CdnFox

You did and I wasn't the only person to call you on it. And I certainly wasn't the only time you suggested but that attack was justified. Ohh noooooeess, triggered leftie liar is triggered Sure, there are many, but here's one that was wrtten ONE YEAR AFTER what you quoted The Jews of Israel (1949) There is no problem of such overwhelming importance to us Jews as consolidating that which has been accomplished in Israel with amazing energy and an unequalled willingness for sacrifice. May the joy and admiration that fill us when we think of all that this small group of energetic and thoughtful people has achieved give us the strength to accept the great responsibility which the present situation has placed upon us. -Albert Einstein The fact is you took one small note and took it entirely out of context. Both before the creation of isreal and after he praised isreal and it's creation and the actions and the people involved. He regretted that the jews and arabs couldn't find a way to live in peace and he blamed the british for creating a hostile environment that put one against the other but he was pro isreal and did NOT believe that they had done anything wrong. You lose kid. You should learn to read more than just your echo chamber. Exactly. anyone who denies what einstein REALLY said instead of taking him out of context is exactly that person. And that would be you. You are, as always, a liar and a terrorist supporter. You should feel disgusted.

5% of all deaths in Canada, and I mean all deaths, we're from maid last year We've heard the stories of veterans being told to consider made rather than other treatments. I firmly believe people should have the right to die with dignity at their decision. But I do have to wonder sometimes if there isn't a problem

So you Freely admit you're trying to get people killed

It is 100% what you said. We were discussing the specific event and you said they were exercising their human rights to resist oppression with that attack. Those were literally your words, and not just once but few times when I came back and challenged you on that. We've been through that and we know that that's a lie. Fact of the matter is the only people that use that defense are people that are excited and happy about the idea of killing women and children in terrorist attacks to promote the group that they prefer. It's not real

The fact that you have nothing intelligent to say doesn't mean that others don't And I love that you're still too much of a coward to address me directly, as I said in another post I can at least respect moon box in that respect compared to you

Honestly I think he said it because he's not afraid to lie and he though it would help him get elected. There are ways that the government could massively stimulate huge increases in construction but unfortunately loaning money to developers is not one of them. That has not been their problem. That's true. Although if we're being fair part of the problem has been that municipalities and cities have become a little drunk on the money they make from Developers in the forms of fees and charges and those have grown substantially if not exponentially in some areas. But the feds could have done a lot more in recent years and matching immigration to housing starts should have been a no-brainer

You are horrifically mistaken. Currently as things stand in British Columbia about 55 to 60% of the cost of building a new home development for a contractor is in red tape and compliance issues No municipality has the right to red tape. Municipalities and cities do not exist in the constitution, only provinces and federal governments do. All lower forms of government derive their power from the provincial government itself and the provincial government can dictate whatever it likes. They absolutely do. I absolutely gave you a link to a story about the government building things I know reading isn't your forte but for god's sake it was an easy link And yes, Poilievre did quite a bit when he was minister under harper. And they built more homes then then are being built in Canada right now. And that was 15 years ago when we had a lower population. The government absolutely has the ability to impact how many homes are built and in fact that's something cardi has just set up a department to do but unfortunately it's failing. And anybody familiar with the industry could have told you that's what was going to happen. He's not addressing the right problems

It's not complicated. Control population growth to match growth in medical capacity. Introduce Private/public blended solutions such as those which have been wildly succcessful in france Restore full federal funding OR restore the collection of taxes for that purpose to the provinces. Done. Other places do this right. we do it wrong and it shows.

They didn't. That's just a lie that those who support the terrorist killing of innocent civilians and babies like to spout in order to justify they're completely immoral stance. There's no Tit for Tat. These guys are terrorist scum and you support them because you believe it's okay to kill women and children without warning in an act of terrorism. You have said so many times. It was their human right to do so you claimed.

Well first off that's absolutely false. Governments of all levels build housing all the time. One of many examples: BC Gov News In addition government set the stage for whether or not it is Affordable to build. Governments have a direct impact on whether or not developers are interested in building within an area or not. So governments do have the ability to directly influence where homes are built and how many homes are built. They don't just sit back and hope.

