CdnFox

LOL wow kid, that's as solid as an admission of complete failure on your part as i've seen Show me where i compared trudeau to hilter Never happened. I said that claiming something about him would be as ridiculous as claiming something entirely different about hitler would be, i never said once that trudeau was like hitler obviously you know I was right and you couldn't argue it so you felt the need to lie like a cheap twat in order to come to the defense of your poor heroes honor! LOLOL How pathetic!!! I don't think it's me who needs the pills kiddo If you've got that level of delusion and fanatic devotion going on you need to camp out at the pharmacy

Sorry but none of that is based in fact. Virtually all of that can be chalked up to delusions based on the fact you don't like trump . The very fact you would lie at the end and claim that you have no feelings with regards to trump when it is painfully obvious and Beyond any doubt from your writing that you in fact do have strong feelings about trump tells us everything we need to know The evidence isn't even remotely overwhelming that he's on Russia's side. The evidence is overwhelming that he wants the war stop so we can claim a Nobel Prize and that's about all the overwhelming evidence we have. The rest is just lies and delusion on your part. And no, the hookers aren't irrelevant. People just like you were saying that it was overwhelmingly evident that the hooker story was true. It wasn't. People like you say it was overwhelmingly obvious that trump colluded with the Russians during the election. We now know that wasn't true with certainty. People like you swore up and down the steel dossier was true, we know it was fabricated entirely If I had a dollar for every time somebody like you said there was overwhelming evidence for something that turned out to be false about trump I could pay for his next election campaign You are so deluded on the subject that you cannot have a rational conversation. Again this is why trump won. Leftists like yourself couldn't speak the truth to save their lives and really that's all you needed to do to win. They lied about Biden, then they spent the entire campaign giggling and lying about trump. They spent the year leading up to the campaign lying about trump. Not to mention lying about trump supporters Sorry but I just have no patience for this level of stupidity. There are a lot of negative things you can say about trump that are honest, I have no idea why you feel the need to make shit up. I guess you think he's not really that bad and if you don't lie about him he just won't look bad enough to other people. But what the hell does that say about you kiddo?

Dude are you quoting yourself and replying to yourself? That's a little weird.

You literally vote in favor of corruption every election. And you have said that elections don't matter and we shouldn't be thinking about them. You are 100% pro corruption if it's a party you like and you are pretending that you have anything to say on the matter. When you actually stand up against corruption once then you'll be allowed to talk about it

Wow. You must really have thought he had a point to poop your panties THAT bad kiddo Next time try refuting points, it'll make you look a lot less silly and desperate. And if you can't.... well that tells you something about your views doesn't it.

I think there are poor strategy. Reagan thought they were a poor strategy. There can be a handful of cases where it makes sense in very limited amounts but as you say wide scale deployment of them strikes me as bad idea. Obviously trump disagrees and we will have to see whether or not his strategy can pull out a win over time

You have posted NOTHING that actually indicates that. In fact, i believe it to be a complete lie. And if you've got evidence to show that's wrong then you're hiding it well. We already know the numbers you posted were a lie. People don't die of aids in a few months, so it doesn't even make sense. If that was so tragic why aren't you spending all of your money donating to aids? The fact that you aren't suggests that even YOU believe that it's ok not to spend money you don't want to on other people's problems. Hypocrite. Your taxes go to run your country. And canada saw more canadians die waiting for care per capita than the us did. So why are you so eager to kill your own people in the name of pretending to save others who AREN"T our responsibility?

Numbers lie all the time. There are lies, damned lies, and statistics And as i already pointed out, your numbers lie A LOT.

Hogwash. There is no gov't department anywhere that we get the 'best equipment' that they want and there's a hell of a lot more lives on the line in some of those cases. 23,000 canadians died waiting for treatment last year alone. 23 thousand. In contrast, do you know how many soldiers we lost in combat in the last 10 years? Pretty much ZERO. So we don't give doctors everything they want because we can't afford it, but we're supposed to give the military the absolute best of the best because.... their lives are worth more or something? Don't think so. the military deserves to be well equipped and trained. That is true. But there are other considerations, including the politics of relying on the states which is a HORRIBLE idea as events have shown, the benefits of establishing military development relationships with others, the economic benefits involved and other practical considerations. And yes the military might not care about all of those, but that's why they don't get the final decision. It's very important that our leaders listen carefully to the experts from the military. And it's very important that both they and the military consider where the next threats are going to come from (and sorry but the politicians are actually even more up to speed on that than the military is, as wars are a political choice). But in the end the final decisions must take into account a wide range of factors including military, political, economic and future relationships. That's the way it is.

