LITTLE evil and corrupt, then you lose the right to complain if someone else sets the bar differently. The brazenness doesn't play into it. Either this kind of thing is okay or this kind of thing is wrong. The democrats established that this kind of thing is okay. The republicans are now taking that and running with it. If the democrats ever get back into power they can choose at that time to say what we did was wrong and we're going to change how things are done in the future and then get by in for that. But we're seeing again and again democrats trying to sell this idea where they're saying " All right maybe it was a little wrong when we did it, but don't you think we should stop now before you do it?" And everyone knows full well the democrats are going to do it again the moment they get back into power So a better choice is to just do the same things to them as they've been doing in spades. Perhaps they will come to the realization that there is a price for them doing these things and that if you want to live without these things then they have to give them up too
-
Absolute bulllcrap. Politics has played a role in the judicial system for ages in the us. It didn't "become corrupted" with trump. Remember when bill clinton ran across the tarmac to lynch's plane as she was deciding about charges to hillary clinton to 'talk about their grandchildren'? Bill Clinton, AG Loretta Lynch meet on tarmac in Phoenix - CBS News Once again the left likes to pretend that this is all terrible stuff that's never happened before but that's not the truth. There is ample evidence of democrat interference with the doj and the case of clinton, obama ordered the intelligence agencies to provide a false report about trump, etc etc. And once again when all that was happening the left was told "If you let this go and don't speak up it'll be used against you some day." Well today is someday it would seem.
-
Is Quebec Becoming The New Evil Empire?
CdnFox replied to Zeitgeist's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
Probably. but once you open the door to restrictions on religion like that it'll wind up getting used and abused against christians as well. I'm not terribly religious but i do think it's important to protect the rights of those who are. If you want to restrict large gatherings and such because they're disruptive that's one thing but then do that, don't tell people where they can and cannot pray -
No he didn't. I doubt he'd even heard of it. Staffers would have said "this is what we're doing btw' and he'd have said 'er ok'. THis is right up there with him creating an office to announce a bunch of major projects which were already happening regardless then trying to take credit for it He did nothing