I posted facts and links... I made an argument and defended it with reason and logic. You jumped in and whined and cried like your diaper was full And this happens every single time you get your ass handed to you by me in a thread, you come on all the other threads and start acting like a buthurt loser. What a sad little life you must lead to have no better reason to come here than to stink up the place Oh but I'm sure that your failures in life are definitely due to my postcount. There's no doubt about that.

Ahhh and no link. What a surprise. Made it up did you? Here's a real search with links. Yes, data indicates that the share of consumer insolvency filings by women in Canada has been increasing, reaching its largest recorded percentage in recent years. While the total volume of consumer insolvencies fluctuates with economic conditions (total filings surged in 2024 to a 15-year high), the proportion of those insolvencies attributed to women has steadily grown over the past decade. women bankruptcy in canada increasing - Google Search Sorry kid. You're wrong again. No wonder you didn't want to post the link. Awww moonbox, is @Goddess making you angry with facts now too? LOL As usual you contribute nothing, you just show up to either attack me or defend the liberals, the latter in this case it would seem. Pathetic. Hey, how's those math lessons going?

I'll give you an A+ and a star for indifference to harm to children

As I said when they announced it it's an industry I know very well and they completely and utterly missed the point if their actual goal was to build more homes. And of the homes that do get built using the program most of them would have been built anyway and are simply saving some of their developer friends about load of money that taxpayers expense And there was absolutely no need to create yet another new bureaucracy for it when they already have three specifically dedicated to the same issues. The housing problem is not going away anytime soon. There is a correct answer but his was absolutely wrong

You're always lying either way But that was pretty clever

No problem old man

Sounds like you were talking about you Except you didn't mention lying and your dedication to defending liberals

But i'm not I'm rubbing your nose in it. Which means you're wrong again

I would personally plan on getting on with your life rather than waiting for that to happen

That couldn't be less true. Do you ever notice that you have to lie to make virtually all of your points? Does that not tell you that maybe you've got a problem with your facts? Is protecting your echo chambers so desperately important to you but the truth just doesn't matter?

Talking about yourself again? Tsk tsk, well you've stated you approve of shooting women and children to fight repression, i don't doubt you'd kick the elderly on the way to demand your vaccine.

It's much easier to hide where the money went after you spent it The problem with his big plan is that he can make that announcement but they're still going to have to be votes on money matters before that budget or he won't have the money to spend. And if the opposition says we're not authorizing anything till we see your budget he's going to have a problem. But yes, you have to be liberal stupid to think that issuing a budget 3/4 of the way through the budget is anything other than dumb

I suppose a twat might see it that way Ranked in the top 10, other sources I provided said 5th. Now I realize that it doesn't actually say 2006, what it says is 2004 to 2007. Your math skills are so weak you probably didn't realize that six was in between those two OF two points. Which i already noted, and pointed out it's basically nothing. Falling or gaining one or two points up and down is not much of anything. Especially over a number of years. The countries are always improving and some will be ahead one year and behind another.... it's a decline but really nothing. As i said, harper held the line. So we finished about where we were at. In the top 10, maybe two points below where we started but no significant movement. Then we dropped about 17 points. THAT is significant When you asked to cite something I completely expected you to lie about the response and to fail to understand. I really appreciate you not disappointing As I said, harper held the line. He did good and there was no substantial or significant up or down movement. Countries always go up or down one or two especially over 10 years Under Justin it dropped 17 Everything I said was true and once again you look like a complete twat Because you can't understand simple math and common sense statements

At the end of the day this is the heart of the matter. It's not that corruption is hidden. There's generally enough evidence of corruption that reasonable people can expect that it's happening and could choose to do something about it as voters. But generally that's not what happens and therefore politicians feel emboldened It's hard to put it on the courts because the governments at the end of the day have a lot of control over the courts as we've seen in the last 8 years But if the voters absolutely devastated parties where corruption was an issue and said they would never consider them again until the corruption was cleaned up, we wouldn't have anywhere near the problem we do Conservatives have a history of doing that in Canada. The NDP does too actually on the provincial level. But liberals will keep voting for corruption all day and all night. And that's a problem

We've had government oversight and you still support the guys who are corrupt The problem really isn't that we can't catch corruption, the problem is we don't punish it. People like you are happy to vote for it again