LOL so are your diapers kiddo The conservatives did more for working families that the libs have and obviously that's got you pissed Now go ask your mommy for some talcum powder for that rash LOL

Yes much speculation by people who hate trump. Or people who want to try and discredit trump. No sane person would hold those opinions to account without some species of evidence of which there isn't a scrap. Again it is reasonable that if he's trying to sell something to Putin he would write something that he thinks Putin would like. There's no conflict there there's no questionable Behavior. There's nothing out of the ordinary with that. Sure, just like trump was colluding with the Russians to win the election and got peed on by hookers in Moscow. Fool me once with that bullshit shame on you. Fool me twice.... There are several reasons why it's far-fetched. And all of the evidence shows that trump has never been a Russian asset. Again, why would you think that a peace plan that trump was going to try and sell to Russia would not include the things that he thinks Russia wants to have? And if it was drawn up by the Kremlin, why didn't they jump at it? They're currently saying it's not good enough and they're not interested. Your argument makes zero sense and you need to twist the facts to the point of ridiculousness to make it fit No, you only say that it's Putin because you don't like trump. There is zero evidence whatsoever that Russia was involved, and more importantly there is no need to include russia to explain any of it, this is what you would expect trump to produce if he wants to try and get a peace deal to win his peace prize. It's as silly as saying "Oh trump said something really nice about himself, it must be the Russians". You don't need Russians to get trump to say something nice about himself. And you don't need Russians to get him to put together a peace plan that he thinks the Russians will go for

All government purchasing is a potentially political decision. Were you unaware of that? You seem to be suggesting that politics shouldn't play a role in political purchases?

Did you actually read the source stuff? I'm guessing not. Those are not actual deaths. Those are potential deaths. The dashboard presents it as actual but if you look at the research that they specifically reference it is not the case. In addition the model that they are referencing makes three predictions depending on the percentage of population impacted and of course they've chosen the worst of the three models or possibilities Your numbers are 100% fake. They are guesstimates as to the possible maximum impact that could potentially have using a number of mathematical models. There isn't an indication that even one person actually died as a result of it. Which is I guess why I couldn't find what I was looking for, I was looking for actual deaths and there is nothing on that That would be my fault for taking you at your word. I should have guessed there was a trick to it So now that we know that your statistics are a lie, let's go back and deal with the concept Usaid is one source of income at these groups can rely on but if they can't get that then it is up to them to secure other means of funding. The united states has absolutely no moral or ethical or practical responsibility for these people. The USA is facing severe deficit. That severely impacts the life health and well-being of 400 million Americans. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to spend Americans money on Americans? Next time don't use fake numbers to try and make your argument

All the policies I mentioned did And they were all conservative! Wah wah waaaaaaahhhh, you lose again kid How do you feel? You mad about it?

LOL i suppose a teen might lay awake at night convincing himself he 'bested' someone that he didn't It would be a very teen thing to do As i've told you, there is no 'besting' for me, i'm not in competition with you. I just point and laugh at your antics You think you 'win' the same way a dog who manages to catch his own tail does

He gets the money by sitting on the board of all of the companies he funneled public cash into while he was prime minister who are now paying him back for by putting him on the board and paying him hundreds of thousands of dollars each as a thank you each year. You get a hundred or so of those and now you're talking about real money

You're stretching a little too far there. If Trump Jr owns a company or a part of a company and that company gets direct benefit then it's a conflict of interest. But if he works for a company that invests in other companies then it is reasonable to assume that they are going to invest in companies that are successful at winning contracts. Even if it was a subsidiary you might have a point but if they're just investors of course they're going to invest in companies that do well and win contracts. They might invest in Lockheed Martin, that doesn't mean that trump has a conflict ordering f-35s Consider this, currently carney is issuing contracts that directly benefit Brooksfield which he has a major share stake in and will probably work for when he leaves politics and that isn't considered a conflict of interest. This is way less direct than that. So again I have to ask is the contract inappropriate? If the contract is a reasonable contract but things that are needed and are being delivered at a fair market price compared to other firms then there you go. Also you haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that the selection process for that contract had anything to do with trump or was in any way shape or form influenced by him. Or that he was even aware it was going on. No doubt, and I'm sure they used connections that he was able to provide in order to make sure that their contract bid was as successful as possible. But I guarantee you that they didn't just present that bid out of thin air, they would have been responding along with other companies to a specification and it would have been subject to a purchasing process. Virtually every company out there does hire lobbyists to try and help make contacts with the right people to pitch their product but that's not the same as corruption. You would have to show that somehow the purchasing process which was likely going on long before trump got elected took an unusual turn or that this contract wasn't appropriate Hunter Biden sold influence all over the world And the left said nothing. That was far more obvious than this There's little doubt in my mind that trump Jr will use contacts in order to Lobby on behalf of people that he sells his services too, just like dozens and dozens of other influencer and lobbyists. A lot of the time it's about knowing who to call, and just having that name and number is critical. But that's not the same as selling influence which is what you're suggesting is happening. What's your suggesting is happening is that trump Jr gets hired by a company and then calls daddy and says make sure this company wins the contract. In the first case you presented that's really unlikely considering it's two steps removed. In the second case you mentioned you haven't shown that the process was in any way shape or form affected or that the contract went wasn't appropriate Compare that to Canada's arrive cam app situation, where it was single sourced to someone friendly to Justin who was not a company that normally built that kind of thing couldn't show what work they did for the money and produced the product that another company recreated for fun on the weekend. That is a clear case. You haven't made that kind of case Trump Jr was a business person selling his services doing the same sort of stuff before trump became president and will likely continue to be so after trump is president. You need to demonstrate that there's actual influencing or likely influencing, and that these companies wouldn't have won those bids without those contacts

