Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. I'lll say the same thing i say about trump.... if you didn't complain when the leftie loonies did it, you can't complain if someone does it back Harper played fair and stuck to the rules, this corruption and abuse of power is a liberal thing. You can't expect the other side to play fair if your side constantly breaks the rules. So you've had your fair warning whatever you guys do in power is fair game for the next guy. No whining or crying will be of any help.
  2. well i guess those guys should have tried peace instead of constantly choosing war. They were well on their way to in in 2014 till they decided to side with hamas. You can't be screaming "From the river to the sea" night and day, align with a group that kills over a thousand civilians, and then complain if people don't trust you and want to make sure you're not going to attack them. They should have disavowed hamas, and made peace with israel. They had that option. They chose conflict. Now they live with it. Oh well, you made your choice now you live with the consequences.
  3. The jewish animals that are hamas? Look.... we've talked about how much nyquil you're allowed in a day before.....
  4. Nope, it's no worse than obama and biden. You just THINK it's worse because you liked it when they did it but you don't like it when trump does. Sorry kiddo, you're hypocrisy won't save you now.
  5. Holy crap, this is REALLY bad Carney quietly gives sweeping new powers to his ministers Hidden in the federal government’s 634-page omnibus bill C-15, the Budget Implementation Act, is a measure that has so far escaped scrutiny. Under the pretext of regulatory efficiency, Prime Minister Mark Carney plans to grant cabinet ministers the power to exempt any individual or company from any federal law on the books — except for the Criminal Code — for up to six years. The measure wasn’t included in the version of the Liberals’ Nov. 4 budget that was given to reporters. He can literally say that ANY company or person is EXEMPT from any law other than criminal code violations. They can exempt a company from paying income tax. They can exempt a person from environmental regulation or licensing requirements or even labor code. This is INSANE. The house puts laws in place, and now any minister can just set that aside at a whim?
  6. Liberals look to criminalize faith, while allowing hate to fester | National Post Now i'm not particularly religious, but even I fully respect people's rights to their religion. this is intolerable. For now, no one in Canada can be found guilty of wilfully promoting hatred or antisemitism if they can show that, in good faith, they “expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text.” But should the Bloc get its way, that defence in the Criminal Code will be erased. So now you won't even be able to quote the bible if the bible passage is felt to be hate speech, which is so broadly defined that you can almost not aviod 'hate speech' if you have an opinion about damn near anything (that isn't pre authorized by the left). we are quickly becoming Britain
  7. My dad sold bradley his first warehouse, those are made in canada or at least used to be. We've had one for ages, tho i've stil got the older non digital one. Amazing machines once you dial them in. Also i've just got my annual December salmon in the creek, they'll be here till about new years. Little buggers woke me up last night thrashing around as they do. Now i just have to keep my old retired neighbour out of the creek with his net....
  8. That's not a quiver. That's his sippy cup.
  9. Nothing intelligent to add as usual. A couple of snide remarks and that's it. This is why you always have to pretend to be a pseudo intellectual Mike. Instead of a real one
  10. Maybe you think the animals are Jewish and they've got it coming?
  11. LOL wow kid, that's as solid as an admission of complete failure on your part as i've seen Show me where i compared trudeau to hilter Never happened. I said that claiming something about him would be as ridiculous as claiming something entirely different about hitler would be, i never said once that trudeau was like hitler obviously you know I was right and you couldn't argue it so you felt the need to lie like a cheap twat in order to come to the defense of your poor heroes honor! LOLOL How pathetic!!! I don't think it's me who needs the pills kiddo If you've got that level of delusion and fanatic devotion going on you need to camp out at the pharmacy
  12. Sorry but none of that is based in fact. Virtually all of that can be chalked up to delusions based on the fact you don't like trump . The very fact you would lie at the end and claim that you have no feelings with regards to trump when it is painfully obvious and Beyond any doubt from your writing that you in fact do have strong feelings about trump tells us everything we need to know The evidence isn't even remotely overwhelming that he's on Russia's side. The evidence is overwhelming that he wants the war stop so we can claim a Nobel Prize and that's about all the overwhelming evidence we have. The rest is just lies and delusion on your part. And no, the hookers aren't irrelevant. People just like you were saying that it was overwhelmingly evident that the hooker story was true. It wasn't. People like you say it was overwhelmingly obvious that trump colluded with the Russians during the election. We now know that wasn't true with certainty. People like you swore up and down the steel dossier was true, we know it was fabricated entirely If I had a dollar for every time somebody like you said there was overwhelming evidence for something that turned out to be false about trump I could pay for his next election campaign You are so deluded on the subject that you cannot have a rational conversation. Again this is why trump won. Leftists like yourself couldn't speak the truth to save their lives and really that's all you needed to do to win. They lied about Biden, then they spent the entire campaign giggling and lying about trump. They spent the year leading up to the campaign lying about trump. Not to mention lying about trump supporters Sorry but I just have no patience for this level of stupidity. There are a lot of negative things you can say about trump that are honest, I have no idea why you feel the need to make shit up. I guess you think he's not really that bad and if you don't lie about him he just won't look bad enough to other people. But what the hell does that say about you kiddo?
