CdnFox

Whataboutism is your way of trying to dodge the role the dems have played in the current situation. Sorry kid, that isn't whataboutism. If you punch someone in the face, and they punch you back, and you try to pretend that the fact you punched first isn't relevant, you're simply being dishonest. Not to mention wildly stupid Trump has accomplished quite a bit. It may not be things you approve of but you can't say he hasn't done anything. And the hatred was started by the democrats. They're the ones who let the rhetoric get out of control early on. When you grow up and learn to face the truth and address the points that are raised to you like a man instead of running like a child behind trite buzzwords and dismissive pap, then we can talk about change.

Don't kid yourself. It'll be everybody. The 1% is always want to know what the other 1% are doing

Of course there was, and I am extremely comfortable with the truth. It tends to serve me well and allows me to crush little twats like you You're just bitter because you realize you put your foot in it and now you look stupid having done the very thing you were denying democrats and left Wingers like yourself do LOL it was pretty funny

If we're being 100% honest I don't see a big difference between that and trump 20 years ago other than he didn't have the ability to text at the time It really doesn't speak to a mental illness. He might be slightly narcissistic and possibly borderline sociopath but those are normal states for people to exist in as part of the spectrum of mental states. Arguably almost all of the presidents that have ever been fall into those categories to one degree or another. You simply cannot get to the very top of the food chain without being very driven, very convinced that you're the most important thing in the universe, and extremely competitive. As to whether or not he should be presidents, the people have said so and may I remind you that you back to guy who was actually suffering mental health issues long after it should have been apparent that he wasn't cognitively functioning at a reasonable level

That's not necessarily true. Well I generally agree with the sentiment the fact is people who are considering made are often doing so had a. Of extreme emotional distress in their life. They can be highly susceptible to the influence or persuasion of others at that time. If you take a veteran who has bad ptds And you can't sleep and is emotionally distressed and physically injured or ailing due to wounds he received years ago and you are telling him that you can't treat him and the government won't pay for it, And as he sits there emotionally crippled and unable to decide what to do in an unable to cope with his emotional state and the prospect of continued suffering and you say to him "By the way there is an option, have you considered maid? it might be for the best..." At that point you have significantly colored that person's thinking and they may not be necessarily making that decision on their own. I still believe in maid, but I do have concerns

oh don't think i don't empathize LOL Damn near missed one this morning. I remember a joke: Dr: " You appear to have gout" Patient: "What? I thought gout was only a rich man's disease!" Dr: " that used to be true, but credit cards solved that" I grew up with a shag carpet And i eat a lot of PBJ. and i AM a hunka hunka burning love... heyyyyyy wait a minute....

Arguably true, but I think we would both agree that there are some serious problems with that. There may be an opportunity the next time the democrats get in. Although to be honest with you the amount of work that would be required for both sides to make that happen is substantial and I think both sides would be resistant. Even if the leaders of the day realize that this is basically an exercise in mutually assured destruction and that the only way forward is for both sides to agree to changes that would disarm everybody, there will always be members on both sides who feel that they need to keep that weapon in their back pocket. The problem is that mentality tends to lead to a Downward spiral. Sooner or later one side uses it again and then the other feels justified in reciprocating and the other side reciprocates the next time and so on and so on. This kind of decline has been the death of many societies and empires over the years and I'm not sure I ever recall reading about one that managed to correct the problems once it had started seriously

In other words you're angry at the truth and can't refute it so you'll attack me instead kid, everything I said was completely true and easily observed. Want proof? Instead of actually addressing what I said you chose to try and dehumanize me by calling me a troll so that you didn't have to actually address the points I raised. Game set and match kid

LOL, sometimes you just gotta lean into it

You did and I wasn't the only person to call you on it. And I certainly wasn't the only time you suggested but that attack was justified. Ohh noooooeess, triggered leftie liar is triggered Sure, there are many, but here's one that was wrtten ONE YEAR AFTER what you quoted The Jews of Israel (1949) There is no problem of such overwhelming importance to us Jews as consolidating that which has been accomplished in Israel with amazing energy and an unequalled willingness for sacrifice. May the joy and admiration that fill us when we think of all that this small group of energetic and thoughtful people has achieved give us the strength to accept the great responsibility which the present situation has placed upon us. -Albert Einstein The fact is you took one small note and took it entirely out of context. Both before the creation of isreal and after he praised isreal and it's creation and the actions and the people involved. He regretted that the jews and arabs couldn't find a way to live in peace and he blamed the british for creating a hostile environment that put one against the other but he was pro isreal and did NOT believe that they had done anything wrong. You lose kid. You should learn to read more than just your echo chamber. Exactly. anyone who denies what einstein REALLY said instead of taking him out of context is exactly that person. And that would be you. You are, as always, a liar and a terrorist supporter. You should feel disgusted.