Well let me flush that out for you a little The BC conservative party has been around forever, and until the year before the last election it polled at about 1 to 1.5% most years. It hasn't won an election since the 40s. It was basically a dead party where a few crock pots would occasionally join up and get drunk over pizzas talking about how to run the country. The two parties of consequence were the BC liberals, which was actually an amalgam of the BC reform right-wing party and the actual liberal left-wing party, and the NDP. So runstad is working for the liberals at the time, has a disagreement with them and leaves the party. Manages to take over the conservative party. Due to a series of freak circumstances the conservatives suddenly started getting noticed and began to get a lot of attention in the polls. I think people could use them with the CPC and the liberal party began to fall apart. Suddenly before the election it was crystal clear that there was going to be a split vote and the conservatives were slightly ahead so the liberals collapsed their party and everybody jump ship to join the conservative party to present a united front and win the election This happens over a month or so, it is brutally fast, there are many hurt feelings because not everybody can run in the writing of their choice now and some long time hard-working liberals were thrown out on the street, and they went to the election and they damn near won. But now the election is over and everybody sits back and tries to breathe and figure out what the hell happened and what to do next. And suddenly everyone's looking around and realizing that they don't know a lot of the people they're working with and that there's a lot of disagreement. The fragment of the conservative party that was left was very right wing, and the liberals that jump ship were more Centrist or left of center. Now there's conflict. Some of the far right members break off and form a new party, some that are more to the left want to take over and throw out the current leader and basically turn it into a renamed liberal party. Some people just like to watch things burn and run around causing problems on purpose. And that is the environment which led to the current circumstances. Do you remember those old game shows where they put people in a box and turn a big fan on and blow money around them and they had to catch the bills as they were flying around in a tornado? That's pretty much the circumstance he found himself in trying to hold on to his members. We'll see if this process leads to a more stable circumstance or not

You go sit in your corner and think about what you've done.

Projection and deflection all in the same sentence. A very efficient of you

True. At this point it's a mixed bag. Inflation pressure is up is it feds can't reduce interest. But the job market is strong and investment is coming back into the economy in decent amounts and GDP growth is strong. it's going to take a little longer to see if the arrow straightens out and flies true, or if he was wrong, The challenge is that midterms are coming up and people are indeed grumbling about affordability already He's going to have to deliver more than just some dead drug dealers to keep the public happy, so we'll see

And? Are they delivering magnets? Are they doing the work that their contracted to do? are price is out of the range of normal or something? No? hmmm. Carney does worse than that almost daily in Canada you haven't said a single peep about it. Or demonstrated why this contract should have been issued. The trump stupidness All Over America and several other countries. And they invest in a lot of those countries and companies. Unless you can show that this process wasn't appropriate for the trump was directly involved in it you have a tough case to make

I cannot find anything that remotely corroborates that. And I noticed you didn't post a source In fact reading the reports from usaid another organization specifically with respect to this issue that number seems absolutely impossible. It should have been questionable to you from the get-go Once again the fact that you feel the need to lie to support your cause suggest that you don't have a very good cause. I generally can make all of my points completely effectively with the truth, if you're feeling the need to turn away from the truth to make your points you need to review your points

You're making up a lot of things. You've started with a conclusion and you're trying to work your way back to a question and that's always results in very bad logic.

No that's just more rhetoric. Clearly anything that's going to stand a chance to get passed by Putin is going to be something that works in his favor. I disagree with the plan, but it's clear that trump wants to try and win a Nobel Prize who's trying to find an end of the war that's quick. If it were Biden or if it were carney or if it were just in Trudeau you'd be praising the plan saying anything that brings peace to the region is worth it. You're against the plan because it's trump. And because you are a leftist any circumstance like this has to mean Russian collusion At this point it's a tradition!!