  13. Dude are you quoting yourself and replying to yourself? That's a little weird.
  14. You literally vote in favor of corruption every election. And you have said that elections don't matter and we shouldn't be thinking about them. You are 100% pro corruption if it's a party you like and you are pretending that you have anything to say on the matter. When you actually stand up against corruption once then you'll be allowed to talk about it
  15. Wow. You must really have thought he had a point to poop your panties THAT bad kiddo Next time try refuting points, it'll make you look a lot less silly and desperate. And if you can't.... well that tells you something about your views doesn't it.
  16. I think there are poor strategy. Reagan thought they were a poor strategy. There can be a handful of cases where it makes sense in very limited amounts but as you say wide scale deployment of them strikes me as bad idea. Obviously trump disagrees and we will have to see whether or not his strategy can pull out a win over time
  17. You have posted NOTHING that actually indicates that. In fact, i believe it to be a complete lie. And if you've got evidence to show that's wrong then you're hiding it well. We already know the numbers you posted were a lie. People don't die of aids in a few months, so it doesn't even make sense. If that was so tragic why aren't you spending all of your money donating to aids? The fact that you aren't suggests that even YOU believe that it's ok not to spend money you don't want to on other people's problems. Hypocrite. Your taxes go to run your country. And canada saw more canadians die waiting for care per capita than the us did. So why are you so eager to kill your own people in the name of pretending to save others who AREN"T our responsibility?
  18. Numbers lie all the time. There are lies, damned lies, and statistics And as i already pointed out, your numbers lie A LOT.
  19. Hogwash. There is no gov't department anywhere that we get the 'best equipment' that they want and there's a hell of a lot more lives on the line in some of those cases. 23,000 canadians died waiting for treatment last year alone. 23 thousand. In contrast, do you know how many soldiers we lost in combat in the last 10 years? Pretty much ZERO. So we don't give doctors everything they want because we can't afford it, but we're supposed to give the military the absolute best of the best because.... their lives are worth more or something? Don't think so. the military deserves to be well equipped and trained. That is true. But there are other considerations, including the politics of relying on the states which is a HORRIBLE idea as events have shown, the benefits of establishing military development relationships with others, the economic benefits involved and other practical considerations. And yes the military might not care about all of those, but that's why they don't get the final decision. It's very important that our leaders listen carefully to the experts from the military. And it's very important that both they and the military consider where the next threats are going to come from (and sorry but the politicians are actually even more up to speed on that than the military is, as wars are a political choice). But in the end the final decisions must take into account a wide range of factors including military, political, economic and future relationships. That's the way it is.
  20. LOL so are your diapers kiddo The conservatives did more for working families that the libs have and obviously that's got you pissed Now go ask your mommy for some talcum powder for that rash LOL
  21. Yes much speculation by people who hate trump. Or people who want to try and discredit trump. No sane person would hold those opinions to account without some species of evidence of which there isn't a scrap. Again it is reasonable that if he's trying to sell something to Putin he would write something that he thinks Putin would like. There's no conflict there there's no questionable Behavior. There's nothing out of the ordinary with that. Sure, just like trump was colluding with the Russians to win the election and got peed on by hookers in Moscow. Fool me once with that bullshit shame on you. Fool me twice.... There are several reasons why it's far-fetched. And all of the evidence shows that trump has never been a Russian asset. Again, why would you think that a peace plan that trump was going to try and sell to Russia would not include the things that he thinks Russia wants to have? And if it was drawn up by the Kremlin, why didn't they jump at it? They're currently saying it's not good enough and they're not interested. Your argument makes zero sense and you need to twist the facts to the point of ridiculousness to make it fit No, you only say that it's Putin because you don't like trump. There is zero evidence whatsoever that Russia was involved, and more importantly there is no need to include russia to explain any of it, this is what you would expect trump to produce if he wants to try and get a peace deal to win his peace prize. It's as silly as saying "Oh trump said something really nice about himself, it must be the Russians". You don't need Russians to get trump to say something nice about himself. And you don't need Russians to get him to put together a peace plan that he thinks the Russians will go for
  22. All government purchasing is a potentially political decision. Were you unaware of that? You seem to be suggesting that politics shouldn't play a role in political purchases?
  23. Did you actually read the source stuff? I'm guessing not. Those are not actual deaths. Those are potential deaths. The dashboard presents it as actual but if you look at the research that they specifically reference it is not the case. In addition the model that they are referencing makes three predictions depending on the percentage of population impacted and of course they've chosen the worst of the three models or possibilities Your numbers are 100% fake. They are guesstimates as to the possible maximum impact that could potentially have using a number of mathematical models. There isn't an indication that even one person actually died as a result of it. Which is I guess why I couldn't find what I was looking for, I was looking for actual deaths and there is nothing on that That would be my fault for taking you at your word. I should have guessed there was a trick to it So now that we know that your statistics are a lie, let's go back and deal with the concept Usaid is one source of income at these groups can rely on but if they can't get that then it is up to them to secure other means of funding. The united states has absolutely no moral or ethical or practical responsibility for these people. The USA is facing severe deficit. That severely impacts the life health and well-being of 400 million Americans. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to spend Americans money on Americans? Next time don't use fake numbers to try and make your argument
  24. All the policies I mentioned did And they were all conservative! Wah wah waaaaaaahhhh, you lose again kid How do you feel? You mad about it?
  25. LOL i suppose a teen might lay awake at night convincing himself he 'bested' someone that he didn't It would be a very teen thing to do As i've told you, there is no 'besting' for me, i'm not in competition with you. I just point and laugh at your antics You think you 'win' the same way a dog who manages to catch his own tail does
×
×
  • Create New...