5% of all deaths in Canada, and I mean all deaths, we're from maid last year We've heard the stories of veterans being told to consider made rather than other treatments. I firmly believe people should have the right to die with dignity at their decision. But I do have to wonder sometimes if there isn't a problem

So you Freely admit you're trying to get people killed

It is 100% what you said. We were discussing the specific event and you said they were exercising their human rights to resist oppression with that attack. Those were literally your words, and not just once but few times when I came back and challenged you on that. We've been through that and we know that that's a lie. Fact of the matter is the only people that use that defense are people that are excited and happy about the idea of killing women and children in terrorist attacks to promote the group that they prefer. It's not real

The fact that you have nothing intelligent to say doesn't mean that others don't And I love that you're still too much of a coward to address me directly, as I said in another post I can at least respect moon box in that respect compared to you

Honestly I think he said it because he's not afraid to lie and he though it would help him get elected. There are ways that the government could massively stimulate huge increases in construction but unfortunately loaning money to developers is not one of them. That has not been their problem. That's true. Although if we're being fair part of the problem has been that municipalities and cities have become a little drunk on the money they make from Developers in the forms of fees and charges and those have grown substantially if not exponentially in some areas. But the feds could have done a lot more in recent years and matching immigration to housing starts should have been a no-brainer

You are horrifically mistaken. Currently as things stand in British Columbia about 55 to 60% of the cost of building a new home development for a contractor is in red tape and compliance issues No municipality has the right to red tape. Municipalities and cities do not exist in the constitution, only provinces and federal governments do. All lower forms of government derive their power from the provincial government itself and the provincial government can dictate whatever it likes. They absolutely do. I absolutely gave you a link to a story about the government building things I know reading isn't your forte but for god's sake it was an easy link And yes, Poilievre did quite a bit when he was minister under harper. And they built more homes then then are being built in Canada right now. And that was 15 years ago when we had a lower population. The government absolutely has the ability to impact how many homes are built and in fact that's something cardi has just set up a department to do but unfortunately it's failing. And anybody familiar with the industry could have told you that's what was going to happen. He's not addressing the right problems

It's not complicated. Control population growth to match growth in medical capacity. Introduce Private/public blended solutions such as those which have been wildly succcessful in france Restore full federal funding OR restore the collection of taxes for that purpose to the provinces. Done. Other places do this right. we do it wrong and it shows.

They didn't. That's just a lie that those who support the terrorist killing of innocent civilians and babies like to spout in order to justify they're completely immoral stance. There's no Tit for Tat. These guys are terrorist scum and you support them because you believe it's okay to kill women and children without warning in an act of terrorism. You have said so many times. It was their human right to do so you claimed.

Well first off that's absolutely false. Governments of all levels build housing all the time. One of many examples: BC Gov News In addition government set the stage for whether or not it is Affordable to build. Governments have a direct impact on whether or not developers are interested in building within an area or not. So governments do have the ability to directly influence where homes are built and how many homes are built. They don't just sit back and hope.

I posted facts and links... I made an argument and defended it with reason and logic. You jumped in and whined and cried like your diaper was full And this happens every single time you get your ass handed to you by me in a thread, you come on all the other threads and start acting like a buthurt loser. What a sad little life you must lead to have no better reason to come here than to stink up the place Oh but I'm sure that your failures in life are definitely due to my postcount. There's no doubt about that.

Ahhh and no link. What a surprise. Made it up did you? Here's a real search with links. Yes, data indicates that the share of consumer insolvency filings by women in Canada has been increasing, reaching its largest recorded percentage in recent years. While the total volume of consumer insolvencies fluctuates with economic conditions (total filings surged in 2024 to a 15-year high), the proportion of those insolvencies attributed to women has steadily grown over the past decade. women bankruptcy in canada increasing - Google Search Sorry kid. You're wrong again. No wonder you didn't want to post the link. Awww moonbox, is @Goddess making you angry with facts now too? LOL As usual you contribute nothing, you just show up to either attack me or defend the liberals, the latter in this case it would seem. Pathetic. Hey, how's those math lessons going?

I'll give you an A+ and a star for indifference to harm to children

As I said when they announced it it's an industry I know very well and they completely and utterly missed the point if their actual goal was to build more homes. And of the homes that do get built using the program most of them would have been built anyway and are simply saving some of their developer friends about load of money that taxpayers expense And there was absolutely no need to create yet another new bureaucracy for it when they already have three specifically dedicated to the same issues. The housing problem is not going away anytime soon. There is a correct answer but his was absolutely wrong

You're always lying either way But that was pretty clever

No problem old man